Sperm Selection Methods in Art: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Male infertility, accounting for nearly half of infertility cases worldwide, has spurred significant research into its causes, diagnosis and treatment strategies. Genetic abnormalities, social causes, environmental exposures, lifestyle and further health conditions are key contributors. Essential to improving ART outcomes is among other, the selection of high-quality sperm, which requires methods that assess sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity and oxidative stress levels. Traditional techniques such as semen analysis, Swim-Up, and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) are still widely used but disscussion takes place regarding the limitation in detecting DNA damage and oxidative stress. Advanced methods like magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and microfluidic sorting have emerged as more precise tools for selecting sperm with better genetic integrity, although they face challenges in standardization, cost, and clinical adoption. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and Raman spectroscopy offer the potential for more automated, accurate sperm selection, minimizing human error and variability. However, the integration of these methods into clinical practice requires further validation through large-scale studies, including assessments of their long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. Future research should focus on refining sperm selection techniques, tailoring them to personalized infertility confrontation and addressing gaps in evidence to improve ART outcomes and patient care.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00