Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 12,694 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements Vijaya Holla, Brandon Lane, Jesse Redford, Philipp Kopp, Stefan Kollmannsberger This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Dec, 2025 Read the published version in Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation → Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Numerical simulation models for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) vary in complexity and fidelity, ranging from high-fidelity models that capture melt pool dynamics to simplified models suited for part-scale temperature predictions and process optimizations. Validation against experimental data is essential to build confidence in their predictive capabilities. However, for in-situ thermographic measurements, a direct comparison is challenging due to the data’s size and the multi-scale nature of the process. Similarities must be analyzed at different spatial and temporal scales based on the model’s fidelity and its intended application. For example, agreement between a thermal simulation and measurement in a steady-state scenario does not guarantee accuracy during transient phases. Statistical similarity measures provide a quantitative means to assess model-measurement agreement, highlighting regions of high and low similarity. In this work, we validate a thermal simulation model, discretized using the space-time finite element method, against thermographic camera measurements using various similarity metrics and evaluate their applicability to PBF-LB/M. We also propose a multi-scale similarity assessment approach tailored to model fidelity and application. Thermal simulation Model-Measurement comparison Similarity Tests Space-Time Finite Element Method Thermography Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 12 Dec, 2025 Read the published version in Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation → Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7536866","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-05 07:27:07","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":516607987,"identity":"2fc12e7d-9279-4731-a33d-de49ca6bcbec","order_by":0,"name":"Vijaya Holla","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-0818","institution":"Technical University of Munich","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vijaya","middleName":"","lastName":"Holla","suffix":""},{"id":516607988,"identity":"5f77182a-7d79-412d-b6f2-aa568098f06d","order_by":1,"name":"Brandon Lane","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Brandon","middleName":"","lastName":"Lane","suffix":""},{"id":516607990,"identity":"c80ad76a-7687-4a3e-8f9e-ec87c90cc455","order_by":2,"name":"Jesse Redford","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jesse","middleName":"","lastName":"Redford","suffix":""},{"id":516607992,"identity":"52f76988-6d66-45de-9f5f-a1f15d8b5445","order_by":3,"name":"Philipp Kopp","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bauhaus-Universität, Weimar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Kopp","suffix":""},{"id":516607993,"identity":"480979c3-bcd4-438a-ab9f-dcb569c3fa42","order_by":4,"name":"Stefan Kollmannsberger","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bauhaus-Universität, Weimar","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Stefan","middleName":"","lastName":"Kollmannsberger","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-04 14:00:27","currentVersionCode":2,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-025-00430-5","type":"published","date":"2025-12-12T15:58:11+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":98245317,"identity":"cc328838-e6a0-422e-9e62-f62194d95973","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-15 16:17:41","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":8968176,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ModeMeasurementcomparison.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7536866/v2_covered_174c5bc2-f44e-437b-8f19-483dfe803cdf.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Technical University of Munich","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Thermal simulation, Model-Measurement comparison, Similarity Tests, Space-Time Finite Element Method, Thermography","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Numerical simulation models for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) vary in complexity and fidelity, ranging from high-fidelity models that capture melt pool dynamics to simplified models suited for part-scale temperature predictions and process optimizations. Validation against experimental data is essential to build confidence in their predictive capabilities. However, for in-situ thermographic measurements, a direct comparison is challenging due to the data’s size and the multi-scale nature of the process. Similarities must be analyzed at different spatial and temporal scales based on the model’s fidelity and its intended application. For example, agreement between a thermal simulation and measurement in a steady-state scenario does not guarantee accuracy during transient phases. Statistical similarity measures provide a quantitative means to assess model-measurement agreement, highlighting regions of high and low similarity. In this work, we validate a thermal simulation model, discretized using the space-time finite element method, against thermographic camera measurements using various similarity metrics and evaluate their applicability to PBF-LB/M. We also propose a multi-scale similarity assessment approach tailored to model fidelity and application.","manuscriptTitle":"Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":2,"date":"2025-09-17 14:59:14","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7536866/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"3f5e6326-00f2-4f32-aad3-9c118c83a868","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 17th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-15T16:13:54+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-7536866","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-025-00430-5","journal":{"identity":"integrating-materials-and-manufacturing-innovation","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation"},"publishedOn":"2025-12-12 15:58:11","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 12th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-17 14:59:14","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s40192-025-00430-5","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-025-00430-5","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v2","identity":"rs-7536866","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7536866","identity":"rs-7536866","version":["v2"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00