Over‐the‐Counter Provision of Oral Contraceptive Pills for Patients With Dysmenorrhea, Suspected or Confirmed Endometriosis or Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gaps

In: Reproductive, Female and Child Health · 2026 · vol. 5(1) · doi:10.1002/rfc2.70040 · W7128777225
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This systematic review found no eligible studies evaluating the effectiveness, values, preferences, or cost of over-the-counter oral contraceptive pills for self-managing dysmenorrhea.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost associated with over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills for self‐managing dysmenorrhea, including symptoms related to suspected or confirmed endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain. Methods Comprehensive searches of peer‐reviewed and grey literature were conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE) from inception through to April 2025 and screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Results No eligible studies were identified. We found no evidence evaluating the effectiveness, values and preferences, or cost of over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills compared to standard of care for managing dysmenorrhea. Conclusion The absence of evidence highlights an important research gap in the use of self‐management strategies for dysmenorrhea. Future studies could evaluate comparative outcomes, implementation models, and preferences of women affected by dysmenorrhea, including in low‐ and middle‐income settings and among underserved communities. A phased approach, such as pharmacist‐led over‐the‐counter access, could address current access barriers while providing critical data to guide future policy decisions. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42024616792.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrhea

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK