Pelvic recurrence of stage 1a well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma after 13 years: A case report.

OA: closed
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text

The provided text contains only journal metadata and policy information, lacking the actual abstract or full text of the case report titled "Pelvic recurrence of stage 1a well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma after 13 years." Consequently, no specific study population, methodology, clinical findings, or limitations can be extracted for summary. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A great majority of endometrial carcinoma recurrences are observed in high-risk patients and within the first 3 years of treatment. The relapse of endometrial carcinoma occurring more than 10 years after initial treatment has rarely been described. Initially diagnosed and treated for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 1a, grade 1 adenocarcinoma, our patient presented 13 years later with an isolated pelvic recurrence, demonstrating, to our knowledge, the longest disease-free interval with recurrence in the pelvis reported in literature. After surgical resection, the patient is being considered for enrollment in a clinical trial. Despite favorable prognostic features, it is possible to observe the recurrence of endometrial carcinoma even 5 years after surveillance and remission. Successful salvage therapies are available but may depend upon early diagnosis.
Full text 531 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
- About Us - Editorial Board - Journal Policies - Advertising - Allegations of Misconduct - Appeals and Complaints - Archiving and Preservation - Article Processing Charges (APC) - Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Authorship and Contributorship - Conflicts of Interest - Copyright and Licensing - Data Availability and Reproducibility - Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy - Editorial Oversight - Ethical Misconduct - Open Access - Peer Review Policy - Post Publication Discussions - Research Ethics - Instructions - Contact Us

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00