Assessment of phytosanitary practices on the environment: Case study potato of Loukkos (North-West Morocco)

Assessment of phytosanitary practices on the environment: Case study potato of Loukkos (North-West Morocco) | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Assessment of phytosanitary practices on the environment: Case study potato of Loukkos (North-West Morocco) Mohamed Abbou, Mohamed Chabbi, Mohamed Benicha This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Feb, 2023 Read the published version in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment → Version 1 posted 4 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Loukkos perimeter is among the most important irrigated agricultural areas in Morocco. It covers horticulture and market garden production, including potato. This crop is characterized by the intensive use of pesticides that could lead to health and ecological risks, via the food chain and contamination of natural resources, including groundwater. This study aims to assess the use of pesticides in potato cultivation and their impacts on the environment and human health. Here, pesticide use was characterized by the number of treatments (NT), quantity of active substances indicator (QASI) and the treatment frequency indicator (TFI), through field surveys carried out on 50 Loukkos potato producers. The results showed that farmers use heavy pesticide treatments, mainly against late blight. We determined NT = 19 treatments, total TFI = 28.10 and QASI = 14.86 kg/ha. These values reflect a massive use of pesticides on this crop, which could therefore constitute a challenge and a major constraint for the development of sustainable agriculture in this zone, due to their negative environmental and health effects. It is, therefore, necessary to react quickly to make changes in phytosanitary practices with the aim to monitoring pesticide use via the agro-environmental indicators to reduce health and environmental impact of intensive pesticide use. Potato pesticides agro-environmental indicators phytosanitary practices Loukkos Morocco Introduction Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the fourth most important agronomic crop in the world after wheat, rice, and maize (Sampaio et al. 2020; Sookhtanlou et al., 2021). In Morocco, the potato is one of the most economically important crops. The area is sown with potatoes varies from 50000 to 60000 ha per year. It represents l8 to l9% of the total surface area of cultivated vegetable crops (Alaoui et al., 2021). According to a section of the widely used FAOSTAT database, the cultivation of potatoes is widely practiced with an estimated area of 57534 ha and a production of 1707068T with an average national yield of 29.67 T/ha (FAO (FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2022). Together with sugar crops and cereals, potatoes represent one of the leading agricultural products in Morocco, principally for irrigated zones, including the Loukkos perimeter. In view of the fact that this crop requires inputs, especially pesticides, the problems of the irrational use of this production factor are posed with acuity in the face of biodiversity and public health. More concretely, upon completion of the Green Morroco Plan (GMP) period, the government launched in 2020, Green Generation 2020-2030, a new Moroccan agricultural strategy. Being a strategic sector with the ambition of doubling its GDP by 2030. This strategy aimed to promote modern agriculture, with high added value crops adapted to export markets. A change towards more intensive agricultural practices in the foreseeable future, as foreseen by this new strategy, will further increase the risk of diffuse pollution of water, air, and soil from agricultural sources. This can undoubtedly pose different implications for both natural resources and humans because of the heavy use of pesticides. Besides, potato plants are susceptible to a wide variety of diseases that severely can reduce the yield, quality, and storability of tubers (Meno et al., 2021). Without pesticides use, there would be a 78% loss of fruit production, a 54% loss of vegetable production and a 32% loss of cereal production (Tudi et al., 2021). In intensive agriculture, as is the case in the Loukkos area, potato cultivation faces major difficulties, mainly related to the control of late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans , which remain the most expensive potato pathogen to manage worldwide (Goss et al., 2013). The potato is a crop that is very consumptive of pesticides in the Loukkos perimeter, since it is exposed to multiple attacks by pests and diseases that damage the product and cause significant economic losses. Concomitantly, aphids cause serious losses in potato plants and tubers, mostly because they vector viruses (Saguez et al., 2013). The absence of an environmentally friendly alternative for the management of potato pests and diseases has left farmers with no option other than pesticides used in potato crops. For this reason, the use of pesticides on potatoes is an integral part of agricultural practice at the Loukkos perimeter. However, the misuse of these products could hurt both human health (Berni et al., 2021b) and the environment (Berni et al., 2021a) including the contamination of surface and groundwater, soil, and the living environments of non-target organisms (Rissouli et al., 2017; Farahy et al., 2021), through the flow processes, leaching, and spraying. On the other hand, exposure to pesticides also affects biodiversity (Shefali et al., 2020; Pelosi et al., 2021; Wen et al., 2021). They could alter the functioning of the endocrine system (Girard et al. 2020) and the use of pesticides in mixtures can act additively, synergistically, and/or antagonistically in the environment (cocktail effect) (López et al., 2021). In Morocco, between 2008 and 2014, total pesticide imports increased from 17.135 tons/y to 19.180 tons/y (Berni et al., 2021a). In addition, due to the lack of education and the presence of a counterfeit market, pesticides constitute a major problem to be addressed by occupational and environmental health (Menouni et al., 2022). Based on the results of the intoxication analysis, pesticides are a serious public health problem in Morocco, as long as they have been incriminated, according to the Moroccan Anti-Poison and Pharmacovigilance Center, pesticides caused 4110 cases of poisoning between 2008 and 2014 cases of poisoning between 2008 and 2014 (Berni et al., 2021b). On the other hand, the National Food Safety Office (ONSSA) destroyed last year 136 tons of potatoes due to exceeding MRLs or the use of unauthorized pesticides (Bahouq et al., 2021). However, the phytosanitary protection practices implemented by potato producers are poorly documented at the Loukkos perimeter and therefore, remain poorly known. Given these findings, the evaluation of the pressure of plant protection practices on the environment is necessary to highlight the current state of the crop from an environmental point of view. In addition, the evaluation of pesticide use becomes a fundamental requirement to ensure sustainable development. The integration of indicators in tools to evaluate the sustainability of practices is an important issue (Lamichhane et al. 2019), including the treatment frequency indicator (IFT) and the quantity of active substances indicator (QASI) (Hossard et al., 2017; Fouillet et al., 2022), recently used in the Ecophyto plant in France to reduce pesticide use (Vernier et al., 2013; Guichard et al., 2017). In this light, Agro-environmental indicators can be used as a monitoring tool to minimize pesticide use in Loukkos perimeter. The objective of this work is to assess the pressure of pesticide use in potato cultivation at Loukkos perimeter, north-west of Morocco, by determining agro-environmental indicators, and whose aim is to contribute to the more responsible use of plant protection products and the development of sustainable crop protection in this region. Materials And Methods Description of the study area This study was conducted within the Loukkos perimeter of Northwest Morocco. Its total area is 2650 km 2 . The region has a useful agricultural area of 147.500 Ha, 45.000 Ha of which are irrigated. The region has a Mediterranean climate with an annual average temperature ranging between 11°C in winter and 25°C in summer, and annual average rainfall is approximately of 700 mm between October and April (Sarti et al., 2021). This area is a major asset for the development of the region. It is characterized by intensive agriculture including horticulture and market gardening. The sandy soil originated from the Loukkos region called “R’mel”, is inorganic and poor in nitrogen, its texture is sandy (Benicha et al., 2016; Elhani et al., 2019). Conduct of surveys To assess potato practices, field surveys were carried out using a questionnaire containing information on the farmer (age, sex, education level), the agricultural planted area, varieties, and pesticide treatments (frequency, dose, target, period, time to harvest,…). A total of 50 farms were surveyed representing different areas of Loukkos (El Aouamra, Oulad El Ghoumari, Zlaoula, Laghdira, and Rehamna). All potato farmers themselves used chemical pesticides on their farms. Agro-environmental indicators In the present study, pesticide use in cultivation in Loukkos perimeter was characterized by three agro-environmental indicators: the number of treatments (NT), treatment frequency indicator (TFI) and quantity of active substances indicator (QASI). The NT is defined as the sum of the total number of products applied per pass on the agricultural plot during a marketing year. A mixture of two products applied during the same passage also counts for two treatments. The TFI reflects the intensity of pesticide use on a farm (Pierlot et al., 2017). It is commonly used in Europe to assess the reliance of cropping systems on pesticides (Yvoz et al., 2020). The QASI is a simple indicator of the quantity of active substances used per ha (Möhring et al., 2019). It is also among the important indicators used to monitor the Ecophyto 2018 plan in France (Hossard et al., 2017). Results Characteristics of the farmers surveyed Data distribution of some features available in the data set includes the variety, age, educational attainment and Farm size were used to describe the population and the farms to measure the variables studies. The results are presented in (Table 1). Table 1 Basic sociodemographic information of interviewees in Loukkos (n = 50) Variables Category/Type Frequency Proportion (%) Farm size 0.5-2ha 2ha-3ha 3ha-5ha 26 13 11 52 26 22 Age years years 31 10 09 62 20 13 Variety Name Manitou Memphis Mondial Cornado 25 10 10 05 50 20 20 10 Education level None Primary Secondary 33 12 05 67 24 09 The main pests and diseases of crops in the plain of Loukkos associated with potatoes Phytophthora infestans , the pathogen of potato late blight which is a devastating disease of potatoes among all farmers surveyed, causes stem and leaf rot, leading to significant economic losses. It is more and more frequently encountered in prospected farms. This disease can only be treated as a preventive measure, mainly in the function of the risk level and pluviometry during the cycle of crop growth. Late blight is recognized thanks to oily and brown, rounded spots on the upper surface of the leaves. The presence of late blight is still signaled, but the incidence is much more important with the increase in humidity. On the other hand, the sunniest months are the most favorable for the apparition of aphids belonging to the order Hemiptera and the family Aphididae . The latter develops in priority on the leaves of the lower part of the plant and especially in the lower face of the leaves, leading to severe yield reduction and loss of tuber quality. The present research findings indicated that the disease severity was significantly noticed during surveys, which makes agriculture depend on the pesticides used, pushing the farmers to use, heavily the pesticides to fight against these diseases. Nevertheless, pesticides pose a particular danger to farmers, not only through their massive use, but through the absence of personal protective equipment, adequate storage, no respect for good practices. Nevertheless, pesticides pose a particular danger to farmers, not only through their massive use but through the absence of personal protective equipment, adequate storage, and no respect for good practices, due to the low level of education of the producers and lack of training qualifying who remain a strong obstacle with the good knowledge of the ecotoxicity of the pesticides and their dangers chronic. This situation may lead to a risk of contamination and thereby health risks. Categories of active substances identified during potato crop production cycle From the 31 commercial products used for the cultivation of potatoes, 25 different active substances, belonging to 19 chemical families, have been identified. In terms of quantity, fungicides remain the most used with 84%, followed by insecticides with 9% and herbicides with 7%. Among these substances, 56.7% are not registered on the potato crop in Morocco. The pesticides used are classified, in terms of toxicity according to the WHO, as moderately hazardous (67%), slightly hazardous (12%), while (21%) are listed as unlikely to be acutely hazardous in normal use. Irrational use of the latter can have chronic and acute health effects, depending on the level and route of exposure. Moreover, on the ecological side, 66% of these substances are difficult biodegradable, while 24% are rapidly biodegradable. This can lead to significant health and ecological consequences due to their persistence and accumulation in soils, surfaces, and groundwater, and their adverse effects on biodiversity. Pesticide preparations based on organophosphates (chlorpyrifos-ethyl, dimethoate), carbamates (mancozeb, propamocarb, maneb), phenylamides (metalaxyl), pyrethroids (deltamethrin) and neonicotinoids (thiacloprid, sulfoxaflor, imidacloprid), bipyridiles (diquat, paraquat) and substituted ureas (linuron), were the most used pesticide substances against the pests of Loukkos potato. These pesticides all have, with different degrees, potential for toxicity and can, unfortunately, be harmful, both