18f-fdg Pet/mr in Focal Epilepsy: a New Step for Improving the Detection of Epileptogenic Lesions
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Abstract Purpose: Hybrid PET/MR is a promising tool in focal drug-resistant epilepsy, however the additional value for the detection of epileptogenic lesions and surgical decision-making remains to be established.Methods: We retrospectively compared 18F-FDG PET/MR images with those obtained by a previous 18F-FDG PET co-registered with MRI (PET+MR) in 25 consecutive patients (16 females, 13-60 year-old) investigated for focal drug-resistant epilepsy. Visual analysis was performed by two readers blinded from imaging modalities, asked to assess the technical characteristics (co-registration, quality of images), confidence in results, location of PET abnormalities and presence of a structural lesion on MRI. The clinical impact on surgical strategy and outcome was assessed independently.Results: The location of epilepsy was temporal in 9 patients and extra-temporal in 16 others. MRI was initially considered negative in 21 of them. PET alone demonstrated metabolic abnormalities in 19 cases (76%), and the co-registration with MRI allowed the detection of 4 additional structural lesions. PET/MR was considered better performing than PET+MR in 56% of patients. The increase in sensitivity was 13% and new structural lesions (mainly focal cortical dysplasias) were detected in 6 patients (24%). Change of surgical decision-making was substantial for 40% of patients, consisting in avoiding invasive monitoring in 6 patients and modifying the planning in 4 others. Seizure-free outcome was obtained in 13/14 patients who underwent a cortical resection.Conclusion: Hybrid PET/MR improves the detection of epileptogenic lesions, allowing to optimize the presurgical work-up and to increase the proportion of successful surgery even in the more complex cases.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00