Cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer in comparison with induction of ovulation with gonadotropins in the treatment of female infertility: a clinical trial
rct
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) with that of conventional infertility treatment in couples with female infertility, excluding tubal factors.
DESIGN: Patients were randomly divided in two groups: receiving GIFT or conventional infertility treatment. For a period of 2 years, GIFT was compared with conventional infertility treatment in couples with endometriosis, anovulation, idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus factor, female immunologic factor, or multifactorial causes of infertility in a randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: The study was performed in the Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa.
PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-four successive couples with female infertility were selected for the study. All couples were from the higher socioeconomic bracket.
INTERVENTIONS: One group received GIFT and the other received conventional infertility treatment consisting of induction of ovulation with gonadotropins followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The results were stratified according to the specific cause of infertility. Outcome was measured by the success rate per treatment cycle, as well as the cost per pregnancy.
RESULTS: Overall, GIFT proved to be successful in 26.7% of treatment cycles compared with 9.7% with conventional therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: After careful analysis, the authors came to the conclusion that GIFT is more cost-effective than conventional infertility treatment in patients with endometriosis and anovulation. In patients with idiopathic infertility, immunologic infertility, a cervical mucus factor, and multifactorial infertility, induction of ovulation followed by intrauterine artificial insemination or normal intercourse proved to be more cost-effective.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-13T06:13:37.491660+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:49.821429+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine