Effectiveness of School Nurses promoting Oral Health among 7-15 Years old School Children in Nepal | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Effectiveness of School Nurses promoting Oral Health among 7-15 Years old School Children in Nepal Dilip Prajapati, Swagat Kumar Mahanta, Darpa Pradhan, Roshan Kumar Chaudhary, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted 15 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Gingival diseases and dental caries are significant global burdens, especially in low- and middle income countries. The Nepal government has initiated the One School, One Nurse program in the county since 2019. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of school nurses leading in promoting oral health among schoolchildren in Nepal. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted among 324 students (aged 7–15) from three different government schools with school nurses in the Kavre district of Nepal. An intervention group received weekly reinforced oral health education from a trained school nurse. A semi-intervention group received a single education session, while a control group didn't receive any training or intervention. Expert dentists collected baseline and three months of follow-up data on dental caries, plaque index, and gingival index. Results Baseline data recorded high dental caries prevalence in both primary (48.9%) and permanent dentition (46.8%). Students (52.9%) brush their teeth occasionally, and 46.2% of them use non-fluoridated toothpaste. There was a significant reduction in the plaque score (2.06 ± 0.63 to 1.50 ± 0.54) in the intervention group compared to the semi-intervention and control groups (2.06 to 2.02 and 2.18 to 2.06). There was improved gingival bleeding in the intervention group (3.4 ± ± 2.47 to 1.32 ± 1.20), whereas minimal improvement was observed in the semi-intervention group, and oral health status remained unchanged or worsened in the control group. Conclusion School nurses play a significant role in improving the gingival health of school children and are effective in promoting oral health among the school children, especially in the low- and middle-income countries where there is no provision of school dental nurses. dental caries gingival disease molar incisor hypo mineralization plaque school nurse school oral health Introduction Untreated dental caries is the most prevalent global health condition [ 1 ], often excluded from universal health coverage, with oral diseases affecting 70–95% of school-aged children in Southeast Asia. This burden is particularly significant in low- and middle-income countries due to insufficient preventive and treatment services and health inequalities [ 2 ]. In Nepal, the "National School Health and Nutrition Strategy" and "One School One Nurse" program [ 3 ] aim to strengthen health promotion, including through "health ambassadors" [ 4 ]. However, the National Health Insurance program offers limited or no oral health coverage [ 5 ], leading to high out-of-pocket expenditures, especially for lower-income households [ 6 ]. School nurses, despite their potential, are an underutilized resource in oral health promotion. Previous research highlights their crucial role and the effectiveness of reinforced oral health education [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of school nurses in promoting oral health among 7 to 15-year-old schoolchildren in Nepal's Kavre Palanchowk district. Methodology The Quasi Experiment was conducted among 324 students (aged 7–15) from the three government schools in Kavre palanchowk district (1. Shree Bhaleshwor secondary school, Panauti Municipality. 2. Shree Roshi Secondary School, Roshi Rural Municipality 3. Shree Setidevi Secondary School, Ravi Opi. Dhulikhel Municipality). Baseline data were collected and follow up data were recorded after three months. Sample Size: A convenience sampling technique were used, with total sample size needed for this study was 297. This study considered 80% power and 95% CI where mean score of the experimental group was taken 0.78 ± 0.42 and mean score control group was taken: 0.94 ± 0.3822 from Shenoy et al [ 10 ]. Using the formula of sample size (n) = 2 (Z α/2 + Z β ) 2 ϭ 2 )/ (µ 1 − µ 2 ) 2 Total sample size calculated 99 in each group. Methods: This study was conducted from February to May 2025 where screening was done in the school premises by Nepal Medical Council registered dentist with sterilized dental kit and head lamp in the well illuminated area under universal precautions. Both verbal and written consent (Assent form) was taken from students, respective class teachers and parents. Two trained and calibrated dentists from Kathmandu University School of medical Sciences, collected the data from the participants including demographic details with Socio economic status, Kuppuswamy’s SES scale [ 11 ]. WHO Basic Oral health Surveys methods- Dentition status [ 12 ] was used to record Dentition status whereas Turesky–Gilmore–Glickman modification of the Quigley-Hein plaque index and Loe and Sillness Gingival index was used to record plaque and gingival status. Demographic details were recorded, height and weight were scaled to record body Mass index followed by three set of self-reported questions regarding tooth brushing frequency, type of toothpaste using and availability of the toothbrush. They were asked with the help of the pictures, whether they were using fluoridated or non-fluoridated toothpaste showing commonly used and available tooth paste in the Nepal. Regarding the Modified Kuppuswamy scale, Socio economic status of the parents, we provided each students with the chart to record the Education Level, occupation of the head of the household and average total monthly family income, data were recorded by the individual parents and submitted to the school teacher on the next day. Molar Incisor hypoplasia was recorded according to the European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Criteria (EAPD) [ 13 ]. Two Tone ™ Disclosing Solution were used to reveal both older and newer plaque with the help of tweezer and cotton pellet. Gingival bleeding was recorded by drying the gingiva and periodontal probe and the recording was made based on gingival bleeding. Three schools were selected according to the geographical, cultural and similar life style in the same district after the approval of the Education development and co-ordination unit, Kavrepalanchowk. The schools were divided into three groups. Group 1 (Intervention group, IG): Oral health education training (OHET) was given to school nurse at the respective school by the expert Public health Dentist (PI) followed by two days special oral health training in the department of Community and public health dentistry, Dhulikhel Hospital. OHET includes Introduction to Oral health, Prevention of Oral Disease, Common oral disease and condition of children, Role of plaque and calculus on gingival disease and dental caries, Role of fluoride, Tooth brushing technique and supervision. Weekly oral health education (One hour) was given to the students by the school nurse under supervision of the Investigators. Group 2 (Semi-intervention group, SIG): No oral health related training (OHET) was given to the school nurse at the respective school but one time oral health education was given to the students in the school premises by expert dentist regarding oral health promotion, importance of brushing and brushing technique only after baseline data collection. This in commonly practiced methods of oral health program in Nepal. Group 3 (Control group, CG): In this school, there was no oral health education training (OHET) given to the school nurse and students whereas, no supervision was done by the dentist regarding the program. Eligibility criteria: Students aged 7–15 years old from government schools from Kavre Palanchowk District where there must be recruitment of school nurses in School were included in this study. The participants must provide verbal consent and assent form for oral examination whereas children with systemic disease and or requiring emergency dental treatment, ongoing orthodontic treatment and those refuse to participate in this study will not be included in this study. Data Analysis: Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subsequently imported into SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0) for analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all inferential tests. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Non-parametric tests were employed for all comparative analyses. The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to compare mean scores among the three independent study groups for paired comparisons of pre- and post-intervention data, within each group, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. Result This study was conducted among 324 government students age ranging from 7 to 15 years old, with 178 (54%) boys and 146 (46%) girls. Socio economic Status of the students were collected from the parents, where most of the students are from upper lower group 178(54.9%), followed by lower middle class 107 (33%), lower group 34 (10.5%) and only 5 (1.5%) belonged to upper middle group. surprisingly, 226 (69.5%) of the students were underweight, whereas 81(24.9%) of them had normal body mass index and only 2 of them are obese. (Table 1 ). Table 1 Demographic Distribution of the students. (N, %) N = 324 Age 7–11 years old 178 (54) 12–15 years old 146 (46) Gender Boy 168 (51.9) Girl 156 (48.1) Socio Economic Status Upper Middle 5 (1.5) Lower Middle 107 (33) Upper Lower 178 (54.9) Lower 34 (10.5) Body Mass Index 1 Underweight 226 (69.5) 2 Normal BMI 81 (24.9) 3 Over weight 15 (4.6) 4 Obese 2 (0.6) School 1. Shree Bhaleshwor Secondary School, Panauti 127 (39.1) 2. Shree Roshi Secondary School, Katunjebeshi 82 (25.3) 3. Shree Seti Devi Secondary School, Bhumlu 115 (35.5) During the baseline data collection, 158 (48.9%) of the students had decayed primary tooth, dmft whereas 151(46.8%) of them had decayed permanent tooth, DMFT. The mean dmft and DMFT score of the students was 1.72 ± 2.29 (0–10) and 1.19 ± 1.67 (0–12). The overall plaque index score was 2.1 ± 0.64 and the mean gingival bleeding score was 3.99 ± 2.85. Self -reported oral hygiene questionnaire were asked to the students where 314 (96.6%) students had tooth brush, Nearly half of the children 150 (46.2%) use non-fluoridated toothpaste and more than half 172 (52.9%) of the students brush occasionally and six of them never brushes their teeth. (Table 2 ) Table 2 Baseline result of the students N = 324 (Mean and proportion) dmft Mean ± SD Range N (%) 1.72 ± 2.29 0–10 158 (48.9) DMFT 1.19 ± 1.67 0–12 151 (46.8) PI 2.1 ± 0.64 0–4.3 GB 3.99 ± 2.85 0–17 303 (93.5) Q1 Do you have tooth brush Yes 314 (96.6) No 10 (3.1) Q2 Which tooth paste do you use Fluoridated 171 (52.6) Non fluoridated 150 (46.2) Q3 How many times do you brush your teeth? Occasionally 172 (52.9) Once a day 114 (35.1) Twice a day 31 (9.5) Never 6 (1.8) dmft: primary decayed missing filled tooth DMFT: permanent Decayed Missing Filled Tooth PI: Plaque Index GB: Gingival bleeding Molar Incisor hypo mineralisation (MIH) was present on 26.9% among 324 children, Type 1 MIH was most prevalent among other type classified by European Academy of paediatric dentistry where 18.8% have demarcated opacities with localized discoloration in enamel whereas only 1.9% of them have severe form of MIH (Table 3 ). Table 3 Distribution of Molar Incisor hypoplasia among the students. Present N (%) Absent N (%) Type of MIH present N (%) 87 (26.9) 237 (73.1) Absent 273 (73.1) Type 1 61 (18.8) Type 2 20 (6.2) MIH Distribution according to the school Type 3 6 (1.9) Present Absent School 1 N (%) 127 44 ( 34.6) 83 (65.4) School 2 N (%) 82 22 (26.8) 60 (73.2) School 3 N (%) 115 21 9 (18.3) 94 (81.7) The mean plaque index score for group 1 decreased from 2.06 ± 0.63 to 1.50 ± 0.54 whereas group 2 and group 3 showed very minimal decrease from 2.06 ± 0.68 to 2.02 ± 0.69 and 2.18 ± 0.64 to 2.06 ± 0.98. Overall, plaque levels were slightly improved across all groups with group 1 showing significant reduction in plaque scores (p < 0.05). (Table 4 ) The mean gingival bleeding score for group 1 showed significant decrease from 3.4 ± 2.47 to 1.32 ± 1.20 suggesting clear improvement in gingival health whereas group 2 showed slight decrease from 4.94 ± 2.75 to 4.59 ± 2.662 suggesting slight improvement and group 3 showed increase from 3.97 ± 3.14 to 4.96 ± 3.18 suggesting deterioration of gingival health. (Table 5 ) During data analysis, dependent variables were tested for normality which showed skewed distribution. Hence non parametric tests were employed for comparison of paired data. Wilcoxon sign rank test was used for paired comparisons. (Table 5 ) In Group 1, significant reduction in median plaque from 1.95 (2.43–1.6) to 1.37(1.79–1.17) were observed (p < 0.001). Median Gingival bleeding scores also showed significant reductions. In the semi intervention group median plaque scores showed slight reduction from 1.96 (2.56–1.56) to 1.89 (2.53–1.47), however the results were not statistically significant. Gingival bleeding remained constant at a median score of 4 pre and post intervention. For group 3, Plaque scores reduced slightly from 2.15 (2.62–1.75) to 2.03 (2.45–1.45). Gingival bleeding increased significantly from a median score of 3 (5 − 2) to 5 (7 − 2). (P < 0.05) However new carious lesion seems increased in all the groups with loss of follow up 17 (14.8%) in control group (not shown in the table) Table 4 Comparisons of gingival and plaque scores among intervention, semi intervention and control schools Intervention group mean ± S.D Semi Intervention group mean ± S.D Control group Mean ± S.D Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post DMFT 0.94 ± 1.29 0.98 ± 1.28 0.89 ± 1.33 1.15 ± 1.47 1.67 ± 2.11 1.86 ± 2.06 Plaque Index 2.06 ± 0.63 1.50 ± 0.54 2.06 ± 0.68 2.02 ± 0.69 2.18 ± 0.64 2.06 ± 0.98 GB 3.4 ± 2.47 1.32 ± 1.20 4.94 ± 2.75 4.59 ± 2.66 3.97 ± 3.14 4.96 ± 3.18 DMFT: Permanent Decayed Missing Filled Tooth GB: Gingival Bleeding Table 5 Comparison of median plaque and gingival scores among case and control group (pre and post intervention) Pre, Median (IQR) Post, Median (IQR) p value Intervention Group 1 Plaque scores 1.95 (2.43–1.6) 1.37 (1.79–1.17) < 0.001 Gingival Bleeding 3 (5 − 1) 1 (2 − 0) < 0.001 Semi intervention group 2 Plaque scores 1.96 (2.56–1.56) 1.89 (2.53–1.47) 0.35 Gingival Bleeding 4 ( 7 − 3) 4 (6 − 2) 0.06 Control Group 3 Plaque scores 2.15 (2.62–1.75) 2.03 ( 2.45–1.45) < 0.01 Gingival Bleeding 3 (5 − 2) 5 (7 − 2) < 0.01 Discussion Our study shows that oral health education to the school nurse in the schools are effective strategy for improving oral health outcomes among students. we observed significant reduction in plaque and gingival bleeding among the intervention group compared to control, that align with the previous studies by Subedi et al [ 9 ] and Ganesh et al [ 14 ], which reported that school based OHE programs improves the students oral health knowledge and practices, leading to better plaque control and gingival health with daily tooth brushing activity. This study prioritize the reinforced weekly OHE delivered by the school nurse to the students over three months, this approach is supported by Shenoy et al [ 10 ], who mentioned that more frequent OHE (three weeks interval) was more effective than less frequent time period of (six weeks interval). Our study showed that there is marked reduction in mean plaque index among intervention group (2.06 to 1.5) and bleeding gum (3.4 to 1.32) while control group showed minimal improvement or a worsening of the conditions. These results are consistent with similar interventions studies by Shahapur et al [ 15 ] and Reddy et al [ 16 ]. The need of the study highlights the high burden of oral disease among the students, our baseline data shows the high prevalence of dental caries 48.9% in primary teeth and 46.8% in the permanent dentition, which is higher than the study done by lee et al [ 17 ] and the global average of 43% in primary dentition and 28.7% in primary dentition according to the global health observatory, global status report on oral health 2023, World health Organization [ 18 ]. Which might be linked with the high percentage of children (46.2%) using non fluoridated toothpaste. This study provides a comprehensive distribution of the prevalence of MIH, 26.9% compared to the global prevalence rate [ 19 ]. The global average for MIH is 14.2%, however prevalence ranges widely from 2.4 to 40.2%. This indicates that MIH varies significantly among communities [ 20 ] School nurses represent a critical frontline resources in addressing this public health issue through integrated oral health promotion. The socio economic barrier and literacy rate among the older generation, and rural urban disparities limits access to dental services, where most of the children never visit the dentist which increase the chances of disease progression. The impact of OHE program depends upon the time interval of the education provided to the students. The study done in Nepal to evaluate the oral health related knowledge, attitude and practices among the student nurses shows adequate oral health Knowledge attitude and practice [ 21 ]. Hence we can reinforce this practices through oral health training to the school nurses by Dentist or dental professionals. There are very few study done to improve oral health through School nurses, Baginska et al [ 22 ] conducted the study that highlights the role of polish school nurses to promote the oral health among school children 7–19 years old, and concluded that school nurses have potentially crucial role in improving the oral health status of the children and pupils through oral health education, dietary counselling and fluoride prophylaxis, which supports our study, undoubtedly Dentist should support school nurses with provision of OHE training through local and national level. This nurse-led OHE program proved effective, the literature suggests its impact could be further enhanced by integrating our approach with supervised tooth-brushing programs, as supported by Damle et al [ 23 ]. A systematic review by Bramantoro et al. [ 24 ] confirms that school-based programs are most effective when they are comprehensive and repetitive. Future programs could also incorporate more engaging educational methods, such as games and drama [ 25 ], or adopt a holistic model that involves parents and teachers to achieve more sustainable outcomes [ 26 , 27 ]. The influence of school nurses often extends beyond the school environment, as educated children share knowledge with their family members, creating a ripple effect in oral health promotion. School nurses' acts as liaisons between families and dental health services which improve access to care, ensuring the necessary dental treatment and referral. Different studies done among school nurses regarding oral health shows significant improve in oral health of the school children through different oral health program and activities. Challenges and problems: Many school nurses lacks specialized oral health training, insufficient funding and materials limit the scope of oral health program that can be done in school. Inconsistent support from education and health policies often results in a lack of clear mandates for school nurses to prioritize oral health promotion. Furthermore, a key administrative challenge is the retention of school nurses, which undermines the continuity of any oral health program. Recommendation, way forward: Policy development: Advocate for the creation and enforcement of education and health policies that explicitly prioritize school-based oral health programs and designate clear responsibilities for school nurses. Develop and