Cumulative live birth rates in egg donor IVF cycles with or without endometrial scratching: Is there a residual effect in subsequent embryo transfers? Follow-up results of a RCT in clinical practice
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This randomized controlled trial investigated whether endometrial scratching in previous egg donor IVF cycles impacts cumulative live birth rates in subsequent embryo transfers.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
IntroductionEndometrial scratching (ES) is a simple technique that has been claimed to improve pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. Our objective was to acknowledge the effects of ES in subsequent embryo transfers by assessing the cumulative live birth rates (LBR) in patients undergoing egg-donor in vitro fertilization (IVF).Material and methodsWe performed a follow-up analysis of the cumulative reproductive outcomes of the 352 patients included in the Endoscratch Trial (NCT03108157) during the twelve months following the randomization date. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent an ES for the second and/or successive embryo transfers versus those who did not have an ES performed, in order to determine a possible carry over effect that could lead to different LBR in these groups.ResultsOur analysis reveals that both groups (with and without ES performed before the first embryo transfer) had similar cumulative LBR (69.9% vs 65.9% in group A and B respectively, RR: 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92 - 1.22, p = 0.42). When we analyzed the results comparing patients who had received at least an ES before any of the embryo transfers during that period, we did not find any differences in LBR either (68.0% in patients with at least an ES and 67.8% in patients without ES, RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.87 - 1.16, p = 0.96).ConclusionAccording to our results, we cannot state that ES has a long term effect on endometrial receptivity of egg recipients as cumulative LBR do not differ from those of patients who do not receive it.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (23)
- Does local injury to the endometrium before IVF cycle really affect treatment outcome? Results of a randomized placebo controlled trial via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.043 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e32832a0654 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/0974-1208.63116 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deu213 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s12884-020-02958-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.004 via openalex
- W6702994221 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejmoa1808737 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dey242 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dew053 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/09513590.2016.1190818 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.040 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijgo.12355 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.022 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.025 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/medicina55090527 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s43032-020-00204-8 via openalex
- doi:10.29252/ijrm.14.3.193 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00345-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.029 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:04:04.317202+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK