Testing the mutation accumulation hypothesis in aging with AlphaGenome

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,698 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The mutation accumulation (MA) hypothesis posits that somatic mutations progressively escape selection and degrade tissue function during aging. Direct tests of this idea have been limited by the difficulty of predicting, at scale, the molecular consequences of individual somatic variants. Here I use AlphaGenome, a sequence-to-function deep learning model, to systematically score the predicted transcriptional impact of somatic mutations under a nested series of designs spanning individual variants, co-occurring variant bundles, and real mutation catalogues. First, I characterize the genome-wide effect-size baseline by scoring 4,000 random single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in colon tissue, together with 1-Mb-window combined-effect tests. Second, I extend this baseline to gene-body resolution with a 60-cell × 4,000-SNV simulation and pseudobulk RNA-seq aggregation. Third, I analyze the real somatic mutation catalogue of Cagan et al. (Nature, 2022), scoring 54,158 substitutions and 9,799 indels from 54 mouse colonic crypts plus three human samples, together with region- and gene-level enrichment tests against GENCODE. Across all analyses, both random and real somatic variants, including single-nucleotide variants and indels, produce predicted expression changes whose distributions lie three to four orders of magnitude below the tissue’s endogenous aging transcriptional program. These results argue against a simple, direct mutation-accumulation explanation for the age-associated transcriptional signature of colonic epithelium and redirect attention to epigenetic and regulatory mechanisms. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00