Simulated drought with Polyethylene-Glycol (PEG) decreases above-ground performance and increases nodulation in the legume Medicago lupulina

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Under climate change, understanding how plants and crops respond to drought is essential for basic research in ecology and evolution, and improving agricultural resilience. One common method of simulating drought in experimental conditions is by applying polyethylene glycol (PEG) to plants. We investigated drought growth responses in Medicago lupulina (black medic) using PEG to simulate drought stress. We grew Medicago lupulina plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti in Magenta boxes under controlled conditions and randomly assigned them to one of three treatments: a control, PEG applied to the bottom (PEG added to the bottom-watering container of a magenta box), or PEG applied from the top (PEG poured over the growth media). After 60 days, we measured true leaf number, nodule count, and below- and above-ground dry biomass. PEG treatments significantly reduced above-ground growth, including total biomass and leaf number, but unexpectedly increased nodulation. Our results suggest that while PEG effectively simulates drought stress on above-ground growth parameters, it may not accurately simulate drought effects on rhizobial symbiosis. PEG treatments had no effect on below-ground biomass, suggesting that increased nodulation is not a result of increased plant investment in below-ground growth under simulated drought. We hypothesize that PEG, as a persistent liquid that plants do not absorb, created conditions favorable for nodulation. Overall, these results highlight the importance of interpreting PEG-simulated drought experiments with caution when assessing mutualistic interactions.
Full text 2,071 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Under climate change, understanding how plants and crops respond to drought is essential for basic research in ecology and evolution, and improving agricultural resilience. One common method of simulating drought in experimental conditions is by applying polyethylene glycol (PEG) to plants. We investigated drought growth responses in Medicago lupulina (black medic) using PEG to simulate drought stress. We grew Medicago lupulina plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti in Magenta boxes under controlled conditions and randomly assigned them to one of three treatments: a control, PEG applied to the bottom (PEG added to the bottom-watering container of a magenta box), or PEG applied from the top (PEG poured over the growth media). After 60 days, we measured true leaf number, nodule count, and below- and above-ground dry biomass. PEG treatments significantly reduced above-ground growth, including total biomass and leaf number, but unexpectedly increased nodulation. Our results suggest that while PEG effectively simulates drought stress on above-ground growth parameters, it may not accurately simulate drought effects on rhizobial symbiosis. PEG treatments had no effect on below-ground biomass, suggesting that increased nodulation is not a result of increased plant investment in below-ground growth under simulated drought. We hypothesize that PEG, as a persistent liquid that plants do not absorb, created conditions favorable for nodulation. Overall, these results highlight the importance of interpreting PEG-simulated drought experiments with caution when assessing mutualistic interactions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The fifth paragraph of the Description section was updated with more references and descriptions of the nodule response of Medicago to drought; the topic sentence of the second paragraph of the Description section was elaborated; Figure labels were enlarged; The raw data and R code were published on Zenodo and referenced in the Statistical Analysis section.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00