Reproductive system and agronomic potential of wild husk tomato Physalis gracilis (Solanaceae)

Reproductive system and agronomic potential of wild husk tomato Physalis gracilis (Solanaceae) | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Reproductive system and agronomic potential of wild husk tomato Physalis gracilis (Solanaceae) Omar Enríquez Antonio, María del Pilar Zamora-Tavares, Lislie Solís-Montero, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Wild plants are fundamental to human nutrition. Characterizing species with food value is essential to promote agro-food diversity. The genus Physalis produces acidic and sweet edible fruits that are traditionally consumed in local diets. Physalis gracilis is a perennial herb, with sweet, orange-colored fruits harvested for householdconsumption, distributed throughout Mexico and Central America. This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive system of P. gracilis and its agronomic potential. Floral longevity and development stages were determined in 30 flower buds until floral senescence, using individuals grown under greenhouse and open-field conditions. Stigma receptivity was assessed using hydrogen peroxide. Six artificial cross treatments were conducted to characterize the reproductive system, and indices of self-incompatibility and pollen limitation were calculated. To assess agronomic potential, an open-field crop was established with 144 plants (three accessions × 48 individuals), and six descriptors were evaluated from five fruits per plant. Results showed that P. gracilis is a completely self-incompatible species, however, it does not exhibit pollen limitation. P. gracilis responded positively to agricultural management (93.8% plant survival) and showed an average yield of 8.178 t·ha − 1 . Fruit size ranged from 11–22 mm. The average sweetness was 11.29° Brix and pH was 4.18. This study demonstrates that P. gracilis is a strong candidate for domestication as a new open-field crop, with desirable fruit traits, such as weight, size, and sweetness, that are superior to those of other wild Physalis species and comparable to the cultivated P. peruviana , a species highly valued for its fruit flavor. fruits horticulture new crops plant reproduction self-incompatible plant wild genetic resources Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Introduction Globally, wild plants play a crucial role in human nutrition (Bharucha and Pretty 2010 ). In Mexico, approximately 5,000 non-domesticated plant species are used either in their wild state or as tolerated species within agroecosystems and traditional gardens (Casas et al. 1996 ). There is increasing interest in characterizing wild species with food potential to identify their nutritional attributes and develop novel crops (Prohens et al. 2003 ). The Solanaceae family includes species of major horticultural relevance, such as potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.), tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.), chili pepper ( Capsicum spp.), and husk tomato ( Physalis spp .; Martínez et al. 2017 ), along with several wild relatives that could enhance food agrobiodiversity. The genus Physalis (Solanaceae) contains several species that are economically and nutritionally important. The edible fruits, which are berries with an acidic or sweet taste, possess nutraceutical properties (Herrera et al. 2011 ). In the American continent, two species are pre-Hispanic crops of national significance: Physalis peruviana L. (uchuva, cape gooseberry, aguaymanto) in South America (Puente et al. 2011 ) and Physalis philadelphica Lam. (husk tomato) in North America, mainly in Mexico (Zamora-Tavares et al. 2015 ; Alcalá-Gómez et al. 2022). Over the last 50 years, P. angulata L. (tomatillo milpero), a native species, has been cultivated in the central region of Jalisco, Mexico (Vargas-Ponce et al., 2016 ). Historically, the fruits of P. angulata have been used as food and medicine in Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico (Rengifo and Vargas 2013; Vargas-Ponce et al. 2016 ). Likewise, the backyard cultivation of P. grisea (Waterf.) M. Martínez (goldenberry) and P. longifolia Nutt. to consumption of their sweet fruits is common in the United States of America (USA) (Kindscher et al. 2012 ). Recently, the agronomic potential of several wild and weedy populations of P. angulata has been confirmed (Morales-Saavedra et al. 2019 ). Also, the agronomic productivity of P. acutifolia (Miers) Sandw., P. chenopodifolia Lam., and P. pubescens L. have been demonstrated. These species hold cultural significance for certain ethnic groups in Northwest and Central Mexico (Kindscher et al., 2012 ; Valdivia-Mares et al., 2016 ). Similarly, some Physalis species have been evaluated as new crops outside their native range, including P. peruviana (Panayotov and Popova 2014 ; Sing et al. 2014), P. philadelphica (Mulato-Brito and Peña Lomeli 2007; Sing et al. 2014), P. pruinosa L., and P. nicandroides Schltdl. (Sing et al. 2014). Physalis gracilis Miers is a perennial herb, slightly erect to prostrate, reaching up to 90 cm in length and rooting at the lower nodes. Flowering occurs year-round. The flowers are solitary, with yellow corollas that bear five distinct dark spots. The fruit is a berry, orange in color, 8–15 mm in diameter, and characterized by its sweet taste, which makes it highly valued for family consumption and, on a very small scale, for sale in local markets in Mexico (Santiaguillo and Blas 2009 ; Vargas-Ponce et al. 2011 ). The species is distributed from Nayarit and San Luis Potosí, Mexico, through Central America to Panama, at elevations between 1,400 and 2,250 m asl. It inhabits open areas within pine–oak and cloud forests and occurs as a weed in agricultural fields associated with these ecosystems (Martínez et al. 2023 ; Nee 1993 ). Given its perennial habit and fruit sweetness, assessing its performance under cultivation and its yield potential is relevant for future domestication efforts. Moreover, understanding the reproductive system of species with agronomic potential is essential, since fruit production is directly determined by the reproductive strategy employed. According to Menzel ( 1951 ), Physalis species are predominantly allogamous. However, recent studies on the reproductive biology of Physalis , conducted mainly on wild species or those under incipient utilization, have revealed variation in their reproductive system. For example, in P. philadelphica , artificial selection through cultivation has favored self-incompatibility in domesticated populations, whereas in wild populations, self-pollination seems advantageous by producing seeds that germinate faster than those of cultivated plants (Solís-Montero et al. 2021 ). In P. acutifolia , self-incompatibility is predominant, although intraspecific variation has been observed, with some populations exhibiting self-pollination (Pretzs and Smith, 2021). Meanwhile, P. angulata , P. peruviana , P. pubescens , P. micrantha Link, and P. nicandroides reproduce mainly through self-pollination (Azeez 2020 ; Figueiredo et al. 2020 ; Ojeda-Flores 2024 ), with P. peruviana exhibiting a mixed system (Ramírez et al. 2021). Whereas, P. viscosa L. and P. cinerascens (Dunal) Hitchc. are allogamous (Ojeda-Flores 2024 ; Sullivan 1985 ). The reproductive system of P. gracilis remains unknown; however, determining it is crucial for establishing its cultivation as a new crop. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the reproductive system of Physalis gracilis and evaluate its agronomic potential. Given that most Physalis species reproduce by cross-pollination, we hypothesized that P. gracilis is self-incompatible and that it will perform favorably under open-field cultivation. Materials and Methods Study Area The study was conducted in the experimental fields, both open-air and greenhouse, of the University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences (CUCBA), University of Guadalajara, located in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico (20°44'41''N, 103°30'58''W, 1640 m asl). The site has Eutric Regosol soils with an average pH of 5.38 and a semi-warm temperate climate with warm and rainy summers (García 2004 ). The mean annual temperature is 19.6°C, mean annual precipitation is 979.6 mm, and average relative humidity of 60% (García 2004 ). Plant material Accessions of P. gracilis were obtained from collections carried out in the states of San Luis Potosí and Querétaro, Mexico (Table 1 ). To obtain seedlings, seeds from the three accessions were germinated in trays in a greenhouse using a substrate mixture of moss, regolith, humus (3:2:1). Table 1 Geographical data of the studied populations of Physalis gracilis . Code Acession State Municipality Locality Elevation m asl 432 OVP 432 Querétaro Pinal de Amoles Pinal de Amoles 2340 512 LEV sn San Luis Potosí Xilitla Xilitla 638 513 LEV sn San Luis Potosí Huehuetlán Rancho la Pimienta 161 Characterization of the reproductive system Establishment of seedlings When the seedlings reached 10 cm in height, they were transplanted into 10 cm diameter pots. One month later, they were transferred to 15 cm diameter pots containing a substrate composed of volcanic rock (pumice) and organic matter (soil) (1:1). To characterize the reproductive system, 15 plants were established under greenhouse conditions. Floral development and longevity Floral longevity and developmental stages were assessed by monitoring flower buds from emergence to senescence in plants grown in a greenhouse and open-field during the spring-summer cycle of 2023. Thirty buds were randomly selected (15 in the greenhouse and 15 in the open-field, one bud per plant), and observations were made hourly from 9:00 to 17:00 h over seven days. Anthesis was determined by recording the timing of stigma receptivity and anther dehiscence. Each day after anthesis, the pistils were immersed in hydrogen peroxide to assess the stigma receptivity. A stigma was considered receptive when a strong bubbling reaction was observed (Zeisler 1933 ). Artificial crossing experiments The reproductive system of Physalis gracilis was determined using seven artificial crossing treatments, following the approach proposed by Solís-Montero et al. ( 2021 ). Five treatments were conducted under greenhouse conditions and two under open-field conditions. Artificial crosses were performed once the stigma receptivity was established. Experiments were conducted on 15 plants, with two replicates per treatment (30 flowers in total). The five greenhouse artificial crossing treatments were as follows: 1) Agamospermy (A): This treatment evaluated the capacity of P. gracilis to produce fruit through endogenous mechanisms in the absence of pollen. Anthers were removed (emasculated with metal forceps) on the first day of anthesis, prior to anther dehiscence, to prevent self-pollen deposition. 2) Autonomous self-pollination (AS): Flowers were left intact and unmanipulated until senescence to determine whether P. gracilis is capable of autonomous self-pollination in the absence of pollinators. 3) Hand-mediated self-pollination (MS): This treatment was used to test for the presence of a self-incompatibility system by transferring pollen from a flower’s own anthers onto its stigma using metal forceps. 4) Hand-mediated cross-pollination with a single pollen donor (CP1): This treatment assessed whether fruit set could occur using pollen from another plant. Pollen from one flower was deposited onto the stigma of a different, previously emasculated flower. 5) Hand-mediated cross-pollination with three pollen donors (CP3): To evaluate fruit set under an excess of pollen availability, anthers from three flowers (each from a different individual) were collected, placed in a 0.2 mL tube, mixed, and deposited onto the stigma of a previously emasculated flower using metal forceps. The two open-field treatments were as follows: 6) Pollen supplementation (PS): This treatment determined whether plants were pollen-limited. Pollen from three different plants was mixed (one anther per flower in a 0.2 mL tube) and applied to the stigma of the selected flower. Following manual cross-pollination, the plants were left exposed to open (natural) pollination. 