Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Small and Normal-Sized Uterus

In: Hysterectomy · 2017 · pp. 499–553 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_35 · W2754856906
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-13

This paper discusses the development and current status of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for normal-sized uteri, noting its advantages and key procedural considerations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This chapter reviews the evolution and current practice of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for small and normal-sized uteri, describing surgical assessment, trocar placement, instrument considerations, prophylaxis, and potential adjuncts. It reports that, for normal-sized uterus cases, laparoscopic hysterectomy has become a standard operation with low complication rates, a regular learning curve, and advantages over vaginal hysterectomy such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, earlier return to activities, and fewer infections, while allowing simultaneous treatment of comorbidities like endometriosis or adhesions. The chapter emphasizes limitations/caveats through the need for correct preoperative sizing and location assessment and the necessity to discuss decisions such as whether to use morcellation, perform laparoscopic steps, or consider oophorectomy/salpingectomy, implying that outcomes depend on these procedural choices. Relevance to endometriosis: the chapter explicitly notes that laparoscopic hysterectomy’s advantage over vaginal hysterectomy includes the possibility to simultaneously treat comorbidities such as endometriosis, though the paper’s main focus is technical/procedural guidance for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 8,679 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The basic concept of laparoscopic hysterectomy was developed by Kurt Semm and Liselotte Mettler in the 1980s. However, the instruments and techniques used at the time (endotherm and loop) did not keep pace with the development of intrafascial hysterectomy. Advancements in instruments, technical support, and consistent training have considerably improved the procedure. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the normal-sized uterus has become a standard operation with low complication rates and a regular learning curve. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, earlier return to normal activities, and fewer infections. Its major advantage over vaginal hysterectomy is the possibility to simultaneously treat comorbidities, such as endometriosis or adhesions. Laparoscopic supracervical/subtotal hysterectomy is a useful alternative. Its advantages and disadvantages need to be discussed with the patient; the final decision is made jointly by the doctor and the patient. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be given for all types of hysterectomy. The first step is a correct assessment of the size and location of the uterus (clinical examination and ultrasound scan). The next step is to determine the positions of trocars and the manipulator. The following questions have to be answered: (1) Are disposable instruments required? (2) Are more than two ancillary trocars necessary? What trocar diameter should be used and what is the best location? (3) Is morcellation necessary or can the uterus be removed through the vagina? (4) Do any other operative steps have to be considered, such as the treatment of endometriosis, adnexal masses, or adhesions? (5) How is the vaginal cuff to be closed? Oophorectomy and/or salpingectomy should be considered; their advantages and disadvantages should be included in the patient’s counseling. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Kovac SR. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(1):58–71. Schollmeyer T et al. Hysterectomy trends over a 9-year period in an endoscopic teaching center. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;126(1):45–9. Lefebvre G et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(1):37–61. quiz 74–6. Stang A, Merrill RM, Kuss O. Hysterectomy in Germany: a DRG-based nationwide analysis, 2005–2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(30):508–14. Brummer TH, Seppala TT, Harkki PS. National learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000–2005. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):840–5. Prevention, C.f.D.C.a., Women’s reproductive health: hysterectomy fact sheet, D.o.R. Health, Editor. 2009: 1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Hanstede MM et al. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(2):220–5. Alkatout I et al. Precarious preoperative diagnostics and hints for the laparoscopic excision of uterine adenomatoid tumors: two exemplary cases and literature review. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1119 e5–8. Alkatout I et al. Principles and safety measures of electrosurgery in laparoscopy. JSLS. 2012;16(1):130–9. Hughes E, et al., Ovulation suppression for endometriosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3): p. CD000155. Lethaby A, V Ivanova, NP Johnson. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2): p. CD004993. Thakar R et al. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(17):1318–25. Gorlero F et al. Hysterectomy and women satisfaction: total versus subtotal technique. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):405–10. Roovers JP et al. Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2003;327(7418):774–8. Ascher-Walsh CJ et al. Location of adenomyosis in total hysterectomy specimens. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10(3):360–2. Sarmini OR, Lefholz K, Froeschke HP. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(2):121–4. BMI, Demography Report: Report of the German federal government on the demographic situation and future development of the country 2011, German Federal Ministry of the Interior. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):489–97. Olsen AL et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6. Symmonds RE, Pratt JH. Vaginal prolapse following hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;79:899–909. Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L. Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(1):13–7. Marchionni M et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(8):679–84. Swift SE, Pound T, Dias JK. Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(3):187–92. Elessawy M et al. The incidence of complications by hysterectomy for benign disease in correlation to an assumed preoperative score. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;292(1):127–33. Reich H. Laparoscopic oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in the treatment of benign tubo-ovarian disease. Int J Fertil. 1987;32(3):233–6. Mettler L et al. Comparative evaluation of classical intrafascial-supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) with transuterine mucosal resection as performed by pelviscopy and laparotomy–our first 200 cases. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(4):418–23. Semm K. Hysterectomy via laparotomy or pelviscopy. A new CASH method without colpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991;51(12):996–1003. Hohl MK, Hauser N. Safe total intrafascial laparoscopic (TAIL) hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7(3):231–9. Schüssler B, Scheidel P, Hohl MK. Hysterektomie update. Frauenheilkunde aktuell. 2008;3:4–12. Veress J. Neues Instrument zur Ausführung von Brust- und Bauchpunktionen und Pneumothoraxbehandlung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1938;64:1480–1. Alkatout I et al. Abdominal anatomy in the context of port placement and trocars. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(4):241–51. Kramer L. Mixed reviews on removing fallopian tubes to prevent ovarian cancer. CMAJ. 2013;185(9):E391–2. Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer–shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(7):918–31. Caceres A, McCarus SD. Fallopian tube prolapse after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(2 Pt 2):494–5. Altman D et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):572 e1–6. Thompson JD, Warshaw J. Hysterectomy. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, editors. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia-New York: Lippincott Raven; 1996. p. 771–854. van Herendael B. Strategies to prevent vaginal vault descent during hysterectomy. In: Mettler L, editor. Manual of new hysterectomy techniques. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2007. p. 82–5. Hur HC et al. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):311–7. Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR. Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):859–65. Wall LL. A technique for modified McCall culdeplasty at the time of abdominal hysterectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178(5):507–9. Ostrzenski A. A new, simplified posterior culdoplasty and vaginal vault suspension during abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;49(1):25–34. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland About this chapter Cite this chapter Alkatout, I. (2018). Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Small and Normal-Sized Uterus. In: Alkatout, I., Mettler, L. (eds) Hysterectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_35 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_35 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22496-1 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22497-8 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (39)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK