A Modern Network Approach to Revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) Construct Validity
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
Exploratory Graph Analysis was used across two large samples to examine the PANAS factor structure, confirming a two-factor oblique structure and assessing dimensionality stability and item assignments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Scale (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor-analytic literature. The main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PANAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. EGA was used to: (1) estimate the dimensionality of the PANAS scores, (2) establish the stability of the dimensionality estimate and of the item assignments into the dimensions, and (3) assess the impact of potential redundancies across item pairs on the dimensionality and structure of the PANAS scores. This assessment was carried out across two studies that included two large samples of participants. In sum, the results are consistent with a two-factor oblique structure.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00