7) Natural pollination (NP): Flowers were marked at the pedicel and left exposed to natural pollination. This treatment tested the capacity of P. gracilis to set fruit under natural conditions. For all treatments, the number of immature fruits (one week later) and mature fruits (approximately three weeks later) was recorded. The self-incompatibility index (SII) was calculated as the ratio of mature fruits produced per flower in self-pollination treatments to that in cross-pollination treatments with a single pollen donor (Ruíz-Zapata and Arroyo 1978). SII values were classified as follows: 1 = fully compatible; 0.2 > SII < 1 = partially compatible; SII < 0.2 = highly incompatible; and SII = 0 = completely incompatible. To evaluate pollen limitation, the pollen limitation index (PL) was calculated as PL = 1 - (NP/PS), where NP corresponds to immature fruit production under natural pollination and PS to that under pollen supplementation (Larson and Barrett 2000 ). Immature fruits were used because some mature fruits were lost to pests. Negative or zero values indicated no pollen limitation, whereas positive values indicated pollen limitation. Additionally, the pre-dispersal fitness index was calculated as Wpre = 1-(WpreNP/WprePS), where WpreNP was obtained by multiplying fruit production by the mean number of seeds per plant under natural pollination, and WprePS was calculated similarly for the pollen-supplementation treatment (Gómez et al. 2010 ; Solís-Montero et al. 2015 ). Confidence intervals (95%) were estimated using bootstrapping with 1000 permutations (Gómez et al. 2010 ). Finally, differences in fruit set and seed number were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLM). A binomial distribution was used for the fruit set, and a Poisson distribution was used for the seed number. For fruit set, confidence intervals were estimated using the Hmisc library (Harrel and Dupont 2019). For seed number, post-hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey's test with the glht function and multcomp library (Hothorn et al. 2008 ). Treatments involving agamospermy, autonomous self-pollination, and hand-mediated self-pollination were excluded from the analysis as they produced no fruit. All analyses, except for the SII self-incompatibility index, were performed using RStudio ver. 4.3.2 (R Core Team 2023 ). Characterization of Agronomic Potential Agricultural management When the Seedling reached 10 cm in height, they were transplanted to an open field at a spacing of 60 cm between plants and 150 cm between rows in a continuous layout without replication, resulting in a planting density of 13,778 plants·ha⁻¹. The crop was established in rows with mulch and drip irrigation (500 l·h⁻¹) (Fig. 1 ). To improve soil quality, 500 kg of worm humus was incorporated into the experimental area. Agricultural management included weed control and the application weekly of a complete fertilizer (1:1:1) throughout the experimental period. Organic insecticides were applied every 15 days, as needed. Data were collected from the fruits harvested from 48 plants per accession. Evaluation of Agronomic Potential Agronomic potential was evaluated using descriptors commonly applied to Mexican species of Physalis (Morales et al. 2018; Valdivia et al. 2016): total number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit weight (AFW), equatorial diameter of the fruit (EDF), firmness (F), total soluble solids (TSS) expressed as Brix grades, and pH (Table 2 ). In addition, the yield per hectare (Yha) was calculated by multiplying the average number of fruits per plant by the mean fruit weight and planting density. This descriptor was used to estimate the agronomic potential of the accession and compare its yield with that of other cultivated species. Table 2 Descriptors used in the agronomic characterization of Physalis gracilis. Descriptor Code Type a Units 1 Total number of fruits per plant NFP A amount 2 Average fruit weight AFW A gr 3 Equatorial diameter of the fruit DE A mm 4 Firmness F A Kg/cm² 5 Total soluble solids TSS PCh Brix grades 6 Hydrogen potential pH PCh Log n potential of hydrogen 7 Yield per hectare Yha A t·ha − 1 a A = agronomic, PCh = physicochemical Fruit weight was measured using an analytical balance (Nimbus®). The equatorial diameter was determined using a digital caliper (precision ± 0.01 mm), and fruit firmness was determined with an analog penetrometer (GY-3, resolution 0.02). TSS (°Brix) and fruit acidity (pH) were measured using a refractometer (Atago Ind) and a digital potentiometer (Science Med, precision ± 0.05), respectively. Except for pH, the descriptors were measured in five randomly selected fruits per plant. For pH, the number of fruits varied for each plant, depending on juice availability. To evaluate the variation in descriptors among accessions, a one-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed. A Euclidean distance matrix was constructed, and data were standardized to z-scores to ensure comparability among variables. Accessions were considered fixed effects, and statistical significance was assessed using 10,000 permutations based on the unrestricted permutation of raw data method and the type III sums of squares. Finally, a test for homogeneity of dispersion (PERMDISP) and principal coordinate analysis (PCO) were performed as complementary analyses to the PERMANOVA results, using the same data preprocessing and similarity coefficients as PERMANOVA. PERMDISP was applied to assess differences in the variability of descriptors among accessions, with statistical significance, using 10,000 permutations. PCO was based on six descriptors (NFP, AWF, ED, F, TSS, and pH) to visualize differences in agronomic attributes among accessions. All analyses were performed with Primer 6.1.11 + PERMANOVA 1.0.1 (Anderson et al. 2008 ). Results Characterization of reproductive biology Floral development and longevity Of the 30 selected buds, 28 completed their development through to floral senescence (13 in the greenhouse and 15 in the open-field). Monitoring from bud to senescence allowed us to define eight developmental stages and longevity in P. gracilis (Fig. 2 ): 0) immature floral bud; 1) mature floral bud (with trichomes on the floral calyx); 2) separation of calyx lobes; 3) onset of corolla opening; 4) full corolla opening; 5) onset of anther dehiscence (two anthers); 6) full anther dehiscence; and 7) floral senescence. Physalis gracilis flowers exhibited daily opening and closing cycles until senescence. The opening began between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. and closing occurred around 5:00 p.m. Stigma receptivity was observed at stage 5, coinciding with the onset of anther dehiscence. Flower longevity differed between environments: in the greenhouse stages 3–7 lasted an average of four days, whereas in open-field lasted an average of 2.5 days. Artificial crosses Physalis gracilis did not produce fruits through agamospermy or apomixis and was confirmed as a self-incompatible species; neither agamospermy nor autonomous nor hand-mediated self-pollination resulted in fruit set. The self-incompatibility index indicated a completely self-incompatible reproductive system (SII = 0). In contrast, treatments favoring cross-pollination (cross-pollination, pollen supplementation, and natural pollination) produced 84% of the fruits set to maturity. The statistical analysis (GLM) comparing the four treatments (CP1, CP3, PS, and NP) indicated significant differences; however, pairwise tests (Tukey) were not sufficiently robust to confirm them, likely due to the nature of the data (Table 3 ). Pollen supplementation (PS) appeared to generate lower fruit production compared to other treatments, with only nine of the 30 expected fruits reaching maturity. Several fruits were lost in the open-field due to causes unrelated to the experiment. The pollen limitation (PL) and pre-dispersal fitness (Wpre) indices indicated no evidence of pollen limitation, as both values were negative, with PL = -0.17 and upper and lower confidence intervals of -0.3927 and − 0.0127, and Wpre = 0.43 and confidence intervals of -0.7184 and − 0.0910 (Table 3 ). Seed production varied among the treatments. Crosses with a single donor (CP1) produced significantly fewer seeds than those with three donors (CP3), with the highest seed numbers observed under natural pollination (Table 3 ). Pollen supplementation with at least three donors yielded results comparable to those of CP3. Table 3 Immature fruit production (number of flowers per treatment), seed number of mature fruits ± standard error (number of mature fruits) of P. gracilis , pollen limitation (PL), and predispersal fitness (L_Wpre) indices. GLM PL Treatment Immature fruit production Mean number of seeds Number fruits Mean number of seeds Agamospermy 0 (30) 0 Autonomous self-pollination 0 (30) 0 Hand-mediated self-pollination 0 (30) 0 Cross-pollination single pollen donor 100 (30) 188.43 ± 10.19 c (30) Cross-pollination three pollen donor 100 (30) 206.61 ± 9.18 b (28) Natural pollination 96.6 (30) 282.72 ± 13.39 a (29) PL/L_Wpre -0.17 ± O.12 -0.4333 ± 0.12 Pollen supplementation 77.77(18) 205.11 ± 41.55 b (9) IC 95% (-0.3927, -0.0127) (-0.7184,-0.0910) Devianza 12.654 533.94 GL 3 3 Self-incompatibility index SII = 0 p < 0.001 < 0.001 Different letters indicate statistical differences between the treatments. *** P < 0.001 CI = confidence intervals A = Agamospermy; AS = Autonomous self-pollination; MS = Hand-mediated self-pollination; CP1 = Cross-pollination single pollen donor; CP3 = Cross-pollination three pollen donor; NP = Natural pollination; PS = Pollen supplementation Agronomic Potential Characterization Response to Agricultural Management A total of 162 plants from three P. gracilis accessions were established under agricultural management. Their establishment and adaptation were favorable, achieving a survival rate of 93.8% and an average productivity of 8.178 t · ha − 1 (Table 4 ). Accession 513 showed the highest Yha of 9.079 t·ha − 1 , but also had the highest proportion of non-established plants (9.2%), whereas accession 432 recorded the lowest yield (7.001 t·ha − 1 ). The number of fruits per plant varied widely among accessions, from 41 in accession 512 to 744 in accession 513, the latter also having the highest average number of fruits per plant (278). Fruit weight ranged from 0.66 g to 5.12 g, with accession 512 presenting the highest average (2.48 g) and accession 432 presenting the lowest. The equatorial diameter ranged from 11 to 22 mm, with accession 512 displaying the largest mean value (16.92 mm). Fruit firmness was similar between accessions 432 and 512, both exceeding that in 513. The ºBrix ranged from 11.17 to 11.36, while the pH ranged from 3.91 to 4.43. Table 4 Means and standard deviations per accession of descriptors used in Physalis gracilis . Accession NPF P DE F °Brix pH Yha 432 255 1.99 15.65 1.49 11.34 4.43 7.001 SD ± 103 ± 0.58 ± 1.82 ± 0.48 ± 3.14 ± 0.28 minimum 59 0.66 11 0.4 3 3.83 maximum 504 5.12 22 3.5 18 5.31 512 247 2.48 16.92 1.46 11.17 4.22 8.462 SD ± 142 ± 0.70 ± 1.67 ± 0.50 ± 2.62 ± 0.32 minimum 41 1.22 12 0.2 3.4 3.56 maximum 626 4.65 21 2.5 18 5.23 513 278 2.37 16.72 1.31 11.36 3.91 9.079 SD ± 159 ± 0.53 ± 1.33 ± 0.35 ± 2.40 ± 0.27 minimum 46 1.20 13 0.2 4.4 3.54 maximum 744 3.86 20 2.6 17.6 4.87 M 260.36 2.28 16.43 1.42 11.29 4.18 8.178 NPF = total number of fruits per plant, P = fruit weight, DE = equatorial diameter of the fruit, F = firmness, Yha = yield per hectare (t-ha − 1 ), SD = standard deviation, M = mean of the three accessions Agronomic Potential The one-way PERMANOVA model explained 29.6% of the variation in agronomic descriptors among the Physalis gracilis accessions, revealing statistically significant differences (Table 5 ). Pairwise comparisons confirmed that all three accessions were distinct. PERMDISP further indicated significant differences in the variation of descriptors among accessions (Table 5 ), suggesting that both dispersion and location effects contributed to this variation. The principal coordinate analysis (PCO) ordination conducted at the accession level based on the mean values of descriptors showed that the first axis explained 59.4% of the total variation, primarily associated with equatorial diameter, fruit weight, pH, and firmness (Fig. 2 ). Along this axis, accession 512 was strongly associated with fruit weight and equatorial diameter, whereas 432 was aligned with pH and firmness. The second axis accounted for 40.6% of the variation, mainly related to ºBrix, number of fruits per plant, diameter, and fruit weight. Accession 513 was closely associated with the number of fruits per plant and ºBrix compared to the other accessions. Table 5 One-way PERMANOVA and PERMDISP results of variation among the three analyzed accessions of Physalis gracilis . Factor PERMANOVA PERMDISP Pseudo-F P C.V % F P Accesssions 9.457 0.0001 29.6 3.4518 0.0406 Residuals 70.4 P = statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05); C.V. % = coefficient of variation expressed as a percentage Discussion Outcrossing plants are generally expected to experience stronger pollen limitations because of their reliance on pollinators for reproduction (Larson