Effects of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in patients with adenomyosis
In a retrospective cohort of patients with adenomyosis, adding a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation yielded greater 12-month improvements in pain, menstrual volume, and uterine volume than ablation alone.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 70 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis who underwent either laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation alone or the same procedure combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The researchers compared changes in visual analog scale pain scores, menstrual volume, and uterine volume over a 12-month follow-up period between the two treatment groups. Results indicated that adding the intrauterine device to radiofrequency ablation led to significantly greater reductions in pain, menstrual bleeding, and uterine size compared to ablation alone. The authors noted that these preliminary findings require confirmation through larger prospective studies with longer follow-up durations to establish definitive efficacy. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically comparing surgical ablation techniques with hormonal adjunct therapy for symptom management.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,356 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-10-10T06:01:16.085653+00:00