implement a standardized, nationwide oral health training curriculum to provide school nurses with the essential knowledge and practical skills for effective student care and education. Foster strategic partnerships between schools, dental professionals, and local health authorities to strengthen program initiatives, secure resources, and enhance community-wide awareness and support. Limitation: The scope of the study was confined to single district in Nepal, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other regions of the country. This study design employed non-random allocation of schools, introducing possible selection bias and confounding variables. Furthermore, duration of the study was of only three months, relatively short, which might be insufficient to capture long term sustainability of the behavior changes. The study focus was on students and and school nurses only, excluding other stakeholders like teachers and administrative staffs. Future research should aim to address through multisite, randomized trials with longer follow up periods. Benefit of this study: This program could be great milestone to prevent possible dental caries and gingival disease among students. This program will help them to adopt healthy life style with improve in oral health practice. Middle income Country like Nepal can adopt this type of program to empower existing school nurse to improve oral health related quality of life among the school children and further such program can be included in National Oral Health Policy of Nepal. Conclusion This study showed that empowering school nurses with oral health training is a highly effective strategy to improve oral hygiene and gingival health in school children, particularly in low and middle income countries with high disease prevalence where there is no provision of school dental nurses. The significant reduction in plaque and gingival bleeding in intervention group confirms that reinforced education delivered by the nurses is the effective way to control oral diseases rather than providing traditional one time oral health education to the school children. School Nurses have potential to influence children's oral health through education, early detection and community engagement. By prioritizing oral health promotion in the school health framework, Nepal can improve children's overall health outcomes and reduce the burden of oral health. However, overcoming barriers related to training, resources and policy support is essential to maximize their effectiveness. This information can help in future oral health promotion initiatives and preventive measures across the Nepal. This research will inform the policy makers and healthcare providers on the necessity of school-based preventive oral health programs. Declarations Ethical Considerations and consent to Participants This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences (IRC, KUSMS) with approval number 354/24 on dated January 2025. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all participating children (aged 7–15 years) prior to the commencement of the study. Additionally, verbal/written assent was obtained from the children themselves after explaining the study in a local Nepali language they could easily understand. Before the study, we had meeting with School nurses, teachers and stakeholders where we discussed about the programs in details and the letter of permission were taken from the respective three school before the study Consent for Publication Written informed consent was obtained from the participants, School Principals and School Nurses for the publication of this study. Competing Interest: None Funding: This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies. Author Contribution DP and SP Conceptualized and designed the study, developed the school nurse intervention protocol, and drafted the original manuscript. DP, DRP and RY Coordinated field activities in Nepal, supervised the school nurses, and was responsible for data collection and investigation among the 7–15-year-old participants.DP, RKC and SKM provided methodological guidance, reviewed and edited the manuscript for critical intellectual content, and provided administrative and technical support. DP and SP Acted as the project supervisor, secured necessary institutional resources, and provided final approval of the version to be published.All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.(DP: Dilip Prajapati, SP: Shaili Pradhan. DRP: Darpa Pradhan, RY: Ramesh Yadav, SKM: Swagat Kumar Yadav, RKC:Roshan Kumar Chaudhary) Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the school teachers, nurses and the education Development and Coordination Unit, Kavrepalanchowk, for the vital coordination of the program. We also extend our gratitude to the Nepal Health Research Council, Dhulikhel Hospital and the Kathmandu University School of medical Sciences for their invaluable support and guidance throughout this study. Data Availability Data analysed or generated in this study can be obtained on reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author. References World Health Organization. Strategy for oral health in South-East Asia, 2013–2020. New Delhi: World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2013 [cited 2016 Dec 4]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/205697 World Health Organization. Oral health country profile: Nepal 2022 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2022 [cited 2024 May 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/oral-health-npl-2022-country-profile Ministry of Health, Government of Bagmati Province. One School One Nurse Program Implementation Guideline, 2078. Hetauda (NP): Ministry of Health; 2021. Government of Nepal. Ministry of Health and Population. School Health and Nursing Service Directives 2081. Kathmandu (NP): Ministry of Health and Population; 2025 Jan. p. 9. Ayer R, Tiwari S, Jnawali SP, Van Dael R. A Study on Nepal’s National Health Insurance Program [Internet]. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2024 May [cited 2024 May 23]. Available from: https://www.adb.org/publications/study-nepal-national-health-insurance-program Medina-Solís CE, Ávila-Burgos L, Márquez-Corona MD, Medina-Solís JJ, Lucas-Rincón SE, Borges-Yañez SA, Fernández-Barrera MÁ, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Maupomé G. Out-of-pocket expenditures on dental care for schoolchildren aged 6 to 12 years: a cross-sectional estimate in a less-developed country setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):1997. Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Jamiołowski J, Kierklo A. Polish school nurses’ opinion and knowledge towards topical fluoride treatment. Acta Stomatol Croatica. 2019;53(2):150. D'cruz AM, Aradhya S. Impact of oral health education on oral hygiene knowledge, practices, plaque control and gingival health of 13-to 15‐year‐old school children in Bangalore city. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2013;11(2):126–33. Subedi K, Shrestha A, Bhagat T, Baral D. Effectiveness of oral health education intervention among 12–15-year-old school children in Dharan, Nepal: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):525. Shenoy RP, Sequeira PS. Effectiveness of a school dental education program in improving oral health knowledge and oral hygiene practices and status of 12-to 13-year-old school children. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(2):253–9. Joshi SK, Acharya K. Modification of Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale in the context of Nepal, 2019. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2019;17(65):1–2. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Weerheijm K. The European academy of paediatric dentistry and molar incisor hypomineralisation. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2015;16(3):233–4. Ganesh SA, Bhat PK, Jyothi C. Initial impact of health education program on oral health, knowledge and awareness among 15-year-old children of Governent High School, Sarakki, Bangalore. J Indian Association Public Health Dentistry. 2007;5(10):57–65. Shahapur RP, Shahapur PR. Evaluation of oral health education intervention on oral hygiene status among high school students. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013;4(2):39–44. Reddy MP, Lakshmi SV, Kulkarni S, Doshi D, Reddy BS, Shaheen SS. Impact of oral health education on plaque scores with and without periodic reinforcement among 12-year-old school children. J Indian Association Public Health Dentistry. 2016;14(2):116–20. Lee HJ, Prajapati D, Jin BH. Dental caries status and related modifiable factors among Nepali students. Community Dent Health. 2019;36(3):207–13. World Health Organization. Prevalence of untreated caries of deciduous teeth [Internet]. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. [cited 2024 May 23]. Jälevik B. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2010;11(2):59–64. Dave M, Taylor G. Global prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation. Evid-Based Dent. 2018;19(3):78–9. Bhattarai R, Khanal S, Rao GN, Shrestha S. Oral health related knowledge, attitude and practice among nursing students of Kathmandu–a pilot study. J Coll Med Sciences-Nepal. 2016;12(4):160–8. Baginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Kierklo A. The role of Polish school nurses in the oral health promotion for 7–19 year-old children and adolescents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):265–72. Damle SG, Patil A, Jain S, Damle D, Chopal N. Effectiveness of supervised toothbrushing and oral health education in improving oral hygiene status and practices of urban and rural school children: A comparative study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dentistry. 2014;4(3):175–81. Bramantoro T, Santoso CM, Hariyani N, Setyowati D, Zulfiana AA, Nor NA, et al. Effectiveness of the school-based oral health promotion programmes from preschool to high school: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0256007. John BJ, Asokan S, Shankar S. Evaluation of different health education interventions among preschoolers: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dentistry. 2013;31(2):96–9. Yekaninejad MS, Eshraghian MR, Nourijelyani K, Mohammad K, Foroushani AR, Zayeri F, Pakpour AH, Moscowchi A, Tarashi M. Effect of a school-based oral health‐education program on I ranian children: Results from a group randomized trial. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120(5):429–37. Saied-Moallemi Z, Virtanen JI, Vehkalahti MM, Tehranchi A, Murtomaa H. School‐based intervention to promote preadolescents’ gingival health: a community trial. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(6):518–26. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 07 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 05 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 03 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 01 Apr, 2026 Reviews received at journal 30 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 26 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Mar, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Mar, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 24 Mar, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 23 Mar, 2026 Editor invited by journal 23 Mar, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 22 Mar, 2026 First submitted to journal 22 Mar, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9028510","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":611706407,"identity":"de5fd1e9-7098-4bb7-b009-9957fad67902","order_by":0,"name":"Dilip Prajapati","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kathmandu University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dilip","middleName":"","lastName":"Prajapati","suffix":""},{"id":611706408,"identity":"428bff5f-14ca-4bdf-9f6a-4453485022c9","order_by":1,"name":"Swagat Kumar Mahanta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kathmandu University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Swagat","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Mahanta","suffix":""},{"id":611706409,"identity":"78ba4bfa-95c2-4bac-a81e-1720698effd3","order_by":2,"name":"Darpa Pradhan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Darpan Dental Home","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Darpa","middleName":"","lastName":"Pradhan","suffix":""},{"id":611706410,"identity":"dedbf5d4-c442-47fe-bbd9-9756ea0abff1","order_by":3,"name":"Roshan Kumar Chaudhary","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roshan","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Chaudhary","suffix":""},{"id":611706411,"identity":"86048be2-beb4-4894-a8d5-db8aa2cf13fe","order_by":4,"name":"Ramesh yadav","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kathmandu University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ramesh","middleName":"","lastName":"yadav","suffix":""},{"id":611706412,"identity":"930b9d97-4f5f-45e2-bea3-254b8b969c4f","order_by":5,"name":"Shaili Pradhan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shaili","middleName":"","lastName":"Pradhan","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-04 09:38:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":105455318,"identity":"825db54b-de9e-4a92-a4fc-0679f1b0cdf3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-26 08:59:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":637285,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9028510/v1/1810f713-4862-4540-b5f9-006c22b546cf.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Effectiveness of School Nurses promoting Oral Health among 7-15 Years old School Children in Nepal","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eUntreated dental caries is the most prevalent global health condition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e], often excluded from universal health coverage, with oral diseases affecting 70\u0026ndash;95% of school-aged children in Southeast Asia. This burden is particularly significant in low- and middle-income countries due to insufficient preventive and treatment services and health inequalities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Nepal, the \"National School Health and Nutrition Strategy\" and \"One School One Nurse\" program [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e] aim to strengthen health promotion, including through \"health ambassadors\" [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the National Health Insurance program offers limited or no oral health coverage [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], leading to high out-of-pocket expenditures, especially for lower-income households [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool nurses, despite their potential, are an underutilized resource in oral health promotion. Previous research highlights their crucial role and the effectiveness of reinforced oral health education [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of school nurses in promoting oral health among 7 to 15-year-old schoolchildren in Nepal's Kavre Palanchowk district.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe Quasi Experiment was conducted among 324 students (aged 7–15) from the three government schools in Kavre palanchowk district (1. Shree Bhaleshwor secondary school, Panauti Municipality. 2. Shree Roshi Secondary School, Roshi Rural Municipality 3. Shree Setidevi Secondary School, Ravi Opi. Dhulikhel Municipality). Baseline data were collected and follow up data were recorded after three months.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSample Size: A convenience sampling technique were used, with total sample size needed for this study was 297. This study considered 80% power and 95% CI where mean score of the experimental group was taken 0.78 ± 0.42 and mean score control group was taken: 0.94 ± 0.3822 from Shenoy et al [\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. Using the formula of sample size (n) = 2 (Z \u003csub\u003eα/2\u003c/sub\u003e + Z \u003csub\u003eβ\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e ϭ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e)/ (µ\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e − µ\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e Total sample size calculated 99 in each group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethods: This study was conducted from February to May 2025 where screening was done in the school premises by Nepal Medical Council registered dentist with sterilized dental kit and head lamp in the well illuminated area under universal precautions. Both verbal and written consent (Assent form) was taken from students, respective class teachers and parents. Two trained and calibrated dentists from Kathmandu University School of medical Sciences, collected the data from the participants including demographic details with Socio economic status, Kuppuswamy’s SES scale [\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. WHO Basic Oral health Surveys methods- Dentition status [\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e] was used to record Dentition status whereas Turesky–Gilmore–Glickman modification of the Quigley-Hein plaque index and Loe and Sillness Gingival index was used to record plaque and gingival status.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemographic details were recorded, height and weight were scaled to record body Mass index followed by three set of self-reported questions regarding tooth brushing frequency, type of toothpaste using and availability of the toothbrush. They were asked with the help of the pictures, whether they were using fluoridated or non-fluoridated toothpaste showing commonly used and available tooth paste in the Nepal. Regarding the Modified Kuppuswamy scale, Socio economic status of the parents, we provided each students with the chart to record the Education Level, occupation of the head of the household and average total monthly family income, data were recorded by the individual parents and submitted to the school teacher on the next day. Molar Incisor hypoplasia was recorded according to the European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Criteria (EAPD) [\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Two Tone\u003csup\u003e™\u003c/sup\u003e Disclosing Solution were used to reveal both older and newer plaque with the help of tweezer and cotton pellet. Gingival bleeding was recorded by drying the gingiva and periodontal probe and the recording was made based on gingival bleeding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree schools were selected according to the geographical, cultural and similar life style in the same district after the approval of the Education development and co-ordination unit, Kavrepalanchowk. The schools were divided into three groups. Group 1 (Intervention group, IG): Oral health education training (OHET) was given to school nurse at the respective school by the expert Public health Dentist (PI) followed by two days special oral health training in the department of Community and public health dentistry, Dhulikhel Hospital. OHET includes Introduction to Oral health, Prevention of Oral Disease, Common oral disease and condition of children, Role of plaque and calculus on gingival disease and dental caries, Role of fluoride, Tooth brushing technique and supervision. Weekly oral health education (One hour) was given to the students by the school nurse under supervision of the Investigators. Group 2 (Semi-intervention group, SIG): No oral health related training (OHET) was given to the school nurse at the respective school but one time oral health education was given to the students in the school premises by expert dentist regarding oral health promotion, importance of brushing and brushing technique only after baseline data collection. This in commonly practiced methods of oral health program in Nepal. Group 3 (Control group, CG): In this school, there was no oral health education training (OHET) given to the school nurse and students whereas, no supervision was done by the dentist regarding the program.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEligibility criteria: Students aged 7–15 years old from government schools from Kavre Palanchowk District where there must be recruitment of school nurses in School were included in this study. The participants must provide verbal consent and assent form for oral examination whereas children with systemic disease and or requiring emergency dental treatment, ongoing orthodontic treatment and those refuse to participate in this study will not be included in this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Analysis: Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subsequently imported into SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0) for analysis. A p-value of \u0026lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all inferential tests. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Non-parametric tests were employed for all comparative analyses. The Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to compare mean scores among the three independent study groups for paired comparisons of pre- and post-intervention data, within each group, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Result","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study was conducted among 324 government students age ranging from 7 to 15 years old, with 178 (54%) boys and 146 (46%) girls. Socio economic Status of the students were collected from the parents, where most of the students are from upper lower group 178(54.9%), followed by lower middle class 107 (33%), lower group 34 (10.5%) and only 5 (1.5%) belonged to upper middle group. surprisingly, 226 (69.5%) of the students were underweight, whereas 81(24.9%) of them had normal body mass index and only 2 of them are obese. (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemographic Distribution of the students.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(N, %)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN = 324\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7–11 years old\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e178 (54)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12–15 years old\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e146 (46)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e168 (51.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGirl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e156 (48.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocio Economic Status\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpper Middle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (1.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLower Middle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e107 (33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpper Lower\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e178 (54.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLower\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34 (10.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody Mass Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 Underweight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e226 (69.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 Normal BMI\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e81 (24.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 Over weight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 (4.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 Obese\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (0.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1. Shree Bhaleshwor Secondary School, Panauti\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e127 (39.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2. Shree Roshi Secondary School, Katunjebeshi\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e82 (25.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3. Shree Seti Devi Secondary School, Bhumlu\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e115 (35.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring the baseline data collection, 158 (48.9%) of the students had decayed primary tooth, dmft whereas 151(46.8%) of them had decayed permanent tooth, DMFT. The mean dmft and DMFT score of the students was 1.72 ± 2.29 (0–10) and 1.19 ± 1.67 (0–12). The overall plaque index score was 2.1 ± 0.64 and the mean gingival bleeding score was 3.99 ± 2.85. Self -reported oral hygiene questionnaire were asked to the students where 314 (96.6%) students had tooth brush, Nearly half of the children 150 (46.2%) use non-fluoridated toothpaste and more than half 172 (52.9%) of the students brush occasionally and six of them never brushes their teeth. (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline result of the students N = 324 (Mean and proportion)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003edmft\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean ± SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.72 ± 2.29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0–10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e158 (48.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDMFT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.19 ± 1.67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0–12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e151 (46.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePI\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.1 ± 0.64\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0–4.3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.99 ± 2.85\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0–17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e303 (93.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQ1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDo you have tooth brush\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e314 (96.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 (3.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQ2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhich tooth paste do you use\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFluoridated\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e171 (52.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon fluoridated\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e150 (46.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQ3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow many times do you brush your teeth?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOccasionally 172 (52.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOnce a day\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e114 (35.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwice a day\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e31 (9.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNever\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (1.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003edmft: primary decayed missing filled tooth\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eDMFT: permanent Decayed Missing Filled Tooth\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003ePI: Plaque Index\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eGB: Gingival bleeding\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eMolar Incisor hypo mineralisation (MIH) was present on 26.9% among 324 children, Type 1 MIH was most prevalent among other type classified by European Academy of paediatric dentistry where 18.8% have demarcated opacities with localized discoloration in enamel whereas only 1.9% of them have severe form of MIH (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDistribution of Molar Incisor hypoplasia among the students.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePresent N (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbsent N (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType of MIH present N (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e87 (26.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e237 (73.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbsent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e273 (73.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType 1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e61 (18.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType 2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20 (6.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMIH Distribution according to the school\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType 3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (1.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePresent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbsent\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool 1 N (%) 127\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44 ( 34.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83 (65.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool 2 N (%) 82\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22 (26.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60 (73.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool 3 N (%) 115\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21 9 (18.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94 (81.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe mean plaque index score for group 1 decreased from 2.06 ± 0.63 to 1.50 ± 0.54 whereas group 2 and group 3 showed very minimal decrease from 2.06 ± 0.68 to 2.02 ± 0.69 and 2.18 ± 0.64 to 2.06 ± 0.98. Overall, plaque levels were slightly improved across all groups with group 1 showing significant reduction in plaque scores (p \u0026lt; 0.05). (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) The mean gingival bleeding score for group 1 showed significant decrease from 3.4 ± 2.47 to 1.32 ± 1.20 suggesting clear improvement in gingival health whereas group 2 showed slight decrease from 4.94 ± 2.75 to 4.59 ± 2.662 suggesting slight improvement and group 3 showed increase from 3.97 ± 3.14 to 4.96 ± 3.18 suggesting deterioration of gingival health. (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring data analysis, dependent variables were tested for normality which showed skewed distribution. Hence non parametric tests were employed for comparison of paired data. Wilcoxon sign rank test was used for paired comparisons. (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) In Group 1, significant reduction in median plaque from 1.95 (2.43–1.6) to 1.37(1.79–1.17) were observed (p \u0026lt; 0.001). Median Gingival bleeding scores also showed significant reductions. In the semi intervention group median plaque scores showed slight reduction from 1.96 (2.56–1.56) to 1.89 (2.53–1.47), however the results were not statistically significant. Gingival bleeding remained constant at a median score of 4 pre and post intervention. For group 3, Plaque scores reduced slightly from 2.15 (2.62–1.75) to 2.03 (2.45–1.45). Gingival bleeding increased significantly from a median score of 3 (5 − 2) to 5 (7 − 2). (P \u0026lt; 0.05) However new carious lesion seems increased in all the groups with loss of follow up 17 (14.8%) in control group (not shown in the table)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparisons of gingival and plaque scores among intervention, semi intervention and control schools\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention group mean ± S.D\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSemi Intervention group mean ± S.D\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl group\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean ± S.D\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDMFT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.94 ± 1.29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.98 ± 1.28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.89 ± 1.33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.15 ± 1.47\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.67 ± 2.11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.86 ± 2.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlaque Index\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.06 ± 0.63\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.50 ± 0.54\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.06 ± 0.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.02 ± 0.69\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.18 ± 0.64\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.06 ± 0.98\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.4 ± 2.47\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.32 ± 1.20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.94 ± 2.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.59 ± 2.66\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.97 ± 3.14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.96 ± 3.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"8\"\u003eDMFT: Permanent Decayed Missing Filled Tooth\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"8\"\u003eGB: Gingival Bleeding\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of median plaque and gingival scores among case and control group (pre and post intervention)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre, Median (IQR)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost, Median (IQR)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ep value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention Group 1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlaque scores\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.95 (2.43–1.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.37 (1.79–1.17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGingival Bleeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (5 − 1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2 − 0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSemi intervention group 2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlaque scores\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.96 (2.56–1.56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.89 (2.53–1.47)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGingival Bleeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 ( 7 − 3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (6 − 2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl Group 3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlaque scores\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.15 (2.62–1.75)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.03 ( 2.45–1.45)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGingival Bleeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (5 − 2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (7 − 2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 0.01\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e Our study shows that oral health education to the school nurse in the schools are effective strategy for improving oral health outcomes among students. we observed significant reduction in plaque and gingival bleeding among the intervention group compared to control, that align with the previous studies by Subedi et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e] and Ganesh et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], which reported that school based OHE programs improves the students oral health knowledge and practices, leading to better plaque control and gingival health with daily tooth brushing activity. This study prioritize the reinforced weekly OHE delivered by the school nurse to the students over three months, this approach is supported by Shenoy et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e], who mentioned that more frequent OHE (three weeks interval) was more effective than less frequent time period of (six weeks interval). Our study showed that there is marked reduction in mean plaque index among intervention group (2.06 to 1.5) and bleeding gum (3.4 to 1.32) while control group showed minimal improvement or a worsening of the conditions. These results are consistent with similar interventions studies by Shahapur et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e] and Reddy et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe need of the study highlights the high burden of oral disease among the students, our baseline data shows the high prevalence of dental caries 48.9% in primary teeth and 46.8% in the permanent dentition, which is higher than the study done by lee et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e] and the global average of 43% in primary dentition and 28.7% in primary dentition according to the global health observatory, global status report on oral health 2023, World health Organization [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. Which might be linked with the high percentage of children (46.2%) using non fluoridated toothpaste. This study provides a comprehensive distribution of the prevalence of MIH, 26.9% compared to the global prevalence rate [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. The global average for MIH is 14.2%, however prevalence ranges widely from 2.4 to 40.2%. This indicates that MIH varies significantly among communities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool nurses represent a critical frontline resources in addressing this public health issue through integrated oral health promotion. The socio economic barrier and literacy rate among the older generation, and rural urban disparities limits access to dental services, where most of the children never visit the dentist which increase the chances of disease progression. The impact of OHE program depends upon the time interval of the education provided to the students. The study done in Nepal to evaluate the oral health related knowledge, attitude and practices among the student nurses shows adequate oral health Knowledge attitude and practice [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Hence we can reinforce this practices through oral health training to the school nurses by Dentist or dental professionals. There are very few study done to improve oral health through School nurses, Baginska et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e] conducted the study that highlights the role of polish school nurses to promote the oral health among school children 7\u0026ndash;19 years old, and concluded that school nurses have potentially crucial role in improving the oral health status of the children and pupils through oral health education, dietary counselling and fluoride prophylaxis, which supports our study, undoubtedly Dentist should support school nurses with provision of OHE training through local and national level.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis nurse-led OHE program proved effective, the literature suggests its impact could be further enhanced by integrating our approach with supervised tooth-brushing programs, as supported by Damle et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. A systematic review by Bramantoro et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e] confirms that school-based programs are most effective when they are comprehensive and repetitive. Future programs could also incorporate more engaging educational methods, such as games and drama [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e], or adopt a holistic model that involves parents and teachers to achieve more sustainable outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe influence of school nurses often extends beyond the school environment, as educated children share knowledge with their family members, creating a ripple effect in oral health promotion. School nurses' acts as liaisons between families and dental health services which improve access to care, ensuring the necessary\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003edental treatment and referral. Different studies done among school nurses regarding oral health shows significant improve in oral health of the school children through different oral health program and activities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenges and problems: Many school nurses lacks specialized oral health training, insufficient funding and materials limit the scope of oral health program that can be done in school. Inconsistent support from education and health policies often results in a lack of clear mandates for school nurses to prioritize oral health promotion. Furthermore, a key administrative challenge is the retention of school nurses, which undermines the continuity of any oral health program.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecommendation, way forward:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy development: Advocate for the creation and enforcement of education and health policies that explicitly prioritize school-based oral health programs and designate clear responsibilities for school nurses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eDevelop and implement a standardized, nationwide oral health training curriculum to provide school nurses with the essential knowledge and practical skills for effective student care and education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eFoster strategic partnerships between schools, dental professionals, and local health authorities to strengthen program initiatives, secure resources, and enhance community-wide awareness and support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimitation:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe scope of the study was confined to single district in Nepal, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other regions of the country. This study design employed non-random allocation of schools, introducing possible selection bias and confounding variables. Furthermore, duration of the study was of only three months, relatively short, which might be insufficient to capture long term sustainability of the behavior changes. The study focus was on students and and school nurses only, excluding other stakeholders like teachers and administrative staffs. Future research should aim to address through multisite, randomized trials with longer follow up periods.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBenefit of this study:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis program could be great milestone to prevent possible dental caries and gingival disease among students. This program will help them to adopt healthy life style with improve in oral health practice. Middle income Country like Nepal can adopt this type of program to empower existing school nurse to improve oral health related quality of life among the school children and further such program can be included in National Oral Health Policy of Nepal.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study showed that empowering school nurses with oral health training is a highly effective strategy to improve oral hygiene and gingival health in school children, particularly in low and middle income countries with high disease prevalence where there is no provision of school dental nurses. The significant reduction in plaque and gingival bleeding in intervention group confirms that reinforced education delivered by the nurses is the effective way to control oral diseases rather than providing traditional one time oral health education to the school children.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool Nurses have potential to influence children's oral health through education, early detection and community engagement. By prioritizing oral health promotion in the school health framework, Nepal can improve children's overall health outcomes and reduce the burden of oral health. However, overcoming barriers related to training, resources and policy support is essential to maximize their effectiveness. This information can help in future oral health promotion initiatives and preventive measures across the Nepal. This research will inform the policy makers and healthcare providers on the necessity of school-based preventive oral health programs.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":" \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eEthical Considerations and consent to Participants\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences (IRC, KUSMS) with approval number 354/24 on dated January 2025. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all participating children (aged 7\u0026ndash;15 years) prior to the commencement of the study. Additionally, verbal/written assent was obtained from the children themselves after explaining the study in a local Nepali language they could easily understand. Before the study, we had meeting with School nurses, teachers and stakeholders where we discussed about the programs in details and the letter of permission were taken from the respective three school before the study\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eConsent for Publication\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eWritten informed consent was obtained from the participants, School Principals and School Nurses for the publication of this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCompeting Interest:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNone\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eDP and SP Conceptualized and designed the study, developed the school nurse intervention protocol, and drafted the original manuscript. DP, DRP and RY Coordinated field activities in Nepal, supervised the school nurses, and was responsible for data collection and investigation among the 7\u0026ndash;15-year-old participants.DP, RKC and SKM provided methodological guidance, reviewed and edited the manuscript for critical intellectual content, and provided administrative and technical support. DP and SP Acted as the project supervisor, secured necessary institutional resources, and provided final approval of the version to be published.All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.(DP: Dilip Prajapati, SP: Shaili Pradhan. DRP: Darpa Pradhan, RY: Ramesh Yadav, SKM: Swagat Kumar Yadav, RKC:Roshan Kumar Chaudhary)\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to acknowledge the school teachers, nurses and the education Development and Coordination Unit, Kavrepalanchowk, for the vital coordination of the program. We also extend our gratitude to the Nepal Health Research Council, Dhulikhel Hospital and the Kathmandu University School of medical Sciences for their invaluable support and guidance throughout this study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eData Availability\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e Data analysed or generated in this study can be obtained on reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. Strategy for oral health in South-East Asia, 2013\u0026ndash;2020. New Delhi: World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2013 [cited 2016 Dec 4]. Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://iris.who.int/handle/10665/205697\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/205697\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. Oral health country profile: Nepal 2022 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2022 [cited 2024 May 23]. Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/publications/m/item/oral-health-npl-2022-country-profile\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/oral-health-npl-2022-country-profile\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMinistry of Health, Government of Bagmati Province. One School One Nurse Program Implementation Guideline, 2078. Hetauda (NP): Ministry of Health; 2021.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovernment of Nepal. Ministry of Health and Population. School Health and Nursing Service Directives 2081. Kathmandu (NP): Ministry of Health and Population; 2025 Jan. p. 9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAyer R, Tiwari S, Jnawali SP, Van Dael R. A Study on Nepal\u0026rsquo;s National Health Insurance Program [Internet]. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2024 May [cited 2024 May 23]. Available from: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.adb.org/publications/study-nepal-national-health-insurance-program\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.adb.org/publications/study-nepal-national-health-insurance-program\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMedina-Sol\u0026iacute;s CE, \u0026Aacute;vila-Burgos L, M\u0026aacute;rquez-Corona MD, Medina-Sol\u0026iacute;s JJ, Lucas-Rinc\u0026oacute;n SE, Borges-Ya\u0026ntilde;ez SA, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Barrera M\u0026Aacute;, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Maupom\u0026eacute; G. Out-of-pocket expenditures on dental care for schoolchildren aged 6 to 12 years: a cross-sectional estimate in a less-developed country setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):1997.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Jamiołowski J, Kierklo A. Polish school nurses\u0026rsquo; opinion and knowledge towards topical fluoride treatment. Acta Stomatol Croatica. 2019;53(2):150.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eD'cruz AM, Aradhya S. Impact of oral health education on oral hygiene knowledge, practices, plaque control and gingival health of 13-to 15‐year‐old school children in Bangalore city. Int J Dental Hygiene. 2013;11(2):126\u0026ndash;33.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSubedi K, Shrestha A, Bhagat T, Baral D. Effectiveness of oral health education intervention among 12\u0026ndash;15-year-old school children in Dharan, Nepal: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):525.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShenoy RP, Sequeira PS. Effectiveness of a school dental education program in improving oral health knowledge and oral hygiene practices and status of 12-to 13-year-old school children. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(2):253\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJoshi SK, Acharya K. Modification of Kuppuswamy\u0026rsquo;s socioeconomic status scale in the context of Nepal, 2019. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2019;17(65):1\u0026ndash;2.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeerheijm K. The European academy of paediatric dentistry and molar incisor hypomineralisation. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2015;16(3):233\u0026ndash;4.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGanesh SA, Bhat PK, Jyothi C. Initial impact of health education program on oral health, knowledge and awareness among 15-year-old children of Governent High School, Sarakki, Bangalore. J Indian Association Public Health Dentistry. 2007;5(10):57\u0026ndash;65.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShahapur RP, Shahapur PR. Evaluation of oral health education intervention on oral hygiene status among high school students. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013;4(2):39\u0026ndash;44.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eReddy MP, Lakshmi SV, Kulkarni S, Doshi D, Reddy BS, Shaheen SS. Impact of oral health education on plaque scores with and without periodic reinforcement among 12-year-old school children. J Indian Association Public Health Dentistry. 2016;14(2):116\u0026ndash;20.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee HJ, Prajapati D, Jin BH. Dental caries status and related modifiable factors among Nepali students. Community Dent Health. 2019;36(3):207\u0026ndash;13.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. Prevalence of untreated caries of deciduous teeth [Internet]. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. [cited 2024 May 23].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJ\u0026auml;levik B. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2010;11(2):59\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDave M, Taylor G. Global prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation. Evid-Based Dent. 2018;19(3):78\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBhattarai R, Khanal S, Rao GN, Shrestha S. Oral health related knowledge, attitude and practice among nursing students of Kathmandu\u0026ndash;a pilot study. J Coll Med Sciences-Nepal. 2016;12(4):160\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaginska J, Rodakowska E, Kobus A, Kierklo A. The role of Polish school nurses in the oral health promotion for 7\u0026ndash;19 year-old children and adolescents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):265\u0026ndash;72.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDamle SG, Patil A, Jain S, Damle D, Chopal N. Effectiveness of supervised toothbrushing and oral health education in improving oral hygiene status and practices of urban and rural school children: A comparative study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dentistry. 2014;4(3):175\u0026ndash;81.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBramantoro T, Santoso CM, Hariyani N, Setyowati D, Zulfiana AA, Nor NA, et al. Effectiveness of the school-based oral health promotion programmes from preschool to high school: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0256007.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohn BJ, Asokan S, Shankar S. Evaluation of different health education interventions among preschoolers: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dentistry. 2013;31(2):96\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYekaninejad MS, Eshraghian MR, Nourijelyani K, Mohammad K, Foroushani AR, Zayeri F, Pakpour AH, Moscowchi A, Tarashi M. Effect of a school-based oral health‐education program on I ranian children: Results from a group randomized trial. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120(5):429\u0026ndash;37.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaied-Moallemi Z, Virtanen JI, Vehkalahti MM, Tehranchi A, Murtomaa H. School‐based intervention to promote preadolescents\u0026rsquo; gingival health: a community trial. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(6):518\u0026ndash;26.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"bmc-public-health","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pubh","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Public Health](http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pubh/default.aspx","title":"BMC Public Health","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"dental caries, gingival disease, molar incisor hypo mineralization, plaque, school nurse, school oral health","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGingival diseases and dental caries are significant global burdens, especially in low- and middle income countries. The Nepal government has initiated the One School, One Nurse program in the county since 2019. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of school nurses leading in promoting oral health among schoolchildren in Nepal.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA prospective cohort study was conducted among 324 students (aged 7\u0026ndash;15) from three different government schools with school nurses in the Kavre district of Nepal. An intervention group received weekly reinforced oral health education from a trained school nurse. A semi-intervention group received a single education session, while a control group didn't receive any training or intervention. Expert dentists collected baseline and three months of follow-up data on dental caries, plaque index, and gingival index.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline data recorded high dental caries prevalence in both primary (48.9%) and permanent dentition (46.8%). Students (52.9%) brush their teeth occasionally, and 46.2% of them use non-fluoridated toothpaste. There was a significant reduction in the plaque score (2.06\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.63 to 1.50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.54) in the intervention group compared to the semi-intervention and control groups (2.06 to 2.02 and 2.18 to 2.06). There was improved gingival bleeding in the intervention group (3.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.47 to 1.32\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.20), whereas minimal improvement was observed in the semi-intervention group, and oral health status remained unchanged or worsened in the control group.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool nurses play a significant role in improving the gingival health of school children and are effective in promoting oral health among the school children, especially in the low- and middle-income countries where there is no provision of school dental nurses.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Effectiveness of School Nurses promoting Oral Health among 7-15 Years old School Children in Nepal","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-26 08:58:15","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9028510/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2026-04-07T07:04:48+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-06T02:08:17+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-03T06:02:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-01T06:33:36+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-03-30T08:14:21+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"157059842364701201728978156905868111719","date":"2026-03-26T05:30:58+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"206966157408188494641686087624398455005","date":"2026-03-25T03:24:56+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"169420617640304488599679598899190522840","date":"2026-03-24T14:07:29+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"5872764527055472248600920363098781644","date":"2026-03-24T11:47:45+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"75559631106429961530876754961490862900","date":"2026-03-24T11:20:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-03-24T11:15:10+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-03-23T11:59:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-03-23T11:13:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-03-22T09:03:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Public Health","date":"2026-03-22T07:22:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"bmc-public-health","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pubh","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Public Health](http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pubh/default.aspx","title":"BMC Public Health","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"ca0b7d6c-12e4-4875-92c6-d3ef0fc9e2ff","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 26th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"in-revision","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-07T07:11:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-26 08:58:15","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9028510","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9028510","identity":"rs-9028510","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.