Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper studied how people resolve approach–avoidance motivational conflicts when potential monetary gains and losses vary in magnitude, using a parametrically adjustable paradigm that produced a continuous behavioral measure of willingness to engage. Across multiple studies in different populations and settings, the authors found that outcome magnitudes reliably predicted behavior, generating individual indices interpreted as gain-approach and loss-avoidance tendencies. Anxiety severity showed associations with greater passive avoidance in a sample-specific manner. A major caveat stated by the authors is that the work originated as a preprint and was not initially peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Human behavior often involves resolving conflicts between motivations to pursue rewards and to avoid harm. Maladaptive resolution of such approach-avoidance conflicts is a hallmark of various psychopathologies, notably anxiety disorders. To systematically study motivated behavior tendencies, we need to identify factors that may drive them, such as sensitivity to the magnitudes of expected outcomes. We developed a novel paradigm that presents conflict situations with parametrically-varying magnitudes of potential monetary gains and losses that map onto a continuous behavioral outcome reflecting willingness to engage in each situation. Using this paradigm, we evaluate the hypothesis that potential outcome magnitudes determine conflict behavior, across a series of studies in different populations and settings - including a proof-of-concept with young adults, replication in a larger sample, online administration, and application to youth with and without anxiety disorders. Our findings demonstrate that outcome magnitudes reliably predicted behavior, yielding robust individual indices of gain-approach and loss-avoidance tendencies. Moreover, anxiety severity was associated with greater passive avoidance in a sample-specific manner. By quantifying individual-level indices that link potential outcome magnitudes to observable behavior, our work offers a reliable framework for investigating adaptive and maladaptive motivated behaviors, with potential utility for both basic and clinical research.
Full text 16,471 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels Shir Ben-Zvi Feldman, Omer Dayan, Ya’ira Somerville, Chang-Hao Kao, and 9 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 24 Apr, 2026 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Human behavior often involves resolving conflicts between motivations to pursue rewards and to avoid harm. Maladaptive resolution of such approach-avoidance conflicts is a hallmark of various psychopathologies, notably anxiety disorders. To systematically study motivated behavior tendencies, we need to identify factors that may drive them, such as sensitivity to the magnitudes of expected outcomes. We developed a novel paradigm that presents conflict situations with parametrically-varying magnitudes of potential monetary gains and losses that map onto a continuous behavioral outcome reflecting willingness to engage in each situation. Using this paradigm, we evaluate the hypothesis that potential outcome magnitudes determine conflict behavior, across a series of studies in different populations and settings - including a proof-of-concept with young adults, replication in a larger sample, online administration, and application to youth with and without anxiety disorders. Our findings demonstrate that outcome magnitudes reliably predicted behavior, yielding robust individual indices of gain-approach and loss-avoidance tendencies. Moreover, anxiety severity was associated with greater passive avoidance in a sample-specific manner. By quantifying individual-level indices that link potential outcome magnitudes to observable behavior, our work offers a reliable framework for investigating adaptive and maladaptive motivated behaviors, with potential utility for both basic and clinical research. Biological sciences/Neuroscience Biological sciences/Psychology approach avoidance motivation anxiety conflict Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementalMaterialScientificreports20250617.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 24 Apr, 2026 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 07 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 06 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 05 Aug, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 Jul, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 14 Jul, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 14 Jul, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 14 Jul, 2025 Editor invited by journal 20 Jun, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 18 Jun, 2025 First submitted to journal 17 Jun, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6916454","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":473907680,"identity":"7e991d4e-42e9-4c3f-8d81-6d835ce2a2be","order_by":0,"name":"Shir Ben-Zvi Feldman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shir","middleName":"Ben-Zvi","lastName":"Feldman","suffix":""},{"id":473907681,"identity":"de7b3f61-0c82-438e-939c-236b619d3980","order_by":1,"name":"Omer Dayan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Omer","middleName":"","lastName":"Dayan","suffix":""},{"id":473907682,"identity":"38815b58-4c03-4b37-98f8-28b6b00d4a36","order_by":2,"name":"Ya’ira Somerville","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ya’ira","middleName":"","lastName":"Somerville","suffix":""},{"id":473907683,"identity":"7ccebfb9-e2c1-4afc-8273-e6466bf90b4f","order_by":3,"name":"Chang-Hao Kao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Mental Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chang-Hao","middleName":"","lastName":"Kao","suffix":""},{"id":473907684,"identity":"4dacbc60-f420-451c-95eb-ff788078a5de","order_by":4,"name":"Shelly Cohen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shelly","middleName":"","lastName":"Cohen","suffix":""},{"id":473907685,"identity":"d3d3637e-a62d-4057-a0b8-2e937f33f1e8","order_by":5,"name":"Oriana Glickman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Oriana","middleName":"","lastName":"Glickman","suffix":""},{"id":473907686,"identity":"1c2763fe-a79f-4de5-86b4-d0544fed7451","order_by":6,"name":"Sonia G. Ruiz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Yale University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sonia","middleName":"G.","lastName":"Ruiz","suffix":""},{"id":473907687,"identity":"25494bc3-236f-4460-b3fa-740a62536105","order_by":7,"name":"Philip Newsome","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Southern California","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philip","middleName":"","lastName":"Newsome","suffix":""},{"id":473907688,"identity":"3b957e93-b817-42c6-afe5-f4232b9c0428","order_by":8,"name":"Julia O. Linke","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Freiburg University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Julia","middleName":"O.","lastName":"Linke","suffix":""},{"id":473907689,"identity":"eb335818-152b-4fbd-8d9b-67d173811ae0","order_by":9,"name":"Tomer Shechner","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Haifa","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tomer","middleName":"","lastName":"Shechner","suffix":""},{"id":473907690,"identity":"339fcb87-f439-4000-82c6-a8791d1ffec5","order_by":10,"name":"Daniel S. Pine","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Mental Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Daniel","middleName":"S.","lastName":"Pine","suffix":""},{"id":473907691,"identity":"281f627d-71bc-44e8-810a-7a0ebb39d9bf","order_by":11,"name":"Silvia Lopez-Guzman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Mental Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Silvia","middleName":"","lastName":"Lopez-Guzman","suffix":""},{"id":473907692,"identity":"4f37693c-dd2d-4049-af09-3206be1cc86f","order_by":12,"name":"Rany Abend","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Reichman University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rany","middleName":"","lastName":"Abend","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-17 16:53:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46946-4","type":"published","date":"2026-04-24T15:59:31+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":107928168,"identity":"b4682882-5367-47ca-9858-1bbdba52d0a5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-27 16:08:46","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1153628,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptScientificreports20250617.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6916454/v1_covered_afecbb3e-6311-4826-86e3-32cc666226f5.pdf"},{"id":85263464,"identity":"c7993fec-30df-4ed4-bda0-c7193ebc56f0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-06-24 04:32:02","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":520996,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMaterialScientificreports20250617.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6916454/v1/223632b40f9bb4f0911cd896.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"approach, avoidance, motivation, anxiety, conflict","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eHuman behavior often involves resolving conflicts between motivations to pursue rewards and to avoid harm. Maladaptive resolution of such approach-avoidance conflicts is a hallmark of various psychopathologies, notably anxiety disorders. To systematically study motivated behavior tendencies, we need to identify factors that may drive them, such as sensitivity to the magnitudes of expected outcomes. We developed a novel paradigm that presents conflict situations with parametrically-varying magnitudes of potential monetary gains and losses that map onto a continuous behavioral outcome reflecting willingness to engage in each situation. Using this paradigm, we evaluate the hypothesis that potential outcome magnitudes determine conflict behavior, across a series of studies in different populations and settings - including a proof-of-concept with young adults, replication in a larger sample, online administration, and application to youth with and without anxiety disorders.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur findings demonstrate that outcome magnitudes reliably predicted behavior, yielding robust individual indices of gain-approach and loss-avoidance tendencies. Moreover, anxiety severity was associated with greater passive avoidance in a sample-specific manner. By quantifying individual-level indices that link potential outcome magnitudes to observable behavior, our work offers a reliable framework for investigating adaptive and maladaptive motivated behaviors, with potential utility for both basic and clinical research.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-24 04:23:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-08-07T07:43:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-06T09:16:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-05T16:42:07+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"78164018392589367587799027593563432422","date":"2025-07-28T13:03:25+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"240476992131263105912222619809507646925","date":"2025-07-14T14:37:05+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-07-14T13:40:48+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-07-14T13:21:46+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-06-20T05:50:05+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-06-19T00:43:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-06-17T16:42:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c5692314-f118-4320-9103-04c2276b7ade","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 24th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":50329246,"name":"Biological sciences/Neuroscience"},{"id":50329247,"name":"Biological sciences/Psychology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-27T16:06:36+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6916454","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46946-4","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2026-04-24 15:59:31","publishedOnDateReadable":"April 24th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-24 04:23:57","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-026-46946-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46946-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6916454","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6916454","identity":"rs-6916454","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00