Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper examined how metformin modulates the inflammatory response of primary human classical monocytes exposed in vitro to recombinant SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1), focusing on metabolic mechanisms using Seahorse extracellular flux analysis and inflammatory gene expression by qPCR. Monocytes stimulated with rS1 showed increased glycolytic activity linked to pro-inflammatory cytokine production; metformin pretreatment reduced glycolytic activation while partially suppressing inflammation, whereas inhibiting mitochondrial complex I with rotenone and complex I ROS scavenging did not reproduce the same effect. Instead, activation of AMPK with A769662 produced a glycolytic and cytokine expression pattern similar to metformin, suggesting AMPK modulation as a key component of metformin’s action in this setting. The study’s limitation is that it uses in vitro rS1 stimulation of monocytes from healthy donors rather than direct assessment in patients with disease. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Severe COVID-19 is characterized by a hyperinflammatory state associated with an exacerbated inflammatory activation of monocytes and macrophages in the respiratory tract. Metformin has been identified as a potent monocyte inflammatory suppressor, and it has been demonstrated to attenuate inflammation in COVID-19. The mechanisms underlying metformin anti-inflammatory effects are, however, unclear. We thus sought to investigate metformin’s main interactions and their respective isolated effects in modulating monocyte inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 stimulation. Methods Classical human monocytes were isolated from healthy 18-40-year-old individuals and stimulated in vitro with recombinant spike protein subunit 1 (rS1) to assess glycolytic and oxidative metabolic responses by Seahorse extracellular flux analysis, and inflammatory gene expression by qPCR. Stimulated monocytes were either pre-treated with metformin, rotenone, S1QEL, or A769662. Results Monocytes stimulated in vitro with rS1 showed an increased glycolytic response associated with production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Metformin pre-treatment reduced glycolytic activation while partially suppressing inflammation. Rotenone-dependent mitochondrial complex I inhibition was not able to replicate the same effect, and neither complex I specific ROS scavenging. Conversely, A769662 induced AMPK activation led to suppressed glycolytic inflammatory response and cytokine expression pattern similar to metformin, thus suggesting AMPK modulation as a possible central component for metformin’s mode of action upon S1 stimulation. Conclusions In summary, further investigation into the interactions underlying AMPK activity on monocytes in the context of SARS-CoV-2 may provide a better elucidation of metformin’s anti-inflammatory effect.
Full text 41,664 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 View ORCID Profile Rafael Moura Maurmann , Kierstin Davis , View ORCID Profile Negin Mosalmanzadeh , View ORCID Profile Brenda Landvoigt Schmitt , View ORCID Profile Brandt D. Pence doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675877 Rafael Moura Maurmann 1 College of Health Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Rafael Moura Maurmann Kierstin Davis 1 College of Health Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Negin Mosalmanzadeh 1 College of Health Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Negin Mosalmanzadeh Brenda Landvoigt Schmitt 1 College of Health Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Brenda Landvoigt Schmitt Brandt D. Pence 1 College of Health Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Brandt D. Pence For correspondence: bdpence{at}memphis.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Background Severe COVID-19 is characterized by a hyperinflammatory state associated with an exacerbated inflammatory activation of monocytes and macrophages in the respiratory tract. Metformin has been identified as a potent monocyte inflammatory suppressor, and it has been demonstrated to attenuate inflammation in COVID-19. The mechanisms underlying metformin anti-inflammatory effects are, however, unclear. We thus sought to investigate metformin’s main interactions and their respective isolated effects in modulating monocyte inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 stimulation. Methods Classical human monocytes were isolated from healthy 18-40-year-old individuals and stimulated in vitro with recombinant spike protein subunit 1 (rS1) to assess glycolytic and oxidative metabolic responses by Seahorse extracellular flux analysis, and inflammatory gene expression by qPCR. Stimulated monocytes were either pre-treated with metformin, rotenone, S1QEL, or A769662. Results Monocytes stimulated in vitro with rS1 showed an increased glycolytic response associated with production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Metformin pre-treatment reduced glycolytic activation while partially suppressing inflammation. Rotenone-dependent mitochondrial complex I inhibition was not able to replicate the same effect, and neither complex I specific ROS scavenging. Conversely, A769662 induced AMPK activation led to suppressed glycolytic inflammatory response and cytokine expression pattern similar to metformin, thus suggesting AMPK modulation as a possible central component for metformin’s mode of action upon S1 stimulation. Conclusions In summary, further investigation into the interactions underlying AMPK activity on monocytes in the context of SARS-CoV-2 may provide a better elucidation of metformin’s anti-inflammatory effect. Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiologic agent for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease which has infected more than 770 million people and caused over 7 million deaths worldwide since it first outbreak by the end of 2019. 1 While the implementation of widespread vaccination programs has considerably restrained SARS-CoV-2 transmission, 2 the constant pathogen evolution observed during the pandemic raises serious concerns for reinfections and new outbreaks. 3 This is a particular concern for older adults and those with comorbidities ( e . g . diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases) given their higher susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 reinfections and disease severity. 4 , 5 Therefore, pharmacological strategies to counteract disease severity and decrease mortality are still needed. Hyperinflammation is a critical hallmark of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection 6 associated with poor prognosis and increased mortality risk. 7 , 8 Despite inflammatory pattern heterogeneity among individuals, 7 , 9 it resembles the patterns observed in cytokine release syndromes, such as macrophage activation syndrome, thus suggesting a direct connection between dysregulated mononuclear phagocyte activation and COVID-19 severity. 10 , 11 In fact, increased monocyte and monocyte-derived macrophage infiltration into the lungs of individuals with severe COVID-19 has been demonstrated by single cell RNA sequencing studies 12 , 13 and postmortem analyses. 14 , 15 Accordingly, a strong inflammatory activation has been detected in these cells in the lungs of critical patients. 12 , 16 Markers of inflammatory activation have also been observed in circulating monocytes, denoted by high expression of cytokines, expansion of CD14+CD16+ subsets, and decreased HLA-DR expression. 7 , 17 – 19 Altogether, these alterations on the innate immune compartment highlight the striking role of these cells in disease progression. Therapeutic approaches targeting hyperinflammation have been widely explored for reducing COVID-19 severity and mortality. 20 Among them, metformin, a commonly used anti-diabetic drug, has been shown to decrease mortality 21 , 22 and systemic inflammation 23 , 24 in COVID-19 patients undergoing treatment prior to diagnosis. Metformin has also been pointed out as a treatment for non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndromes 25 and as potent suppressor of monocyte and macrophage inflammatory activation. 24 , 26 – 31 The mechanisms underlying metformin immunomodulatory properties are, however, still debatable, and have been mostly attributed to interference with metabolic rewiring of immune cells. 32 Of note, metformin’s mode of action is directly related to inhibition of mitochondrial respiration through complex I blockage and consequent stimulation of AMPK due to a drop in ATP production. 33 While some recent studies have correlated metformin anti-inflammatory properties with inhibition of complex I activity and associated ROS production independent of AMPK activity, 24 , 26 , 27 others have pointed out to the central role of this energy sensor. 28 – 31 Nonetheless, which exact mechanisms are at play in the context of COVID-19 remains an open question. We have previously demonstrated that metformin is able to oppose hypercytokinemia in primary human monocytes stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein and live virus. 34 Metformin reduced cytokine production and strongly inhibited both glycolytic activation and mitochondrial respiration in vitro . However, we did not determine the mechanisms underlying such adaptations. Therefore, in order to further investigate in vitro modulation of metformin observed in our previous study, we sought to isolate metformin’s main interactions, i . e . complex I inhibition and AMPK stimulation, and evaluate their impact on inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 stimulation. Methods Subjects 17 healthy 18-40-year-old individuals were recruited without respect to sex or race. Subjects reported to the laboratory every two weeks, and 8 mL of blood were collected into EDTA-treated vacutainer tubes by venipuncture in each visit. Blood samples were immediately used for monocyte isolation as described below. Monocyte Isolation Human classical monocytes (CD14 + CD16 - ) were isolated using immunomagnetic negative sorting kit (EasySep Direct Human Monocyte Isolation Kit, StemCell Technologies, Cambridge, MA). As we have previously described, 35 this procedure yields a highly pure (> 85%) population of classical monocytes with depletion of intermediate (CD14 + CD16 + ) and non-classical monocytes (CD14 - CD16 + ) due to the presence of an anti-CD16 antibody in the cocktail. Isolated cells were diluted 10× for counting using a hemocytometer chamber. All downstream assays were performed with freshly isolated monocytes. Media and Reagents All assays were performed using Seahorse XF base DMEM medium (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) supplemented with 10 mM glucose and 2 mM L-glutamine (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Recombinant spike protein subunit 1 (rS1) was purchased from RayBiotech (Peachtree Corners, GA). Metformin, S1QEL, rotenone, and A769662 were purchased from Millipore Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Seahorse Extracellular Flux Assay Glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation were quantified via kinetic monitoring of extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR), respectively, on a Seahorse XFp analyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). For all assays, monocytes were plated at 1.5x10 5 cells per well (B-G). Wells A and H were used for background measurement without cells. All analyses were run in duplicate. For metformin, S1QEL, rotenone, and A769662 seahorse assays, cells were incubated with media (wells B-E), or either 5 mM metformin, 5 µM S1QEL, 5 µM rotenone, or 100 µM A769662 (wells F-G) for 1 hour at 37°C in a non-CO 2 incubator prior to Seahorse assays. 5 basal measurements were performed, followed by injection of media (wells B-C) or 300 nM spike protein (wells D-G) for a final concentration of 0 nM (wells B-C) or 30 nM spike protein (wells D-G). ECAR and OCR were then monitored serially for 30 measurements. Following the assay, images from all wells were taken at 10× magnification for cell counting in order to adjust raw measurements for cell number. Cell culture supernatants were then removed, pooled by duplicate, and stored at -80°C. Cells were then lysed with 100 μl Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), pooled by duplicate, and stored at -80°C. Gene Expression RNA isolation was performed using the Trizol method based on manufacturer’s instructions for cell lysates retrieved from Seashore assays. Isolated RNA was quantified on Nanodrop Lite instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 200-600 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Gene expression was analyzed using commercial pre-validated gene expression assays and Taqman reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) on QuantStudio 6 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative gene expression was quantified using the 2 -ΔΔCt method 36 against ACTB as housekeeping gene. Primer/probe IDs were: ACTB (Hs03023943_g1); IL1B (Hs01555410_m1); IL6 (Hs00174131_m1); CXCL8 (Hs00174103_m1); TNF (Hs00174128_m1); IL10 (Hs00961622_m1). Data Processing and Statistical Analysis All data processing and statistical analyses were performed in R v.4.3.1. 37 Isolated monocytes from each individual were subjected to all treatments for each experiment, so data were paired and analyzed using within-subjects designs. Data were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test and analyzed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA, for data which met the normality assumption) or Friedman’s test (for data which did not meet the normality assumption). For analyses with significant main effects, post hoc mean separation was performed using pairwise paired T tests (for RM-ANOVA) or pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (for Friedman’s tests) with p-value adjustment using the Holm-Bonferroni method. 38 Significance cutoff was p<0.05. For cluster analysis cytokine expression data of all treatment was combined, standardized, and modeled using K-means approach. All raw data and analytical scripts (as R markdown files) are available in a dedicated FigShare repository. 39 Ethical Approval All human subject activities were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Memphis under protocol PRO-FY2021-476, and subjects provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. Results Metformin Suppresses Inflammatory Response to Spike Protein SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been previously reported to trigger inflammatory response in myeloid cells. 40 , 41 We have previously demonstrated metformin treatment to suppress inflammatory activation upon spike protein stimulation. 34 Pre-treatment with metformin reduced glycolytic response to rS1 ( Figure 1A ) and strongly inhibited mitochondria respiration ( Figure 1B ) in Seahorse assays. This metabolic response was accompanied by the suppression of IL6 cytokine gene expression, as well as a reduction in IL10 expression ( Figure 1C ). TNF expression was partially reduced but did not reach statistical significance due to limited statistical power ( Figure 1C ). No significative changes were observed regarding IL1B expression ( Figure 1C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Metformin attenuates glycolytic activation and suppresses mitochondrial respiration while partially decreasing inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1). Metformin reduces extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in response rS1 (A) and ablates oxygen consumption rate (OCR) (B). Additionally, metformin alleviates upregulation of inflammatory cytokine gene expression (C). Metformin Inflammatory Suppression is not Dependent on Complex I Inhibition and ROS Production To test whether metformin inflammatory suppression is dependent on its modulation of complex I activity, we first pre-treated monocytes with rotenone, a complex I inhibitor. While no changes were observed in glycolytic response ( Figure 2A ), mitochondrial respiration was strongly suppressed ( Figure 2B ). However, no effects on cytokine expression were observed following rotenone pre-treatment when compared to spike treatment alone ( Figure 2C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Rotenone suppresses mitochondrial respiration but not glycolytic activation or inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1). Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) response is unaltered upon rotenone pre-treatment (A) while oxygen consumption rate (OCR) is completely suppressed. No differences were observed regarding inflammatory gene expression (C). Next, we choose to investigate whether metformin inhibition of ROS production by complex I instead of complex I activity per se modulates inflammatory response. Cells were pre-treated with S1QEL, a complex I superoxide-specific scavenger. No differences in glycolytic response and mitochondrial respiration were observed ( Figure 3A-B ). Likewise, no differences were detected in gene expression when compared to spike treatment alone ( Figure 3C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Complex I reactive oxygen species scavenging does not alter metabolic or inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1). Unaltered extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) (A) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) (B) responses on S1QEL pre-treated cells upon rS1 stimulation. No differences were observed regarding inflammatory gene expression (C). Metformin Inflammatory Modulation is Independent of AMPK Activation Given that metformin-related effects on complex I did not evoke the previously observed inflammatory effects, we assessed whether metformin action was dependent on AMPK activation. Monocytes pre-treated with A769662, a potent specific AMPK activator, displayed a suppressed glycolytic response ( Figure 4A ) without any effects on mitochondrial respiration ( Figure 4B ). Furthermore, no significative differences were detected in cytokine gene expression ( Figure 4C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. AMPK activation ablates glycolytic response but does not alter mitochondrial respiration and inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1). A769662 suppresses extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in response rS1 (A) without altering oxygen consumption rate (OCR) (B). No significant differences were observed regarding inflammatory gene expression (C). Metformin Treatment and AMPK Activation Display Similar Inflammatory Profiles Despite non-significative differences being detected on the inflammatory profile of cells pre-treated with AMPK activator, it resembles the pattern observed on metformin pre-treatment. We thus performed a cluster analysis to evaluate the similarity between the inflammatory profile outputs (IL-1B + IL6 + TNF) of each treatment. As expected, metformin and A769662 treatments where clustered together alongside non-stimulated monocytes, while rotenone and S1QEL treated monocytes clustered with most of media treated wells stimulated with spike protein ( Figure 5 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Metformin and AMPK activation display a similar inflammatory profile in response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 (rS1). Metformin and A769662 treated monocytes were clustered together with non-stimulated monocytes, while rotenone and S1QEL treated cells were clustered with most of media treated wells stimulated with spike protein. Discussion We have previously demonstrated metformin abrogates monocyte inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein and live virus in vitro . 34 While we observed similar results in the present study, we detected a milder suppression regarding to cytokine expression when replicating the experiment. Nevertheless, metformin was still able to suppress glycolytic inflammatory activation and mitochondrial respiration. To elucidate the possible mechanisms underlying metformin related adaptations, we sought to isolate metformin’s main interactions. We first attempted to inhibit complex I with rotenone, but no effects were observed in terms of inflammatory response. Similarly, directly inhibiting ROS production on complex I using S1QEL did not elicit any significant effect. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the indirect effect of metformin on AMPK. Similar to metformin, direct AMPK activation led to suppressed glycolytic inflammatory response, with a low non-significant impact on cytokine expression. However, despite the lack of significant changes in gene expression, AMPK activation elicited a cytokine expression pattern comparable to metformin, thus suggesting AMPK modulation as a possible central node for metformin’s mode of action upon S1 stimulation. Despite the known anti-inflammatory properties of metformin, its mode of action remains controversial, especially regarding its dependency on AMPK modulation. 27 , 32 For instance, Soberanes et al. 26 demonstrated metformin to attenuate particulate matter-induced IL-6 release from alveolar macrophages by inhibiting mitochondrial complex I and consequently suppressing ROS signaling and the opening of Ca 2+ release-activated Ca 2+ channels, central nodes for IL-6 generation. In accordance, Kelly et al. 27 also showed blunted LPS-induced IL-1β expression in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages due to mitochondrial complex I activity and ROS production inhibition by metformin treatment. It is important to note that in both studies metformin anti-inflammatory effects were independent of AMPK activity and mostly attributable to ablation of ROS generation. While we did not measure mitochondrial ROS production, rotenone is known to potentiate its generation, 42 which could thus account for the unaltered inflammatory response observed in the present study. However, in Kelly’s et al. 27 work rotenone treatment was not only able to replicate the same effect as metformin but also promoted a reduction in ROS production. Conversely, a recent study demonstrated metformin’s effect to be also independent of inhibition of mitochondrial ROS production, as pharmacological ROS stimulation was unable to restore inflammatory response to LPS following metformin treatment. 24 The authors attributed metformin’s effect to limited generation and oxidation of mitochondrial DNA, therefore decreasing NLRP3 inflammasome signaling. In this context, combining rotenone to S1QEL treatment may hold a further elucidation whether inhibiting mitochondrial complex I depends on ROS inhibition to suppress rS1 inflammatory stimulation. Regardless of ROS production, those studies highlight the inhibiting mitochondrial complex I as a major node for metformin’s mode of action, which we failed to demonstrate. One of the mainstream effects attributed to metformin is its indirect stimulation of AMPK through changes in cell energy balance. 33 In fact, this phenomenon is associated with most of the benefits of metformin treatment in a plethora of cell types. 42 , 43 AMPK activation antagonizes metabolic inflammatory response by limiting glycolytic capacity and driving oxidation of substrates in mitochondria. 44 This metabolic rewiring interference has been correlated with promotion of inflammatory to anti-inflammatory macrophage switch in a plethora of pathological contexts such as obesity, 30 ischemic stroke, 45 wound healing, 46 and cancer. 47 However, a precise definition of the mechanisms underlying metformin AMPK-dependent effect remains uncovered as it has been attributed to the modulation of distinct inflammatory axis. 28 – 31 Of note, it has been shown to indirectly downregulate NF-κB transcriptional activity consequently suppressing TNF-α expression and ROS production, 31 while other studies have attributed it to NLRP3 modulation and JKN1 phosphorylation. 28 , 29 Nonetheless, we did not observe a significative effect on cytokine expression following AMPK stimulation despite suppressed inflammatory glycolytic activation. Although the evidence provided in this study is not strong enough to demonstrate that metformin acts through AMPK to modulate cytokine production, we can still draw a connection between those based on their similar cytokine profile. An important limitation of this study is that we restricted inflammatory response evaluation to metabolic measures and cytokine expression. For instance, Xian et al. 24 demonstrated a very limited effect of metformin on cytokine expression upon LPS stimulation but with a pronounced modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Besides, we did not include ROS assessment in our analysis, which, despite the controversy on ROS involvement, may provide additional clues of relevant mechanisms to be explored in our model. Additionally we included a small sample size, which may blunt demonstrating some of the interrogated mechanisms due to the large effect size. Nevertheless, we include a healthy young population which we believe excludes extra variance from comorbidities such as aging and provides a better mechanistic evaluation. Conclusions A precise definition of metformin’s mode of action is a challenging task given its connection with pleiotropic metabolic hubs, thus leading to controversial findings. While the tested effects of individualized key metformin’s interactions did not elicit the same response, we were able to identify AMPK activation as a promising central player on our model. We thus believe that a further investigation into the interactions underlying AMPK activity on monocytes stimulated with S1 may hold a potential area of interest. Author Contributions BP conceived the study. BP designed experiments. RMM, KD, NM, BLS, and BP collected data. RMM and BP analyzed data. RMM prepared the first manuscript draft. BP edited the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the participants in this study. Funder Information Declared University of Memphis / University of Tennessee Health Science Center CORNET American Heart Association , 18AIREA33961089 American Heart Association , 19TPA34910232 University of Memphis College of Health Sciences Footnotes Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. Source of Funding The study was primarily supported by a University of Memphis/University of Tennessee Health Science Center Collaborative Research Network (CORNET) award to BP, with additional support from American Heart Association grants 18AIREA33961089 and 19TPA34910232 and a University of Memphis College of Health Sciences faculty research grant to BP. BLS is supported by National Cancer Institute grant U01CA272541. References 1. ↵ World Health Organization . WHO COVID-19 dashboard . World Health Organization . Updated February, 2025 . Accessed February 11, 2025 . https://covid19.who.int/ 2. ↵ Lai CC , Chen IT , Chao CM , Lee PI , Ko WC , Hsueh PR . COVID-19 vaccines: concerns beyond protective efficacy and safety . Expert Rev Vaccines . 2021 ; 20 ( 8 ): 1013 – 1025 . doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1949293 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Markov PV , Ghafari M , Beer M , et al. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 . Nat Rev Microbiol . 2023 ; 21 : 361 – 379 . doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00878-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Barek MA , Aziz MA , Islam MS . Impact of age, sex, comorbidities and clinical symptoms on the severity of COVID-19 cases: A meta-analysis with 55 studies and 10014 cases . Heliyon . 2020 ; 6 ( 12 ): e05684 . doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05684 OpenUrl CrossRef 5. ↵ Shaheen NA , Sambas R , Alenezi M , Alharbi NK , Aldibasi O , Bosaeed M. COVID-19 reinfection: A multicenter retrospective study in Saudi Arabia . Ann Thorac Med . 2022 ; 17 ( 2 ): 81 – 86 . doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_74_22 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Chen G , Wu D , Guo W , et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 . J Clin Invest . 2020 ; 130 ( 5 ): 2620 – 2629 . doi: 10.1172/JCI137244 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Laing AG , Lorenc A , Del Molino Del Barrio I , et al. A dynamic COVID-19 immune signature includes associations with poor prognosis . Nat Med . 2020 ; 26 ( 10 ): 1623 – 1635 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1038-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Del Valle DM , Kim-Schulze S , Huang HH , et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival . Nat Med . 2020 ; 26 ( 10 ): 1636 – 1643 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Pan D , Sze S , Minhas JS , et al. The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review . EClinicalMedicine . 2020 ; 23 : 100404 . doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100404 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Mehta P , McAuley DF , Brown M , et al. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression . Lancet . 2020 ; 395 ( 10229 ): 1033 – 1034 . doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Schulert GS , Grom AA . Pathogenesis of macrophage activation syndrome and potential for cytokine-directed therapies . Annu Rev Med . 2015 ; 66 : 145 – 159 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-061813-012806 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Liao M , Liu Y , Yuan J , et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19 . Nat Med . 2020 ; 26 ( 6 ): 842 – 844 . doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0901-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Zhou Z , Ren L , Zhang L , et al. Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients . Cell Host Microbe . 2020 ; 27 ( 6 ): 883 – 890.e2 . doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.017 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Chen , Y. et al. The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) directly decimates human spleens and lymph nodes . medRxiv . Preprint posted online March 31, 2020 . doi: 10.1101/2020.03.27.20045427 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 15. ↵ Beigmohammadi MT , Jahanbin B , Safaei M , et al. Pathological findings of postmortem biopsies from lung, heart, and liver of 7 deceased COVID-19 patients . Int J Surg Pathol . 2021 ; 29 ( 2 ): 135 – 145 . doi: 10.1177/1066896920935195 OpenUrl CrossRef 16. ↵ Ramachandran P , Dobie R , Wilson-Kanamori JR , et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level . Nature . 2019 ; 575 ( 7783 ): 512 – 518 . doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. ↵ Zhang D , Guo R , Lei L , et al. Frontline Science: COVID-19 infection induces readily detectable morphologic and inflammation-related phenotypic changes in peripheral blood monocytes . J Leukoc Biol . 