Effect of exercise intervention on chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome: A network meta-analysis

Bailin Shen, 沈百林, Ziang Zhao, Wenrui Huang, Hongwen Wei
In: Journal of Sport and Health Science · 2026 · pp. 101179 · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2026.101179 · PMID:42772634 · W7214012433
article OA: diamond CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-06 ⓘ

This network meta-analysis of men with chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome found that pelvic floor muscle training combined with electrical stimulation most effectively reduced symptoms and improved quality of life compared to standard medical care.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative effectiveness of different exercise interventions for managing chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome (CPPPS) in men. We assessed their impact on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score, including its pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life subscales, and examined potential improvements in maximum urinary flow rate (Q max ). Using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we identified the most effective exercise therapies to address current uncertainties in treatment prioritization and provide clinically actionable insights. Our findings aimed to guide evidence-based practice and highlight priority areas for future research in CPPPS management. Methods We systematically searched 8 major Chinese and international databases for RCTs published up to July 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted with Stata/MP 18 to calculate mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs), and interventions were ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Results Fifteen RCTs with a total of 1736 patients were included in the analysis. Most exercise-based interventions outperformed standard medical care (SMC). Of these, pelvic floor muscle training combined with pelvic floor muscle electrical stimulation (PFMT+PFMES) produced the greatest reduction in the NIH-CPSI (MD = –25.34; 95%CI: –30.03 to –20.65; SUCRA = 100%), with consistent superiority in the pain (MD = –10.76; 95%CI: –12.69 to –8.83; SUCRA = 100%) and quality of life (MD = –7.20; 95%CI: –10.87 to –3.53; SUCRA = 98.9%) subdomains. PFMES alone was most effective for urinary symptoms (MD = –5.64; 95%CI: –10.16 to –1.12; SUCRA = 91.2%), while PFMT+Squat also showed notable benefits, ranking just below PFMT+PFMES and PFMES. For Q max , all exercise interventions combined with SMC showed a trend towards improvement, although results were not statistically significant. Overall, the certainty of evidence was rated as low to moderate. Conclusion Exercise-based interventions, particularly PFMT+PFMES and PFMES, demonstrated clear advantages over SMC in improving NIH-CPSI and its subdomains. These approaches may represent valuable components of comprehensive management for CPPPS. Future high-quality trials with extended follow-up are needed to strengthen the evidence base and determine their long-term effects on patient-reported outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

References (33)

SciLite annotations

organisms 1
men 2004071

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-06T06:07:52.081803+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:57:59.810255+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK