Mode II Compensation Failure in Endometriosis: A Formal Derivation of the Fibrotic Locking Threshold and Four Testable Predictions
This paper derives a fibrotic locking threshold for endometriosis and proposes that antifibrotic therapy combined with wound-rate reduction is necessary and sufficient for non-redundant lesion recovery.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper studies endometriosis as a formal example of Mode II compensation failure, using a cycle-averaged differential equation that incorporates two nonlinearities in fibrotic wound healing: self-amplifying ECM stiffening and resolution saturation, to explain why combining anti-injury approaches with antifibrotic therapy is non-redundant rather than merely additive. It derives a closed-form fibrotic locking threshold, ε* = ρ / [ρ + (√α + √(θ/ψ))²], and proves that both nonlinearities are required to produce bistability (neither alone suffices), with sufficiency established separately. It then presents four falsifiable predictions about how anti-platelet modulation of wound initiation, TGF-β3 restoration of resolution efficiency, and specific combination effects alter progression and recoverable lesion basins, and it includes a worked example addressing a separation of fibrotic benefit from fertility cost under the stated model. The paper does not state an explicit empirical limitation beyond being a formal framework tied to existing nonlinearities, and it preserves ovulation in its model because none of the interventions targets the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it derives a fibrotic “locking threshold” model to explain non-redundant combined antifibrotic and anti-injury strategies in endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-16T06:00:53.652782+00:00