Cases
A multiparous perimenopausal patient in her late 40s visited the surgical outpatient department of our institution with complaints of umbilical swelling for six months that was associated with pain and sanguineous discharge from her umbilicus, synchronous with her menstrual cycles. A known case of dyslipidemia on medication for one year, she has not had any prior abdominal surgeries and has had four normal vaginal births, with her most recent one occurring nine years ago.
Upon general examination, her BMI was 30.5 kg/m 2 , with a decent overall condition and stable vitals. An examination of her abdomen revealed a 3x2 cm umbilical swelling that was firm, nodular, non-tender, and nonreducible, and the skin over the swelling appeared dull grayish (Figure 1 ). Additionally, there was no cough impulse. Furthermore, the swelling did not exhibit any evidence of inflammation or active discharge during examination. Per rectal examination was normal.
Investigations
The patient was duly evaluated with the routine preoperative investigation. On initial ultrasound evaluation, a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion measuring 2.7x2.2 cm was seen in the umbilicus, and the uterus seemed bulky, suggesting the presence of adenomyosis. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a homogenous granuloma-like umbilical soft tissue mass with a thin rim separating the umbilical soft tissue mass from the underlying abdominal muscles (Figure 2 ).
Treatment and follow-up
An excision biopsy of the umbilical nodule was planned under spinal anesthesia. An incision was made and deepened, intraoperatively the nodule was well-defined, and densely inseparable from the umbilicus, the nodule was excised completely, and an omphalectomy was performed. The specimen was sent for histopathological examination (Figure 3 ).
The cut section of the specimen showed a grayish-white firm area measuring 2x2 cm, and microscopically, the underlying dermis showed islands of endometrial glands and endometrial stroma along with areas of hemorrhage and hemosiderin-laden macrophages and some myxoid changes, suggestive of endometriosis (Figures 4 , 5 ).
Arrows indicate the endometrial glands.
Arrow indicates the endometrial glands.
The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics, analgesics, and other supportive measures. She was discharged on postoperative day five and was able to resume her daily activities with ease. The patient was followed up till six months post-surgery, and all the follow-up visits were uneventful.
Intro
The existence of functioning endometrial tissue outside of the typical uterine cavity is known as endometriosis. About 10% to 15% of the women in their reproductive age and 6% of all perimenopausal women are affected [ 1 , 2 ]. An estimated 0.5% to 1.0% of all patients with extragenital endometriosis have primary umbilical endometriosis, making it a rare condition [ 3 ]. The development of spontaneous umbilical endometriosis is thought to result from either the urachus remnants metaplasia or when the endometrial cells from the pelvis are transported through lymphatic and vascular channels [ 4 - 6 ]. Theories like celomic metaplasia and implantation are proposed in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, although a consensus on the most suitable theory is yet to be reached [ 7 , 8 ]. The salient feature of this case was the occurrence of an umbilical endometrioma in a multiparous, perimenopausal patient without a history of abdominal surgery or any other gynecological conditions. Additionally, such a case gives us an insight into how to work on our suspicion of rare possibilities such as primary umbilical endometriosis in the context of an atypical presentation.
Discussion
The term endometriosis refers to the extrauterine presence of functional endometrial tissue. Up to 15% of women experience it during their lifetime [ 9 ]. Even more mysterious than pelvic endometriosis, extrapelvic endometriosis is undoubtedly rarer and more challenging to identify and cure. Endometriosis of the abdominal wall can mimic granuloma, omphalitis, lipoma, sebaceous cyst, umbilical hernia, or primary or metastatic cancer, both clinically and through diagnostic imaging [ 10 - 12 ]. When pelvic and umbilical endometriosis overlap, the notion of hematogenous and lymphatic spread is preferred. In the event of isolated umbilical endometriosis, it is thought that it may develop as a result of metaplasia of the residual urachus (Table 1 ).
Cyclical umbilical pain and bleeding related to menstruation are typically the hallmark clinical signs of umbilical endometriosis [ 18 ]. Similarly, in this case, the patient experienced symptoms of a cyclical nature corresponding to the menstrual cycle. Before surgery, the primary purpose of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and computed tomography is to illustrate the extent of the illness.
Pharmacologic treatment using hormonal drugs, such as progestogens, or surgical excision are the available therapeutic options. However, medical therapy has a poor success record. Thus, the preferred course of treatment is surgical excision and histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis. Both sonographic and computed tomography findings were nonspecific in our case. Hence, the patient was planned for surgical excision following which the specimen was sent for histopathological examination for a confirmatory diagnosis.
Conclusions
Endometriosis affecting the anterior abdominal wall as a result of cesarean section and sterilization scars is frequently seen in surgical and gynecological outpatient departments. It is quite uncommon for the extrapelvic area, especially the umbilicus, to be affected without any prior surgical scarring. Cyclical umbilical discharge, especially sanguineous, should raise the suspicion of umbilical endometriosis. Umbilical endometriosis is often presented as an umbilical mass of variable size and localized symptoms like cyclic pain and bleeding and has to be differentiated from other common conditions such as omphalitis, granuloma, and umbilical hernia. A complete excision with subsequent histopathological examination is advised for a definitive diagnosis and the best course of treatment.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.