Comparison of oocyte quality in IVF/ICSI cycles between patients with histologically proven endometriosis and patients where endometriosis has been excluded by laparoscopy
This conference, hosted by the International Chemistry & Technology Society, provides a platform for chemistry professionals to present research, network, and advance their careers while exhibiting new technologies and services.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper compares oocyte quality outcomes in IVF/ICSI cycles between two groups: patients with histologically proven endometriosis and patients in whom endometriosis was excluded via laparoscopy. It reports differences in oocyte quality between these populations, attributing any observed variation to the presence versus absence of endometriosis as confirmed by surgical/histological criteria. The text provided does not include details on specific endpoints, results, or limitations beyond the stated study design. Relevance to endometriosis: this paper directly addresses endometriosis status (histologically proven vs excluded by laparoscopy) as the key comparison in IVF/ICSI oocyte-quality outcomes, making it centrally about endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
523 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00