SEA-G: A Coherence Diagnostic for Galactic Architecture in Large Surveys

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

We present SEA-G (Synthesis & Estimation Architecture-Galaxies), an assumption-light diagnostic framework for comparative analysis of galactic architecture in large surveys. Each galaxy is represented by a minimal latent architectural state derived from structural, kinematic, stellar population, and starformation observables. Internal consistency among these dimensions is quantified by a coverage-weighted coherence metric, Cg, enabling regime classification and identification of architecturally disrupted or transitional systems. We apply SEA-G to 512,436 low-redshift galaxies (z < 0.1) from the DESI DR1 Bright Galaxy Survey and to 1,982 galaxies from SDSS-IV MaNGA DR17 with resolved kinematics. The coherence distribution is stable under normalization and threshold variation, with a low-coherence fraction of 17±3% in DESI and 11 ± 2% in MaNGA. Low-coherence systems are significantly enriched in known transitional populations (green valley, post-starburst, kinematically misaligned), with odds ratios OR = 1.9 ± 0.2 from logistic regression controlling for stellar mass and star-formation rate. Gaussian mixture modeling favors a two-component description of the coherence distribution (∆BIC = 18.4 ± 2.1). SEA-G does not infer causal evolutionary pathways. Instead, it provides a reproducible diagnostic layer that integrates heterogeneous observables into a single interpretable scalar, complementing forward modeling and enabling systematic triage in next-generation galaxy surveys. This paper forms part of a broader series developing the Synthesis & Estimation Architecture (SEA) as a domain-general framework for coherence-based diagnostics and observability-limited inference across astrophysical systems.
Full text 6,845 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
SEA-G: A Coherence Diagnostic for Galactic Architecture in Large Surveys | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 18 February 2026 V1 Latest version Share on SEA-G: A Coherence Diagnostic for Galactic Architecture in Large Surveys Author : Peter Brunzelle 0009-0005-7109-6745 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177143662.27581868/v1 110 views 57 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract We present SEA-G (Synthesis & Estimation Architecture-Galaxies), an assumption-light diagnostic framework for comparative analysis of galactic architecture in large surveys. Each galaxy is represented by a minimal latent architectural state derived from structural, kinematic, stellar population, and starformation observables. Internal consistency among these dimensions is quantified by a coverage-weighted coherence metric, Cg, enabling regime classification and identification of architecturally disrupted or transitional systems. We apply SEA-G to 512,436 low-redshift galaxies (z < 0.1) from the DESI DR1 Bright Galaxy Survey and to 1,982 galaxies from SDSS-IV MaNGA DR17 with resolved kinematics. The coherence distribution is stable under normalization and threshold variation, with a low-coherence fraction of 17±3% in DESI and 11 ± 2% in MaNGA. Low-coherence systems are significantly enriched in known transitional populations (green valley, post-starburst, kinematically misaligned), with odds ratios OR = 1.9 ± 0.2 from logistic regression controlling for stellar mass and star-formation rate. Gaussian mixture modeling favors a two-component description of the coherence distribution (∆BIC = 18.4 ± 2.1). SEA-G does not infer causal evolutionary pathways. Instead, it provides a reproducible diagnostic layer that integrates heterogeneous observables into a single interpretable scalar, complementing forward modeling and enabling systematic triage in next-generation galaxy surveys. This paper forms part of a broader series developing the Synthesis & Estimation Architecture (SEA) as a domain-general framework for coherence-based diagnostics and observability-limited inference across astrophysical systems. Supplementary Material File (sea_g__a_coherence_diagnostic_for_galactic_architecture_in_large_surveys (2).pdf) Download 272.78 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 18 February 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Keywords architectural disruption coherence diagnostics galactic architecture galaxy transition regimes large-scale galaxy surveys latent state modeling sea statistical consistency metrics survey-scale classification Authors Affiliations Peter Brunzelle 0009-0005-7109-6745 [email protected] Independent Researcher View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 110 views 57 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Peter Brunzelle. SEA-G: A Coherence Diagnostic for Galactic Architecture in Large Surveys. Authorea . 18 February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.177143662.27581868/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.177143662.27581868/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe4c8057a0558f4',t:'MTc3OTIxMTMyMQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00