Abstract
Tokyo’s Olympic and Paralympic Games set to begin in late July 2021 without
spectators from abroad, but vaccine rollout has been slow in Japan compared to other
developed countries. In this study, COVID-19 epidemic curve in Tokyo is developed
based on weekly reported data from January 23, 2020 until April 16, 2021. The
maximum daily number of the infected cases in Tokyo in August 2021 would be 7,991
if the current pace of vaccinations (1/1,000 per day). This daily number is greater than
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
the highest daily cases (2,447) recorded on January 7, 2021. However, if the rollout
pace could be doubled (1/500 per day), the peak daily new cases would be 4,470 in
August. If it could be quadrupled (1/250 per day), the peak would be noted at 2,128 in
July and the highest number in August would be 1,977. If vaccine rollout could not be
enhanced, the cancellation might be an acceptable decision, since health is the most
precious to our Olympians.
TEXT
New COVID-19 cases in Japan have increased in recent weeks and the country
experiences a “fourth wave” of the infection as it prepares for the Olympic and
Paralympic Games, which are set to begin in late July 2021 without spectators from
abroad. However, vaccine rollout has been slow in Japan compared to other developed
countries. Japan does not produce domestic anti-COVID-19 vaccines and we import and
provides mRNA vaccines to people (first healthcare workers, followed by elderly) that
started on the February 17, 2021. This is worrisome because there would be a big
COVID-19 infection surge in Tokyo during the Games with an overwhelmed local
healthcare system and less availability of healthcare workers supporting the Games (1).
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
Moreover, athletes, coaches, judges, and journalists would face greater risk of infection
from the surge.
We developed COVID-19 epidemic curve in Tokyo based on weekly reported data from
January 23, 2020 until April 16, 2021 (2). A susceptible-exposed-infected-removed
compartmental model as in (3) was used for the curve fitting by updating the estimation
per week. More precisely, the model equations are as follows.
𝑆′ = −𝛽𝑆𝐼, 𝐸′ = 𝛽𝑆𝐼 − 𝜀𝐸, 𝐼′ = 𝜀𝐸 − 𝛾𝐼, 𝑅′ = 𝛾𝐼,
where 𝑆(𝑡), 𝐸(𝑡), 𝐼(𝑡) and 𝑅(𝑡) denote the susceptible, exposed, infected and
removed populations at time (day) 𝑡, respectively. 𝛽 denotes the infection rate and ε
and 𝛾 denote the transition rates from 𝐸 to 𝐼 and 𝐼 to 𝑅, respectively. As in (3), we
set ε = 0.2 and 𝛾 = 0.1 so that the average period of incubation and infection are
1/ε = 5 (days) and 1/𝛾 = 10 (days), respectively (4,5). In addition, we assumed that
𝑆 + 𝐸 + 𝐼 + 𝑅 = 1 so that each population implies the proportion to the total
population. To estimate the infection rate 𝛽, we assumed that the daily number of
newly reported cases is given by 𝑌 = 𝑝𝐼𝑁 and fitted it to the data (2) to find the best
𝛽 that minimizes the least-squares error, where 𝑝 denotes the detection rate and 𝑁
denotes the population in Tokyo. We assumed that 𝑁 = 1.39 × 107 (6), and we also
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
estimated 𝑝 by using the observational fact that antibody prevalence in Tokyo was
0.1% in June 2020 (7) and 1.35% in December 2020 (8). More precisely, we estimated
𝑝 so that the removed population 𝑅 in June and December 2020 is close to 0.001 and
0.0135, respectively, under the assumption that the antibody prevalence can be
approximated by 𝑅. As stated above, the estimation was updated per week, and hence,
we obtained the infection rate 𝛽 in each week from January 23, 2020 to April 16, 2021.
To predict the epidemic curve after April 17, 2021, we calculated the average of the
infection rates in the last three weeks and assumed that it will not change. To discuss the
effect of the vaccination, we introduced the vaccination rate 𝑣 and changed the
equations of 𝑆 and 𝑅 as 𝑆′ = −𝛽𝑆𝐼 − 𝑣𝑆 and 𝑅′ = 𝛾𝐼 + 𝑣𝑆, respectively.
Figure 1 depicts the curve of new cases (1A, upper figure) and antibody prevalence (1B,
lower figure). Our curve predicts that the maximum daily number of the infected cases
in Tokyo in August 2021 would be 7,991 if the current pace of vaccinations (1/1,000 per
day of the adult population, about 10,000 two-shot complete vaccinations). This daily
number is greater than the highest daily cases (2,447) recorded on January 7 (9). During
that month in Tokyo, the healthcare system was overwhelmed.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
However, if the rollout pace could be doubled (1/500 per day), the peak daily new cases
would be 4,470 in August. If it could be quadrupled (1/250 per day), the peak would be
noted at 2,128 in July and the highest number in August would be 1,977. In these
accelerated pace scenarios, subsequent cases would be decreasing thereafter (Figure
1A). The limitation of our analysis included unclear effects from possible public health
intervention such as strict lockdown as well as from higher transmission of variants.
Nevertheless, based on our predictive analysis, the vaccination speed in Tokyo should
be rapidly increased to mitigate a COVID-19 surge to prevent overwhelmed local
healthcare system and less availability of healthcare workers during the time of the
Games. This might be able to lower risk of infection among athletes and all the people
involved in the Games. If vaccine rollout could not be enhanced before the Games, the
cancellation might be an acceptable decision. After all, health is the most precious to our
Olympians.
References
1: New York Times. Doubts about Tokyo’s pandemic Olympics.16 April 2021.
2: CKAN. Tokyo COVID-19 positive cases by day of confirmation (in Japanese).
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
Accessed at
https://catalog.data.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/dataset/t000010d0000000087/resource/4f72def
3-f3fa-4739-a445-3e256de710cc
3: Kuniya T. Prediction of the epidemic peak of coronavirus disease in Japan, 2020. J
Clin Med 2020;9:789.
4: Linton NM, Kobayashi T, Yang Y , et al. Incubation period and other epidemiological
characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical
analysis of publicly available case data. J Clin Med 2020;9:538.
5: Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, et al. How will country-based
mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet
2020;395:21-27.
6: Statistics Bureau of Japan. Current Population Estimates. Accessed at
https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jinsui/2.html
7: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The result of the neutralization test in the
antibody possession survey (in Japanese). Accessed at
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000648706.pdf
8: The Japan Times. 1.35% in Tokyo have coronavirus antibodies. Accessed at
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/03/30/national/tokyo-antibody-rate/
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
9: Tokyo metropolitan government. COVID-19 information website. Accessed at
https://stopcovid19.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/cards/number-of-confirmed-cases
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
No funding.
Ethics committee approval: N.A.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 1
Legend
A) The number of newly reported or predicted daily cases of COVID-19 in Tokyo
B) Antibody prevalence for COVID-19 in Tokyo
Figure 1
A)
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
B)
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 21, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255676doi: medRxiv preprint