2021 ; 109 ( 1 ): 13 – 22 . doi: 10.1002/JLB.4HI0720-470R OpenUrl CrossRef 18. Wen W , Su W , Tang H , et al. Immune cell profiling of COVID-19 patients in the recovery stage by single-cell sequencing . Cell Discov . 2020 ; 6 : 41 . doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-00187-5 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Mann ER , Menon M , Knight SB , et al. Longitudinal immune profiling reveals key myeloid signatures associated with COVID-19 . Sci Immunol . 2020 ; 5 ( 51 ): eabd6197 . doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6197 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 20. ↵ Toussi SS , Hammond JL , Gerstenberger BS , Anderson AS . Therapeutics for COVID-19 . Nat Microbiol . 2023 ; 8 ( 5 ): 771 – 786 . doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01356-4 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Hariyanto TI , Kurniawan A. Metformin use is associated with reduced mortality rate from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection . Obes Med . 2020 ; 19 : 100290 . doi: 10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100290 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Lukito AA , Pranata R , Henrina J , Lim MA , Lawrensia S , Suastika K. The effect of metformin consumption on mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Diabetes Metab Syndr . 2020 ; 14 ( 6 ): 2177 – 2183 . doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.11.006 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Cheng X , Liu YM , Li H , et al. Metformin is associated with higher incidence of acidosis, but not mortality, in individuals with COVID-19 and pre-existing type 2 diabetes . Cell Metab . 2020 ; 32 ( 4 ): 537 – 547.e3 . doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.013 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Xian H , Liu Y , Rundberg Nilsson A , et al. Metformin inhibition of mitochondrial ATP and DNA synthesis abrogates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pulmonary inflammation . Immunity . 2021 ; 54 ( 7 ): 1463 – 1477.e11 . doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.05.004 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Yu LL , Zhu M , Huang Y , et al. Metformin relieves acute respiratory distress syndrome by reducing miR-138 expression . Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci . 2018 ; 22 ( 16 ): 5355 – 5363 . doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201808_15737 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Soberanes S , Misharin AV , Jairaman A , et al. Metformin targets mitochondrial electron transport to reduce air-pollution-induced thrombosis . Cell Metab . 2019 ; 29 ( 2 ): 335 – 347.e5 . doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.019 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Kelly B , Tannahill GM , Murphy MP , O’Neill LA . Metformin inhibits the production of reactive oxygen species from NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase to limit induction of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and boosts interleukin-10 (IL-10) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated macrophages . J Biol Chem . 2015 ; 290 ( 33 ): 20348 – 20359 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.662114 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 28. ↵ Vasamsetti SB , Karnewar S , Kanugula AK , Thatipalli AR , Kumar JM , Kotamraju S. Metformin inhibits monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation via AMPK-mediated inhibition of STAT3 activation: Potential role in atherosclerosis . Diabetes . 2015 ; 64 ( 6 ): 2028 – 2041 . doi: 10.2337/db14-1225 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Kim J , Kwak HJ , Cha JY , et al. Metformin suppresses lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response in murine macrophages via activating transcription factor-3 (ATF-3) induction . J Biol Chem . 2014 ; 289 ( 33 ): 23246 – 23255 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.577908 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 30. ↵ Jing Y , Wu F , Li D , Yang L , Li Q , Li R. Metformin improves obesity-associated inflammation by altering macrophages polarization . Mol Cell Endocrinol . 2018 ; 461 : 256 – 264 . doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.025 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Bułdak Ł , Machnik G , Bułdak RJ , Łabuzek K , Bołdys A , Okopień B. Exenatide and metformin express their anti-inflammatory effects on human monocytes/macrophages by the attenuation of MAPKs and NFκB signaling . Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol . 2016 ; 389 ( 10 ): 1103 – 1115 . doi: 10.1007/s00210-016-1277-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Ursini F , Russo E , Pellino G , et al. Metformin and autoimmunity: A “new deal” of an old drug . Front Immunol . 2018 ; 9 : 1236 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01236 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Foretz M , Guigas B , Bertrand L , Pollak M , Viollet B. Metformin: From mechanisms of action to therapies . Cell Metab . 