Expanding cholera serosurveillance to vaccinated populations

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studied how to estimate cholera seroincidence in populations that have received oral cholera vaccines, using antibody dynamics measured over time in Bangladesh and Haiti. The authors analyzed 757 longitudinal serum samples from confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 cases and uninfected contacts, plus vaccinees, using a multiplex bead assay to quantify IgG, IgM, and IgA binding to five cholera-specific antigens; they found infection induced stronger and broader antibody responses than vaccination, with CTB and TcpA antibody rises uniquely associated with infection. Prior random forest seroincidence models often misclassified vaccinated individuals as recently infected during the first four months post-vaccination, and the study’s new random forest approaches used vaccinee data to keep false positives among vaccinated low (about 1%) without substantial sensitivity loss. The authors report that simulated serosurveys could yield unbiased seroincidence estimates within 21 days of vaccination campaigns by accounting for vaccination status or using updated models, in order to reduce bias due to immune responses shared by vaccination and infection, though the performance is based on their modeling and simulated scenarios. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,992 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Mass oral cholera vaccination campaigns targeted at subnational areas with high incidence are central to global cholera elimination efforts. Serological surveillance offers a complementary approach to address gaps in clinical surveillance in these regions. However, similar immune responses from vaccination and infection can lead to overestimates of incidence of infection. To address this, we analyzed antibody dynamics in infected and vaccinated individuals to refine seroincidence estimation strategies for partially vaccinated populations. We tested 757 longitudinal serum samples from confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 cases and uninfected contacts in Bangladesh as well as vaccinees from Bangladesh and Haiti, using a multiplex bead assay to measure IgG, IgM, and IgA binding to five cholera-specific antigens. Infection elicited stronger and broader antibody responses than vaccination, with rises in cholera toxin B-subunit (CTB) and toxin-coregulated pilus A (TcpA) antibodies uniquely associated with infection. Previously proposed random forest models frequently misclassified vaccinated individuals as recently infected (over 20% at some time points) during the first four months post-vaccination. To address this, we developed new random forest models incorporating vaccinee data, which kept false positive rates among vaccinated (1%) and unvaccinated (4%) individuals low without a significant loss in sensitivity. Simulated serosurveys demonstrated that unbiased seroincidence estimates could be achieved within 21 days of vaccination campaigns by ascertaining vaccination status of participants or applying updated models. These approaches to overcome biases in serological surveillance enable reliable seroincidence estimation even in areas with recent vaccination campaigns enhancing the utility of serological surveillance as an epidemiologic tool in moderate-to-high cholera incidence settings. Significance statement Serological surveillance can improve how we monitor cholera in high burden areas where clinical surveillance is limited. However, vaccination can produce immune responses similar to infection, leading to overestimates in seroincidence. This study extends seroincidence estimation techniques using machine learning models to partially vaccinated populations. We analyzed antibody dynamics from vaccinated and infected individuals to develop methods that reduce misclassification of vaccinated individuals as recently infected. These methods enable reliable seroincidence estimates in areas with recent vaccination campaigns, providing a step toward better epidemiologic monitoring in the context of global cholera control initiatives. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This research was supported through programs funded by the National Institutes of Health, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases including R01 AI137164 (JBH, RCC), R37 (SBC), R01 AI106878 (ETR, FQ), R01AI099243 (JBH, LCI), U01 AI058935, U01 HD39165 (SBC, FQ, ETR), R01 AI135115 (DTL), the Fogarty International Center, Training Grant in Vaccine Development and Public Health (TW005572 [RB, MK]), and Emerging Global Fellowship Award TW010362 (TRB). We are grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden and the UK for providing core/unrestricted support to icddr,b. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: These studies were approved by the Research Review Committee and Ethical Review Committee of the icddr,b, the IRB of the Massachusetts General Hospital (2013P002604) and the Haitian National Bioethics Committee (Ref:1415-81). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00