Women's perspectives on pelvic pain: insights into the emotional and diagnostic journey in primary care
A survey of 45 women with pelvic pain revealed significant physical and emotional impacts, highlighting disparities in GP experiences where patients reported both validation and dismissal during their diagnostic journey.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study surveyed 550 female patients at a general practice to evaluate the emotional and diagnostic experiences associated with pelvic pain. Among the 45 respondents reporting pain, the condition significantly impaired quality of life and emotional well-being, with many describing their symptoms using terms related to physical trauma. The research highlighted a disparity in clinical interactions, where some women felt validated while others experienced dismissal or confusion during GP consultations. Relevance to endometriosis: pelvic pain is a primary symptom of endometriosis, making this paper relevant to understanding patient barriers in diagnosing adenomyosis and endometriosis within primary care settings.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,858 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Method
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
SciLite annotations
organisms 3
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:08:58.330073+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:55:19.302648+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-08-30T09:54:48.501902+00:00