The Utility of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Assessing Complex Infertility Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study on Uterine, Ovarian, and Unexplained Factors

article OA: green CC0

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects a substantial percentage of couples globally, with complex cases often involving uterine, ovarian, or unexplained factors that remain challenging to diagnose accurately. Although non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasound and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are widely used, their limitations in sensitivity and specificity underscore the need for diagnostic laparoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing complex infertility cases, specifically focusing on uterine, ovarian, and unexplained factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women presenting with either primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following standard clinical assessments, including ultrasonography and hormonal profiling. Data were collected on uterine anomalies, ovarian cysts, PCOD, and unexplained infertility cases, and were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. Results: Uterine abnormalities, primarily fibroids, were identified in 12% of cases, mainly among primary infertility patients. Ovarian factors, including PCOD and ovarian cysts, were detected in 20% of cases across both primary and secondary infertility groups. Additionally, 12% of cases were classified as unexplained infertility due to the absence of identifiable abnormalities. Diagnostic laparoscopy provided higher detection rates for these factors compared to conventional imaging techniques, underscoring its role in cases where non-invasive methods were inconclusive. Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying complex infertility factors, offering a reliable and safe method for comprehensive infertility evaluation. Its high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting uterine, ovarian, and unexplained infertility factors, supports its use as a routine investigative procedure in infertility workups. Recommendations: Laparoscopy should be considered for routine use in infertility evaluations, especially for patients with complex or unexplained infertility, to improve diagnosis and guide targeted treatment.
Full text 7,805 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Background

Infertility affects a substantial percentage of couples globally, with complex cases often involving uterine, ovarian, or unexplained factors that remain challenging to diagnose accurately. Although non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasound and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are widely used, their limitations in sensitivity and specificity underscore the need for diagnostic laparoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing complex infertility cases, specifically focusing on uterine, ovarian, and unexplained factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women presenting with either primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following standard clinical assessments, including ultrasonography and hormonal profiling. Data were collected on uterine anomalies, ovarian cysts, PCOD, and unexplained infertility cases, and were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. Results: Uterine abnormalities, primarily fibroids, were identified in 12% of cases, mainly among primary infertility patients. Ovarian factors, including PCOD and ovarian cysts, were detected in 20% of cases across both primary and secondary infertility groups. Additionally, 12% of cases were classified as unexplained infertility due to the absence of identifiable abnormalities. Diagnostic laparoscopy provided higher detection rates for these factors compared to conventional imaging techniques, underscoring its role in cases where non-invasive methods were inconclusive. Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying complex infertility factors, offering a reliable and safe method for comprehensive infertility evaluation. Its high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting uterine, ovarian, and unexplained infertility factors, supports its use as a routine investigative procedure in infertility workups. Recommendations: Laparoscopy should be considered for routine use in infertility evaluations, especially for patients with complex or unexplained infertility, to improve diagnosis and guide targeted treatment.

Abstract

(English)

Background

Infertility affects a substantial percentage of couples globally, with complex cases often involving uterine, ovarian, or unexplained factors that remain challenging to diagnose accurately. Although non-invasive imaging methods such as ultrasound and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are widely used, their limitations in sensitivity and specificity underscore the need for diagnostic laparoscopy, a minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing complex infertility cases, specifically focusing on uterine, ovarian, and unexplained factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 women presenting with either primary or secondary infertility. Each participant underwent diagnostic laparoscopy following standard clinical assessments, including ultrasonography and hormonal profiling. Data were collected on uterine anomalies, ovarian cysts, PCOD, and unexplained infertility cases, and were analyzed to compare findings between primary and secondary infertility groups. Results: Uterine abnormalities, primarily fibroids, were identified in 12% of cases, mainly among primary infertility patients. Ovarian factors, including PCOD and ovarian cysts, were detected in 20% of cases across both primary and secondary infertility groups. Additionally, 12% of cases were classified as unexplained infertility due to the absence of identifiable abnormalities. Diagnostic laparoscopy provided higher detection rates for these factors compared to conventional imaging techniques, underscoring its role in cases where non-invasive methods were inconclusive. Conclusion: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for identifying complex infertility factors, offering a reliable and safe method for comprehensive infertility evaluation. Its high diagnostic accuracy, particularly for detecting uterine, ovarian, and unexplained infertility factors, supports its use as a routine investigative procedure in infertility workups. Recommendations: Laparoscopy should be considered for routine use in infertility evaluations, especially for patients with complex or unexplained infertility, to improve diagnosis and guide targeted treatment. Files IJPCR,Vol16,Issue12,Article10.pdf Files (295.3 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:940803183ed9f4f3765c5d4338262a71 | 295.3 kB | Preview Download | Additional details Dates - Accepted - 2024-12-05 Software - Repository URL - http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue12,Article10.pdf - Development Status - Active

References

- 1. Venus Bansal DS, Bhavani BH, Avasthi K, Goyal A. To study the role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility. 2. Panchal DN, Shah A. Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec 1;5(12):4180-3. 3. Shree A. Role of Diagnostic HysteroLaparoscopy in Evaluation of Female Infertility (Master's thesis, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)). 4. Dutta S, Mazumder P, Mishra D, Saha JK. Study on Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of HSG & Laparoscopy in Infertility. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020 Mar 23;9(12):937-43. 5. Jahan S. Role of laparoscopy in infertility. BIRDEM Medical Journal. 2012 Oct 22;2(2): 99-103. 6. Foroozanfard F, Sadat Z. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for tubal patency in infertile women. Nursing and midwifery studies. 2013 Jun;2(2):188. 7. Varlas V, Rhazi Y, Cloțea E, Borș RG, Mirică RM, Bacalbașa N. Hysterolaparoscopy: a gold standard for diagnosing and treating infertility and benign uterine pathology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Aug 23;10(16):3749. 8. Carbonnel M, Goetgheluck J, Frati A, Even M, Ayoubi JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for infertility treatment: current views. Fertility and Sterility. 2014 Mar 1;101(3):621-6. 9. Al Ahwal LM, Saeed Dawood AE, Raof Farahat MA, Gawad Hadwa IM. Laparoscopic assessment of the tubo ovarian relationship in unexplained infertility. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2022 Mar 8:86-98. 10. Selim R, Al Gergawy AE, Shaheen KA, Balaha MH. The role of combined diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in unexplained infertility. International Surgery Journal. 2022 Jul 26;9(8) :1395-405. 11. Gordts S. O-024 Endoscopic management of the unexplained infertility, what does it add?. Human Reproduction. 2021 Jul 1;36 (Supplement_1):deab126-004. 12. Thimmappa SS, Datti SN. Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Female Subfertility Factors: Experience in Rural MedicalCollege. 13. Hamed IA, Shady NW, Ait-Allah AS. The Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Unexplained Infertility Cases. Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences. 2021 Nov 8;2(4):57-63. 14. Dash B. Screening of infertility by laparoscopy in a medical college and hospital of eastern India: a clinical study. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018. 15. Kasem SB, Sultana N, Begum F, Razzaque SA, Adiba R, Anika S. Laparoscopic Evaluation of Primary and Secondary Subfertility. Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;33(2):143-8.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T17:55:41.139562+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK