Tropical diseases conference 2019 Differences in autophagy-associated mRNAs in peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and gynecologic cancers

In: Journal of Next Generation Sequencing & Applications · 2020 · vol. 6(2) , pp. 1–2 · W3046390011
article OA: green CC0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on OpenAlex

Abstract

Endometriosis and gynecologic cancer show similar patterns of invasion. Little is known about the roles of autophagy in endometriosis and, to date, the expression of autophagy-associated mRNAs has not been compared in patients with endometriosis and gynecologic cancers. This study therefore compared the levels of expression of autophagy-associated mRNAs in patients with endometriosis and gynecologic cancers. The levels of autophagy mRNAs, including those encoding mTOR, P13KC3, Beclin-1, Bcl-2, LC3 II, FLIP, Rubicon, BIRC2 and BIRC5, were measured by real time polymerase chain reaction in peritoneal fluid of 27 patients with benign masses (control group), 42 patients with endometriosis, and 43 patients with gynecologic (ovarian, uterine, and cervical) cancers. Findings in the three groups were compared.Autophagy mRNAs were present in all samples from patients with endometriosis and gynecologic cancers. The levels of PI3K, FLIP, and Rubicon mRNAs were significantly higher in the endometriosis than in the control group (p<0.05 each). Compared with the gynecologic cancer group, the levels of LC3II and FLIP mRNAs were significantly lower, and the levels of Beclin-1 and Rubicon mRNAs significantly higher, in the endometriosis group (p<0.05 each). Levels of PI3K and FLIP mRNA were significantly higher in the endometriosis and gynecologic cancer groups than in the control group (p<0.05 each). PI3K, FLIP, and Rubicon mRNAs are closely associated with the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The similar increases in PI3K and FLIP mRNA expression observed in patients with endometriosis and gynecologic cancer suggest that these conditions have similar autophagic characteristics. The lower levels of Beclin-1 mRNA in the gynecologic cancer than in other two groups suggest that lowerBeclin-1 mRNA levels increase the likelihood of developing gynecologic cancer.
Full text 8,315 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 2 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Autophagy is a manner of lysosomal self-degradation of cellular components through forming autophagosomes which are con - served in all eukaryotes (1, 2). This is a pivotal manner to main - tain mobile homeostasis (three). An autophagosome is a dou - ble-membrane vesicle that incorporates sequestered cytoplasmic cargos and transports them to lysosomes (4). Autophagosome for- mation is an important step in autophagy and is first-rate-tuned by various autophagy-associated gene (ATG) products, inclusive of ATG5, ATG12, and ATG16. During autophagosome forma - tion, ATG5 is conjugated with ATG12 by means of ubiquitin-like conjugation structures and, similarly, forms a homodimer which includes an ATG5-ATG12/ATG16 complicated (five, 6). The complex is localized to autophagy-associated membranes and me- diates LC3 conversion (7–nine). LC3 conversion is widely used as a marker of autophagosome formation (10). It has been men - tioned that lack of ATG5, ATG12, or ATG16 outcomes in a lower of autophagosome formation, thereby impairing the autophagic system (11–thirteen). Autophagy is involved in various stress responses, and dysreg - ulation of autophagy has been determined in many sicknesses, such as cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury, Crohn’s sickness, neurodegeneration, myopathy, and diabetes, functioning because the driving or exacerbating aspect inside the pathogenesis of the diseases (3). In addition, autophagy is implicated in cancer de - velopment, even though it continues to be debatable whether or not autophagy promotes or suppresses the increase of cancer cells (14). Several reviews have proven that autophagy is a prosurviv - al process in established most cancers cells, and the inhibition of autophagy is one of the strategies for cancer remedy (14–17). Therefore, elucidation of the quality molecular mechanisms of autophagic procedures is important in expertise the position of autophagy in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases. Several vital regulators had been identified, and their expression mechanisms have been elucidated in numerous models (reviewed in references 4 and 18). Several microRNAs (miRNAs) were suggested to be pivotal regulators of autophagy (19–21). In this have a look at, we investigated the regulatory mechanism of autophagosome forma - tion on the RNA degree. HuR (human antigen R) (also referred to as HuA or ELAVL1) is a member of the Hu/ELAV (embryonic lethal strange vision)-like RNA binding protein (RBP) family containing three RNA recog - nition motifs (RRM) (22). HuR binds to AU-rich factors (ARE) inside the untranslated areas (UTRs) of goal mRNAs and regu - lates gene expression by affecting the stableness or translation of goal mRNAs (22, 23). HuR is ubiquitously expressed and has essential roles in immune reaction, angiogenesis, metastasis, and cancer improvement through regulating cell proliferation, migra - tion, survival, dying, and autophagy (24). HuR is thought to sell cellular increase and survival by using increasing most cancers-re - Short Communication Vol.06 Iss.2 Volume 06 • Issue 2 lated genes, consisting of the Cox-2, hypoxia-inducible element 1α (HIF-1α), and vascular endothelial growth component (VEGF) genes, and augmented expression of HuR is related to cancer pro- gression in a few kinds of most cancers (23, 25–27). Several efforts have been made to validate the capability of HuR as a molecular target for most cancers remedy (28–30). Here, we look at the role of HuR within the regulation of au - tophagosome formation and display that HuR silencing reduces autophagosome formation and the autophagic flux of human liver cells. Along with previous studies showing SQSTM1/p62 regulation through HuR (31, 32), we identify ATG5, ATG12, and ATG16 mRNAs as novel objectives of HuR and reveal augmented expression of ATG5, ATG12, ATG16, and HuR in hepatocellu - lar carcinoma (HCC). Our outcomes provide a molecular mech - anism of autophagosome formation regulated by HuR and the capacity of HuR concentrated on in cancer development. Biography : Specialist in Robot-assisted surgery, single port laparoscopic sur - gery, gynecologic oncology(cancer), laparoscopic surgery for gyne- cologic cancer, and general gynecology. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea

References

• Yang HL, Mei J, Chang KK, Zhou WJ, Huang LQ, Li MQ. Autophagy in endometriosis. Am J Transl Res. 2017; 9(11):4707-4725 • Zhan L, Li J, Wei B. Autophagy in endometriosis: Friend or foe? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018; 495(1): 60-63. • Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of au - tophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1993; 333: 169–174. • Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. The role of Atg pro- teins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011; 27: 107–132. • Levine B, Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of dis- ease. Cell. 2008; 132: 27–42. • Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011; 147: 728–741. • Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 368: 651–662. • Hirsch M, Duffy J, Davis CJ, Nieves Plana M, Khan KS. In - ternational Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes and Mea- sures for Endometriosis. BJOG. 2016 Oct; 123(11): 1761-8. • Tae Gyu Choi, Sung Soo Kim. Autophagy in Redox Signal - ling. Hanyang Med Rev. 2013; 33: 83-89 • Cuervo AM. Autophagy: in sickness and in health. Trends Note: This work is partly presented at 6th International Conference on Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases (January 28-29, 2019 Barcelona, Spain). Cell Biol. 2004; 14: 70-77. • Gozuacik D, Kimchi A. Autophagy as a cell death and tumor suppression mechanism Oncogene. 2004; 23: 2891-2906

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK