The role of GnRH agonists plus add-back therapy in the treatment of endometriosis
This review examines studies on GnRH agonists with add-back therapies, such as estrogen and progestin regimens, to improve bone metabolism and lesion atrophy in endometriosis treatment.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper reviews evidence on how GnRH agonists work for symptomatic endometriosis, attributing lesion regression to iatrogenic hypoestrogenism and noting that a consistent decrease in bone mass limits long-term use. It describes regulatory constraints (e.g., maximum six months in the context of endometriosis) and explains that high recurrence of pelvic symptoms after stopping therapy motivates strategies to improve safety for longer treatment. The review discusses emerging ideas about maintaining an “ideal” estradiol range to support normal bone metabolism while still inducing endometriotic lesion atrophy, and it summarizes studies of add-back regimens using different substances, including estrogen and progestins, with variable results. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on GnRH agonists plus add-back therapy to address both efficacy and long-term safety.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,645 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-02T06:10:09.037253+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:52.568893+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine