The matrix stiffness is increased in the eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis patients: a study based on atomic force microscopy and histochemistry

other OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This study compared mechanical properties and fibrosis-related features in eutopic endometrium from women with adenomyosis (n=6) versus controls without adenomyosis (n=6), using atomic force microscopy with histologic staining performed in the secretory phase. The authors found that adenomyosis samples had a significantly higher Young’s modulus than controls (21.21±1.63 vs 4.73±0.38 kPa) and that collagen fiber arrangement was more disordered and cross-linked, although collagen fiber diameter did not differ significantly between groups. They assessed fibrosis using hematoxylin-eosin, Picrosirius red, and Masson’s trichrome and quantified collagen staining by ImageJ. The paper’s main explicit limitation is the small sample size (6 per group). This paper is centrally about adenomyosis—demonstrating increased stiffness and altered collagen organization in the eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis patients measured by atomic force microscopy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Previous ultrasound studies suggest that patients with adenomyosis (AM) exhibit increased uterine cavity stiffness, although direct evidence regarding extracellular matrix (ECM) content and its specific impact on endometrial stiffness remains limited. This study utilized atomic force microscopy to directly measure endometrial stiffness and collagen morphology, enabling a detailed analysis of the endometrium's mechanical properties: through this approach, we established direct evidence of increased endometrial stiffness and fibrosis in patients with AM. Endometrial specimens were also stained with Picrosirius red or Masson's trichrome to quantify fibrosis, and additional analyses assessed α-SMA and Ki-67 expression. Studies indicate that pathological conditions significantly influence the mechanical properties of endometrial tissue. Specifically, adenomyotic endometrial tissue demonstrates increased stiffness, associated with elevated ECM and fibrosis content, whereas normal endometrial samples are softer with lower ECM content. AM appears to alter both the mechanical and histological characteristics of the eutopic endometrium. Higher ECM content may significantly impact endometrial mechanical properties, potentially contributing to AM-associated decidualization defects and fertility challenges.
Full text 19,927 characters · extracted from pmc · 4 sections · click to expand

Results

Figure 2A shows the results of endometrial stiffness measurements (Young’s modulus). For the first time, we report changes in the mechanical microenvironment of the eutopic endometrium in patients with AM. The study found that the Young’s modulus of the AM group (21.21±1.628 kPa) was significantly higher than that of the control group (4.726±0.3845 kPa). Since tissue stiffness and collagen distribution are closely related, we investigated collagen arrangement or distribution in the endometrium of both groups to further explore the potential contributors to the increased tissue stiffness. In the control group, as shown in Figure 2B (a-d), the normal arrangement of collagen fibers can be clearly observed, which is an elongated chain-like structure with relatively consistent thickness, an orderly arrangement, and no cross-linking between fibers. In contrast, the arrangement of collagen structures in the disease group shown in Figure 2B (e–h) appeared more disordered and cross-linked. Meanwhile, Figure 2C shows the results of the collagen diameter measured in both groups of eutopic endometrium. No significant difference in collagen diameter was observed between the AM group (92.57±3.016 nm) and the control group (85.71±2.718 nm). Illustration of the process for measuring endometrial stiffness using AFM. A ) Schematic diagram of the process for detecting endometrial stiffness with AFM. B ) Data obtained from AFM measurements. The AFM tip applies force to the tissue, and the indentation depth (μm) and deflection error (nm) are recorded. These results are used to calculate elasticity using a standard calculation. To investigate the reasons behind the endometrial sclerosis, we stained the specimens to investigate the degree of fibrosis. The degree of endometrial fibrosis was assessed using HE, PSR, or MTC. Figure 3A shows representative photomicrographs of the endometrium. Figure 3 B,C shows the percentage of the positive area for PSR and MTC, respectively, indicating significant higher proportion of positive staining in the eutopic endometrium of patients with AM than the control. A higher percentage of positively stained areas indicates an increase in the degree of fibrosis. To investigate the contributors of fibrosis in AM, we examined the expression of α-SMA, a marker of myofibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, as increased α-SMA expression typically indicates myofibroblast formation. Figure 4A is the representative images of α-SMA-positive fluorescent staining. As shown in Figure 4B , the proportion of positive α-SMA staining in the eutopic endometrium of patients with AM (40.82±1.253%) is significantly higher than that in the control group (13.72±0.9102%), suggesting ECM remodeling in AM. Ki-67, a well-established marker for evaluating cell proliferation in both benign and malignant diseases, was used to assess cellular proliferation activity in the epithelial and stromal regions. 20 , 21 Figure 5 A,B shows that in the control group, Ki-67-positive cells were primarily located in the epithelial area (1.062±0.1304%), indicating normal proliferative activity within the epithelium. In contrast, the disease-affected group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of Ki-67-positive cells in the stromal area (3.387±0.5702%), reflecting increased stromal cell proliferation associated with AM. Illustration of the process of measuring endometrial stiffness and collagen diameter using AFM. A ) Statistical chart of endome-trial stiffness value (Young's modulus); ** p <0.01. B ) Typical image of collagen fibers in the endometrium; (a-d) collagen fibers in the control group; (e-h) collagen fibers in the AM group; the framed area in the image represents a typical collagen fiber arrangement, with the corresponding enlarged image shown on the right. C ) Bar graph of collagen diameter (nm) in the endometrium from control and AM groups; data are expressed as mean ± SEM; ns, p ≥0.05. D ) The diameter of the fibrils was obtained by line section analysis using NanoScope analysis software (Bruker); double-sided arrows show the measured length of one collagen diameter.

Materials

Endometrial samples for the AM group (AM, n=6) were collected from women aged 18-45 years with dysmenorrhea who underwent hysterectomy due to AM, suspected by ultrasound and confirmed through postoperative pathology. These women had regular menstrual cycles (24 to 32 days ± 3 days in length, with a duration of 2-7 days). Endometrial samples for the control group (Ctrl, n=6) were obtained from women of childbearing age (18-45 years) with no history of dysmenorrhea, recurrent miscarriage, or clinical or laparoscopic evidence of AM. Control samples were collected by hysteroscopic biopsy or by sagittal dissection of the uterus after benign hysterectomy using a sterile scalpel. All endometrial samples were taken during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. Both groups excluded women with systemic diseases, tumors, endocrine disorders, cardiovascular or rheumatic diseases, or recent hormone therapy (within the past three months). In this study, “AM” refers to the AM group, and “Ctrl” refers to the normal control group without AM. Endometrial samples were obtained during surgeries from female subjects. All endometrial samples were collected in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Medical Ethics Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Each patient enrolled in this study provided informed consent for all procedures and allowed data collection and analysis for research purposes. The study was non-advertised, and no remuneration was offered to encourage patients to give consent. One hour after specimen removal, the extracted endometrial tissue was rinsed with PBS, promptly embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, and cryopreserved at -80°C. The frozen tissue block was sectioned into 25 μm slices using a cryostat (CM3050 S; Leica, Nussloch, Germany) and temporarily stored at -20°C. Before conducting AFM measurements, each section was immersed in PBS to remove the OCT compound and allowed to thaw at room temperature. Measurements were completed within an hour of thawing to preserve tissue structure. Biomechanical analysis was conducted using an AFM scanner (Dimension ICON, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Figure 1 A,B provides schematic diagrams illustrating the experimental method. For the microscale experiments, the modulus was determined by employing the force-volume mode within a fluid cell containing 0.15 M PBS (pH 7.4). This was done using a V-shaped silicon nitride cantilever with an affixed borosilicate glass sphere of 5 μm in diameter. The spherical tip, with a spring constant of 0.06 N/m (Bruker), was utilized. The calculation of the elastic modulus involved the following equation: where E is the elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio (v), S represents the contact stiffness (the slope observed in the initial section of the unloading regime of the load-indentation curve), and A corresponds to an area function linked to the effective cross-sectional, or projecting area, of the indenter, as described in previous studies. The detailed calculation methodology can be found in earlier investigations. 17 , 18 For nanoscale experiments, images of collagen fibers were obtained using a ScanAsyst-Air probe with a radius of curvature of 5 nm and a force constant of 0.4 N/m. NanoScope analysis software (Bruker) was used to obtain relevant information about fibrils through line cross-section analysis, including arrangement, diameter, and other characteristics. Figure 2D illustrates the experimental method with a schematic diagram. To further assess the extent of endometrial fibrosis, endometrial specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, dewaxed, rehydrated in distilled water, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Picrosirius red (PSR) or Masson’s trichrome (MTC), using staining kits (PSR: Servicebio, Wuhan, China; G1018; MTC: Servicebio, G1006) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PSR and MTC staining were used to detect collagen fibrils deposited within the matrix. 19 To objectively quantify the extent of fibrosis in the endometrium stained for collagen with PSR or MTC, we used ImageJ version 1.53q (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). For each specimen, six random fields of view were analyzed at 40x magnification. Fiber content was quantified as a percentage of the total positive staining area. In PSR staining, positive results appear as red collagen fibers, while in MTC staining, positive staining appears as blue collagen fibers. For Ki-67 immunohistochemical analysis, 4 μm paraffinembedded tissue sections were prepared, dewaxed, and subjected to antigen retrieval. The sections were placed in a repair box containing citric acid antigen retrieval buffer (Phygnen, PH0422) and heated in a microwave. The temperature was maintained at medium heat for 8 min until boiling, followed by medium-low heat for 7 min. After natural cooling, the slides were placed in PBS (pH 7.4) and washed three times on a decolorizing shaker, each wash lasting 5 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by treating sections with 3% hydrogen peroxide in phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) for 25 min at room temperature in the dark. Subsequently, sections were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (Servicebio, GC305010 ) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS (pH 7.4), sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies: anti-Ki-67 mouse antibody (Servicebio, GB121141 ) diluted 1:500. In the negative control group, tissues were incubated with PBS only, without the anti-Ki-67 primary antibody. The secondary antibody used was HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Servicebio, GB23301) diluted 1:200, and sections were incubated for 50 min at room temperature. Subsequently, DAB chromogenic solution (Servicebio, G1212) was used to develop the color, and the cell nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. To quantify Ki-67-labeled cells, we calculated the percentage of labeled cells relative to the total number of hematoxylin -stained nuclei. For each sample, six randomly selected fields at 40× magnification were counted under a Nikon Eclipse C1 upright fluorescence microscope. The average percentage of labeled cells was then calculated for each sample. For immunofluorescence, primary antibodies included mouse anti-α-SMA antibody (Servicebio, GB12044) at a 1:500 dilution. Tissue sections were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (Servicebio, GC305010 ) for 30 min and then washed with PBS (pH 7.4). Slides were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and washed in buffer. Further incubations included secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor ® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Servicebio, GB25301) at a 1:400 dilution and CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Servicebio, GB21303) at a 1:300 dilution. After washing, DAPI staining solution (Servicebio, G1012) was added for nuclear counterstaining. Finally, the slides were sealed with anti-fluorescence quenching mounting medium (Servicebio, G1401) and used with Nikon Eclipse C1 upright fluorescence equipped with oil immersion and a 40x objective. Observations were performed microscopically. To quantify α-SMA labeled cells, we reported the percentage of labeled cells relative to the total number of DAPI-stained nuclei. For each sample, six fields at 40x magnification were randomly selected and counted. The average percentage of labeled cells was calculated for each sample. All data are presented as mean ±SEM and were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.1. After confirming normal distribution and homogeneity of variances using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Bartlett’s test, the Student’s t- test was used for analysis. Statistical significance was determined at p≤0.05.

Discussion

Many issues in biomedicine cannot be fully explained by biochemical mechanisms alone, as they are closely intertwined with mechanical processes. 22-24 Mechanomics and biomechanics provide new perspectives on numerous medical challenges, and underscore the importance of understanding mechanical properties for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine diseases. Unlike elastography techniques, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography which also focused on the mechanics of tissues, AFM allows for localized and whole-cell studies of cellular mechanical properties in their natural environment. 25 , 26 It provides detailed insights into morphological structures ( e.g. , height, surface roughness, fiber orientation) and mechanical characteristics ( e.g ., Young’s modulus, stiffness, adhesion energy, adhesion force, tension). 27 This method uniquely offers high-resolution structural, mechanical, and functional information, making AFM a promising tool for disease research, diagnosis, and monitoring, and potentially filling an important gap in current clinical diagnostics. 28-30 Research has revealed that the endometrium in patients with AM differs from the one in individuals without this condition, showing multiple metabolic and molecular abnormalities. 4 , 31 , 32 This leads to increased angiogenesis and cellular proliferation, decreased apoptosis, progesterone resistance, and altered cytokine expression, resulting in an abnormal immune response and reduced reproductive performance. 33 Under physiological conditions, the endometrial ECM stiffness changes during embryo implantation, aiding cell movement. 34 , 35 Moreover, changes in endometrial stiffness in AM patients impact pregnancy outcomes by affecting trophoblast adhesion and invasion. 36 A stiffer endometrial matrix can hinder embryonic invasion and placental function, potentially leading to late miscarriage and premature delivery. Understanding these factors is crucial in managing AM-related fertility issues. Biological tissue mechanics vary significantly under different physiological and pathological conditions, as cells remodel ECM in response to disease. This remodeling often involves changes in ECM synthesis and regulation by cells. Currently, limited research exists on the mechanical properties of human endometrial tissue. Alterations in the components of the endometrial ECM can directly impact mechanical properties, such as tissue stiffness. Collagen, the most abundant ECM protein, contributes significantly to the tensile strength and stiffness of tissue. 37 Other studies have also confirmed that cross-linking between collagen and elastin molecules can increase fiber stiffness. 38-40 This study observed similarly increased collagen cross-linking in the eutopic endometrium of patients with AM, contributing to increased endometrial stiffness. Notably, collagen fiber diameter showed no significant difference between AM and normal endometrial tissue, aligning with findings by Zakaria et al . in lung cancer tissue, where increased collagen concentration and density did not alter fiber diameter. 41 This suggests that fiber diameter alone does not determine tissue stiffness; rather, stiffness likely results from the cumulative effects of ECM components, 42 particularly the excessive synthesis and deposition of ECM proteins. 30 α-SMA, an actin isoform crucial to fibrogenesis, is highly expressed in AM, where its upregulation is associated with fibroblast subtypes possessing strong ECM remodeling capabilities, correlating with the increased stiffness observed in situ . 43 Additionally, α-SMA is linked to the activation of mechanosensitive signaling pathways: filamentous α-SMA activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, and cells overexpressing α-SMA exhibit tension-induced enhancement of p38 activation. 44 However, whether this pathway is involved in endometrial fibrosis in AM remains unclear, warranting further research. Moreover, Ki-67 staining indicates dominant stromal cell proliferation in AM, though it is uncertain if this is driven by EMT, which could confer migratory and invasive properties to cells, leading to stromal cell migration and proliferation. On the other hand, endometrial stromal cells from patients with endometriosis can move through small channels quickly, showing high flexibility and lower stiffness. 45 This could explain their abnormal movement and invasiveness. These findings highlight the importance of understanding tissue mechanics in conditions like AM for future research on cell-ECM interactions in endometrial tissue. Effect of AM on eutopic endometrial fibrosis. A ) Representative photomicrographs of the eutopic endometrium stained with HE, PSR, or MTC; (a-c) staining of the control group; (d-f) staining of the AM group; scale bars: 20 μm. B ) The positive area of PSR staining significantly increased in patients with AM; ** p <0.01. C) The positive area of MTC staining significantly increased in patients with AM; ** p <0.01. Immunofluorescence staining of α-SMA in the endometrial tissue of both groups. A) Expression of α-SMA; upper magnification 200x scale bar: 50 μm; lower magnification 400x, scale bar: 25 μm. B ) The proportion of α-SMA-positive staining area is higher in the AM group compared to the normal control group; ** p <0.01.

Introduction

Adenomyosis (AM) is a common gynecological inflammatory disease characterized by the infiltration of endometrial tissue into the myometrium. This condition leads to inflammation and myometrial hypertrophy, presenting clinically with symptoms such as pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and infertility. 1 , 2 The pathogenesis of AM remains controversial, with primary hypotheses including the endometrial invasion hypothesis, 3 the tissue injury and repair (TIAR) 4 mechanism, and stem cell theory. 5 Notably, AM is associated with endometrial stromal and epithelial fibrosis. AM exhibits significant increases in platelet aggregation, transforming growth factor (TGF-β1), phosphorylated Smad3, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation markers. Additionally, smooth muscle metaplasia is increased, along with a rise in fibrosis compared to normal endometrium. 6 , 7 Evidence from transvaginal elastic ultrasonography 8 indicates that AM lesions are stiffer than fibroids and normal myometrium. However, there is a lack of direct observation or evidence of endometrial fibrosis and stiffness in AM. More importantly, the factors contributing to potentially increased endometrial stiffness remain inconclusive. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a user-friendly, high-resolution technique that can measure mechanical properties at the nanoscale. 9-11 AFM is capable of directly measuring the elastic and viscoelastic properties of biological cells through indentation 12 and has therefore been widely used to characterize the mechanical behavior of cells under healthy and pathological conditions. An increasing number of studies have performed mechanistic characterization of cells in different diseases, including breast cancer, 13 , 14 bladder cancer 15 and thyroid cancer, 16 to assess cell invasion ability. These studies reveal that malignant cells often exhibit increased deformability, motility, and metastatic potential. In this study, we used AFM to evaluate the elastic modulus of AM-affected versus normal endometrial tissue, providing a direct assessment of disease-induced mechanical changes. This study reports, for the first time, that ECM remodeling and fibrosis occur in the eutopic endometrium of patients with AM, leading to increased endometrial stiffness. We believe that this will inevitably impact reproductive function. We believe that investigating these factors further will deepen our understanding of AM pathology and may aid in developing improved diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies for this condition.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:17:00.440375+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine