Stage-specific habitat use of the Mountain Plover in Colorado

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Habitat structure, food availability, and predation risk have spatiotemporal variation on the landscape that creates tradeoffs between risk and rewards for animals as they use habitat. These tradeoffs are associated with survival consequences and can vary by life or breeding stage, but stage-specific shifts in these relationships are often not considered in studies of habitat use and survival. We investigated habitat use for nests and broods in the Mountain plover as an example of a ground-nesting species with precocial, mobile young to explore breeding stage-specific responses to vegetation structure, food availability, and predation risk. We located and monitored nests and broods at two study sites in Colorado occupied by geographically separated breeding populations of plovers. We quantified the three covariate categories across standardized site-wide grids in 2021 and 2022. We employed a resource selection analysis to evaluate 10 a priori working hypotheses for how environmental covariates may influence the habitat used by plovers for nesting and brood-rearing. Model comparison results suggest that habitat use relative to availability is best explained by a linear relationship with vegetation structure while conditioning on breeding stage and site, with no effect of food availability or predation risk detected in our dataset. Specifically, probability of use for both nest and brood sites was highest in areas with taller vegetation, contrary to previous research about nest site selection. These unexpected results may be due to the unbalanced sample sizes of the two sites, as previous separate studies have shown opposing habitat use strategies, or due to the coarseness of our covariate data. Regardless of limitations, these results emphasize the importance of investigating stage-specific and potentially site-specific shifts in habitat use patterns for species with precocial young.
Full text 1,811 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Habitat structure, food availability, and predation risk have spatiotemporal variation on the landscape that creates tradeoffs between risk and rewards for animals as they use habitat. These tradeoffs are associated with survival consequences and can vary by life or breeding stage, but stage-specific shifts in these relationships are often not considered in studies of habitat use and survival. We investigated habitat use for nests and broods in the Mountain plover as an exemplar of a ground-nesting species with precocial, mobile young to explore site- and breeding stage-specific responses to vegetation structure, food availability, and predation risk. We located and monitored nests and broods at two study sites in Colorado occupied by geographically separated breeding populations of plovers. We quantified the three covariate categories across standardized site-wide grids in 2021 and 2022. We employed a resource selection analysis to evaluate 10 a priori working hypotheses for how environmental covariates may influence the habitat used by plovers for nesting and brood-rearing. Model comparison results suggest that habitat use relative to availability is best explained by a quadratic relationship with vegetation structure dependent on breeding stage and site but not influenced by food availability or predation risk. Specifically, probability of use for nest sites was highest in areas with shorter vegetation, consistent with previous research, while probability of use for broods was lowest in areas with moderate groundcover height and bare ground coverage and highest at the extremes. These results emphasize the importance of investigating stage-specific habitat use for species with precocial young. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00