Abstract
Static structural models often fail to capture the dynamic mechanisms of protein interactions. To address this, we introduce DynaPIN, an open-source pipeline for extracting dynamic interface fingerprints from molecular simulations. DynaPIN unifies quality control metrics, interface prediction accuracy assessment, and atomistic interaction analysis into a single automated workflow, accessible at https://github.com/CSB-KaracaLab/DynaPIN . A key feature is our interface-specific analysis centered on a Dynamic Interface definition, which classifies residues based on the persistence of their interaction status over the simulation. We applied DynaPIN to representative rigid, medium, and difficult targets from the DynaBench dataset, an MD simulation resource for Docking Benchmark 5.5. Our results show that interface flexibility diverges from static accuracy classifications established in Docking Benchmark 5.5, as explored before. All in all, by providing standardized, frame-resolved outputs, DynaPIN’s aim is to facilitate mechanistic studies and generate standardized unbiased data for future dynamics-aware artificial intelligence models.
Full text
1,234 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Static structural models often fail to capture the dynamic mechanisms of protein interactions. To address this, we introduce DynaPIN, an open-source pipeline for extracting dynamic interface fingerprints from molecular simulations. DynaPIN unifies quality control metrics, interface prediction accuracy assessment, and atomistic interaction analysis into a single automated workflow, accessible at https://github.com/CSB-KaracaLab/DynaPIN. A key feature is our interface-specific analysis centered on a Dynamic Interface definition, which classifies residues based on the persistence of their interaction status over the simulation. We applied DynaPIN to representative rigid, medium, and difficult targets from the DynaBench dataset, an MD simulation resource for Docking Benchmark 5.5. Our results show that interface flexibility diverges from static accuracy classifications established in Docking Benchmark 5.5, as explored before. All in all, by providing standardized, frame-resolved outputs, DynaPIN’s aim is to facilitate mechanistic studies and generate standardized unbiased data for future dynamics-aware artificial intelligence models.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.