to humans and to non-target organisms. Mancozeb is the active ingredient most used in all the surveyed sites, to control mildew. Its availability in several commercial specialties (Turbo ZM, Uthane, Buster, Systemil 72 WP, Ridomil gold MZ 68 WG, Agrizibe, and Dithane M45) and the existence of several pesticide shops, further facilitates its use. The application rates vary from 2 to 6 Kg/ha per treatment, which is two to three times higher than the approved dose/ the registered rate. Regarding the specifications of the commercial specialties used, we noticed that these pesticides are presented in the form of concentrated emulsions EC (51.28%), soluble concentrates SL (16.80%), wettable powders WP (13.44%), concentrated suspensions SC (9.24%), water-dispersible granules WG (5.88%), powder for powdering DP (2.52%) and oily substances OD (0.84%). All these formulations are mainly used against mildew and aphids. Problems related to formulations use can extend beyond the farming area when residential areas are nearby. In ddition, many drinking water wells exist in or near these farming areas. The results of the study showed health and environmental risks related to the use of plant protection products in the Loukkos region. Agro-environmental indicators Number of treatments (NT) Regarding phytosanitary problems, potato production is threatened by adverse pests and diseases, severely affecting potato yield and tuber quality, including late blight and aphids, which requires the implementation of fairly heavy curative and preventive protection programs depending on the level of infestation risk and pluviometry level. The average number of pesticide treatments applied on potato crops is NT=19 treatments per cycle. The results showed that NT was strongly linked with the total number of fungicides sprayed NT=14 all along the vegetal cycle, mainly targeting late blight, followed by insecticide treatments NT=4 for aphids during the sunny months, and at the end, herbicide treatments NT=1 to control all the weed flora present in plots using pre-emergence herbicidal treatment (Table 2). In terms of the efficacy of insecticide treatments against aphids, one should intervene as the first aphids arrive, and then re-intervene as soon as new aphids are present. The application rates used often do not correspond to approved ones, while the treatments carried out via backpack sprayers or pull-type sprayer are done without any wearing protective suits or masks. Table 2 Values of NT calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region NT Overall Herbicides Insecticides Fungicides NT 1 4 14 19 Quantity of active substances indicator ( QASI) In terms of pesticide consumption by category of active substances used in potato farms surveyed, we obtained an average value for the indicator of the total quantity of active substances used, QASI= 14.90 kg/ha. According to our results, fungicides, mainly used to fight against mildew, are the most used with an average of QSAI = 14.14 kg/ha, that is to say, a contribution of 95% of total QASI, followed by insecticides against aphids with QASI= 0.45 kg/ha and herbicides against adventitious weeds, applied before the planting of seeds with QASI = 0.31 kg/ha, that is to say, respectively, 3% and 2% of total QASI (Table 3). This QASI value reflects a strong trend in pesticide use. On a time scale, these practices can be involved in ecotoxicity thresholds of active substances being exceeded in different compartments of the environment, through accumulation, dispersion, persistence, derivation, and degradation giving out even more toxic metabolites. Table 3 Values of QASI calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region QASI(kg/ha) Overall Herbicides Insecticides Fungicides QASI 0.31 0.45 14.14 14.90 Treatment frequency indicator (TFI) To further characterize plant protection practices, particularly the intensity of pesticide use, we used the treatment frequency indicator (TFI). The average total TFI for all surveyed farms is 28.10, i.e. 28 treatments at the registered dose per crop cycle. Fungicide treatments contribute with 74.54% of total TFI, while the use of insecticides, targeting mainly downy aphids, represents 21.46% of the total TFI. In contrast, the herbicides come last with contributed 4% of the part of the TFI total (Table 4). It should be noted that this total TFI value still very high, reflecting a heavy use of pesticides in potato crop, strongly related to the total number of fungicides sprayed. These practices remain alarming because of the degradation and the accumulation of pesticides in the natural environment. In the long run, this can lead to significant sanitary and ecological risks. Table 4 Values of TFI calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region TFI Overall Herbicides Insecticides Fungicides TFI 1.13 6.03 20.94 28.1 Discussion In Africa, potato production is threatened by adverse, pests and diseases is a major potato production limiting factors, severely affecting potato yield and tuber quality (Munyaneza et al., 2022). The results of our surveys have shown that late blight and aphids are diseases and pests causing important economic damages at the production level of the potato in the Loukkos perimeter, which pushes the farmers towards the massive use of pesticides. Aggravating the situation, application of pesticides in mixtures without any agronomic justification combined with the absence of personal protective equipment contributes to the farmers' pesticide exposure and the deterioration of the environment. In the territory of the Loukkos in Morocco, our surveys showed that pesticide use proved the only protective method practiced to control late blight and aphids in potatoes. In Europe, aphids gave a mean annual loss of 850000 tons of potato production (Namgung et al., 2022). Annually, late blight causes global losses of nearly 10 billion euros (Sanabria et al., 2020). On the other hand, the low education level of potato producers (67% do not have any level of education) can lead to pesticide misuse. As the result, this situation, in combination with the absence of use of protective equipment, could considerably increase the risk of exposure of farmers to chronic and acute pesticide effects, as well as the exposure of public health to pesticide residues. In fact, in terms of quantifying and measuring the intensity of pesticide use in potato crops, this study highlighted the high pesticide pressure, marked by high values for both the TFI=28.10 as well as the QASI =14.90 kg/ha and the NT=19. Our results showed that the three indicators were strongly linked with the total number of fungicides sprayed, reflecting the high use of fungicides against potato late blight, caused by the fungus Phytophthora infestans . These practices are not without consequences for non-target organisms. This could be due, on the one hand, to the curative and preventive treatments with the same active ingredient (mancozeb) against downy mildew throughout the vegetative cycle, the disease most feared by all the farmers, which could probably increase the resistance of late blight later on to this active ingredient used at a wide range. On the other hand, the neglect of factors interacting during treatments, such as meteorology, pulverization schedule, applied doses and water quality of treatment (pH, conductivity, ...). Also, pest resistance to pesticides is leading growers to further increase the number of treatments and doses applied (Le Bellec et al., 2017). This was frequently observed during the course of our surveys. These bad practices could increase the risk of environmental contamination via dispersal, derivation, persistence, degradation, and/or bioaccumulation in the long term. In addition, the application of pesticides in mixtures is a very common practice. It is used by farmers in order to save believing it the pesticides use in mixtures, in the aim to increase the efficiency and reduce the spraying charges, without agronomic justification, can worsen the environmental and the sanitary situation since it could have/present more dangerous effects than when the substances are applied individually . (Hernández et al., 2013). Certainly, more attention should be directed to specific residue mixtures that could also generate cryptic, synergistic toxicity effects in bees as well (Xiao et al., 2022). It is to be noted that in Morocco, these indicators have not been previously reported for potato crop, which led us to compare our results with those obtained for other crops in Morocco or elsewhere with the same crop or other crops (MAAARO, 2008; Florence et al., 2011; De Baan et al., 2015; Bettiche, 2017; Kanj, 2018; El Bouzaidi et al., 2020; Berni et al., 2021a) (Table 5 and 6). The comparison of the results with the literature shows that these values remain very high and reflect an intensive use of pesticides, which may present risks, both for human health (Basu et al., 2021), as well as for the environment (Liess et al., 2020). Moreover, the survey results showed that a mixture of different active ingredients (linuron, diquat + paraquat) is the basis of the chemical weed control strategies in potato cultivation. Unfortunately, these products have harmful and toxic effects on health (carcinogenic, toxic for reproduction ...). In addition, previous studies have shown the presence of pesticide mixtures in air, in the soil at agricultural in Europe and Afric (Degrendele el al., 2022).This will further increase the risk of diffuse pollution of water, air, and soil from agricultural sources. The seriousness of this situation is amplified by the use of pesticides in the mixture throughout the plant cycle (mixtures of a systematic fungicide with a contact fungicide, mixtures of an insecticide, with a fungicide). While the impacts of individual pesticide compounds on non-target organisms are usually studied, we still lack information about the toxicity of environmentally relevant mixtures as also emphasized in the European Green Deal (Kuchovska´ et al., 2021). Hence, the presence of mixtures of pesticides and biocides in different environmental matrices is a concern because of their potential synergistic, additive, and/or antagonistic effects on non-target organisms (Pérez et al., 2021). Indeed, previous studies have shown the presence of pesticide mixtures in the air in agricultural, urban, or remote locations in Europe (Degrendele et al., 2022). Especially, the amount of field or experiment data remains largely limited for use of pesticides mixture of potatoes in Morocco. Therefore, the assessment of pesticide use will have a positive impact on environmental monitoring and human health. In addition, other factors can be in question to the exposure toxicity, such as formulation, due to fact that it's one of the principal variables of modulation of their toxicities (Samuel et al., 2012). According to the survey results, the pesticide formulations identified included the following: EC (51.28%), SL (16.80%), WP (13.44%), SC (9.24%), WG (5.88%), DP (2.52%) and OD (0.84%). It gets worse, as most of the used formulation poses a high exposure risk. Additionally, 56.7% of used pesticides are not approved for potatoes or are destined for other crops. However, empty pesticide packaging and containers are abandoned in nature, reused, or burned in the fields. These bad practices, in association with high values of agro-environmental indicators found, in the absence of rapid intervention, could cause great concern for the environment and health. Beyond the assessment of the use of pesticides, this study should be completed by a risk assessment for human health and the environment, and by study of agri-environmental impact indicators, which will be the subject of continuous work. Table 5 Comparison of TFI of different cultures References TFI Cultures Country El Bouzaidi et al., 2020 11 .00 Tomato Morocco 0 6 .00 Eggplant 0 5 .00 Melon 0 5 .00 Pepper 0 5 .00 Strawberry 0 3.5 0 Forage corn Bettiche, 2017 09.60 Potato Algeria 07.40 Tomato 04.70 Eggplant 07.40 citrus 11.70 Apricot tree 06.50 Bean Le Bellec et al., 2017 08.96 Potato Mauritius 07.40 leafy vegetables 07.33 Haricot 08.96 Potato 14.65 Cucurbits 04.50 Carrot Florence et al., 2011 04 . 10 Common wheat France 04.60 Peas 0 4. 20 Sugar beet 02 . 10 Sunflower 02 . 00 Maize Kanj, 2018 07.93 Melon and Watermelon Lebanon 09.35 Carrot 09.24 Onion 11.83 Apricot 02.19 Forage corn 04.55 Green lentil Table 6 Comparison of the average quantity of active substance indicator (QASI) References Average quantities of pesticides consumed (kg/ha) Cultures Country El Bouzaidi et al., 2020 0 7.2 0 Eggplant Morocco 01.20 Sugar cane 05.70 Cauliflower 0 6.5 0 Strawberry 0 1.3 0 Corn Forage Average quantity of active substance (QSA) (kg/ha) De Baan et al., 2015 07.80 Stone fruit Switzerland 02.40 Colza 02.10 Leguminous 01.50 Forage corn 06.00 Sugar beet MAAARO, 2008 01.70 Soy Ontario (canada) 01.99 Big cultures 05.40 Vegetables Conclusion Loukkos irrigated perimeter is a very important zone in the economy of northwest region of Morocco. However, the overuse of pesticides due to non-compliance with good phytosanitary practices noted and observed during field surveys and the very high values of pesticide pressure indicators, determined for potato crop, can lead to an increase in the risk factors both for the environment and for human health. It should therefore be noted that these irresponsible practices can be a major obstacle to sustainable agriculture. From a methodological point of view, this study showed the interest of using agro-environmental pressure indicators as a new way to minimize pesticide use. A better control of the latter by all the partners will allow production to increase, to preserve its sanitary quality, and to be at the heart of the challenges of sustainable development. Therefore, future efforts should be directed towards the use of indicators as a decision support tool for crop monitoring. Monitoring is also essential to reduce pesticide use (e.g., bans and restrictions on delete more toxic substances, use easily biodegradable substances, use of bio-pesticides and adapting integrated pest management). The use of the risk assessment tool for pesticide toxicity for humans and the environment will be the objective of our next work. Declarations Ethical Approval All authors contributed to the participation this study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institute of Agronomic Research Tangier (Morocco) and by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Tangier (Morocco). Consent to Participate All participants provided informed consent to participate in the study. All authors guarantee that the research findings have not been previously published. Consent to Publish Me, the undersigned, give my consent for the publication of identifiable details, which may include or details in the text ("Materials") to be published in the above Journal and Article. I confirm that I have seen and had the opportunity to read the Material and Article to be published by Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. I have discussed this consent with MOHAMED BENICHA and MOHAMED CHABBI, who are coauthors of this article. Authors Contributions All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data processing and analysis, data collection and analysis were performed by [MOHAMED ABBOU], [MOHAMED BENICHA] and [MOHAMED CHABBI]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [MOHAMED ABBOU], [MOHAMED BENICHA] and [MOHAMED CHABBI]. All authors provided input into various aspects of the study, provided ongoing critique and approved the final version of the manuscript. All of the authors declare that they have seen the revised manuscript and approved the version to be published. All of the authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Competing Interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose Availability of data and materials The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. References Alaoui, K., Chafik, Z., Arabi, M., Abouloifa, H., Asehraou, A., Chaoui, J., & Kharmach, Ez-Z. (2021). In vitro antifungal activity of Lactobacillus against potato Late blight Phytophthora infestans. Materials Today: Proceedings , 45, 7725-7733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.338 Bahouq, M., Bahouq, H., & Soulaymani, A. (2021). Bibliographic review of phytopharmacovigilance actions and measures on plant protection products in Morocco. E3S Web of Conferences , 319, 01034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131901034 Basu, S., Chanda, A., Gogoi, P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2021). Organochlorine pesticides and heavy metals in the zooplankton, fishes, and shrimps of tropical shallow tidal creeks and the associated human health risk. Marine Pollution Bulletin , 165, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112170 Benicha, M., Mrabet, R. & Azmani, A., 2016. Characterization of carbofuran bound residues and the effect of ageing on their distribution and bioavailability in the soil of a sugar beet field in north-western Morocco. European Journal of Environmental Sciences , 6(1), 57–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2016.9. Berni, I., Menouni, A., Ghazi El. I., Duca, R. C., Kestemont, M. P., Godderis, L., & EL Jaafari, S. (2021a).Understanding farmers’ safety behavior regarding pesticide use in Morocco. Sustainable Production and Consumption , 25, 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.019 Berni, I., Menouni, A., El Ghazi, I., Godderis, L., Duca, R. C., Jaafari, S. E. (2021b). Health and ecological risk assessment based on pesticide monitoring in Saïss plain (Morocco) groundwater. Environmental Pollution , 276, 116638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116638 Bettiche, F. (2017). Usages des produits phytosanitaires dans les cultures sous serres des Ziban (Algérie) et évaluation des conséquences environnementales possibles. Thesis , Université Mohamed Kheider-Biskra Algérie. De Baan, L., Spycher, S., & Daniel, O. (2015). Einsatz von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Schweiz von 2009 bis 2012. Agrarforschung Schweiz , 6(2), 48–55. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from https://www.agrarforschungschweiz.ch/fr/2015/02/utilisation-des-produits-phytosanitaires-en-suisse-de-2009-a-2012/ Degrendele, C., Klánová, J., Prokeš, R., Příbylová, P., Šenk, P., Šudoma, M., Röösli, M., Dalvie, M. A., & Fuhrimann, S. (2022). Current use pesticides in soil and air from two agricultural sites in South Africa: Implications for environmental fate and human exposure. Science of The Total Environment , 807, 150455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150455 El Bouzaidi, H., Hafiane, F. Z., & Fekhaoui, M. (2020). Inventory of Pesticides and their impact on the environment by calculating the frequency of treatment indicator in the Gharb plain (Morocco). Mediterranean Journal of Chemistry , 10(4), 406-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.13171/mjc10402005041137fzh FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2022. FAOSTAT - Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Latest update: 17 February 2022. Accessed 5 March 2021. Farahy, O., Laghfiri, M., Bourioug, M., & Aleya, L. (2021). Overview of pesticide use in Moroccan apple orchards and its effects on the environment. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health , 19-100223. Fouillet, E., Delière, L., Chartier, N., Munier-Jolain, N., Cortel, S., Rapidel, B., & Merot, A. (2022). Reducing pesticide use in vineyards. Evidence from the analysis of the French DEPHY network. European Journal of Agronomy , 136, 126503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126503 Elhani, S., Haddadi, M., Csákvári, E., Zantar, S., Hamim, A., Villányi, V., Douaik, A., & Bánfalvi, Z. (2019). Effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on yield, irrigation water-use efficiency and some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) quality traits under glasshouse conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 224, 105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105745 Florence, J., Butault, J. P., & Guichard, L. (2011). An Economic Analysis of the Possibility of Reducing Pesticides in French Field Crops. Ecological Economics , 70(9), 1638–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.003 Girard, L., Reix, N., & Mathelin, C. (2020). Impact des pesticides perturbateurs endocriniens sur le cancer du sein. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie , 48(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.008 Goss, E. M., Tabima, J. F., Cooke, D. E. L., Restrepo, S., Fry, W. E., Forbes, G. A., & Grunwald, N. J. (2014). The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8791–8796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401884111 Guichard, L., Dedieu, F., Jeuffroy, M., Meynard, J. M., Raymond, R., & Savini, I. (2017). Le plan Ecophyto de réduction d’usage des pesticides en France : décryptage d’un échec et raisons d’espérer. Cahiers Agricultures , 26(14002), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017004 Hernández, A. F., Parrón, T., Tsatsakis, A. M., Requena, M, Alarcón, R., & López-Guarnido, O. (2013). Toxic effects of pesticide mixtures at a molecular level: Their relevance to human health. Toxicology , 307, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.06.009 Hossard, L., Guichard, L., Pelosi, C., & Makowski, D. (2017). Lack of evidence for a decrease in synthetic pesticide use on the main arable crops in France. Science of The Total Environment , 575, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.008 Kanj, F. (2018). Outils et méthodes pour une politique territoriale de gestion raisonnée des pratiques agricoles : cas d’application dans la région de la Béqaa au Liban. Thesis , Université Paul Valéry - Montpellier III Français. Kuchovska,´ E. S., Gonzalez, P., Blahov, L., Barre, M., Gouffier, C., Cachot, J., Alicia Roméro-Ramirez, A., Blaha,´ L., & Morin, B. (2021). Pesticide mixture toxicity assessment through in situ and laboratory approaches using embryo-larval stages of the pacific oyster (Magallana gigas). Marine Environmental Research , 169, 105390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105390 Lamichhane, J. R., Messéan, A., & Ricci, P. (2019). Research and innovation priorities as defined by the Ecophyto plan to address current crop protection transformation challenges in France. Advances in Agronomy , (pp. 81–152) Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.11.003 Le Bellec, F., Scorbiac, M., & Sauzier, J. (2017). Les pratiques phytosanitaires des producteurs de légumes de l’île Maurice : impacts et perspectives de changement. Cahiers Agricultures , 26(55001), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017038 Liess, M., Henz, S., & Shahid, N. (2020). Modeling the synergistic effects of toxicant mixtures. Environmental Sciences Europe , 32(119), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00394-7 López, G. E. C., Romito, M. L., Latorre, M. A., Siroski, P, A., & Poletta, G. L. (2021). Biomarkers of genotoxicity, immunotoxicity and oxidative stress on Caiman latirostris (Broad-snouted caiman) hatchlings exposed to pesticide formulations and mixtures widely used in agriculture. Environmental Advances , 5, 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100114 MAAARO (Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation et des Affaires rurales- Ontario) (Latest update: 13 February 2021. 2021, March 10) (2008) Annexe X - Comparaison des quantités totales de matière active utilisées par hectare sur les principales cultures et pour des groupes de pesticides sélectionnés, 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998, 2003 et 2008. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/french/crops/facts/pesticide-use-appendix10.htm#2 Meno, L., Escuredo, O., Rodríguez-Flores, M. S., & Seijo, M. C. (2021) Looking for a sustainable potato crop. Field assessment of early blight management. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology , 308-309, 108617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108617 Menouni, A., Abou-Said, S., Chetouani, H., Berni, I., Godderis, L., & El Jaafari, S. (2022). Evaluation of occupational exposure to pesticides and Oxidative stress : A case study from Morocco. Safety and Health at Work , 13, S260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.1563 Munyaneza, J. E., & Bizimungu, B. (2022). Management of potato pests and diseases in Africa. Insect Pests of Potato (2th ed., pp. 407-426). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-821237-0.00016-0 Namgung, H., Yu, Y., Lee, S., Kwon, M., Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2022). Morphometric analysis of the wing for aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) associated with potatoes. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 15, 2018-2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2022.01.006 Pelosi, C., Bertrand, C., Daniele, G., Coeurdassier, M., Benoit, P., Nélieu, S., & Fritsch, C. (2021). Residues of currently used pesticides in soils and earthworms: A silent threat?. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment , 305, 107167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107167 Pérez, D. J., Iturburu, F. G., Calderon, G., Oyesqui, L. A. E., De Gerónimo, E., & Aparicio, V. C. (2021). Ecological risk assessment of current-use pesticides and biocides in soils, sediments and surface water of a mixed land-use basin of the Pampas region, Argentina. Chemosphere , 263, 128061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128061 Pierlot, F., Marks-Perreau, J., Réal, B., Carluer, N., Constant, T., Lioeddine, A., van, D. l., Villerd, J., Keichinger, O., Cherrier, R., & Bockstaller, C. (2017). Predictive quality of 26 pesticide risk indicators and one flow model: A multisite assessment for water contamination. Science of the Total Environment , 605-606, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv..06.112 2017 Rissouli, L., Benicha, M., Chafik, T., & Chabbi, M. (2017). Decontamination of water polluted with pesticide using biopolymers: Adsorption of glyphosate by chitin and chitosan. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences , 8(12), 4544-4549. https://doi.org/10.26872/jmes.2017.8.12.479 Saguez, P., Giordanengo, P., & Vincent, C. (2013). Aphids as Major Potato Pests. Insect Pests of Potato , (2th ed., pp. 31–63) Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386895-4.00003-x Shefali, KR., Singh-Sankhla, M., Kumar, R., & Sonone, S. S. (2020). Impact of Pesticide Toxicity in Aquatic Environment. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry , 11(3), 10131-10140. https://doi.org/10.33263/briac113.1013110140 Sampaio, S. L., Petropoulos, S. A., Alexopoulos, A., Heleno, S. A., Santos-Buelga, C., Barros, L., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2020). Potato peels as sources of functional compounds for the food industry: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology , (103), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.015 Samuel, O., Dion, S., & ST-Laurent, L. (2012, April M.-H). Indicateur de risque des pesticides du Québec-IRPeQ-Santé et Environnement Québec. Ministère de l’Agriculture, des pêcheries et de l’Alimentation/ Ministère du Développement Durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs/ Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec. Retrieved March 7, 2021, from http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/602- IndicateurDeRisqueDesPesticides.pdf Sookhtanlou, M., Allahyari, M. S., & Surujlal, J. (2021). Health Risk of Potato Farmers Exposed to Overuse of Chemical Pesticides in Iran. Safety and Health at Work , 13(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.09.004 Sanabria, K., Pérez, W., & Andrade-Piedra, J. L. (2020). Effectiveness of resistance inductors for potato late blight management in Peru. Crop Protection, 137, 105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105241 Sarti, O., Otal, E., Morillo, J., & Ouassini, A. (2021). Integrated assessment of groundwater quality beneath the rural area of R’mel, Northwest of Morocco. Groundwater for Sustainable Development , 14, 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100620 Tudi, M., Daniel, R. H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Sadler, R., Connell, D., Chu, C., & Phung, D. T. (2021). Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 2718(3), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031112 Vernier, F., Miralles, A., Pinet, F., Carluer, N., Gouy, V., Molla, G., & Petit, k. (2013). EIS Pesticides: An environmental information system to characterize agricultural activities and calculate agro-environmental indicators at embedded watershed scales. Agricultural Systems , 122, 11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.07.005 Wen, X., Ma, C., Sun, M., Wang, Y., Xue, X., Chen, J., Song, W., Li-Byarlay, H., & Luo, S. (2021). Pesticide residues in the pollen and nectar of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and their potential risks to honey bees. Science of The Total Environment , 786, 147443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147443 Xiao, J., He, Q., Liu, Q., Wang, Z., Yin, F., Chai, Y., Yang, Q., Jiang, X., Liao, M., Yu, L., Jiang, W., & Cao, H. (2022). Analysis of honey bee exposure to multiple pesticide residues in the hive environment. Science of The Total Environment, 805, 150292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150292 Yvoz, S., Petit, S., Biju, D. L., & Cordeau, S. (2020). A framework to type crop management strategies within a production situation to improve the comprehension of weed communities. European Journal of Agronomy , 115, 126009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126009 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Feb, 2023 Read the published version in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 12 Jul, 2022 Submission checks completed at journal 12 Jul, 2022 Editor assigned by journal 12 Jul, 2022 First submitted to journal 22 Jun, 2022 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1785878","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":120440037,"identity":"a378c6bc-8d3f-48e0-bb91-8f86b95d8840","order_by":0,"name":"Mohamed Abbou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Laboratory of Physical-Chemistry of Materials, Natural Substances and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Abdelmalek Essâadi University, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Tangier, Morocco","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"","lastName":"Abbou","suffix":""},{"id":120440038,"identity":"215a51cc-7c86-4e8b-ba27-f06d500deb5f","order_by":1,"name":"Mohamed Chabbi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Laboratory of Physical-Chemistry of Materials, Natural Substances and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Abdelmalek Essâadi University, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Tangier, Morocco","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"","lastName":"Chabbi","suffix":""},{"id":120440039,"identity":"3cd485df-2a97-4958-b2e8-f5593ea8d677","order_by":2,"name":"Mohamed Benicha","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Laboratory of Pesticides residues, UR research on nuclear techniques, environment and quality, Regional Center of Agronomic research, Tangier, Morocco","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohamed","middleName":"","lastName":"Benicha","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-06-22 21:59:05","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10949-9","type":"published","date":"2023-02-01T18:41:18+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":44718488,"identity":"c482d859-7ceb-494c-b17e-9e97cff2dab2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-10-16 18:46:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":599100,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1785878/v1/07f7e407-c8be-4cb9-8757-f62d7d555997.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Assessment of phytosanitary practices on the environment: Case study potato of Loukkos (North-West Morocco)","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003ePotato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the fourth most important agronomic crop in the world after wheat, rice, and maize (Sampaio et al. 2020; Sookhtanlou et al., 2021). In Morocco, the potato is one of the most economically important crops. The area \u003cs\u003eis\u003c/s\u003e sown with potatoes varies from 50000 to 60000 ha per year. It represents l8 to l9% of the total surface area of cultivated vegetable crops (Alaoui et al., 2021). According to a section of the widely used FAOSTAT database, the cultivation of potatoes is widely practiced with an estimated area of 57534 ha and a production of 1707068T with an average national yield of 29.67 T/ha (FAO (FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2022). Together with sugar crops and cereals, potatoes represent one of the leading agricultural products in Morocco, principally for irrigated zones, including the Loukkos perimeter. In view of the fact that this crop requires inputs, especially pesticides, the problems of the irrational use of this production factor are posed with acuity in the face of biodiversity and public health. More concretely, upon completion of the Green Morroco Plan (GMP) period, the government launched in 2020, Green Generation 2020-2030, a new Moroccan agricultural strategy. Being a strategic sector with the ambition of doubling its GDP by 2030. This strategy aimed to promote modern agriculture, with high added value crops adapted to export markets. A change towards more intensive agricultural practices in the foreseeable future, as foreseen by this new strategy, will further increase the risk of diffuse pollution of water, air, and soil from agricultural sources. This can undoubtedly pose different implications for both natural resources and humans because of the heavy use of pesticides. Besides, potato plants are susceptible to a wide variety of diseases that severely can reduce the yield, quality, and storability of tubers (Meno et al., 2021). Without pesticides use, there would be a 78% loss of fruit production, a 54% loss of vegetable production and a 32% loss of cereal production (Tudi et al., 2021). In intensive agriculture, as is the case in the Loukkos area, potato cultivation faces major difficulties, mainly related to the control of \u0026nbsp;late blight, caused by \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora infestans\u003c/em\u003e, which remain the most expensive potato pathogen to manage worldwide (Goss et al., 2013). The potato is a crop that is very consumptive of pesticides in the Loukkos perimeter, since it is exposed to multiple attacks by pests and diseases that damage the product and cause significant economic losses. Concomitantly, aphids cause serious losses in potato plants and tubers, mostly because they vector viruses (Saguez et al., \u0026nbsp;2013). The absence of an environmentally friendly alternative for the management of potato pests and diseases has left farmers with no option other than pesticides used in potato crops. For this reason, the use of pesticides on potatoes is an integral part of agricultural practice at the Loukkos perimeter. However, the misuse of these products could hurt both human health (Berni et al., 2021b) and the environment (Berni et al., 2021a) including the contamination of surface and groundwater, soil, and the living environments of non-target organisms (Rissouli et al., 2017; Farahy et al., 2021), through the flow processes, leaching, and spraying. On the other hand, exposure to pesticides also affects biodiversity (Shefali et al., 2020; Pelosi et al., 2021; Wen et al., 2021). They could alter the functioning of the endocrine system (Girard et al. 2020) and the use of pesticides in mixtures can act additively, synergistically, and/or antagonistically in the environment (cocktail effect) (L\u0026oacute;pez et al., 2021). In Morocco, between 2008 and 2014, total pesticide imports increased from 17.135 tons/y to 19.180 tons/y (Berni et al., 2021a). In addition, due to the lack of education and the presence of a counterfeit market, pesticides constitute a major problem to be addressed by occupational and environmental health (Menouni et al., 2022). Based on the results of the intoxication analysis, pesticides are a serious public health problem in Morocco, as long as they have been incriminated, according to the Moroccan Anti-Poison and Pharmacovigilance Center, pesticides caused 4110 cases of poisoning between 2008 and 2014 cases of poisoning between 2008 and 2014 (Berni et al., 2021b). On the other hand, the National Food Safety Office (ONSSA) destroyed last year 136 tons of potatoes due to exceeding MRLs or the use of unauthorized pesticides (Bahouq et al., 2021). However, the phytosanitary protection practices implemented by potato producers are poorly documented at the Loukkos perimeter and therefore, remain poorly known. Given these findings, the evaluation of the pressure of plant protection practices on the environment is necessary to highlight the current state of the crop from an environmental point of view. In addition, the evaluation of pesticide use becomes a fundamental requirement to ensure sustainable development. The integration of indicators in tools to evaluate the sustainability of practices is an important issue (Lamichhane et al. 2019), including the treatment frequency indicator (IFT) and the quantity of active substances indicator (QASI) (Hossard et al., 2017; Fouillet et al., 2022), recently used in the Ecophyto plant in France to reduce pesticide use (Vernier et al., 2013; Guichard et al., 2017). In this light, Agro-environmental indicators can be used as a monitoring tool to minimize pesticide use in Loukkos perimeter. The objective of this work is to assess the pressure of pesticide use in potato cultivation at Loukkos perimeter, north-west of Morocco, by determining agro-environmental indicators, and whose aim is to contribute to the more responsible use of plant protection products and the development of sustainable crop protection in this region.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDescription of the study area\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was conducted within the Loukkos perimeter of Northwest Morocco. Its total area is 2650 km\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. The region has a useful agricultural area of 147.500 Ha, 45.000 Ha of which are irrigated. The region has a Mediterranean climate with an annual average temperature ranging between 11\u0026deg;C in winter and 25\u0026deg;C in summer, and annual average rainfall is approximately of 700 mm between October and April (Sarti et al.,\u0026nbsp;2021). This area is a major asset for the development of the region. It is characterized by intensive agriculture including horticulture and market gardening. The sandy soil originated from the Loukkos region called \u0026ldquo;R\u0026rsquo;mel\u0026rdquo;, is inorganic and poor in nitrogen, its texture is sandy (Benicha et al.,\u0026nbsp;2016; Elhani et al.,\u0026nbsp;2019).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConduct of surveys\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo assess potato practices, field surveys were carried out using a questionnaire containing information on the farmer (age, sex, education level), the agricultural planted area, varieties, and pesticide treatments (frequency, dose, target, period, time to harvest,\u0026hellip;). A total of 50 farms were surveyed representing different areas of Loukkos (El Aouamra, Oulad El Ghoumari, Zlaoula, Laghdira, and Rehamna). All potato farmers themselves used chemical pesticides on their farms.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAgro-environmental indicators\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, pesticide use in cultivation in Loukkos perimeter was characterized by three agro-environmental indicators: the number of treatments (NT), treatment frequency indicator (TFI) and quantity of active substances indicator (QASI). The NT is defined as the sum of the total number of products applied per pass on the agricultural plot during a marketing year. A mixture of two products applied during the same passage also counts for two treatments. \u0026nbsp;The TFI reflects the intensity of pesticide use on a farm (Pierlot et al., 2017). It is commonly used in Europe to assess the reliance of cropping systems on pesticides (Yvoz et al., 2020). The QASI is a simple indicator of the quantity of active substances used per ha (M\u0026ouml;hring et al., 2019). It is also among the important indicators used to monitor the Ecophyto 2018 plan in France (Hossard et al., 2017).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCharacteristics of the farmers surveyed\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData distribution of some features available in the data set includes the variety, age, educational attainment and Farm size were used to describe the population and the farms to measure the variables studies. \u0026nbsp;The results are presented in (Table 1).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eBasic sociodemographic information of interviewees in Loukkos (n = 50)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.718954248366014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariables\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.019607843137255%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCategory/Type\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.673202614379086%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFrequency\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.58823529411765%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProportion (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.718954248366014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFarm size\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.019607843137255%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.5-2ha\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2ha-3ha\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3ha-5ha\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.673202614379086%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.58823529411765%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.718954248366014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.019607843137255%\"\u003e\n \u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eyears\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003c/ol\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 30 years\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60 \u0026gt; years\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.673202614379086%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.58823529411765%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.718954248366014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariety Name\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.019607843137255%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eManitou\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMemphis\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMondial\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCornado\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.673202614379086%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.58823529411765%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"30.718954248366014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEducation level\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.019607843137255%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNone\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePrimary\u003c/p\u003eSecondary\u003cbr\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.673202614379086%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"20.58823529411765%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe main pests and diseases of crops in the plain of Loukkos associated with potatoes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhytophthora infestans\u003c/em\u003e, the pathogen of potato late blight which is a devastating disease of potatoes among all farmers surveyed, causes stem and leaf rot, leading to significant economic losses. It is more and more frequently encountered in prospected farms. This disease can only be treated as a preventive measure, mainly in the function of the risk level and pluviometry during the cycle of crop growth. Late blight is recognized thanks to oily and brown, rounded spots on the upper surface of the leaves. The presence of late blight is still signaled, but the incidence is much more important with the increase in humidity. On the other hand, the sunniest months are the most favorable for the apparition of aphids belonging to the order \u003cem\u003eHemiptera\u003c/em\u003e and the family \u003cem\u003eAphididae\u003c/em\u003e. The latter develops in priority on the leaves of the lower part of the plant and especially in the lower face of the leaves, leading to severe yield reduction and loss of tuber quality. The present research findings indicated that the disease severity was significantly noticed during surveys, which makes agriculture depend on the pesticides used, pushing the farmers to use, heavily the pesticides to fight against these diseases. Nevertheless, pesticides pose a particular danger to farmers, not only through their massive use, but through the absence of personal protective equipment, adequate storage, no respect for good practices. Nevertheless, pesticides pose a particular danger to farmers, not only through their massive use but through the absence of personal protective equipment, adequate storage, and no respect for good practices, due to the low level of education of the producers and lack of training qualifying who remain a strong obstacle with the good knowledge of the ecotoxicity of the pesticides and their dangers chronic. This situation may lead to a risk of contamination and thereby health risks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCategories of active substances identified during potato crop production cycle\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom the 31 commercial products used for the cultivation of potatoes, 25 different active substances, belonging to 19 chemical families, have been identified. In terms of quantity, fungicides remain the most used with 84%, followed by insecticides with 9% and herbicides with 7%. Among these substances, 56.7% are not registered on the potato crop in Morocco. The pesticides used are classified, in terms of toxicity according to the WHO, as moderately hazardous (67%), slightly hazardous (12%), while (21%) are listed as unlikely to be acutely hazardous in normal use. Irrational use of the latter can have chronic and acute health effects, depending on the level and route of exposure. Moreover, on the ecological side, 66% of these substances are difficult biodegradable, while 24% are rapidly biodegradable. This can lead to significant health and ecological consequences due to their persistence and accumulation in soils, surfaces, and groundwater, and their adverse effects on biodiversity. Pesticide preparations based on organophosphates (chlorpyrifos-ethyl, dimethoate), carbamates (mancozeb, propamocarb, maneb), phenylamides (metalaxyl), pyrethroids (deltamethrin) and neonicotinoids (thiacloprid, sulfoxaflor, imidacloprid), bipyridiles (diquat, paraquat) and substituted ureas (linuron), were the most used pesticide substances against the pests of Loukkos potato. These pesticides all have, with different degrees, potential for toxicity and can, unfortunately, be harmful, both to humans and to non-target organisms. Mancozeb is the active ingredient most used in all the surveyed sites, to control mildew. Its availability in several commercial specialties (Turbo ZM, Uthane, Buster, Systemil 72 WP, Ridomil gold MZ 68 WG, Agrizibe, and Dithane M45) and the existence of several pesticide shops, further facilitates its use. The application rates vary from 2 to 6 Kg/ha per treatment, which is two to three times higher than the approved dose/ the registered rate. Regarding the specifications of the commercial specialties used, we noticed that these pesticides are presented in the form of concentrated emulsions EC (51.28%), soluble concentrates SL (16.80%), wettable powders WP (13.44%), concentrated suspensions SC (9.24%), water-dispersible granules WG (5.88%), powder for powdering DP (2.52%) and oily substances OD (0.84%). All these formulations are mainly used against mildew and aphids. Problems related to formulations use can extend beyond the farming area when residential areas are nearby. In ddition, many drinking water wells exist in or near these farming areas. The results of the study showed health and environmental risks related to the use of plant protection products in the Loukkos region.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAgro-environmental indicators\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNumber of treatments (NT)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRegarding phytosanitary problems, potato production is threatened by adverse pests and diseases, severely affecting potato yield and tuber quality, including late blight and aphids, which requires the implementation of fairly heavy curative and preventive protection programs depending on the level of infestation risk and pluviometry level. The average number of pesticide treatments applied on potato crops is NT=19 treatments per cycle. The results showed that NT was strongly linked with the total number of fungicides sprayed NT=14 all along the vegetal cycle, mainly targeting late blight, followed by insecticide treatments NT=4 for aphids during the sunny months, and at the end, herbicide treatments NT=1 to control all the weed flora present in plots using pre-emergence herbicidal treatment (Table 2). In terms of the efficacy of insecticide treatments against aphids, one should intervene as the first aphids arrive, and then re-intervene as soon as new aphids are present. The application rates used often do not correspond to approved ones, while the treatments carried out via backpack sprayers or pull-type sprayer are done without any wearing protective suits or masks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eValues of NT calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNT\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverall\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHerbicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInsecticides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFungicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNT\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQuantity of active substances indicator (\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQASI)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn terms of pesticide consumption by category of active substances used in potato farms surveyed, we obtained an average value for the indicator of the total quantity of active substances used, QASI= 14.90 kg/ha. According to our results, fungicides, mainly used to fight against mildew, are the most used with an average of QSAI = 14.14 kg/ha, that is to say, a contribution of 95% of total QASI, followed by insecticides against aphids with QASI= 0.45 kg/ha and herbicides against adventitious weeds, applied before the planting of seeds with QASI = 0.31 kg/ha, that is to say, respectively, 3% and 2% of total QASI (Table 3). This QASI value reflects a strong trend in pesticide use. On a time scale, these practices can be involved in ecotoxicity thresholds of active substances being exceeded in different compartments of the environment, through accumulation, dispersion, persistence, derivation, and degradation giving out even more toxic metabolites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 3\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eValues of QASI calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.08%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQASI(kg/ha)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverall\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.08%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHerbicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInsecticides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFungicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eQASI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.08%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.14\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.64%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTreatment frequency indicator (TFI)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo further characterize plant protection practices, particularly the intensity of pesticide use, we used the treatment frequency indicator (TFI). The average total TFI for all surveyed farms is 28.10, i.e. 28 treatments at the registered dose per crop cycle. Fungicide treatments contribute with 74.54% of total TFI, while the use of insecticides, targeting mainly downy aphids, represents 21.46% of the total TFI. In contrast, the herbicides come last with contributed 4% of the part of the TFI total (Table 4). It should be noted that this total TFI value still very high, reflecting a heavy use of pesticides in potato crop, strongly related to the total number of fungicides sprayed. These practices remain alarming because of the degradation and the accumulation of pesticides in the natural environment. In the long run, this can lead to significant sanitary and ecological risks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 4\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eValues of TFI calculated on basis of the total herbicide, fungicide, insecticide use in Loukkos region\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTFI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverall\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHerbicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInsecticides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFungicides\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTFI\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.1\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn Africa, potato production is threatened by adverse, pests and diseases is a major potato production limiting factors, severely affecting potato yield and tuber quality (Munyaneza et al., 2022). The results of our surveys have shown that late blight and aphids are diseases and pests causing important economic damages at the production level of the potato in the Loukkos perimeter, which pushes the farmers towards the massive use of pesticides. Aggravating the situation, application of pesticides in mixtures without any agronomic justification combined with the absence of personal protective equipment contributes to the farmers\u0026apos; pesticide exposure and the deterioration of the environment. In the territory of the Loukkos in Morocco, our surveys showed that pesticide use proved the only protective method practiced to control late blight and aphids in potatoes. In Europe, aphids gave a mean annual loss of 850000 tons of potato production (Namgung et al., 2022). Annually, late blight causes global losses of nearly 10 billion euros (Sanabria et al., 2020). On the other hand, the low education level of potato producers (67% do not have any level of education) can lead to pesticide misuse. As the result, this situation, in combination with the absence of use of protective equipment, could considerably increase the risk of exposure of farmers to chronic and acute pesticide effects, as well as the exposure of public health to pesticide residues. In fact, in terms of quantifying and measuring the intensity of pesticide use in potato crops, this study highlighted the high pesticide pressure, marked by high values for both the TFI=28.10 as well as the QASI =14.90 kg/ha and the NT=19. Our results showed that the three indicators were strongly linked with the total number of fungicides sprayed, reflecting the high use of fungicides against potato late blight, caused by the fungus \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora infestans\u003c/em\u003e. These practices are not without consequences for non-target organisms. This could be due, on the one hand, to the curative and preventive treatments with the same active ingredient (mancozeb) against downy mildew throughout the vegetative cycle, the disease most feared by all the farmers, which could probably increase the resistance of late blight later on to this active ingredient used at a wide range. On the other hand, the neglect of factors interacting during treatments, such as meteorology, pulverization schedule, applied doses and water quality of treatment (pH, conductivity, ...). Also, pest resistance to pesticides is leading growers to further increase the number of treatments and doses applied (Le Bellec et al., 2017).\u0026nbsp;This was frequently observed during the course of our surveys. These bad practices could increase the risk of environmental contamination via dispersal, derivation, persistence, degradation, and/or bioaccumulation in the long term. In addition, the application of pesticides in mixtures is a very common practice. It is used by farmers in order to save believing it the pesticides use in mixtures, in the aim to increase the efficiency and reduce the spraying charges, without agronomic justification, can worsen the environmental and the sanitary situation since it could have/present more dangerous effects than when the substances are applied individually\u003cs\u003e.\u003c/s\u003e (Hern\u0026aacute;ndez et al., 2013). Certainly, more attention should be directed to specific residue mixtures that could also generate cryptic, synergistic toxicity effects in bees as well (Xiao et al., 2022). It is to be noted that in Morocco, these indicators have not been previously reported for potato crop, which led us to compare our results with those obtained for other crops in Morocco or elsewhere with the same crop or other crops (MAAARO, 2008; Florence et al., 2011; De Baan et al., 2015; Bettiche, 2017; Kanj, 2018; El Bouzaidi et al., 2020; Berni et al., 2021a) (Table 5 and \u0026nbsp;6). The comparison of the results with the literature shows that these values remain very high and reflect an intensive use of pesticides, which may present risks, both for human health (Basu et al., 2021), as well as for the environment (Liess et al., 2020). Moreover, the survey results showed that a mixture of different active ingredients (linuron, diquat + paraquat) is the basis of the chemical weed control strategies in potato cultivation. Unfortunately, these products have harmful and toxic effects on health (carcinogenic, toxic for reproduction ...). In addition, previous studies have shown the presence of pesticide mixtures in air, in the soil at agricultural in Europe and Afric (Degrendele el al., 2022).This will further increase the risk of diffuse pollution of water, air, and soil from agricultural sources. The seriousness of this situation is amplified by the use of pesticides in the mixture throughout the plant cycle (mixtures of a systematic fungicide with a contact fungicide, mixtures of an insecticide, with a fungicide). While the impacts of individual pesticide compounds on non-target organisms are usually studied, we still lack information about the toxicity of environmentally relevant mixtures as also emphasized in the European Green Deal (Kuchovska\u0026acute; et al., 2021). Hence, the presence of mixtures of pesticides and biocides in different environmental matrices is a concern because of their potential synergistic, additive, and/or antagonistic effects on non-target organisms (P\u0026eacute;rez et al., 2021). Indeed, previous studies have shown the presence of pesticide mixtures in the air in agricultural, urban, or remote locations in Europe (Degrendele et al., 2022). Especially, the amount of field or experiment data remains largely limited for use of pesticides mixture of potatoes in Morocco. Therefore, the assessment of pesticide use will have a positive impact on environmental monitoring and human health. In addition, other factors can be in question to the exposure toxicity, such as formulation, due to fact that it\u0026apos;s one of the principal variables of modulation of their toxicities (Samuel et al., 2012). According to the survey results, the pesticide formulations identified included the following: EC (51.28%), SL (16.80%), WP (13.44%), SC (9.24%), WG (5.88%), DP (2.52%) and OD (0.84%). It gets worse, as most of the used formulation poses a high exposure risk. Additionally, 56.7% of used pesticides are not approved for potatoes or are destined for other crops. However, empty pesticide packaging and containers are abandoned in nature, reused, or burned in the fields. These bad practices, in association with high values of agro-environmental indicators found, in the absence of rapid intervention, could cause great concern for the environment and health. Beyond the assessment of the use of pesticides, this study should be completed by a risk assessment for human health and the environment, and by study of agri-environmental impact indicators, which will be the subject of continuous work.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;5\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eComparison of TFI of different cultures\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" dir=\"rtl\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReferences\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTFI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCultures\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCountry\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"6\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; El Bouzaidi et al., 2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eTomato\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"6\" valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMorocco\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eEggplant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMelon\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ePepper\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eStrawberry\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e3.5\u003c/span\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eForage corn\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Bettiche, 2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e09.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ePotato\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eAlgeria\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e07.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eTomato\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e04.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eEggplant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e07.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ecitrus\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e11.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eApricot tree\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e06.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eBean\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"6\" valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Le Bellec et al., 2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e08.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ePotato\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"6\" valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMauritius\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e07.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eleafy vegetables\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e07.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eHaricot\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e08.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ePotato\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e14.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCucurbits\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"50.82644628099174%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e04.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.17355371900826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCarrot\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Florence \u0026nbsp;et al., 2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 04\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCommon wheat\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eFrance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 04.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003ePeas\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e4.\u003c/span\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSugar beet\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 02\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSunflower\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 02\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMaize\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.21641791044776%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Kanj, 2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"22.94776119402985%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 07.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"22.20149253731343%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMelon and Watermelon\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"6\" valign=\"top\" width=\"10.634328358208956%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eLebanon\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.478079331941544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.678496868475992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 09.35\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.843423799582464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCarrot\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.478079331941544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.678496868475992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 09.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.843423799582464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eOnion\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.478079331941544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.678496868475992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 11.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.843423799582464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eApricot\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.478079331941544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25.678496868475992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 02.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.843423799582464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eForage corn\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.478079331941544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"25.678496868475992%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; 04.55\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.843423799582464%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eGreen lentil\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 6\u003c/strong\u003e Comparison of the average quantity of active substance indicator (QASI)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n \u003ctable border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" dir=\"rtl\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"27.902946273830157%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReferences\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"44.194107452339686%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAverage quantities of \u0026nbsp;pesticides consumed (kg/ha)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.464471403812826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCultures\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.43847487001733%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCountry\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.902946273830157%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eEl Bouzaidi et al., 2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.194107452339686%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e7.2\u003c/span\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.464471403812826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eEggplant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.43847487001733%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMorocco\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e01.20\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSugar cane\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e05.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCauliflower\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e6.5\u003c/span\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eStrawberry\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e0\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e1.3\u003c/span\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eCorn Forage\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.902946273830157%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.194107452339686%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAverage quantity of active substance (QSA) (kg/ha)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.464471403812826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.43847487001733%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.902946273830157%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eDe Baan et al., 2015\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.194107452339686%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e07.80\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.464471403812826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eStone fruit\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.43847487001733%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSwitzerland\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"31.506849315068493%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.90215264187867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e02.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"18.59099804305284%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eColza\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"31.506849315068493%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e\u003cspan dir=\"RTL\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"49.90215264187867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e02.10\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"18.59099804305284%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eLeguminous\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e01.50\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eForage corn\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e06.00\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSugar beet\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.902946273830157%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eMAAARO, 2008\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"44.194107452339686%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e01.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.464471403812826%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eSoy\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\" width=\"11.43847487001733%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eOntario (canada)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e01.99\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eBig cultures\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"72.85714285714286%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003e05.40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"27.142857142857142%\"\u003e\n \u003cp dir=\"LTR\"\u003eVegetables\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eLoukkos irrigated perimeter is a very important zone in the economy of northwest region of Morocco. However, the overuse of pesticides due to non-compliance with good phytosanitary practices noted and observed during field surveys and the very high values of pesticide pressure indicators, determined for potato crop, can lead to an increase in the risk factors both for the environment and for human health. It should therefore be noted that these irresponsible practices can be a major obstacle to sustainable agriculture. From a methodological point of view, this study showed the interest of using agro-environmental pressure indicators as a new way to minimize pesticide use. A better control of the latter by all the partners will allow production to increase, to preserve its sanitary quality, and to be at the heart of the challenges of sustainable development. Therefore, future efforts should be directed towards the use of indicators as a decision support tool for crop monitoring. Monitoring is also essential to reduce pesticide use (e.g., bans and restrictions on delete more toxic substances, use easily biodegradable substances, use of bio-pesticides and adapting integrated pest management). The use of the risk assessment tool for pesticide toxicity for humans and the environment will be the objective of our next work.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Approval\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors contributed to the participation this study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institute of Agronomic Research Tangier (Morocco) and by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Tangier (Morocco).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll participants provided informed consent to participate in the study. All authors guarantee that the research findings have not been previously published.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Publish\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMe, the undersigned, give my consent for the publication of identifiable details, which may include or details in the text (\u0026quot;Materials\u0026quot;) to be published in the above Journal and Article. I confirm that I have seen and had the opportunity to read the Material and Article to be published by Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. I have discussed this consent with MOHAMED BENICHA and MOHAMED CHABBI, who are coauthors of this article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors contributed to the study conception and design. \u0026nbsp; Data processing and analysis, data collection and analysis were performed by [MOHAMED ABBOU], [MOHAMED BENICHA] and [MOHAMED CHABBI]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [MOHAMED ABBOU], [MOHAMED BENICHA] and [MOHAMED CHABBI]. \u0026nbsp;All authors provided input into various aspects of the study, provided ongoing critique and approved the final version of the manuscript. All of the authors declare that they have seen the revised manuscript and approved the version to be published. All of the authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlaoui, K., Chafik, Z., Arabi, M., Abouloifa, H., Asehraou, A., Chaoui, J., \u0026amp; Kharmach, Ez-Z. (2021). In vitro antifungal activity of Lactobacillus against potato Late blight Phytophthora infestans. \u003cem\u003eMaterials Today: Proceedings\u003c/em\u003e, 45, 7725-7733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.338 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBahouq, M., Bahouq, H., \u0026amp; Soulaymani, A. (2021). Bibliographic review of phytopharmacovigilance actions and measures on plant protection products in Morocco. \u003cem\u003eE3S Web of Conferences\u003c/em\u003e, 319, 01034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131901034\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBasu, S., Chanda, A., Gogoi, P., \u0026amp; Bhattacharyya, S. (2021). Organochlorine pesticides and heavy metals in the zooplankton, fishes, and shrimps of tropical shallow tidal creeks and the associated human health risk. \u003cem\u003eMarine Pollution Bulletin\u003c/em\u003e, 165, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112170 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBenicha, M., Mrabet, R. \u0026amp; Azmani, A., 2016. Characterization of carbofuran bound residues and the effect of ageing on their distribution and bioavailability in the soil of a sugar beet field in north-western Morocco. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Environmental Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, 6(1), 57\u0026ndash;63. http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2016.9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerni, I., Menouni, A., Ghazi El. I., Duca, R. C., Kestemont, M. P., Godderis, L., \u0026amp; EL Jaafari, S. (2021a).Understanding farmers\u0026rsquo; safety behavior regarding pesticide use in Morocco. \u003cem\u003eSustainable Production and Consumption\u003c/em\u003e, 25, 471-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.019 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerni, I., Menouni, A., El Ghazi, I., Godderis, L., Duca, R. C., Jaafari, S. E. (2021b). Health and ecological risk assessment based on pesticide monitoring in Sa\u0026iuml;ss plain (Morocco) groundwater. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Pollution\u003c/em\u003e, 276, 116638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116638 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBettiche, F. (2017). Usages des produits phytosanitaires dans les cultures sous serres des Ziban (Alg\u0026eacute;rie) et \u0026eacute;valuation des cons\u0026eacute;quences environnementales possibles. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eThesis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, Universit\u0026eacute; Mohamed Kheider-Biskra Alg\u0026eacute;rie. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe Baan, L., Spycher, S., \u0026amp; Daniel, O. (2015). Einsatz von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Schweiz von 2009 bis 2012. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAgrarforschung Schweiz\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 6(2), 48\u0026ndash;55. Retrieved December 10, 2021, from https://www.agrarforschungschweiz.ch/fr/2015/02/utilisation-des-produits-phytosanitaires-en-suisse-de-2009-a-2012/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDegrendele, C., Kl\u0026aacute;nov\u0026aacute;, J., Proke\u0026scaron;, R., Př\u0026iacute;bylov\u0026aacute;, P., \u0026Scaron;enk, P., \u0026Scaron;udoma, M., R\u0026ouml;\u0026ouml;sli, M., Dalvie, M. A., \u0026amp; Fuhrimann, S. (2022). Current use pesticides in soil and air from two agricultural sites in South Africa: Implications for environmental fate and human exposure. \u003cem\u003eScience of The Total Environment\u003c/em\u003e, 807, 150455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150455 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEl Bouzaidi, H., Hafiane, F. Z., \u0026amp; Fekhaoui, M. (2020). Inventory of Pesticides and their impact on the environment by calculating the frequency of treatment indicator in the Gharb plain (Morocco). \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMediterranean Journal of Chemistry\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 10(4), 406-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.13171/mjc10402005041137fzh\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2022. FAOSTAT - Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Latest update: 17 February 2022. Accessed 5 March 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFarahy, O., Laghfiri, M., Bourioug, M., \u0026amp; Aleya, L. (2021). Overview of pesticide use in Moroccan apple orchards and its effects on the environment. \u003cem\u003eCurrent Opinion in Environmental Science \u0026amp; Health\u003c/em\u003e, 19-100223. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFouillet, E., Deli\u0026egrave;re, L., Chartier, N., Munier-Jolain, N., Cortel, S., Rapidel, B., \u0026amp; Merot, A. (2022). Reducing pesticide use in vineyards. Evidence from the analysis of the French DEPHY network. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Agronomy\u003c/em\u003e, 136, 126503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126503\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElhani, S., Haddadi, M., Cs\u0026aacute;kv\u0026aacute;ri, E., Zantar, S., Hamim, A., Vill\u0026aacute;nyi, V., Douaik, A., \u0026amp; B\u0026aacute;nfalvi, Z. (2019). Effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on yield, irrigation water-use efficiency and some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) quality traits under glasshouse conditions. \u003cem\u003eAgricultural Water Management,\u003c/em\u003e 224, 105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105745 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFlorence, J., Butault, J. P., \u0026amp; Guichard, L. (2011). An Economic Analysis of the Possibility of Reducing Pesticides in French Field Crops. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEcological Economics\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 70(9), 1638\u0026ndash;1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.003 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGirard, L., Reix, N., \u0026amp; Mathelin, C. (2020). Impact des pesticides perturbateurs endocriniens sur le cancer du sein. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eGyn\u0026eacute;cologie Obst\u0026eacute;trique Fertilit\u0026eacute; \u0026amp; S\u0026eacute;nologie\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 48(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.008\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoss, E. M., Tabima, J. F., Cooke, D. E. L., Restrepo, S., Fry, W. E., Forbes, G. A., \u0026amp; Grunwald, N. J. (2014). The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes. \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,\u003c/em\u003e 111, 8791\u0026ndash;8796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401884111 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuichard, L., Dedieu, F., Jeuffroy, M., Meynard, J. M., Raymond, R., \u0026amp; Savini, I. (2017). Le plan Ecophyto de r\u0026eacute;duction d\u0026rsquo;usage des pesticides en France : d\u0026eacute;cryptage d\u0026rsquo;un \u0026eacute;chec et raisons d\u0026rsquo;esp\u0026eacute;rer. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCahiers Agricultures\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 26(14002), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHern\u0026aacute;ndez, A. F., Parr\u0026oacute;n, T., Tsatsakis, A. M., Requena, M, Alarc\u0026oacute;n, R., \u0026amp; L\u0026oacute;pez-Guarnido, O. (2013). Toxic effects of pesticide mixtures at a molecular level: Their relevance to human health. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eToxicology\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 307, 136\u0026ndash;145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.06.009\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHossard, L., Guichard, L., Pelosi, C., \u0026amp; Makowski, D. (2017). Lack of evidence for a decrease in synthetic pesticide use on the main arable crops in France. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eScience of The Total Environment\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 575, 152\u0026ndash;161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.008 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKanj, F. (2018). Outils et m\u0026eacute;thodes pour une politique territoriale de gestion raisonn\u0026eacute;e des pratiques agricoles : cas d\u0026rsquo;application dans la r\u0026eacute;gion de la B\u0026eacute;qaa au Liban. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eThesis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, Universit\u0026eacute; Paul Val\u0026eacute;ry - Montpellier III Fran\u0026ccedil;ais.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKuchovska,\u0026acute; E. S., Gonzalez, P., Blahov, L., Barre, M., Gouffier, C., Cachot, J., Alicia Rom\u0026eacute;ro-Ramirez, A., Blaha,\u0026acute; L., \u0026amp; Morin, B. (2021). Pesticide mixture toxicity assessment through in situ and laboratory approaches using embryo-larval stages of the pacific oyster (Magallana gigas). \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMarine Environmental Research\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 169, 105390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105390 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLamichhane, J. R., Mess\u0026eacute;an, A., \u0026amp; Ricci, P. (2019). Research and innovation priorities as defined by the Ecophyto plan to address current crop protection transformation challenges in France. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvances in Agronomy\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 81\u0026ndash;152) Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.11.003\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLe Bellec, F., Scorbiac, M., \u0026amp; Sauzier, J. (2017). Les pratiques phytosanitaires des producteurs de l\u0026eacute;gumes de l\u0026rsquo;\u0026icirc;le Maurice : impacts et perspectives de changement. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCahiers Agricultures\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 26(55001), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017038\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiess, M., Henz, S., \u0026amp; Shahid, N. (2020). Modeling the synergistic effects of toxicant mixtures. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Sciences\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEurope\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e, 32(119), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00394-7 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL\u0026oacute;pez, G. E. C., Romito, M. L., Latorre, M. A., Siroski, P, A., \u0026amp; Poletta, G. L. (2021). Biomarkers of genotoxicity, immunotoxicity and oxidative stress on Caiman latirostris (Broad-snouted caiman) hatchlings exposed to pesticide formulations and mixtures widely used in agriculture. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Advances\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 5, 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100114 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMAAARO (Minist\u0026egrave;re de l\u0026rsquo;Agriculture, de l\u0026rsquo;Alimentation et des Affaires rurales- Ontario) (Latest update: 13 February 2021. 2021, March 10) (2008) Annexe X - Comparaison des quantit\u0026eacute;s totales de mati\u0026egrave;re active utilis\u0026eacute;es par hectare sur les principales cultures et pour des groupes de pesticides s\u0026eacute;lectionn\u0026eacute;s, 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998, 2003 et 2008. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/french/crops/facts/pesticide-use-appendix10.htm#2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeno, L., Escuredo, O., Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Flores, M. S., \u0026amp; Seijo, M. C. (2021) Looking for a sustainable potato crop. Field assessment of early blight management. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAgricultural and Forest Meteorology\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 308-309, 108617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108617 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMenouni, A., Abou-Said, S., Chetouani, H., Berni, I., Godderis, L., \u0026amp; El Jaafari, S. (2022). Evaluation of occupational exposure to pesticides and Oxidative stress : A case study from Morocco. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSafety and Health at Work\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 13, S260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.1563\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMunyaneza, J. E., \u0026amp; Bizimungu, B. (2022). Management of potato pests and diseases in Africa. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInsect Pests of Potato\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003e(2th ed., pp. 407-426). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-821237-0.00016-0 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNamgung, H., Yu, Y., Lee, S., Kwon, M., Kim, J., \u0026amp; Kim, H. (2022). Morphometric analysis of the wing for aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) associated with potatoes. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJournal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e15,\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e2018-2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2022.01.006 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePelosi, C., Bertrand, C., Daniele, G., Coeurdassier, M., Benoit, P., N\u0026eacute;lieu, S., \u0026amp; Fritsch, C. (2021). Residues of currently used pesticides in soils and earthworms: A silent threat?. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAgriculture, Ecosystems \u0026amp; Environment\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 305, 107167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107167 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP\u0026eacute;rez, D. J., Iturburu, F. G., Calderon, G., Oyesqui, L. A. E., De Ger\u0026oacute;nimo, E., \u0026amp; Aparicio, V. C. (2021). Ecological risk assessment of current-use pesticides and biocides in soils, sediments and surface water of a mixed land-use basin of the Pampas region, Argentina. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eChemosphere\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 263, 128061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128061 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePierlot, F., Marks-Perreau, J., R\u0026eacute;al, B., Carluer, N., Constant, T., Lioeddine, A., van, D. l., Villerd, J., Keichinger, O., Cherrier, R., \u0026amp; Bockstaller, C. (2017). Predictive quality of 26 pesticide risk indicators and one flow model: A multisite assessment for water contamination. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eScience of the Total Environment\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 605-606, 655\u0026ndash;665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv..06.112 2017\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRissouli, L., Benicha, M., Chafik, T., \u0026amp; Chabbi, M. (2017). Decontamination of water polluted with pesticide using biopolymers: Adsorption of glyphosate by chitin and chitosan. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eJournal of Materials and Environmental Sciences\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 8(12), 4544-4549. https://doi.org/10.26872/jmes.2017.8.12.479\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaguez, P., Giordanengo, P., \u0026amp; Vincent, C. (2013). Aphids as Major Potato Pests. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInsect Pests of Potato\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e, \u003c/em\u003e(2th ed., pp. 31\u0026ndash;63) Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386895-4.00003-x \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShefali, KR., Singh-Sankhla, M., Kumar, R., \u0026amp; Sonone, S. S. (2020). Impact of Pesticide Toxicity in Aquatic Environment. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBiointerface Research in Applied Chemistry\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 11(3), 10131-10140. https://doi.org/10.33263/briac113.1013110140 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSampaio, S. L., Petropoulos, S. A., Alexopoulos, A., Heleno, S. A., Santos-Buelga, C., Barros, L., \u0026amp; Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2020). Potato peels as sources of functional compounds for the food industry: A review. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrends in Food Science \u0026amp; Technology\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, (103), 118\u0026ndash;129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.015 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSamuel, O., Dion, S., \u0026amp; ST-Laurent, L. (2012, April M.-H). Indicateur de risque des pesticides du Qu\u0026eacute;bec-IRPeQ-Sant\u0026eacute; et Environnement Qu\u0026eacute;bec. Minist\u0026egrave;re de l\u0026rsquo;Agriculture, des p\u0026ecirc;cheries et de l\u0026rsquo;Alimentation/ Minist\u0026egrave;re du D\u0026eacute;veloppement Durable, de l\u0026rsquo;Environnement et des Parcs/ Institut National de Sant\u0026eacute; Publique du Qu\u0026eacute;bec. Retrieved March 7, 2021, from http://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/602- IndicateurDeRisqueDesPesticides.pdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSookhtanlou, M., Allahyari, M. S., \u0026amp; Surujlal, J. (2021). Health Risk of Potato Farmers Exposed to Overuse of Chemical Pesticides in Iran. \u003cem\u003eSafety and Health at Work\u003c/em\u003e, 13(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.09.004 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSanabria, K., P\u0026eacute;rez, W., \u0026amp; Andrade-Piedra, J. L. (2020). Effectiveness of resistance inductors for potato late blight management in Peru. \u003cem\u003eCrop Protection,\u003c/em\u003e 137, 105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105241 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSarti, O., Otal, E., Morillo, J., \u0026amp; Ouassini, A. (2021). Integrated assessment of groundwater quality beneath the rural area of R\u0026rsquo;mel, Northwest of Morocco. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eGroundwater for Sustainable Development\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 14, 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100620 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTudi, M., Daniel, R. H., Wang, L., Lyu, J., Sadler, R., Connell, D., Chu, C., \u0026amp; Phung, D. T. (2021). Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e, \u003c/em\u003e2718(3), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031112 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVernier, F., Miralles, A., Pinet, F., Carluer, N., Gouy, V., Molla, G., \u0026amp; Petit, k. (2013). EIS Pesticides: An environmental information system to characterize agricultural activities and calculate agro-environmental indicators at embedded watershed scales. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAgricultural Systems\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 122, 11\u0026ndash;21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.07.005\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWen, X., Ma, C., Sun, M., Wang, Y., Xue, X., Chen, J., Song, W., Li-Byarlay, H., \u0026amp; Luo, S. (2021). Pesticide residues in the pollen and nectar of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and their potential risks to honey bees. \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eScience of The Total Environment\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, 786, 147443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147443 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXiao, J., He, Q., Liu, Q., Wang, Z., Yin, F., Chai, Y., Yang, Q., Jiang, X., Liao, M., Yu, L., Jiang, W., \u0026amp; Cao, H. (2022). Analysis of honey bee exposure to multiple pesticide residues in the hive environment. \u003cem\u003eScience of The Total Environment,\u003c/em\u003e 805, 150292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150292 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYvoz, S., Petit, S., Biju, D. L., \u0026amp; Cordeau, S. (2020). A framework to type crop management strategies within a production situation to improve the comprehension of weed communities. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Agronomy\u003c/em\u003e, 115, 126009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126009 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"environmental-monitoring-and-assessment","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"emas","sideBox":"Learn more about [Environmental Monitoring and Assessment](http://link.springer.com/journal/10661)","snPcode":"10661","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/10661/3","title":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Potato, pesticides, agro-environmental indicators, phytosanitary practices, Loukkos Morocco","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eLoukkos perimeter is among the most important irrigated agricultural areas in Morocco. It covers horticulture and market garden production, including potato. This crop is characterized by the intensive use of pesticides that could lead to health and ecological risks, via the food chain and contamination of natural resources, including groundwater. This study aims to assess the use of pesticides in potato cultivation and their impacts on the environment and human health. Here, pesticide use was characterized by the number of treatments (NT), quantity of active substances indicator (QASI) and the treatment frequency indicator (TFI), through field surveys carried out on 50 Loukkos potato producers. The results showed that farmers use heavy pesticide treatments, mainly against late blight. We determined NT = 19 treatments, total TFI = 28.10 and QASI = 14.86 kg/ha. These values reflect a massive use of pesticides on this crop, which could therefore constitute a challenge and a major constraint for the development of sustainable agriculture in this zone, due to their negative environmental and health effects. It is, therefore, necessary to react quickly to make changes in phytosanitary practices with the aim to monitoring pesticide use via the agro-environmental indicators to reduce health and environmental impact of intensive pesticide use.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Assessment of phytosanitary practices on the environment: Case study potato of Loukkos (North-West Morocco)","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-07-20 14:46:31","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1785878/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2022-07-13T02:14:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2022-07-12T09:02:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2022-07-12T09:02:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","date":"2022-06-22T21:48:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"environmental-monitoring-and-assessment","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"emas","sideBox":"Learn more about [Environmental Monitoring and Assessment](http://link.springer.com/journal/10661)","snPcode":"10661","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/10661/3","title":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1cdeb73f-098e-43ef-833b-2bebe88f9317","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 20th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-10-16T18:44:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-1785878","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10949-9","journal":{"identity":"environmental-monitoring-and-assessment","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment"},"publishedOn":"2023-02-01 18:41:18","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 1st, 2023"},"versionCreatedAt":"2022-07-20 14:46:31","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s10661-023-10949-9","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10949-9","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1785878","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1785878","identity":"rs-1785878","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}