Creating ontological definitions for use in science

2019 · doi:10.32388/ygif9b
preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 ⓘ

This article defines ontological definitions as precise descriptions of entity classes and relationships used in science and provides a guide for creating them using a standard format.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text ⓘ

The paper describes a method for creating ontological definitions intended for use in science, focusing on how to formally specify terms so they can be applied consistently across scientific work. It presents an approach rather than a biomedical experiment, aiming to improve clarity and interoperability of scientific language. The main limitation is that the provided text does not include detailed results, datasets, or domain-specific validation that would allow assessment of performance in any particular biological context. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Ontological definitions provide clarity and facilitate communication which accelerate the development of understanding and the accumulation of evidence about the world. It is hard to write good definitions. Too often they are partial, vague, or fail adequately to characterise the entity to which they refer. Ontological definitions are descriptions of entity classes or relationships that represent their essential properties in such a way that the defined entities are uniquely and fully specified. These definitions are then assigned a label to allow them to be used in scientific discourse. This article provides a brief guide to help with writing good ontological definitions. The standard format of such a definition is: A is a B that C, or involves or relates to C in some way, where A is the class being defined, B is a parent class and C describes a set of properties of A that distinguish it from other members of B.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00