The Friendship Paradox across animal social systems is governed by network structure and biological features

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

A population’s social structure, often represented as a social network, shapes fundamental biological processes including the spread of disease, information, and behaviour. The ‘Friendship Paradox’ is a network phenomenon whereby the average individual has fewer ‘friends’ than their ‘friends’ do. This effect can be quantified as relationship disparity (the difference between an individual’s connectedness and those they are connected to) which captures the local social environment. Previous work has shown that such relationship disparity can be exploited in effective outbreak monitoring, targeted health interventions and optimized contact tracing. Yet, how its magnitude varies across real-world social networks remains poorly understood. Here, we analyse relationship disparity across 391 empirical animal social networks to test how intrinsic network properties and biological attributes predict its extent. We find that smaller and sparser networks exhibit stronger relationship disparity, and that mammalian and avian social systems generally showed stronger relationship disparity than reptilian systems. After controlling for variation in individual sociability, mammalian and reptilian social networks displayed weaker relationship disparity than expected based on network structure alone. Together, these findings demonstrate that both network structure and biological attributes shape relationship disparity in natural social systems, providing a foundation for predicting how higher-order network architecture influences social processes such as contagion. Significance Statement In natural populations, social connections are unevenly distributed, often resulting in a small subset of individuals that are highly connected while many are relatively peripheral. The ‘Friendship Paradox’ is a measure of relationship disparity between individuals and their local social environment. Understanding how features of the social network and biological system are associated with relationship disparity can contribute to understanding what shapes social behaviour. Relationship disparity may not just be an emergent network property but could reflect a higher level of social structuring, and therefore shape processes that depend on social contacts. Our findings demonstrate the value of comparative network analysis for generating insights into fundamental principles structuring real-world societies.
Full text 2,500 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract A population’s social structure, often represented as a social network, shapes fundamental biological processes including the spread of disease, information, and behaviour. The ‘Friendship Paradox’ is a network phenomenon whereby the average individual has fewer ‘friends’ than their ‘friends’ do. This effect can be quantified as relationship disparity (the difference between an individual’s connectedness and those they are connected to) which captures the local social environment. Previous work has shown that such relationship disparity can be exploited in effective outbreak monitoring, targeted health interventions and optimized contact tracing. Yet, how its magnitude varies across real-world social networks remains poorly understood. Here, we analyse relationship disparity across 391 empirical animal social networks to test how intrinsic network properties and biological attributes predict its extent. We find that smaller and sparser networks exhibit stronger relationship disparity, and that mammalian and avian social systems generally showed stronger relationship disparity than reptilian systems. After controlling for variation in individual sociability, mammalian and reptilian social networks displayed weaker relationship disparity than expected based on network structure alone. Together, these findings demonstrate that both network structure and biological attributes shape relationship disparity in natural social systems, providing a foundation for predicting how higher-order network architecture influences social processes such as contagion. Significance Statement In natural populations, social connections are unevenly distributed, often resulting in a small subset of individuals that are highly connected while many are relatively peripheral. The ‘Friendship Paradox’ is a measure of relationship disparity between individuals and their local social environment. Understanding how features of the social network and biological system are associated with relationship disparity can contribute to understanding what shapes social behaviour. Relationship disparity may not just be an emergent network property but could reflect a higher level of social structuring, and therefore shape processes that depend on social contacts. Our findings demonstrate the value of comparative network analysis for generating insights into fundamental principles structuring real-world societies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00