Dividendstripping in Germany, Evidence from the German Futures-Market | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Dividendstripping in Germany, Evidence from the German Futures-Market Moritz Ferdinand Uttscheid This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This paper investigates whether it was actually possible to prevent abusive Cum/Ex and Cum/Cum transactions with legislative amendments made in 2012 (OGAWIV) and in2016 respectively 2018 (InvStRefG). As a result of an adapted environment due to these legal changes, variants of these transactions have emerged. This paper presents and examines these variants theoretically against the background of previous constellations and applicable legislation. Empirically, prior research has already found a gradual effective reduction of Cum/Cum and Cum/Ex transactions after 2012 and 2016 indicated by significant reductions in trading volume around the dividend ex dates. The empirical analyses in this pa- per support these findings and extent them by focusing on data up to 2023 in which another legislative amendment became effective in 2018. The results show, that, again, the trading volume significantly decreased after 2018. However, the remaining trading activity around the ex day, which is still observable up to now, gives reason to suspect that, although a large-scale volume reduction has been achieved, it has not been possible to suppress illegitimate variants of Cum/Ex and Cum/Cum transactions completely. To disentangle whether illegal or con- ventional legal forms of dividendstripping explain this remaining trading activity, additional analyses (based on longer time window and based on a subsample with high profit margins) are performed that however do not find significant support for this suspect. JEL Classification: H26 , G12 , G13 , K34 Cum/Ex Cum/Cum Futures Trading Volume Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6334966","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":451704825,"identity":"6ba0190b-e6db-4d92-ae4f-ba0c16ee7015","order_by":0,"name":"Moritz Ferdinand Uttscheid","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Würzburg","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Moritz","middleName":"Ferdinand","lastName":"Uttscheid","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-03-29 15:38:16","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96366255,"identity":"eccecf8a-9840-46cf-89a8-0a57e3125243","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-20 10:11:19","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2384882,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"UttscheidMoritz.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6334966/v1_covered_84adacfe-3722-4ff7-ac22-3c9c03e64ce1.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Dividendstripping in Germany, Evidence from the German Futures-Market","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Cum/Ex, Cum/Cum, Futures, Trading Volume","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper investigates whether it was actually possible to prevent abusive Cum/Ex and Cum/Cum transactions with legislative amendments made in 2012 (OGAWIV) and in2016 respectively 2018 (InvStRefG). As a result of an adapted environment due to these legal changes, variants of these transactions have emerged. This paper presents and examines these variants theoretically against the background of previous constellations and applicable legislation. Empirically, prior research has already found a gradual effective reduction of Cum/Cum and Cum/Ex transactions after 2012 and 2016 indicated by significant reductions in trading volume around the dividend ex dates. The empirical analyses in this pa- per support these findings and extent them by focusing on data up to 2023 in which another legislative amendment became effective in 2018. The results show, that, again, the trading volume significantly decreased after 2018. However, the remaining trading activity around the ex day, which is still observable up to now, gives reason to suspect that, although a large-scale volume reduction has been achieved, it has not been possible to suppress illegitimate variants of Cum/Ex and Cum/Cum transactions completely. To disentangle whether illegal or con- ventional legal forms of dividendstripping explain this remaining trading activity, additional analyses (based on longer time window and based on a subsample with high profit margins) are performed that however do not find significant support for this suspect.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJEL Classification: H26 , G12 , G13 , K34\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Dividendstripping in Germany, Evidence from the German Futures-Market","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-05 01:39:33","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6334966/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a68f2de7-55bb-4ab4-919e-cf7dd15789ad","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 5th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-03T11:38:13+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-05 01:39:33","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6334966","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6334966","identity":"rs-6334966","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.