Barcoding Brazilian mammals to monitor biological diversity and threats: trends, perspectives, and knowledge gaps
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
DNA barcoding and environmental DNA (eDNA) represent an important advance for biomonitoring the world's biodiversity and its threats. However, these methods are highly dependent on the presence of species sequences on molecular databases. Brazil is one of the largest and most biologically diverse countries in the world. However, many knowledge gaps still exist for the description, identification, and monitoring of its mammalian biodiversity using molecular methods. We aimed at unraveling the patterns related to the presence of Brazilian mammal species on molecular databases to improve our understanding on how effectively it would be to monitor them using DNA barcoding and environmental DNA, and contribute to the conservation of this flagship zoological group. We found that many gaps exist in molecular databases, with many taxa being poorly represented, particularly from the Amazon biome, the order Lagomorpha, and arboreal, gomivorous, near extinct, and illegally traded species. Moreover, our analyses revealed that the year of species description was the most important factor determining the probability of a species to have been sequenced. Primates are the group with the highest number of species considered to be priority for sequencing due to their high level of combined threats. We highlight where investments are needed to fill knowledge gaps and increase the representativity of species on molecular databases to enable a better monitoring ability of Brazilian mammals encompassing different traits using DNA barcoding and environmental DNA.
Full text
2,161 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
DNA barcoding and environmental DNA (eDNA) represent an important advance for biomonitoring the world's biodiversity and its threats. However, these methods are highly dependent on the presence of species sequences on molecular databases. Brazil is one of the largest and most biologically diverse countries in the world. However, many knowledge gaps still exist for the description, identification, and monitoring of its mammalian biodiversity using molecular methods. We aimed at unraveling the patterns related to the presence of Brazilian mammal species on molecular databases to improve our understanding on how effectively it would be to monitor them using DNA barcoding and environmental DNA, and contribute to the conservation of this flagship zoological group. We found that many gaps exist in molecular databases, with many taxa being poorly represented, particularly from the Amazon biome, the order Lagomorpha, and arboreal, gomivorous, near extinct, and illegally traded species. Moreover, our analyses revealed that the year of species description was the most important factor determining the probability of a species to have been sequenced. Primates are the group with the highest number of species considered to be priority for sequencing due to their high level of combined threats. We highlight where investments are needed to fill knowledge gaps and increase the representativity of species on molecular databases to enable a better monitoring ability of Brazilian mammals encompassing different traits using DNA barcoding and environmental DNA.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X29P56
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
biomonitoring; conservation; environmental DNA; Mammalia; Neotropics.
Dates
Published: 2024-02-10 13:29
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00