Dissecting current rectification through asymmetric nanopores

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Rectification, the tendency of bidirectional ionic conductors to favor ion flow in a specific direction, is an intrinsic property of many ion channels and synthetic nanopores. Despite its frequent occurrence in ion channels and its phenomenological explanation using Eyring’s rate theory, a quantitative relationship between the rectified current and the underlying ion-specific and voltage-dependent free energy profile has been lacking. In this study, we designed nanopores in which potassium and chloride current rectification can be manipulated by altering the electrostatic pore polarity. Using molecular dynamics-based free energy simulations, we quantified voltage-dependent changes of free energy barriers in six ion-nanopore systems. Our results illustrate how the energy barriers for inward and outward fluxes become unequal in the presence of an electromotive driving force, leading to varying degrees of rectification for cation and anion currents. This work establishes a direct link between equilibrium potential of mean force and current rectification rate and demonstrates that rectification caused by energy barrier asymmetry depends on the nature of the permeating ion, can be tuned by pore polarity, does not require ion binding sites, conformational flexibility, or specific pore geometry, and, as such, may be widespread among ion channels. Statement of significance In many ion channels, ions flow faster in one direction than the other, even under equal magnitude of driving forces. This phenomenon, known as rectification, often arises as an intrinsic biophysical property of the channel pore and has significant physiological implications. Our molecular dynamics simulations provide a unified framework to dissect the free energy profiles that underpin current rectification. This approach has broad applications in the field of ion channel biology and material design.
Full text 1,981 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Rectification, the tendency of bidirectional ionic conductors to favor ion flow in a specific direction, is an intrinsic property of many ion channels and synthetic nanopores. Despite its frequent occurrence in ion channels and its phenomenological explanation using Eyring’s rate theory, a quantitative relationship between the rectified current and the underlying ion-specific and voltage-dependent free energy profile has been lacking. In this study, we designed nanopores in which potassium and chloride current rectification can be manipulated by altering the electrostatic pore polarity. Using molecular dynamics-based free energy simulations, we quantified voltage-dependent changes of free energy barriers in six ion-nanopore systems. Our results illustrate how the energy barriers for inward and outward fluxes become unequal in the presence of an electromotive driving force, leading to varying degrees of rectification for cation and anion currents. This work establishes a direct link between equilibrium potential of mean force and current rectification rate and demonstrates that rectification caused by energy barrier asymmetry depends on the nature of the permeating ion, can be tuned by pore polarity, does not require ion binding sites, conformational flexibility, or specific pore geometry, and, as such, may be widespread among ion channels. Statement of significance In many ion channels, ions flow faster in one direction than the other, even under equal magnitude of driving forces. This phenomenon, known as rectification, often arises as an intrinsic biophysical property of the channel pore and has significant physiological implications. Our molecular dynamics simulations provide a unified framework to dissect the free energy profiles that underpin current rectification. This approach has broad applications in the field of ion channel biology and material design. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00