2014 ; 20 ( 6 ): 953 – 966 . doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.018 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Cory TJ , Emmons RS , Yarbro JR , Davis KL , Pence BD . Metformin suppresses monocyte immunometabolic activation by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 . Front Immunol . 2021 ; 12 : 733921 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.733921 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Pence BD , Yarbro JR . Aging impairs mitochondrial respiratory capacity in classical monocytes . Exp Gerontol . 2018 ; 108 : 112 – 117 . doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.008 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Livak KJ , Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method . Methods . 2001 ; 25 ( 4 ): 402 – 408 . doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 37. ↵ R Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing . 2014 . Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ 38. ↵ Holm , S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure . Scand J Stat . 1979 ; 6 ( 2 ): 65 – 70 . http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733 OpenUrl Web of Science 39. ↵ FigShare . doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30113695 OpenUrl CrossRef 40. ↵ Ropa J , Cooper S , Capitano ML , Van’t Hof W , Broxmeyer HE . Human hematopoietic stem, progenitor, and immune cells respond ex vivo to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein . Stem Cell Rev Rep . 2021 ; 17 ( 1 ): 253 – 265 . doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10056-z OpenUrl CrossRef 41. ↵ Karwaciak I , Sałkowska A , Karaś K , Dastych J , Ratajewski M. Nucleocapsid and spike proteins of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 induce IL6 in monocytes and macrophages-potential implications for cytokine storm syndrome . Vaccines (Basel) . 2021 ; 9 ( 1 ): 54 . doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010054 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Li N , Ragheb K , Lawler G , et al. Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone induces apoptosis through enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production . J Biol Chem . 2003 ; 278 ( 10 ): 8516 – 8525 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210432200 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 43. ↵ Li Y , Xu S , Mihaylova MM , et al. AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits SREBP activity to attenuate hepatic steatosis and atherosclerosis in diet-induced insulin-resistant mice . Cell Metab . 2011 ; 13 ( 4 ): 376 – 388 . doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.009 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 44. ↵ O’Neill LA , Hardie DG . Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation . Nature . 2013 ; 493 ( 7432 ): 346 – 355 . doi: 10.1038/nature11862 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 45. ↵ Jin Q , Cheng J , Liu Y , et al. Improvement of functional recovery by chronic metformin treatment is associated with enhanced alternative activation of microglia/macrophages and increased angiogenesis and neurogenesis following experimental stroke . Brain Behav Immun . 2014 ; 40 : 131 – 142 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.03.003 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 46. ↵ Qing L , Fu J , Wu P , Zhou Z , Yu F , Tang J. Metformin induces the M2 macrophage polarization to accelerate the wound healing via regulating AMPK/mTOR/NLRP3 inflammasome singling pathway . Am J Transl Res . 2019 ; 11 ( 2 ): 655 – 668 . OpenUrl PubMed 47. ↵ Wang JC , Li GY , Wang B , et al. Metformin inhibits metastatic breast cancer progression and improves chemosensitivity by inducing vessel normalization via PDGF-B downregulation . J Exp Clin Cancer Res . 2019 ; 38 ( 1 ): 235 . doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1211-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 12, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 Rafael Moura Maurmann , Kierstin Davis , Negin Mosalmanzadeh , Brenda Landvoigt Schmitt , Brandt D. Pence bioRxiv 2025.09.12.675877; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675877 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Immunoregulatory effect of metformin in monocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit 1 Rafael Moura Maurmann , Kierstin Davis , Negin Mosalmanzadeh , Brenda Landvoigt Schmitt , Brandt D. Pence bioRxiv 2025.09.12.675877; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.12.675877 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Immunology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7640) Biochemistry (17707) Bioengineering (13903) Bioinformatics (41980) Biophysics (21465) Cancer Biology (18613) Cell Biology (25528) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13387) Ecology (19920) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24332) Genetics (15615) Genomics (22519) Immunology (17747) Microbiology (40424) Molecular Biology (17194) Neuroscience (88664) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2839) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4827) Physiology (7650) Plant Biology (15160) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9826) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00