The round ligament of the uterus: Questioning its distal insertion

In: Morphologie · 2018 · vol. 102(337) , pp. 55–60 · doi:10.1016/j.morpho.2018.04.001 · PMID:29731327 · W2801103869
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10

This paper reviews the anatomical literature to question the commonly accepted distal insertion of the round ligament of the uterus.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeClassically, the round ligament of the uterus (RLU) attaches distally in the ipsilateral labia majora. This attachment has rarely been described in adults. That is why we have performed an anatomical study focused on this distal ending.PatientsWe performed in 2015 the cadaveric dissection of 19 RLU.MethodsIn all cases, the RLU was individualized on its entire length from its uterine origin to the inguinal canal. Then this canal was open from its internal orifice to its external orifice. We described the distal attachment of the RLU according four areas: before the internal inguinal ring, after the external inguinal ring, under the pubic bone and in labia majora.ResultsWe found 3 types of distal attachments with first an attachment after the external inguinal ring in more than half of cases (52.6%). Then, before the internal inguinal ring (26.3%) and under the pubic bone (22.1%). No RLU was found inlabia majora. However, the proximal attachment seems constant at the antero-superior face of uterus, near the tubo-uterine junction like its pelvic path under the broad ligament.ConclusionIn adult, the RLU is a structure, which begins at the cranio-ventral part of the uterine bottom near the tubo-uterine junction. Then it passes under the broad ligament and reaches the inguinal canal, that it crosses in more half of cases. However, 3 distal attachment areas have been identified but never in the labia majora. Indeed, some anatomical information available in anatomical treaties seems not correct and should be amended.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (2)

References (25)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:53:22.067783+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK