Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 80,249 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies View ORCID Profile Rui Zhang , View ORCID Profile Alexandre J Poulain , Qiang Pu , Jiang Liu , View ORCID Profile Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz , View ORCID Profile Xinbin Feng , View ORCID Profile Bo Meng , View ORCID Profile Daniel S Grégoire doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.09.681528 Rui Zhang a Department of Biology, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Rui Zhang Alexandre J Poulain a Department of Biology, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Alexandre J Poulain Qiang Pu b State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guiyang, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jiang Liu b State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guiyang, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz b State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guiyang, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz Xinbin Feng b State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guiyang, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Xinbin Feng Bo Meng b State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Guiyang, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Bo Meng For correspondence: danielgregoire{at}cunet.carleton.ca mengbo{at}vip.skleg.cn Daniel S Grégoire c Department of Chemistry, Carleton University , Ottawa, Canada Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel S Grégoire For correspondence: danielgregoire{at}cunet.carleton.ca mengbo{at}vip.skleg.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Microbial production of methylmercury from inorganic mercury in rice paddies poses health risks to consumers of this essential dietary staple. Although mercury-methylating communities are well characterized, the microbial guilds contributing to methylmercury accumulation in rice paddies remain unclear. Here, we collected paddy soils across a mercury concentration gradient throughout the rice growing season to identify microbial and environmental factors influencing methylmercury dynamics. We show that hgcA gene abundance, the key gene required for methylation, was not a significant predictor of methylmercury concentration in paddy soils. We also show that merB gene abundance correlated with methylmercury in mercury-polluted rhizosphere samples. Methane cycling genes were actively expressed, and their beta-diversity was significantly associated with methylmercury levels. Methanogen abundance correlated with higher methylmercury under elevated total mercury concentrations. Analysis of the methanotroph-associated mbnT gene, implicated in demethylation, revealed an unexpected positive correlation with methylmercury. Multiple regression and machine learning models converged on mercury bioavailability and methanogen/methanotroph abundances as key predictors of methylmercury, with methanogen-associated hgcA gene abundance and methanogen-methanotroph interactions highlighted under flooded, low-redox conditions. These findings suggest that methane-cycling microbes play key roles in methylmercury cycling dynamics and point to management strategies that could simultaneously mitigate mercury pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Importance Methylmercury is a microbially-derived neurotoxin that accumulates in rice, which is a global food staple. Predicting mercury’s fate in rice paddies is challenging because of the interplay between microbes responsible for methylmercury cycling and variables that control mercury availability. Our study coupled genomic and geochemical measurements with machine learning to identify the key predictors of methylmercury accumulation in paddy soils. We demonstrate that methanogen and methanotroph abundance, and mercury bioavailability, are major predictors of methylmercury variability in paddies. We show that considering interactions between methane cycling guilds improves our capacity to predict methylmercury accumulation in soils compared to approaches that rely solely on mercury cycling genes. This work can inform remediation strategies for mercury in rice paddies but also wetlands and permafrost where methane and mercury cycling are tightly coupled. Such strategies could provide a solution to simultaneously mitigate methylmercury exposure and reduce greenhouse gas emissions amid global environmental change. Introduction Mercury (Hg) is a metal primarily emitted as gaseous elemental Hg (Hg(0)) from natural and anthropogenic sources and deposits in ecosystems worldwide, where it undergoes oxidation to Hg(II) and subsequent microbial conversion to methylmercury (MeHg), a potent neurotoxin ( 1 ). MeHg accumulates in rice, a global food staple, with particularly elevated concentrations in paddies near mining, smelting, and industrial areas with elevated Hg(0) emissions ( 2 ). The global atmospheric transportation of Hg could also affect rice paddies away from pollution sources ( 3 ). Since paddy soil represents a major source of MeHg in rice grains ( 4 ), predicting MeHg accumulation in rice paddies is critical for mitigating Hg exposure through diet. Net MeHg accumulation in rice paddies represents an interplay between methylation and demethylation processes ( 5 ). Hg methylation is facilitated by anaerobic microbes harboring the hgcAB gene cluster ( 6 – 8 ), while demethylation occurs via the Hg resistance ( mer ) operon– dependent pathways (e.g., merB / merA ) and mer -independent microbial pathways ( 5 ). These processes are also connectively influenced by environmental variables such as Hg bioavailability, redox, dissolved organic matter (DOM), sulfide ( 5 , 9 – 12 ) and other microbial players indirectly ( 13 ). While Hg methylating communities have been extensively characterized in rice paddies and other ecosystems ( 14 – 19 ), MeHg poorly correlates with Hg-cycling genes (e.g., hgcA , merA , merB ) and hgcA transcripts ( 20 ). This disconnect highlights the need for integrated approaches that consider multiple variables simultaneously when predicting what controls MeHg accumulation in rice. Recent evidence suggests that methane-cycling microbes play underappreciated roles in mediating MeHg dynamics. In rice paddies near Hg-mining areas, methanogens emerged as critical players controlling MeHg levels ( 14 , 15 , 21 ), potentially contributing to both methylation and demethylation, simultaneously ( 14 , 22 , 23 ). Furthermore, methanotrophs were experimentally shown to degrade MeHg at picomolar to nanomolar concentrations under near- neutral pH conditions typical of rice paddies, using a methanobactin-mediated mechanism distinct from the conventional mer -dependent pathway ( 24 , 25 ). However, the ecosystem-level significance of methanotrophic MeHg demethylation and its interaction with methanogenic processes in determining net MeHg accumulation has not been evaluated in rice paddy systems. To address these critical gaps, we aim to (i) identify and rank the relative importance of microbial communities and environmental variables relevant to MeHg turnover as predictors of MeHg accumulation patterns in mining-impacted rice paddies; (ii) characterize the abundance and distribution of methane-cycling microorganisms in relation to MeHg concentrations; and (iii) develop predictive models to inform future mechanistic studies on Hg cycling. By integrating metagenomic, geochemical, and statistical approaches, we show that methanogen and methanotroph abundances are the leading biological predictor, while Hg bioavailability is the primary environmental determinant of MeHg variability. Machine learning analyses further highlighted the importance of methanogen methylator abundance and a methanogen–methanotroph interaction, particularly under flooded conditions where model performance improved. Together, these findings provide environmental-scale data that guide hypothesis development for broader geographical testing, and inform strategies that may jointly mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and Hg exposure. Materials and Methods Soil collection, geochemical analyses, and sequencing Rice paddy soil samples were collected from three sites in Guizhou province, Southwest China: Huaxi (HX, background site), Gouxi (GX, artisanal Hg smelting area), and Sikeng (SK, abandoned Hg mining area). Sampling occurred from May 2021 to April 2022, spanning pre- plantation through post-harvest periods. Surface and rhizosphere soils were collected and processed as follows: individual replicate samples were analyzed separately for geochemical parameters, while replicate samples were combined into composite samples for DNA extraction and subsequent metagenomic analyses. Soil geochemical parameters were analyzed, including Hg species (THg by Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS), MeHg by gas chromatography-CVAFS following USEPA methods, and bio-available fraction Hg by the Mg(NO₃)₂ extraction method, anions (by ion chromatography) ( 26 – 28 ), elemental sulfur (by high-performance liquid chromatography), dissolved organic carbon, soil organic matter, and redox-sensitive species (S²⁻, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺). Recovery rates of the standard reference materials for THg and MeHg analyses were provided in Supplementary Data 1. DNA and RNA extractions were performed using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit and the RNeasy PowerSoil Total RNA Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Both metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing were performed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, producing 150 bp paired-end reads. Sequencing was conducted at Azenta (Suzhou, China). The sequencing aimed for a read depth of approximately 15 Gbp per sample (range: 10.9 – 20 Gbp). Quality metrics are provided in Supplementary Data 2. In total, 50 metagenomic and 6 metatranscriptomic samples were obtained. Details on sample collection, geochemical analyses and sequencing are provided in Supplementary Method 1. Genome assembly and binning Metagenomic data were processed using fastp and FastQC for quality control (Supplementary Data 3) ( 29 , 30 ). Individual assemblies were performed with MetaSPAdes, while site-specific co-assemblies used MEGAHIT ( 31 ). Contigs>2000 bp were retained and mapped with BWA- MEM to generate coverage data. Key assembly metrics, such as N50, total contigs, length distribution and mapping rates are provided in Supplementary Data 4. Four binning algorithms (MetaBAT 2, MaxBin 2, CONCOCT, and VAMB) were applied ( 32 – 35 ), yielding 5307 initial bins. Bin quality was assessed with CheckM2 ( 36 ), and DAS-Tool ( 37 ) was used to select the highest quality bins, followed by dereplication with dRep ( 38 ) (ANI threshold 98%). We retained 267 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with>50% completeness and<10% redundancy following manual refinement in Anvi’o ( 39 ). Taxonomic classification was performed using GTDB-Tk ( 40 ) based on GTDB (release 214) (Supplementary Data 5()) . The co-assembly approach was chosen over individual assembly due to higher MAG yield and greater taxonomic diversity. Details on genome assembly, binning and software versions are provided in Supplementary Method 2. Metatranscriptomic sequence processing The RNA sequences were trimmed and filtered to a minimum mean quality score of 30 using fastp ( 29 ). Forward and reverse sequences were overlapped with a minimum and maximum of 10 and 150 bp, respectively, using FLASH ( 41 ). Sequences were subsequently sorted into SSU ribosomal RNA (rRNA), LSU rRNA, and non-rRNA using SortMeRNA ( 42 ) against the default reference database (smr_v4.3_default_db). The non-rRNA fraction was mapped to the ORFs identified on the contigs from the corresponding sample and linked with featureCounts results to determine the transcript abundance of mcrA , pmoA , mmoX , hgcA , and merB . Taxon- specific transcript abundance was calculated by dividing the RNA reads mapped to transcripts by the total RNA reads in the sample, normalized to HMM length. Functional gene abundance analyses For microbial abundance estimation of various functional guilds, including methanogens, methanotrophs, Hg-methylating microbes, and demethylating microbes, we employed a gene- centric approach at the contig level using individual assemblies. We selected individual assemblies over co-assembly to preserve sample-specific information and enable more accurate quantification of functional genes within each sample. While co-assembly is valuable for generating high-quality MAGs by aggregating data across samples, it inherently homogenizes information from multiple samples, potentially obscuring subtle variations in gene abundance at the individual sample level. Open reading frames (ORFs) were identified using Prodigal ( 43 ), short reads were mapped using BWA MEM ( 44 ), and reads mapped to ORFs were quantified using featureCounts from Subread package ( 45 ). Functional genes were retrieved using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) through hmmsearch of HMMER software ( 46 ). Specifically, the McrA HMM (PF02249) was sourced from PFAM, while PmoA and MmoX HMMs were obtained from the GraftM gene packages ( https://data.ace.uq.edu.au/public/graftm/7 ) with an E-value threshold of 1×10⁻⁵. We conducted protein homology searches using BLASTp against the NCBI non-redundant database (as of Dec 5, 2023) to confirm their identity and refine search results. Queries consisted of HMM hits of the corresponding genes, each limited to the single best hit (-max_target_seqs 1) to focus on the most relevant homolog. McrA, PmoA, and MmoX hits were filtered based on sequence titles indicative of their respective functions (e.g., McrA hits containing "methyl coenzyme M reductase"; PmoA and MmoX hits classified as "methane monooxygenase"). Extra precautions were taken with methane-cycling genes, as PmoA sequence is homologous to other alkane monooxygenases, and it shares homology with the AmoA of ammonia oxidizers. The highest similarity to a known methanotrophic isolate was prioritized. Methanobactin biosynthesis and transport genes from references genomes, MAGs and metagenomes were identified using HMMs listed from a previous study with predefined threshold values ( 47 ). Hg-cycling genes required specialized validation procedures. hgcAB genes were identified using Hg-MATE-Db HMMs (ver. 1.01142021) ( 48 ) and filtered for conserved motifs [N(V/I)WCA(A/G)GK] and [C(M/I)ECGA] ( 6 ). MerB sequences were retrieved using pre- compiled HMMs ( 49 ) and validated for characteristic cysteine and aspartic acid signatures ( 50 ). For additional functional guilds, IRB detection employed HMM profiles from FeGenie ( 51 ) to identify genes related to iron reduction, with gene-specific domain E-value cutoffs as defined in the database configuration files. Abundance for IRB was calculated by summing coverage counts of all identified genes and normalizing against total coding sequence (CDS) counts in each metagenome. For SRB quantification, we targeted the dsrA gene using the TIGR02064.1 HMM profile with a domain E-value cutoff of 392.9. Taxonomic classification was conducted using MMseqs2 ( 52 ) against GTDB (release 214) ( 53 ) with lowest common ancestor strategy. To facilitate cross-sample comparison, we converted taxon-specific coverage values to the percentage of reads normalized to HMM lengths. Total reads numbers in each sample were referred to effective library size values calculated using the edgeR package ( 54 ). Details on functional gene analyses and software versions are provided in Supplementary Method 3. Complementary metagenomic approaches Our study employed two complementary metagenomic strategies. Gene-centric analysis quantifies functional potential across all community members, capturing the full breadth of metabolic capacities including genes from low-abundance taxa that may not assemble into complete genomes. Genome-resolved analysis using MAGs provides taxonomic context, linking functional genes to specific organisms and enabling network analyses of population- level responses to environmental changes. Together, these approaches address different scales: community-wide functional potential (gene-centric) and organism-specific contributions (genome-resolved), both essential for understanding Hg cycling processes. Statistical analyses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of geochemical variables was performed with standardized data, and distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) was used to assess relationships between methane-cycling communities and environmental factors based on Bray- Curtis dissimilarity. Permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) evaluated effects of site and soil compartment on community composition (i.e., beta-diversity), with pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Multiple linear regression with AICc model selection was employed to evaluate the relative importance of methylation potential ( hgcA abundance) and Hg bioavailability (F1-Hg) in predicting MeHg concentrations. Seven candidate models representing different hypotheses were tested, and model assumptions were verified through standard diagnostic tests. MAG relative abundances were calculated by aligning reads to dereplicated genome sets using CoverM (v0.7.0) ( 55 ). Time-dependent correlations between MAG abundance and MeHg concentrations were identified using extended Local Similarity Analysis (eLSA) across 11 time points for each site (Supplementary Data 6) ( 56 , 57 ). False Discovery Rate correction was applied using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, with significant associations defined as FDR-adjusted p<0.05. Random forest regression models were developed to predict MeHg concentrations from 12 predictor variables (9 microbial functional guilds and 3 environmental parameters) using 100-fold cross-validation with 70:30 train-test splits. Model performance was evaluated using RMSE, MAE, R², and Pearson correlation coefficients. All analyses were conducted in R (v4.3.0) with statistical significance set at α=0.05. Detailed methodological parameters are provided in Supplementary Method 4. Code and data availability The code used for the bioinformatics pipeline is available at https://github.com/rzhan186/gy2021_bioinformatics . Supplementary Methods, Discussions, and Figures are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Supplementary Data and Results can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29847869.v3 . Raw sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA1179437 . Results and Discussion Spatial and temporal dynamics of MeHg concentration across the rice paddies THg and MeHg levels varied significantly across rice paddies ( Fig. 1 , Fig. S3). Average THg concentrations across the entire sampling period were significantly elevated at the mining- impacted sites SK (42.03±21.5 mg/kg) and GX (21.41±4.04 mg/kg), compared to the background site HX (0.17±0.02 mg/kg). However, average MeHg concentrations over the sampling period were significantly higher at GX (3.44±0.70 μg/kg), followed by SK (2.42±0.76 μg/kg) and HX (0.78±0.21 μg/kg) (Fig. S3). This supports prior studies indicating that THg is a poor predictor of the net MeHg production ( 58 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Hg dynamics in sampled rice paddies over the growing season. (A) Total mercury (THg), (B) methylmercury (MeHg), and (C) water-soluble Hg fraction (F1) in surface soils (left panels) and rhizosphere soils (right panels). Data points represent individual measurements from replicate soil samples collected at three sites (HX, GX, and SK), with smoothed trend lines (±95% confidence interval). Note that surface soils were sampled throughout the entire study period (including post-harvest), while rhizosphere soils were only collected during the rice growing season when plants were present, resulting in different x-axis scales. THg is shown in mg/kg, while MeHg and F1-fraction are in μg/kg. Day 0 corresponds to the beginning of the sampling period. Distinct temporal trends were observed for MeHg at the mining-impacted sites, which exhibited different patterns compared to the relatively stable levels of THg ( Fig. 1A ). At GX and SK, MeHg peaked at cultivation onset (day 0) and declined throughout the rice-growing season (day 0-80), with further reductions observed post-harvest after drainage. MeHg concentrations were typically higher during the water-saturated season (day 0-100) than in the post-harvest period (day 100-260). A notable increase in MeHg occurred at GX on day 290, coinciding with pre-planting and re-drainage for the next growing season. In contrast, at HX, MeHg levels remained relatively stable overall. Throughout the three sampling sites, no significant differences in MeHg were detected between surface soil and rhizosphere (Mann- Whitney U test, p>0.05). This pattern of fluctuating MeHg in mining-affected sites during cultivation and stability at the background site is previously undocumented, due to the lack of extensive longitudinal sampling. Subsequent sections consider the potential microbial and geochemical drivers contributing to these trends in Hg concentrations. Geochemical factors partially explain site-specific MeHg patterns Geochemical factors were assessed to contextualize their potential impacts on MeHg accumulation (please refer to Fig. S1, Supplementary Result 1 throughout this section). Redox potential measured in overlying water revealed that HX is more oxidizing (109.29±19.12 mV) compared to GX (57.41±37.09 mV) and SK (60.96±20.3 mV). Regardless of soil compartments, DOM concentrations differed significantly between sites, with HX showing the highest levels (0.72±0.31 mg/g). MeHg correlated positively with DOM in surface soil at GX (Spearman’s ρ=0.33) and SK (ρ=0.58), while correlating negatively with DOM SUVA 254 in SK surface (ρ=-0.56) and rhizosphere (ρ=-0.60) (Fig. S2). The bioavailable fraction of Hg (F1-Hg) exhibited temporal fluctuations that partially paralleled MeHg changes, primarily in GX surface soil (ρ=0.54, p=0.0034, n=27) and SK rhizosphere (ρ=0.62, p=0.014, n=15) ( Fig. 1C , Fig. S2). Noticeably, GX initially showed higher F1-Hg than SK, but these differences diminished over the growing season with both sites reaching comparable levels after day 100 ( Fig. 1C ). This decline aligns with the post-harvest period when rice fields are dried and aerated, promoting immobilization of dissolved Hg species through redox-driven precipitation and adsorption processes (e.g., Fe-oxyhydroxide precipitation and adsorption) ( 12 , 59 ). Several key factors showed no significant differences between sites. Soil pH displayed similar temporal trends at HX and GX, while SK showed more apparent fluctuation, but with no significant site differences overall (Kruskal-Wallis test, p>0.05, Fig. S3). Terminal electron acceptors including sulfate (avg. ∼100 mg/kg or 100 μM) and nitrate (avg. ∼ 4 mg/kg or 6.45 μM) demonstrated similar temporal patterns across all sites. Hydrogen sulfide remained consistently low (0-5 μM) with no significant site differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, p>0.05, Fig. S3). This suggests similar rates of microbial sulfate reduction and constraints on Hg methylation or bioavailability as sulfide can readily react with Hg(II), forming HgS ( 60 , 61 ). Fe²⁺/total Fe ratios showed similar temporal trends except in HX subsurface porewater, which displayed lower ratios suggesting reduced iron reduction at the depth of rice roots. The three sites differ primarily in bioavailable Hg content ( i.e., F1-Hg) and DOM, which are both variable known to control Hg methylation ( 62 – 64 ). Since DOM affects Hg(II) bioavailability at low sulfide conditions (≲30 μM) ( 65 , 66 ), the consistently low sulfide levels and differences in F1-Hg suggest DOM potentially contributes to observed MeHg fluctuations. Interestingly, DOM aromaticity (i.e., SUVA 254 ) showed a pronounced effect at SK, where more lower DOM SUVA 254 , indicating higher DOM bioavailability ( 67 ), correlated with higher MeHg in both soil compartments, consistent with previous findings in rice paddy environments ( 62 ). Taken together, our geochemical data suggest that iron and sulfur cycling processes have limited influence on net MeHg accumulation and are insufficient to explain the observed spatiotemporal patterns of MeHg fluctuation across our study sites. While ORP measurements indicate that HX conditions favor microaerophilic to anaerobic processes (denitrification, manganese reduction), and GX and SK are more conducive to iron reduction and sulfate reduction, these differences in redox environments do not adequately account for the MeHg distribution patterns observed. Rather, our findings suggest that net MeHg accumulation is likely controlled by methylating microbes beyond SRB and IRB and active demethylation processes. These results highlight the need to assess the potential contributions of alternative microbial methylators and demethylators to MeHg dynamics in rice paddy environments under the geochemical conditions observed in this study. MeHg levels show limited association with hgcA gene abundance across metabolic guilds As the key marker gene of Hg methylation, we searched for and classified hgcA in the assembled metagenomes ( Fig. 2 ) to assess methylation potential and identify the microbial players involved. Total hgcA abundance was, on average, higher at mining-impacted sites GX (mean=8.4×10⁻⁸±3.0×10⁻⁸; n=16) and SK (mean=8.4×10⁻⁸±2.7 × 10⁻⁸; n=17) compared to the background site (mean=5.5 × 10⁻⁸±1.8 × 10⁻⁸; n=16), aligning with the higher MeHg levels observed at contaminated sites ( Fig.1 , Fig. 2 ). Metatranscriptomic analysis confirmed active hgcA expression across all sites (n=6), with similar expression in surface soils (∼1.0×10⁻⁸) but substantially higher expression in GX and SK rhizospheres (∼1.4–1.7×10⁻⁸), supporting the functional relevance of the metagenomic potential (Fig. S4A). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Analysis of hgcA genes and their correlation with MeHg. (A) Taxonomic distribution and abundance of hgcA genes across specific metabolic guilds throughout the sampling period. Color patterns represent iron-reducing bacteria (IRB, blue patterns), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB, green patterns), methanogens (orange/red patterns), and syntrophs (purple patterns). Note that sequences not classified to known functional groups were excluded from panel A for visualization purposes but are included in total abundance calculations. (B) Spearman correlation coefficients between MeHg concentrations and gene abundances for different metabolic guilds. Syntrophs are not shown due to insufficient data. Asterisks indicate statistical significance levels (* p<0.05; ns: not significant). Temporally, hgcA abundance at HX remained relatively stable, mirroring MeHg trends ( Fig. 1B ). Across the growing season, correlations between total hgcA abundance and soil MeHg were inconsistent with guild-specific differences ( Fig. 2B ). Taxonomically, hgcA was primarily assigned to Deferrimicrobiaceae at HX, whereas Methanoregulaceae -related hgcA increased at GX and SK, particularly in rhizosphere samples. As an additional test of drivers of MeHg accumulation, we fitted multiple linear regression models with model selection by AICc (Supplementary Result 2). The best-supported model included additive effects of bioavailable Hg(II) (F1-Hg) and overall hgcA , while controlling for site and soil compartment. In this model, F1-Hg was a major positive predictor of MeHg concentrations (β=0.73, p<0.001), whereas total hgcA abundance was not significant. Adding an interaction between F1-Hg and hgcA did not improve fit (ΔAICc=3). Consistent with this, the explained variance (adjusted R 2 ) increased from ∼60% (additive model without site/compartment) to ∼84% when site and compartment effects were included, underscoring other environmental influences on MeHg. These results suggest that net MeHg accumulation is not primarily controlled by methylation potential in Hg-contaminated rice paddies, but rather by Hg substrate availability and other environmental factors. This contrasts with findings from river systems where direct correlations between hgcA abundance and MeHg production have been observed under more uniform geochemical conditions ( 68 – 70 ). In rice paddies, the relationship between hgcA and MeHg content is complicated by several factors: (i) Pronounced geochemical gradients in DOM characteristics, redox conditions, and Hg bioavailability; (ii) the presence of multiple MeHg sinks including biotic and abiotic demethylation processes ( 20 , 71 ); and (iii) MeHg uptake by rice plants, which demonstrate efficient MeHg bioaccumulation from paddy soil (i.e., bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) of 5.5-5.6) ( 72 , 73 ). Although the quantitative effect of plant uptake on soil MeHg concentrations was not considered in this study, plant-mediated removal may partially contribute to soil MeHg content we observed. The interplay between MeHg production, degradation, and plant uptake processes operating simultaneously in rice paddies underscores the need to consider the genetic potential of methylating microbes alongside broader ecosystem variables that operate at larger spatial scales to better predict the fate of MeHg in rice paddy systems. merB -mediated demethylation and MeHg dynamics Following hgcA analyses, we investigated demethylation potential represented by merB , which encodes the organomercurial lyase that performs reductive demethylation (RD) ( 74 , 75 ). Total merB gene abundance in rhizosphere was consistently higher compared to surface soil, which were similar across the three sites (HX:mean=5.1×10⁻⁸±5.5×10⁻⁸, n=11; GX: 3.5×10⁻⁸±5.2×10⁻⁸, n=11; SK:5.8×10⁻⁸±3.9×10⁻⁸, n=11) (Fig. S5). The consistently higher merB abundance in rhizosphere samples is likely attributed to radial oxygen loss (ROL) ( 76 ), creating a more oxidizing condition conducive to aerobic merB- carrying microbes ( 77 ), although direct soil ORP measurements were not obtained in this study. The highest rhizosphere merB was observed at day 0, followed by a gradual decline, aligning with previous findings that ROL rates decrease over the rice growth period ( 77 ). This temporal trend further supports the potential role of plant-mediated oxygen dynamics in structuring the merB -carrying community Multiple regression analysis revealed that merB gene abundance has a significant positive association with MeHg levels (β=2.51×10 6 , p=0.0113) after accounting for site- specific effects. The positive association between gene abundance and absolute MeHg concentrations suggest adaptation of microbial communities to Hg-contaminated environments. In highly polluted aquatic systems, increased THg load drives higher absolute MeHg concentrations ( 74 ). The microbial communities respond by enriching for Hg-resistant bacteria carrying the mer -operon, including merB genes ( 74 ). Crucially, this correlation between merB and MeHg is particularly strong in GX (Spearman’s ρ=0.6; n=5) and SK (Spearman’s ρ=0.83; n=6) rhizosphere samples. This suggests that the ROL-driven oxidizing conditions select for the aerobic merB -carrying organisms, and where THg loads are high (GX & SK), these adapted populations are most enriched, leading to the strong co-variance between merB gene abundance and MeHg concentration in this specific micro-environment. At the transcriptomic level, merB transcripts were detected only in HX surface soils (n=6, Fig. S4B). This disconnect from gene abundance likely reflects: (i) site-and compartment-specific conditions regulating merB induction (e.g., oxygen and DOM), which may have been favorable only at HX surface at the sampling time ( 78 ); (ii) the transient nature of merB transcription and the short half-lives of mer transcripts, making them easy to miss in single time-point sampling; and (iii) temporal fluctuations in Hg(II) bioavailability that narrow the window for detectable merB expression ( 74 , 79 ). These findings highlight the need for temporal transcriptomic sampling to better establish relationships between merB expression and MeHg dynamics in situ . Methane-cycling communities show coupled dynamics and shared responses to Hg contamination Recently, the role of methane-cycling microbes in mediating MeHg dynamics has become increasingly evident through controlled laboratory studies ( 14 , 22 , 80 – 82 ) However, the environmental relevance and field-scale implications of these laboratory-derived mechanisms remain largely unexplored in complex agricultural systems. We show that despite contrasting Hg contamination sources (GX: atmospheric deposition; SK: historical smelting residues), methane-cycling communities at GX and SK exhibited similar beta-diversity (PERMANOVA, p<0.001; Fig. 3C &D). Constrained ordinations showed that geochemical variables explained 27.67% of the beta-diversity in methanogens and 22.14% in methanotrophs (p=0.001 and 0.004, respectively; Fig. 3C–D ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Community structure and environmental drivers of methanogens and aerobic methanotrophs. (A) Taxonomic distribution and relative abundance of mcrA genes across sampling days. (B) Taxonomic distribution and relative abundance of pmoA / mmoX genes across sampling days. (C&D): Distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) of beta-diversity in relation to geochemical variables, with panel C showing methanogens and panel D showing methanotrophs. Points represent individual samples colored by site. Arrows indicate environmental variables with significance levels (*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05). THg and MeHg were significant predictors for both groups, and DOM concentration showed an additional significant association with methanogen beta-diversity (permutation tests, p<0.05; Supplementary Result 3). Methanogen and methanotroph abundances were significantly and positively correlated (β=0.51, p=0.003, n=50; Fig. S6), indicating that their populations tended to co-vary across samples. However, methanotrophs were consistently present at roughly an order of magnitude lower abundance than methanogens ( Fig. 3A &B). This observation aligns with studies demonstrating positive co-occurrence networks between these groups ( 83 ) and synchronized responses to environmental factors in rice paddies ( 84 ), likely reflecting their metabolic interdependence. Methanotrophs rely on methane produced by methanogens and may, in turn, help regulate local oxygen concentrations ( 83 , 84 ). This interdependence is further supported by the notably lower abundances of both groups at HX, the site with the highest average ORP, where conditions appeared too oxidizing for robust methanogenesis and suboptimal for aerobic methanotrophy, resulting in reduced populations of both metabolically linked functional groups. The similarity of methane-cycling community structures at Hg-impact sites, in addition to their significant association with THg and MeHg suggests the presence of a core methane- cycling community that adapts similarly to Hg impacts regardless of contamination source. Context-dependent methanogen-MeHg relationships links to DOM quality and compartment effects We subsequently examined how methanogen abundance (via mcrA ) links to MeHg concentrations across sites and soil compartments. Overall methanogen abundance showed marginal association with MeHg (β=-1.30×10 7 , p=0.064), but this relationship varied with THg concentration (β=4.57×10 2 , p=0.049), indicating context-dependent relationships where higher methanogen abundance amplifies MeHg production under elevated THg conditions. Methanogen community beta-diversity correlated significantly with DOM ( Fig. 3C ). Additionally, methanogen abundance showed negative correlations with both DOM quantity (β=-5.94×10 -8 , p=0.007) and SUVA 254 (β=-2.88×10 -8 , p=0.003), suggesting lower abundance where DOM is less bioavailable. Similarly, DOM SUVA 254 correlated negatively with MeHg (β=-0.48, p=0.005) while DOM quantity showed no significant relationship (β=0.60, p=0.140), aligning with previous work showing that DOM bioavailability more critically determines MeHg concentrations than quantity ( 10 , 67 ). Our correlational field data reveal significant associations between DOM, methanogens, and MeHg, these observational relationships that are consistent with established experimental evidence for DOM’s dual role in methylation processes. Higher SUVA 254 values indicate aromatic, humified DOM that reduces MeHg through strong Hg complexation ( 10 , 67 ). Conversely, bioavailable DOM fractions (autochthonous DOM, fresh organic matter, low- molecular-weight acids, algal organic matter) enhance MeHg production by providing carbon sources and stimulating methylating microorganisms, including methanogens ( 10 , 63 , 67 ). The negative correlations with SUVA 254 support this framework: Highly aromatic DOM suppresses both methanogenic proliferation and MeHg formation, while bioavailable DOM promote both processes. Specific methanogen taxa showed compartment-dependent patterns. Methanoregulaceae , the dominant family across sites with diverse Hg methylators ( 7 ), ( Fig. 3A , Supplementary Result 4), mirrored overall methanogen trends with positive MeHg correlations in SK surface soil (ρ=0.745, p=0.011; n=11) but negative correlations in SK rhizosphere (ρ=-0.943, p=0.017; n=6). These family-specific mcrA patterns differ from the relationships shown in Fig. 2 , which reports methanogen-associated hgcA ; methanogens may directly or indirectly contribute to methylation and demethylation, so mcrA –MeHg associations do not necessarily mirror hgcA –MeHg patterns. Minor taxa showed different compartment preferences. Methanospirillaceae (ρ=0.974, p=0.005; n=6) and Methanosarcinaceae (ρ=0.941, p=0.005; n=6) correlated positively with MeHg in SK rhizosphere, with weaker patterns at HX and GX. Metatranscriptomic analysis (n=6) detected active mcrA expression across sites, with higher levels at Hg-contaminated sites, particularly by Methanoregulaceae , providing functional support for gene abundance data (Fig. S4C). Interestingly, we recovered sequences from Methanoperedenaceae , an archaeal group (ANME), which performs anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) via reverse methanogenesis ( 85 ). This finding corroborates the detection of Methanoperedenaceae -associated hgcA from our rice paddy metagenomes ( Fig. 2A , Supplementary Result 7). Although mcrA and hgcA transcripts associated with Methanoperedenaceae were detected at the Hg-impacted sites, (Fig. S4C), we exclude this group from subsequent analyses due to the lack of empirical evidence for their methylation capacity. Their potential role in Hg cycling are discussed in Supplementary Discussion 1. Flooding associates higher methanotroph abundance with lower MeHg Methanotroph abundance relationships with MeHg followed similar site-specific patterns to those observed for methanogens, consistent with the two guilds co-varying across samples (Fig. A&B). However, when focusing specifically on the flooded period, multiple regression revealed a significant negative association between methanotroph abundance and MeHg concentrations (β=–3.21 × 10⁷, p=0.009), after adjusting for site and soil compartment, an effect not observed in the methanogen data. Metagenomic analyses revealed that Methylomonadaceae , Beijerinckiaceae , and Methylococcaceae were the most abundant methanotroph taxa ( Fig. 3B , Supplementary Result 5). Metatranscriptomic data further confirmed active methanotrophy at all sites, with particularly high pmoA expression at SK, where Methylomonadaceae was the most highly expressed methanotroph family (Fig. S4D). Methylomonadaceae showed the strongest negative correlations with MeHg at GX (ρ=-0.8, p=0.133; n=5) and SK (ρ=-0.9, p=0.083; n=5) rhizosphere, while other methanotroph taxa showed weaker correlations (Supplementary Result 6). It is likely that the negative methanotroph–MeHg relationship reflects either (i) flooding-induced oxygen depletion that suppresses aerobic methanotrophs while stimulating anaerobic Hg methylation, or (ii) the influence of taxa such as Methylomonadaceae , which are adapted to low-oxygen conditions via anaerobic denitrification ( 86 – 88 ), allowing persistence in flooded, microaerophilic rhizospheres and potential methanotroph-mediated demethylation via a methanobactin-related pathway, which we explore in the next section. Exploratory analysis of mbnT as a potential demethylation biomarker Recent studies indicate a methanotroph-specific MeHg demethylation pathway facilitated by methanobactins ( 24 , 25 ). Methanobactins are copper-sequestering chalkophores essential for particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) activity in some methanotrophs ( 89 ). While primarily binding copper with high affinity, methanobactins also bind other metals, including Hg(II), albeit with lower affinity ( 89 ). The cellular uptake of methanobactins is mediated by MbnT, a TonB-dependent transporter (TBDT), which is an outer membrane protein ( 90 ). This uptake is crucial as methanobactin appears to deliver MeHg inside the cell, and a study shows that deleting mbnT impairs methanobactin uptake and, consequently, MeHg degradation ( 24 , 25 ). The degradation of MeHg is thought to be carried out by the periplasmic methanol dehydrogenase, targeting the carbon-Hg bond, and is distinct from the merB -dependent organomercurial lyase pathway, as these methanotrophs generally lack the merB gene ( 24 , 25 ) Given the prevalence of methanotrophs in rice paddies, we investigated whether their observed association with MeHg dynamics is linked to MbnT-mediated demethylation. We examined the genomic context of previously studied demethylating methanotrophs and methanotroph-MAGs recovered from rice paddies to determine if they encode genes related to methanobactin biosynthesis ( i.e., mbnA, mbnB, mbnC as core components, and additional enzymes like mbnD, mbnF, mbnN, mbnS, mbnX ) and transport ( mbnE, mbnM, mbnT ) ( 47 ). Aligning with previous research, we confirmed that the demethylating Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b , encodes the full suite of genes for methanobactin biosynthesis and uptake/transport ( Fig. 4 ). Methylomicrobium album BG8 and Methylocystis sp. strain Rockwell , also able to demethylate, encode mbnT but lack genes necessary for methanobactin biosynthesis. Conversely, Methylococcus capsulatus Bath lacks genes for both methanobactin biosynthesis and uptake ( mbnT ) and was shown to not demethylate ( Fig. 4 ) ( 24 ). Subsequently, we show that none of the methanotroph MAGs possessed mbnT genes sufficiently similar to those found in the experimentally confirmed demethylating methanotrophs, and these MAGs also lacked all essential genes for methanobactin biosynthesis. Therefore, the rice paddy MAGs are unlikely to exhibit MeHg demethylation activity, although some of these MAGs showed significant correlations with MeHg via network analyses (Supplementary Result 8 & Discussion 2). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Presence/Absence of Methanobactin-Related Genes in Methanotroph Genomes. This heatmap illustrates the presence and absence of methanobactin biosynthesis and transport genes across experimentally studied methanotrophs (24) and MAGs recovered in this study, along with their respective quality metrics. The x-axis denotes the methanobactin genes, while the left y-axis represents the taxonomic classification of each genome, and the right y-axis lists the RefSeq or MAG IDs. All RefSeq genomes lack MBn biosynthesis, except OB3B (Note mbnB is present is OB3B as a pseudogene, which is not recovered through the HMM based analyses, but confirmed with RefSeq annotation). Based on experimental evidence, we hypothesized that mbnT could serve as a marker for MeHg demethylation capacity as the demethylating methanotrophs are shown to possess the gene and subsequently analyzed mbnT from assembled metagenomes of rice paddies. We recovered mbnT that resemble those found in known demethylating methanotrophs using an HMM (TIGR01783, sequence cutoff 223.5). However, recognizing that TBDTs, including mbnT , have homologs in diverse organisms beyond methanotrophs, we employed a conservative approach, retrieving sequences classified to known demethylating methanotroph genera: Methylomicrobium , Methylocystis , and Methylosinus (Fig. S7). Transcriptomic analyses show that mbnT transcripts from these genera were present in Hg-contaminated rice paddies, though to a limited extent (n=6, Fig. S4E). Multiple regression analyses revealed that total mbnT gene abundance from these genera represents a significant positive predictor of MeHg concentration (β=4.579 ×10⁷, p=0.0136) after accounting for site and compartment specific effects (Supplementary Result 9), contrary to an expected negative correlation if mbnT represents effective demethylation. Our findings suggest that while methanotroph demethylation capacity appears to be present in rice paddies, utilizing mbnT as a marker to assess net MeHg accumulation requires consideration of several limitations: (i) mbnT is not single-copy gene ( 91 ), and it belongs to the family of TBDTs, which are responsible for the uptake of diverse substrates, including metal chelates, and have numerous homologs in organisms other than methanotrophs ( 47 ). Despite using stringent cutoff, the presence of mbnT homologs with high similarity could lead to biased abundance estimations. Furthermore, gene abundance dose not directly equate to activity. (ii) Methanotrophs exhibit varied demethylation rates ( 24 ). These rates depend on various biological factors, including the structure of methanobactin ( 24 ), the efficiency of the MbnT transport system ( 89 ), and the presence of additional copper-handling proteins, like MbnH and MbnP ( 90 ), as well as environmental factors such as redox conditions, pH, and the presence of competing metals ( 92 – 94 ). (iii) Methanobactins can influence Hg cycling through secondary mechanisms. This includes altering microbial community composition ( e.g., through copper competition impacting denitrifying bacteria ( 89 )) or affecting the bioavailability of Hg species via competitive binding ( 94 , 95 ). These broader effects complicate the interpretation of mbnT’ s role in MeHg demethylation. Future studies should prioritize establishing direct relationships between mbnT expression and demethylation rates in situ through quantitative approaches with adequate sample sizes, before linking mbnT abundance to environmental MeHg dynamics. Additionally, broader experimental validation across diverse methanotrophic taxa is needed to confirm the universal applicability of this biomarker. Given the complexity revealed by our environmental data, controlled laboratory studies examining mbnT expression under varying Hg, redox, and competing metal