Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel

Endometriosis is a common entity causing chronic pain and infertility in women. The gold standard method for diagnosis is diagnostic laparoscopy, which is invasive and costly. MRI has shown promise in its ability to diagnose endometriosis and its efficacy for preoperative planning. The Society of Abdominal Radiology established a Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) to improve patient care for patients with endometriosis. In this article, the DFP performs a literature review and uses its own experience to provide technical recommendations on optimizing MRI Pelvis for the evaluation of endometriosis. Similar content being viewed by others

Luciano, D.E. and A.A. Luciano, Management of endometriosis-related pain: an update. Womens Health (Lond), 2011. 7(5): p. 585-90. Falcone, T. and R. Flyckt, Clinical Management of Endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 131(3): p. 557-571. Chapron, C., et al., Ovarian endometrioma: severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2012. 27(3): p. 702-11. Guerriero, S., et al., Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018. 51(5): p. 586-595. Moura, A.P.C., et al., Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2019. 14(4): p. e0214842. Bazot, M., et al., Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2007. 22(5): p. 1457-63. Group, O.C.f.E.B.M.L.o.E.W. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. 2011 August 22, 2019]. Andrews, J., et al., GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013. 66(7): p. 719-25. Andrews, J.C., et al., GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013. 66(7): p. 726-35. Zondervan, K.T., et al., Endometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2018. 4(1): p. 9. Bhosale, P.R., et al., ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group. Ultrasound Q, 2016. 32(2): p. 108-15. Expert Panel on Women’s, I., et al., ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Postmenopausal Subacute or Chronic Pelvic Pain. J Am Coll Radiol, 2018. 15(11S): p. S365-S372. Nisenblat, V., et al., Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016. 2: p. Cd009591. Chen, Y.H., D.B. Wang, and C.S. Guo, Accuracy of Physical Examination, Transvaginal Sonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Rectal Endoscopic Sonography for Preoperative Evaluation of Rectovaginal Endometriosis. Ultrasound Q, 2019. 35(1): p. 54-60. Bazot, M. and E. Darai, Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril, 2017. 108(6): p. 886-894. Abrao, M.S., et al., Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2007. 22(12): p. 3092-7. Burla, L., et al., The ENZIAN score as a preoperative MRI-based classification instrument for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019. 300(1): p. 109-116. Tornqvist, E., et al., Impact of extended written information on patient anxiety and image motion artifacts during magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol, 2006. 47(5): p. 474-80. Powell, R., et al., Improving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations: Development and evaluation of an intervention to reduce movement in scanners and facilitate scan completion. Br J Health Psychol, 2015. 20(3): p. 449-65. Bazot, M., et al., European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol, 2017. 27(7): p. 2765-2775. Thomeer, M.G., et al., Can magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-Tesla reliably detect patients with endometriosis? Initial results. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014. 40(4): p. 1051-8. Chang, K.J., et al., 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics, 2008. 28(7): p. 1983-98. Bartlett, D.J., et al., Comparison of routine pelvic US and MR imaging in patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019. Puglielli, E., E. Di Cesare, and C. Masciocchi, Rectal endometriosis: MRI study with rectal coil. Eur Radiol, 2004. 14(12): p. 2362-3. Balleyguier, C., et al., Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing bladder endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2002. 9(1): p. 15-23. Roy, C., et al., Efficiency of MR imaging to orientate surgical treatment of posterior deep pelvic endometriosis. Abdom Imaging, 2009. 34(2): p. 251-9. Kinkel, K., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 1999. 14(4): p. 1080-6. Bruder, O., et al., 2015 Update on Acute Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium based Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular MR. Large Multi-National and Multi-Ethnical Population Experience With 37788 Patients From the EuroCMR Registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2015. 17: p. 58. Neeley, C., et al., Acute side effects of three commonly used gadolinium contrast agents in the paediatric population. Br J Radiol, 2016. 89(1063): p. 20160027. Morgan, D.E., et al., Assessment of adverse reaction rates during gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging in 28,078 patients. Radiology, 2011. 259(1): p. 109-16. Bazot, M., et al., Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril, 2009. 92(6): p. 1825-33. Chapron, C., et al., Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod, 2017. 32(7): p. 1393-1401. Gimonet, H., et al., Is pelvic MRI in women presenting with pelvic endometriosis suggestive of associated ileal, appendicular, or cecal involvement? Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016. 41(12): p. 2404-2410. Philip, C.A., et al., Correlation between three-dimensional rectosonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: a preliminary study on the first fifty cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015. 187: p. 35-40. Saba, L., et al., Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results. Eur Radiol, 2014. 24(2): p. 335-43. Chamie, L.P., et al., Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiographics, 2011. 31(4): p. E77-100. Yoon, J.H., et al., Deep rectosigmoid endometriosis: “mushroom cap” sign on T2-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Imaging, 2010. 35(6): p. 726-31. Faccioli, N., et al., Evaluation of colonic involvement in endometriosis: double-contrast barium enema vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging, 2010. 35(4): p. 414-21. Schneider, C., et al., MRI technique for the preoperative evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: current status and protocol recommendation. Clin Radiol, 2016. 71(3): p. 179-94. Chamie, L.P., et al., Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and preoperative assessment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009. 106(3): p. 198-201. Scardapane, A., et al., Diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis: contribution of contrast enhanced MR-colonography. Eur Radiol, 2011. 21(7): p. 1553-63. Takeuchi, H., et al., A novel technique using magnetic resonance imaging jelly for evaluation of rectovaginal endometriosis. Fertil Steril, 2005. 83(2): p. 442-7. Loubeyre, P., et al., Pictorial review: rectosigmoid endometriosis on MRI with gel opacification after rectosigmoid colon cleansing. Clin Imaging, 2012. 36(4): p. 295-300. Uyttenhove, F., et al., Deep infiltrating endometriosis: Should rectal and vaginal opacification be systematically used in MR imaging? Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 2016. 44(6): p. 322-8. Hottat, N., et al., Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results. Radiology, 2009. 253(1): p. 126-34. Fiaschetti, V., et al., Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: evaluation of retro-cervical space on MRI after vaginal opacification. Eur J Radiol, 2012. 81(11): p. 3638-45. Chassang, M., et al., Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol, 2010. 20(4): p. 1003-10. Kikuchi, I., et al., Evaluation of the usefulness of the MRI jelly method for diagnosing complete cul-de-sac obliteration. Biomed Res Int, 2014. 2014: p. 437962. Brown, M.A., et al., MRI of the female pelvis using vaginal gel. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005. 185(5): p. 1221-7. Loubeyre, P., et al., Anatomic distribution of posterior deeply infiltrating endometriosis on MRI after vaginal and rectal gel opacification. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009. 192(6): p. 1625-31. Engelaere, C., et al., Pelvic MRI: Is Endovaginal or Rectal Filling Needed? Korean J Radiol, 2018. 19(3): p. 397-409. Macario, S., et al., The Value of Pelvic MRI in the Diagnosis of Posterior Cul-De-Sac Obliteration in Cases of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2012. 199(6): p. 1410-1415. Bazot, M., et al., Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images. Eur J Radiol, 2011. 80(3): p. e331-9. Belghiti, J., et al., Contribution of Computed Tomography Enema and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Lesions in Patients With Colorectal Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015. 22(5): p. 776-84. Valentini, A.L., et al., How to improve MRI accuracy in detecting deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis: MRI findings vs. laparoscopy and histopathology. Radiol Med, 2014. 119(5): p. 291-7. Froehlich, J.M., et al., Aperistaltic effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide versus glucagon on the small bowel assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol, 2009. 19(6): p. 1387-93. Gutzeit, A., et al., Evaluation of the anti-peristaltic effect of glucagon and hyoscine on the small bowel: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular drug administration. European Radiology, 2012. 22(6): p. 1186-1194. Chernish, S.M. and D.D. Maglinte, Glucagon: common untoward reactions--review and recommendations. Radiology, 1990. 177(1): p. 145-6. Skucas, J., The Use of Antispasmodic Drugs during Barium Enemas. American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994. 162(6): p. 1323-1325. Oppenheimer, J., C.E. Ray, Jr., and K.L. Kondo, Miscellaneous pharmaceutical agents in interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2010. 27(4): p. 422-30. Dillman, J.R., et al., IV Glucagon Use in Pediatric MR Enterography: Effect on Image Quality, Length of Examination, and Patient Tolerance. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2013. 201(1): p. 185-189. GlucaGen [package insert]. 2018, Novo Nordisk: Bagsvaerd, Denmark. Information for the physician. Glucagon for Injection, E. Lilly, Editor. 2018. Ghobrial, P.M., et al., Cine MR enterography grading of small bowel peristalsis: evaluation of the antiperistaltic effectiveness of sublingual hyoscyamine sulfate. Acad Radiol, 2014. 21(1): p. 86-91. Barentsz, J.O., S.H. Ruijs, and S.P. Strijk, The role of MR imaging in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1993. 160(5): p. 937-47. Shinagare, A.B., et al., Urinary bladder: normal appearance and mimics of malignancy at CT urography. Cancer Imaging, 2011. 11: p. 100-8. Manganaro, L., et al., Feasibility of 3.0T pelvic MR imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis. Eur J Radiol, 2012. 81(6): p. 1381-7. Zanardi, R., et al., Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society. Abdom Imaging, 2003. 28(5): p. 733-42. Zanardi, R., et al., Staging of pelvic endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging compared with the laparoscopic classification of the American Fertility Society: a prospective study. Radiol Med, 2003. 105(4): p. 326-38. Bazot, M., et al., Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology, 2004. 232(2): p. 379-89. Coutinho, A., Jr., et al., MR imaging in deep pelvic endometriosis: a pictorial essay. Radiographics, 2011. 31(2): p. 549-67. Foti, P.V., et al., Endometriosis: clinical features, MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging, 2018. 9(2): p. 149-172. Morisawa, N., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of decidualized endometriotic cysts: comparative study with ovarian cancers associated with endometriotic cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2014. 38(6): p. 879-84. Bazot, M., et al., Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results. Clin Radiol, 2013. 68(1): p. 47-54. Saba, L., et al., MRI and “tenderness guided” transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of recto-sigmoid endometriosis. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012. 35(2): p. 352-60. Di Paola, V., et al., Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol, 2015. 84(4): p. 568-74. Bazot, M., et al., Value of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images to assess uterosacral ligament endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2011. 26(2): p. 346-53. Bazot, M., et al., The value of MRI in assessing parametrial involvement in endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2012. 27(8): p. 2352-8. Ha, H.K., et al., Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: fat-suppressed T1-weighted vs conventional MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1994. 163(1): p. 127-31. Ito, T.E., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply infiltrative endometriosis. Fertil Steril, 2017. 107(2): p. e11-e12. Tanaka, Y.O., et al., MR staging of pelvic endometriosis: role of fat-suppression T1-weighted images. Radiat Med, 1996. 14(3): p. 111-6. Cornfeld, D.M., et al., Pelvic imaging using a T1W fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008. 28(1): p. 121-7. Togashi, K., et al., Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology, 1991. 180(1): p. 73-8. Heaps, J.M., R.K. Nieberg, and J.S. Berek, Malignant neoplasms arising in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol, 1990. 75(6): p. 1023-8. Scully, R.E., G.S. Richardson, and J.F. Barlow, The development of malignancy in endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1966. 9(2): p. 384-411. Takeuchi, M., et al., Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics, 2006. 26(2): p. 407-17. Suzuki, S., et al., MR findings of ruptured endometrial cyst: comparison with tubo-ovarian abscess. Eur J Radiol, 2012. 81(11): p. 3631-7. Qayyum, A., Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics, 2009. 29(6): p. 1797-810. Nakayama, T., et al., Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005. 22(2): p. 271-8. Busard, M.P., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of (deep infiltrating) endometriosis: the value of diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010. 32(4): p. 1003-9. Balaban, M., et al., The utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of endometriomas from hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. Clinical Imaging, 2015. 39(5): p. 830-833. Lee, N.K., et al., Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts in the ovary. Acta Radiol, 2016. 57(8): p. 998-1005. Genc, B., et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of hormonal cyclic changes in abdominal wall endometriomas. Clin Radiol, 2014. 69(2): p. 130-6. Silvera, S., et al., Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma on diffusion-weighted images: influence of T2-shine-through and T2-blackout effects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005. 26(2): p. 236-41. Namimoto, T., et al., Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases. Eur Radiol, 2009. 19(3): p. 745-60. Davarpanah, A.H., et al., Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016. 41(12): p. 2466-2475. Malek, M., et al., Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015. 16(8): p. 3407-12. Kim, H.J., et al., The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Lesions: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 2016. 11(2): p. e0149465. Robinson, K.A., et al., Understanding malignant transformation of endometriosis: imaging features with pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019. Solak, A., et al., Diagnostic value of susceptibility-weighted imaging of abdominal wall endometriomas during the cyclic menstrual changes: a preliminary study. Eur J Radiol, 2013. 82(9): p. e411-6. Takahashi, N., et al., Usefulness of T2 star-weighted imaging in ovarian cysts and tumors. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016. 42(10): p. 1336-1342. Cimsit, C., et al., Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: preliminary results. Acta Radiol, 2016. 57(7): p. 878-85. Takeuchi, M., K. Matsuzaki, and H. Nishitani, Susceptibility-weighted MRI of endometrioma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008. 191(5): p. 1366-70.

The authors thank Sonia Watson, PhD for assistance with formatting the images. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Tong, A., VanBuren, W.M., Chamié, L. et al. Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol 45, 1569–1586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02483-w Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02483-w