Functional distinction between ionic and electric ephaptic effects on neuronal firing dynamics

Abstract Neuronal activity alters extracellular ion concentrations and electric potentials. Ephaptic effects refer to the feedback influence that these extracellular changes can have on neuronal activity. While electric ephaptic effects occur on a fast timescale due to extracellular potential perturbations, ionic ephaptic effects are driven by slower, accumulative changes in ion concentrations. Among the previous computational studies of ephaptic effects, the vast majority have focused exclusively on electric effects, while ionic ephaptic effects have largely been neglected. In this work, we present an electrodiffusive computational framework consisting of two-compartment neurons that interact via a shared extracellular space. By accounting for both electric potentials and ion-concentration dynamics in a self-consistent manner, our framework enables us to explore the relative roles of electric and ionic ephaptic effects. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that ionic and electric ephaptic interactions play very different roles. While ionic ephaptic interactions increase population firing rates, electric ephaptic interactions primarily drive subtle shifts in spike timing. Furthermore, we show that these spike shifts cause the phase difference (the distance in spike times between a small collection of neurons) to converge to a stable, unique phase difference, which we coin the ephaptic intrinsic phase preference. Author summary Neurons predominantly communicate through synapses: specialized contact points where a brief electrical signal, known as a spike or action potential, in one neuron influences another. Neurons generate these spikes by exchanging ions with the surrounding extracellular space. This way, spiking neurons alter extracellular ion concentrations and electric potentials. Since neurons are sensitive to such changes in their environment, they can also influence one another indirectly through the shared extracellular medium. This form of non-synaptic interaction is known as ephaptic coupling. Most computational models of neuronal activity neglect ephaptic interactions, and those that include them typically consider only electric effects while ignoring ionic contributions. As a result, the relative roles of electric and ionic ephaptic effects remain poorly understood. Here, we introduce a computational framework that accounts for both mechanisms in a self-consistent way. Our results show a functional distinction: ionic ephaptic effects act slowly, regulating population firing rates, whereas electric ephaptic effects act on millisecond timescales and subtly shift spike timing. These shifts cause spike-time differences between neurons to converge to a stable value, a phenomenon we call ephaptic intrinsic phase preference. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.