conditions would help define when mbnT serves as a reliable indicator of methanotroph-mediated MeHg demethylation. Methane-cycling microbes as key biological predictors of MeHg variability Our analyses demonstrate that relying on single factors has limited explanatory power for net MeHg accumulation, despite significant associations found for individual variables. The complexity expected from concurrent methylation and demethylation processes is reflected in the increase in model R² when accounting for site and compartment effects (e.g., from 60% to 84% in hgcA models). To address the limitations of single-factor analyses and identify the key, potentially non-linear, variables driving MeHg patterns across diverse functional genes and varying environmental conditions, we employed Random Forest (RF) analysis. The RF models built using all variables achieved moderate predictive performance (R²=0.70±0.13, range: 0.40-0.95, Fig. 5 ). Bioavailable Hg(II) (F1-Hg) consistently emerged as the dominant predictor across all data splits (100% significance rate, p=0.010). Methanogen abundance ranked as the second most important variable (Mean IncMSE=20.8, 100% significance rate, p=0.013), followed by methanogen-hgcA abundance (Mean IncMSE=9.3, 49% significance rate), substantially outperforming other microbial indicators like total Hg methylators ( hgcA ), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), and iron-reducing bacteria (IRB) abundances. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Variable importance and model performance for predicting MeHg concentrations using random forest analysis (full model). (A) Variable importance plot showing the mean percent increase in mean squared error (%IncMSE) for each predictor variable when permuted, with 95% confidence intervals across 100 different data splits. Larger point size and green coloration indicate higher significance rates. Values show the percentage of data splits where the variable was significant (p<0.05) followed by the mean p-value. (B) Model performance metrics displaying mean values with 95% confidence intervals across all data splits. The model was built using 2001 trees with mtry=4 and validated through 100 permutation tests with random 70/30 train/test splits. Methanotroph abundance was identified as the third most important biological variable overall (Mean IncMSE = 8.8; 31% significance rate). Crucially, an explicit interaction term between methanogen and methanotroph abundances (i.e., their product) was a critical predictor of MeHg (Mean IncMSE = 18.3; 80% significance rate; p=0.038). This result suggests that the methanotrophic influence is primarily expressed through community-level coupling with methane-producing populations. Given that methanogens are key methylators that amplify MeHg under elevated THg, and methanotrophs showed a significant negative association with MeHg during the flooded period (suggesting a role in MeHg consumption/demethylation), the interaction term highlights that the net MeHg outcome is highly sensitive to the balance and synchronous activity of these two metabolically interdependent microbial guilds. Constraining the RF model solely to the flooded period substantially improved predictive accuracy (R 2 =0.86±0.08; Fig. S8B). This improved performance was accompanied by a modest increase in the relative importance of methanogens (mean %IncMSE rose from approximately 21 to 23) and a decrease for F1-Hg (mean %IncMSE fell from approximately 32 to 26), suggesting that the predictive power of methanogens is comparatively greater under flooded, reduced conditions than that of Hg bioavailability alone. Integrating genomic and geochemical data through RF modeling revealed that methanogen, methanogen methylator, and methanotroph abundance were the top biological factors contributing to net MeHg accumulation, while Hg bioavailability and dissolved organic matter (DOM) aromaticity were the dominant geochemical factors. Prediction accuracy further improved when removing less influential variables, reinforcing the importance of these key factors. While previous studies have associated methanogenesis with MeHg content in rice paddies ( 14 , 21 ), our work advances this understanding by identifying methanotrophy as an important biological correlate of net MeHg accumulation and characterizing specific methane- cycling populations associated with MeHg variability. Methanotrophic involvement is particularly noteworthy, as it suggests a previously underappreciated potential demethylation pathway in rice paddies. Our findings indicate that studying the relationship between microbial methane metabolism and Hg cycling provides critical insights into the key biogeochemical factors associated with net MeHg accumulation in Hg-contaminated rice paddies. While these findings advance our understanding of microbial associations with MeHg dynamics, several considerations should guide their interpretation and application. The observed coupling between methane and Hg cycling, though mechanistically plausible, requires validation across diverse environmental contexts before broader generalization to other rice paddy systems. Our RF approach, while effective at identifying statistical associations, cannot establish causal directionality between predictors and MeHg accumulation, highlighting the need for controlled experimental validation of these relationships. We recommend validation across diverse rice paddy systems with (i) varying flooding patterns and water management practices ( 12 , 96 ), (ii) different rice cultivars ( 97 ), and (iii) diverse geographical span ( 3 ) and contamination sources ( 98 – 100 ) to benchmark model transferability. Our results underscore that effective assessment of MeHg risk requires integrating microbial community data with physicochemical gradients that govern both Hg bioavailability and microbial niche occupation. The importance of methane-cycling communities in our predictive models highlights promising avenues for management strategies that could simultaneously address climate change mitigation and Hg pollution through targeted manipulation of shared microbial pathways ( 101 ). Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing financial interest. Acknowledgement This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42394092), the Guizhou Provincial Major Scientific and Technological Program ([2024]013) to BM, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to AJP and DSG. We thank Tianli Zhan for contributing to the geochemical analyses. The bioinformatics analyses were conducted using computing clusters at the Digital Research Alliance of Canada. Reference 1. ↵ Lindberg S et al. A Synthesis of Progress and Uncertainties in Attributing the Sources of Mercury in Deposition . AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment . 2007 Feb ; 36 ( 1 ): 19 – 33 . OpenUrl 2. ↵ Zhao L et al. Mercury methylation in rice paddy and accumulation in rice plant: A review . Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety . 2020 June; 195 : 110462 . 3. ↵ Liu M et al. Rice life cycle-based global mercury biotransport and human methylmercury exposure . Nat Commun . 2019 Nov 14 ; 10 ( 1 ): 5164 . OpenUrl PubMed 4. ↵ Meng B et al. The Process of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) . Environ Sci Technol . 2011 Apr ; 45 ( 7 ): 2711 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 5. ↵ Barkay T , et al. Demethylation─The Other Side of the Mercury Methylation Coin: A Critical Review . ACS Environ Au . 2021 Nov 2;acsenvironau.1c00022. 6. ↵ Parks JM et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation . Science . 2013 ; 339 (6125):1332–5. 7. ↵ Gilmour CC et al. Robust Mercury Methylation across Diverse Methanogenic Archaea . MBio . 2018 May 2 ; 9 ( 2 ): 10 – 128 . OpenUrl CrossRef 8. ↵ Gilmour CC et al. Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments . Environ Sci Technol . 2013 Oct 15 ; 47 ( 20 ): 11810 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Poulin BA et al. A comprehensive sulfate and DOM framework to assess methylmercury formation and risk in subtropical wetlands . Nat Commun . 2025 May 7 ; 16 ( 1 ): 4253 . OpenUrl PubMed 10. ↵ Bravo AG et al. The interplay between total mercury, methylmercury and dissolved organic matter in fluvial systems: A latitudinal study across Europe . Water Research . 2018 Nov 1 ; 144 : 172 – 82 . OpenUrl 11. Abdelhafiz MA et al. DOM influences Hg methylation in paddy soils across a Hg contamination gradient . Environmental Pollution . 2023 Apr 1 ; 322 : 121237 . 12. ↵ Wang X et al. Growing Rice Aerobically Markedly Decreases Mercury Accumulation by Reducing Both Hg Bioavailability and the Production of MeHg . Environ Sci Technol . 2014 Feb 4 ; 48 ( 3 ): 1878 – 85 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 13. ↵ Liu YR et al. Overlooked Role of Putative Non-Hg Methylators in Predicting Methylmercury Production in Paddy Soils . Environ Sci Technol . 2019 Nov 5 ; 53 ( 21 ): 12330 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 14. ↵ Wu Q et al. Methanogenesis Is an Important Process in Controlling MeHg Concentration in Rice Paddy Soils Affected by Mining Activities . Environ Sci Technol . 2020 Nov 3 ; 54 ( 21 ): 13517 – 26 . OpenUrl PubMed 15. ↵ Zhang R et al. Mining-impacted rice paddies select for Archaeal methylators and reveal a putative (Archaeal) regulator of mercury methylation . ISME COMMUN . 2023 July 15; 3 ( 1 ): 74 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. Liu YR et al. Analysis of the Microbial Community Structure by Monitoring an Hg Methylation Gene (hgcA) in Paddy Soils along an Hg Gradient . Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 2014 May 1 ; 80 ( 9 ): 2874 – 9 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 17. Liu YR et al. Unraveling Microbial Communities Associated with Methylmercury Production in Paddy Soils . Environ Sci Technol . 2018 Nov 20 ; 52 ( 22 ): 13110 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. Si Y et al. Mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria . Chemosphere . 2015 Mar 1 ; 122 : 206 – 12 . OpenUrl PubMed 19. ↵ A. Vishnivetskaya T et al. Microbial community structure with trends in methylation gene diversity and abundance in mercury-contaminated rice paddy soils in Guizhou , China. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts . 2018 ; 20 ( 4 ): 673 – 85 . OpenUrl PubMed 20. ↵ Bravo AG et al. Persistent Hg contamination and occurrence of Hg-methylating transcript (hgcA) downstream of a chlor-alkali plant in the Olt River (Romania) . Environ Sci Pollut Res . 2016 June 1; 23 ( 11 ): 10529 – 41 . OpenUrl 21. ↵ Hao Z et al. Relative importance of aceticlastic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens on mercury methylation and methylmercury demethylation in paddy soils . Science of The Total Environment . 2024 Jan ; 906 : 167601 . 22. ↵ Kronberg RM et al. Mechanisms of Methyl Mercury Net Degradation in Alder Swamps: The Role of Methanogens and Abiotic Processes . Environ Sci Technol Lett . 2018 Apr 10 ; 5 ( 4 ): 220 – 5 . OpenUrl 23. ↵ Marvin-DiPasquale MC et al. Bacterial Methylmercury Degradation in Florida Everglades Peat Sediment . Environ Sci Technol . 1998 Sept 1; 32 ( 17 ): 2556 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef GeoRef Web of Science 24. ↵ Kang-Yun CS et al. Evidence for methanobactin “Theft” and novel chalkophore production in methanotrophs: impact on methanotrophic-mediated methylmercury degradation . ISME J . 2022 Jan ; 16 ( 1 ): 211 – 20 . OpenUrl PubMed 25. ↵ Lu X et al. Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs . Sci Adv . 2017 May 31 ; 3 ( 5 ): e1700041 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Jeyakumar P et al. Copper and zinc spiking of biosolids: effect of incubation period on metal fractionation and speciation and microbial activity . Environ Chem . 2008 ; 5 ( 5 ): 347 . OpenUrl 27. Tessier A et al. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals . Anal Chem . 1979 June 1; 51 ( 7 ): 844 – 51 . OpenUrl CrossRef 28. ↵ Wang J et al. Ammonium thiosulphate enhanced phytoextraction from mercury contaminated soil – Results from a greenhouse study . Journal of Hazardous Materials . 2011 Feb 15 ; 186 ( 1 ): 119 – 27 . OpenUrl PubMed 29. ↵ Chen S et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor . Bioinformatics . 2018 Sept 1; 34 ( 17 ): i884 – 90 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Andrews S. Babraham Bioinformatics - FastQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data [Internet] . 2010 [cited 2021 June 8]. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ 31. ↵ Li D et al. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph . Bioinformatics . 2015 May 15 ; 31 ( 10 ): 1674 – 6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Kang DD et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies . PeerJ . 2019 July 26; 7 . 33. Wu YW et al. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets . Bioinformatics . 2016 Feb 15 ; 32 ( 4 ): 605 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. Alneberg J et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition . Nat Methods . 2014 Nov ; 11 ( 11 ): 1144 – 6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 35. ↵ Nissen JN et al. Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders . Nat Biotechnol . 2021 May ; 39 ( 5 ): 555 – 60 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Chklovski A et al. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning . Nat Methods . 2023 Aug ; 20 ( 8 ): 1203 – 12 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Sieber CMK et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy . Nat Microbiol . 2018 July; 3 ( 7 ): 836 – 43 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Olm MR et al. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication . ISME J . 2017 Dec ; 11 ( 12 ): 2864 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Eren AM et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o . Nat Microbiol . 2021 Jan ; 6 ( 1 ): 3 – 6 . OpenUrl PubMed 40. ↵ Chaumeil PA et al. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database . Hancock J , editor. Bioinformatics . 2019 Nov 15;btz848. 41. ↵ Magoč T et al. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies . Bioinformatics . 2011 Nov 1 ; 27 ( 21 ): 2957 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Kopylova E et al. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data . Bioinformatics . 2012 ; 28 ( 24 ): 3211 – 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 43. ↵ Hyatt D et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification . BMC Bioinformatics . 2010 Mar 8 ; 11 ( 1 ): 119 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM . 2013 Mar 16 [cited 2022 Feb 4]; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997v2 45. ↵ Liao Y et al. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features . Bioinformatics . 2014 Apr 1 ; 30 ( 7 ): 923 – 30 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 46. ↵ Eddy SR . HMMER User’s Guide Biological sequence analysis using profile hidden Markov models . 2020 Nov;227. 47. ↵ Dassama LMK et al. Methanobactins: from genome to function . Metallomics . 2017 Jan 25 ; 9 ( 1 ): 7 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Gionfriddo C et al. Hg-MATE-Db.v1.01142021 [Internet]. The Smithsonian Institution ; 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 31]. p. 8700889 Bytes. Available from: https://smithsonian.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Hg-MATE-Db_v1_01142021/13105370 49. ↵ Christakis CA et al. Expanded Diversity and Phylogeny of mer Genes Broadens Mercury Resistance Paradigms and Reveals an Origin for MerA Among Thermophilic Archaea . Frontiers in Microbiology . 2021 ; 12 . 50. ↵ Lafrance-Vanasse J et al. Crystal Structures of the Organomercurial Lyase MerB in Its Free and Mercury-bound Forms: INSIGHTS INTO THE MECHANISM OF METHYLMERCURY DEGRADATION* . Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2009 Jan 9 ; 284 ( 2 ): 938 – 44 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 51. ↵ Garber AI et al. FeGenie: A Comprehensive Tool for the Identification of Iron Genes and Iron Gene Neighborhoods in Genome and Metagenome Assemblies . Frontiers in Microbiology . 2020 ; 11 . 52. ↵ Steinegger M et al. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets . Nat Biotechnol . 2017 Nov ; 35 ( 11 ): 1026 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. ↵ Parks DH et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea . Nat Biotechnol . 2020 Sept; 38 ( 9 ): 1079 – 86 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ Robinson MD et al. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data . Bioinformatics . 2010 ; 26 ( 1 ): 139 – 40 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 55. ↵ Aroney STN et al. CoverM: read alignment statistics for metagenomics . Bioinformatics . 2025 Apr 1 ; 41 ( 4 ):btaf147. 56. ↵ Ruan Q et al. Local similarity analysis reveals unique associations among marine bacterioplankton species and environmental factors . Bioinformatics . 2006 Oct 15 ; 22 ( 20 ): 2532 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 57. ↵ Xia LC et al. Extended local similarity analysis (eLSA) of microbial community and other time series data with replicates . BMC Syst Biol . 2011 Dec 14 ; 5 ( 2 ): S15 . OpenUrl CrossRef 58. ↵ Kelly CA et al. Is total mercury concentration a good predictor of methyl mercury concentration in aquatic systems? Water Air Soil Pollut . 1995 Feb 1 ; 80 ( 1 ): 715 – 24 . OpenUrl CrossRef GeoRef 59. ↵ Wang J , et al. Mobilization, Methylation, and Demethylation of Mercury in a Paddy Soil Under Systematic Redox Changes . Environ Sci Technol . 2021 July 20; 55 ( 14 ): 10133 – 41 . OpenUrl PubMed 60. ↵ Ullrich SM et al. Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation . Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology . 2001 July 1; 31 ( 3 ): 241 – 93 . OpenUrl GeoRef 61. ↵ Zhang Y et al. Biochar and nitrate reduce risk of methylmercury in soils under straw amendment . Science of The Total Environment . 2018 Apr 1 ; 619 – 620 :384–90. 62. ↵ Tang W et al. Increased Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice after Straw Amendment . Environ Sci Technol . 2019 June 4; 53 ( 11 ): 6144 – 53 . OpenUrl PubMed 63. ↵ Pu Q et al. Dissolved organic matter fosters core mercury-methylating microbiomes for methylmercury production in paddy soils . Biogeosciences . 2025 Mar 24 ; 22 ( 6 ): 1543 – 56 . OpenUrl 64. ↵ Bravo AG et al. Biotic formation of methylmercury: A bio–physico–chemical conundrum . Limnol Oceanogr . 2020 May ; 65 ( 5 ): 1010 – 27 . OpenUrl PubMed 65. ↵ Poulin BA et al. Effects of Sulfide Concentration and Dissolved Organic Matter Characteristics on the Structure of Nanocolloidal Metacinnabar . Environ Sci Technol . 2017 Nov 21 ; 51 ( 22 ): 13133 – 42 . OpenUrl PubMed 66. ↵ Graham AM et al. Effect of Dissolved Organic Matter Source and Character on Microbial Hg Methylation in Hg–S–DOM Solutions . Environ Sci Technol . 2013 June 4; 47 ( 11 ): 5746 – 54 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 67. ↵ Hansen AM et al. Optical properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM): Effects of biological and photolytic degradation . Limnology and Oceanography . 2016 ; 61 ( 3 ): 1015 – 32 . OpenUrl 68. ↵ Peterson BD et al. Metabolically diverse microorganisms mediate methylmercury formation under nitrate-reducing conditions in a dynamic hydroelectric reservoir . The ISME Journal . 2023 Oct 1 ; 17 ( 10 ): 1705 – 18 . OpenUrl PubMed 69. Jones DS et al. Diverse Communities of hgcAB+ Microorganisms Methylate Mercury in Freshwater Sediments Subjected to Experimental Sulfate Loading . Environ Sci Technol . 2020 Nov 17 ; 54 ( 22 ): 14265 – 74 . OpenUrl PubMed 70. ↵ Capo E et al. Expression Levels of hgcAB Genes and Mercury Availability Jointly Explain Methylmercury Formation in Stratified Brackish Waters . Environ Sci Technol . 2022 Sept 20; 56 ( 18 ): 13119 – 30 . OpenUrl PubMed 71. ↵ Christensen GA et al. Determining the Reliability of Measuring Mercury Cycling Gene Abundance with Correlations with Mercury and Methylmercury Concentrations . Environ Sci Technol . 2019 Aug 6 ; 53 ( 15 ): 8649 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 72. ↵ Zhang H et al. Bioaccumulation of Methylmercury versus Inorganic Mercury in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grain . Environ Sci Technol . 2010 June 15; 44 ( 12 ): 4499 – 504 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ Liu J et al. Methylmercury production in a paddy soil and its uptake by rice plants as affected by different geochemical mercury pools . Environment International . 2019 Aug 1 ; 129 : 461 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 74. ↵ Schaefer JK et al. Role of the Bacterial Organomercury Lyase (MerB) in Controlling Methylmercury Accumulation in Mercury-Contaminated Natural Waters . Environ Sci Technol . 2004 Aug 1 ; 38 ( 16 ): 4304 – 11 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 75. ↵ Barkay T et al. Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems . FEMS Microbiol Rev . 2003 June; 27 ( 2–3 ): 355 – 84 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 76. ↵ Li Y et al. Root-induced changes in radial oxygen loss, rhizosphere oxygen profile, and nitrification of two rice cultivars in Chinese red soil regions . Plant Soil . 2013 Apr 1 ; 365 ( 1 ): 115 – 26 . OpenUrl 77. ↵ Wang X et al. Radial oxygen loss has different effects on the accumulation of total mercury and methylmercury in rice . Plant Soil . 2014 Dec 1 ; 385 ( 1 ): 343 – 55 . OpenUrl 78. ↵ Sanz-Sáez I et al. Microorganisms Involved in Methylmercury Demethylation and Mercury Reduction are Widely Distributed and Active in the Bathypelagic Deep Ocean Waters . Environ Sci Technol . 2024 Aug 6 ; 58 ( 31 ): 13795 – 807 . OpenUrl PubMed 79. ↵ Barkay T et al. Effects of dissolved organic carbon and salinity on bioavailability of mercury . Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 1997 Nov ; 63 ( 11 ): 4267 – 71 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 80. ↵ 80. Barkay T et al. Microbial Transformations of Mercury: Potentials, Challenges, and Achievements in Controlling Mercury Toxicity in the Environment . In: Advances in Applied Microbiology . Elsevier ; 2005 . p. 1–52. 81. Oremland RS et al. Methylmercury Decomposition in Sediments and Bacterial Cultures: Involvement of Methanogens and Sulfate Reducers in Oxidative Demethylation . Appl Environ Microbiol . 1991 Jan ; 57 ( 1 ): 130 – 7 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 82. ↵ Lu X et al. Anaerobic Mercury Methylation and Demethylation by Geobacter bemidjiensis Bem . Environ Sci Technol . 2016 Apr 19 ; 50 ( 8 ): 4366 – 73 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 83. ↵ Wang W et al. Methanogen–methanotroph community has a more consistent and integrated structure in rice rhizosphere than in bulk soil and rhizoplane . Molecular Ecology . 2024 ; 33 ( 13 ): e17416 . OpenUrl 84. ↵ Lee HJ et al. Methane emission and dynamics of methanotrophic and methanogenic communities in a flooded rice field ecosystem . FEMS Microbiology Ecology . 2014 Apr 1 ; 88 ( 1 ): 195 – 212 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 85. ↵ Haroon MF et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage . Nature . 2013 Aug ; 500 (7464):567–70. 86. ↵ Deng Y et al. Methylomonadaceae was the active and dominant methanotroph in Tibet lake sediments . ISME Communications . 2024 Jan 1 ; 4 ( 1 ):ycae032. 87. Grégoire DS et al. Microbial methane cycling in a landfill on a decadal time scale . Nat Commun . 2023 Nov 16 ; 14 ( 1 ): 7402 . OpenUrl PubMed 88. ↵ Kits KD et al. Methane oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction under hypoxia by the Gammaproteobacterium ethylomonas denitrificans, sp. nov. type strain FJG1 . Environmental Microbiology . 2015 ; 17 ( 9 ): 3219 – 32 . OpenUrl CrossRef 89. ↵ Reyes RM , et al. Methanobactins: Structures, Biosynthesis, and Microbial Diversity . Annual Review of Microbiology . 2024 Nov 10 ; 78 ( 1 ): 383 – 401 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 90. ↵ Dassama LMK et al. Methanobactin transport machinery . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 2016 Nov 15 ; 113 ( 46 ): 13027 – 32 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 91. ↵ Peng P et al. Two TonB-Dependent Transporters in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b Are Responsible for Uptake of Different Forms of Methanobactin and Are Involved in the Canonical “Copper Switch.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 2022 Jan 11 ; 88 ( 1 ): e01793 – 21 . OpenUrl PubMed 92. ↵ Tian HJ et al. Ecological drivers of methanotrophic communities in paddy soils around mercury mining areas . Science of The Total Environment . 2020 June; 721 : 137760 . 93. Choi DW et al. Spectral and thermodynamic properties of Ag(I), Au(III), Cd(II), Co(II), Fe(III), Hg(II), Mn(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), U(IV), and Zn(II) binding by methanobactin from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b . Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry . 2006 Dec 1;100(12):2150–61. 94. ↵ Yin X et al. Synergistic Effects of a Chalkophore, Methanobactin, on Microbial Methylation of Mercury . Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 2020 May 19 ; 86 ( 11 ): e00122 – 20 . OpenUrl PubMed 95. ↵ Stenzler BR et al. Diffusion of H2S from anaerobic thiolated ligand biodegradation rapidly generates bioavailable mercury . Environmental Microbiology . 2022 ; 24 ( 7 ): 3212 – 28 . OpenUrl 96. ↵ Qian H et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation in rice agriculture . Nat Rev Earth Environ . 2023 Sept 26; 4 ( 10 ): 716 – 32 . OpenUrl 97. ↵ Peng X et al. Reducing total mercury and methylmercury accumulation in rice grains through water management and deliberate selection of rice cultivars . Environmental Pollution . 2012 Mar 1 ; 162 : 202 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 98. ↵ Horvat M et al. Total mercury, methylmercury and selenium in mercury polluted areas in the province Guizhou, China . Science of The Total Environment . 2003 Mar ; 304 ( 1– 3 ): 231 – 56 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 99. Xu X et al. The local impact of a coal-fired power plant on inorganic mercury and methyl-mercury distribution in rice (Oryza sativa L .). Environmental Pollution . 2017 Apr ; 223 : 11 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 100. ↵ Liang P et al. Human exposure to mercury in a compact fluorescent lamp manufacturing area: By food (rice and fish) consumption and occupational exposure . Environmental Pollution . 2015 Mar 1 ; 198 : 126 – 32 . OpenUrl PubMed 101. ↵ Li C et al. Aligning global mercury mitigation with climate action . Nat Commun . 2025 Sept 28; 16 ( 1 ): 7826 . OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 11, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies Rui Zhang , Alexandre J Poulain , Qiang Pu , Jiang Liu , Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz , Xinbin Feng , Bo Meng , Daniel S Grégoire bioRxiv 2025.10.09.681528; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.09.681528 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies Rui Zhang , Alexandre J Poulain , Qiang Pu , Jiang Liu , Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz , Xinbin Feng , Bo Meng , Daniel S Grégoire bioRxiv 2025.10.09.681528; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.09.681528 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Microbiology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7618) Biochemistry (17637) Bioengineering (13864) Bioinformatics (41853) Biophysics (21403) Cancer Biology (18540) Cell Biology (25429) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13356) Ecology (19862) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24287) Genetics (15585) Genomics (22464) Immunology (17701) Microbiology (40300) Molecular Biology (17142) Neuroscience (88440) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2825) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4814) Physiology (7633) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4285) Systems Biology (9809) Zoology (2268)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00