and Barret 2000). Contrary to this expectation, Physalis gracilis did not exhibit pollen limitation, despite being a completely self-incompatible species. Moreover, the high efficiency of its pollination is reflected in the evaluated agronomic traits, underscoring its potential as a monoculture crop. Characterization of the Reproductive Biology Floral Development and Longevity The floral anthesis of P. gracilis differed between individuals grown under open-field and greenhouse conditions differed. In the greenhouse, anthesis lasted almost twice as long, averaging four days and up to seven days in some plants. This extended duration is likely due to the absence of natural pollination, in contrast to open fields, where pollinators were present. For P. angulata , a self-compatible species, Figueiredo et al. ( 2020 ) reported a shorter anthesis period of two days, consistent with what we observed for P. gracilis under open-field conditions. Similarly, Lagos et al. ( 2008 ) found that in P. peruviana , a species with a mixed mating system (Ramírez et al. 2021), anthesis lasts only for two days. Recently, Ojeda-Flores ( 2024 ) reported that P. cinerascens (self-incompatible) and P. nicandroides (self-compatible) differ in their floral longevity, with longer anthesis in P. cinerascens than in P. nicandroides . These findings align with our observations in P. gracilis under greenhouse conditions and are consistent with the general expectation that self-incompatibility reproductive systems prolong anthesis to increase pollination opportunities (Gibbs and Talavera 2001 ; Martén-Rodríguez and Fenster 2008 ; Ortiz et al. 2006 ; Weber and Goodwillie 2003; Wyatt 1981 ). The short duration observed in open-field P. gracilis plants is ecologically meaningful because floral anthesis influences the probability and frequency of pollinator visits (Primack 1985 ). Ashman (2004) suggests that floral longevity is "a trait shaped by natural selection to suit a plant's ecological context." Studies on diverse plant groups support this view (Ashman and Schoen 1997 ; Castro et al. 2008 ; Clark and Husband 2007 ; Prokop 2024 ; Prokop et al. 2021 ; Stead and Moore 1983 ). Recently, Prokop ( 2024 ) found that in Convolvulus arvensis , a completely self-incompatible species, floral longevity varies with pollinator abundance, and that reductions in anthesis duration depend on the pollinator species present. In our study, natural pollination resulted in a very high fruit set (96.6%), suggesting that both pollinator abundance in the open field and prolonged floral longevity in their absence under greenhouse conditions are important. Although Physalis species differ in life cycles and reproductive systems (e.g., P. gracilis is perennial and self-incompatible; P. angulata is an annual self-compatible; P. peruviana is perennial with a mixed system), anthesis duration among them are surprisingly similar. This pattern contrasts with the expectation that reproductive systems should drive substantial differences in floral longevity (Ashman 2004). Artificial Crosses The absence of fruit development both autonomous and hand-mediated self-pollination confirms that P. gracilis lacks mechanisms for self-pollen deposition and possess genetic mechanisms that recognize and reject its self-pollen (Takamaya and Isogai 2005). In Solanaceae, approximately 39% of species have a gametophytic self-incompatibility system mediated by RNases, which recognize and reject self-pollen grains to prevent self-fertilization (Franklin-Tong and Franklin 2003 ; Igic et al. 2006 ). Our results strongly suggest that P. gracilis has such a system, which enforces self-incompatibility and promotes outcrossing. Moreover, the agamospermy treatment indicated the absence of endogenous mechanisms enabling fruit development without pollination does not occur. Pollen Limitation Our results confirmed that Physalis gracilis is completely self-incompatible. Self-incompatibility has been reported in P. viscosa (Sullivan 1984), populations of P. peruviana (Ramírez et al. 2021), and cultivated populations of P. philadelphica (Solís-Montero et al. 2021 ). Although P. acutifolia is considered self-incompatible within populations breakdowns of this system have been observed (Pretzs and Smith 2021), as has recently been reported in P. cinerascens (Ojeda-Flores 2024 ). Self-incompatibility is thought to represent the ancestral state of Physalis (Igic et al. 2006 ), yet only P. viscosa had previously been described as completely self-incompatible (Figuereido 2020; Sullivan 1984), to which P. gracilis can now be added. According to the pollen limitation hypothesis, cross-pollinated species are expected to experience stronger limitations due to pollen availability or pollinators (Larson and Barret 2000). Contrary to this expectation, P. gracilis exhibited no pollen limitation, and both fruit and seed production were higher under natural pollination than under pollen supplementation, suggesting that pollinators alone ensured sufficient pollen transfer. This indicates highly efficient plant-pollinator interactions. The reduction in seed production observed under pollen supplementation may be explained by competition among the growing pollen tubes. Specifically, the deposition of excessive pollen grains on the stigma may cause saturation, where only a fraction of pollen tubes successfully fertilize ovules (Mulcahy and Mulcahy 1987 ). Although floral visitors were not systematically quantified, field observations indicated frequent visits by Apis mellifera. Related to this, Delmas et al. (2014) found that in Rhododendron ferrugineum , pollen limitation increases with population density due to visitation rates per flower, whereas smaller populations may experience less pollen limitation but can also be less attractive to pollinators (Ashman et al. 2004 ). In this study, the experimental pot was small but was surrounded by diverse crops, which may have enhanced pollinator attraction. Seed production also varied among the cross-pollination treatments. Pollination with a single donor or with three individuals (including supplementation treatment) produced fewer seeds than natural pollination, which yielded the highest values. The frequent presence of Apis mellifera in crop fields may account for this enhanced seed production under natural conditions. Previous studies have shown that introduced honeybees can increase fruit and seed production in some native plants (Cayuela et al. 2011 ; Dieringer 1992 ; Garibaldi et al. 2013 ; Rosas et al. 2010; Sun et al. 2013 ). However, they can also displace native pollinators (Gouldson 2003). In some systems, A. mellifera complements native bee species, whereas in others, its contribution is dominant, and its absence leads to production losses of up to 90% (Rosas et al. 2010; Southwick and Southwick 1992 ; Sun et al. 2013 ). Thus, the high seed production observed in the natural pollination treatment of P. gracilis under natural pollination is likely related to A. mellifera , although detailed pollinator studies are still needed. Characterization of Agronomic Potential Response to Agricultural Management and Agronomic Potential Physalis gracilis showed a positive response to agricultural management, similar to that observed in other wild and cultivated Physalis species (López et al. 2009; Morales-Saavedra et al. 2018; Valdivia-Mares et al. 2016 ), achieving a successful establishment rate of 93.8% under cultivation. The yield obtained (7–9 t·ha − 1 ) fell within the range recorded for P. pubescens (7.5–12.5 t·ha − 1 ) and P. acutifolia (4.9–20.8 t·ha − 1 ), but was lower than that of P. chenopodiifolia (16–20 t·ha − 1 ), the wild species evaluated by Valdivia-Mares et al. ( 2016 ). Likewise, the yield per hectare of P. gracilis is modest when compared to the most widely cultivated species, P. philadelphica (0.63–30.97 t·ha − 1 , Santiaguillo et al. 1998) and P. angulata (8–28 t·ha − 1 , Morales-Saavedra et al. 2018). It has also been reported that ground-level cultivation systems generally yield less than staking systems (Castillo et al. 1992 ). In Mexico, Physalis species are typically grown as monocultures on the ground. However, in P. philadelphica , staking has been shown to increase yields by up to 40 t·ha − 1 (Castillo et al. 1992 ). Physalis philadelphica and P. angulata are annual species that exhibit erect growth, dichotomous branching, relatively short internodes, and high fruit production, traits that contribute to their higher yield. In contrast, P. gracilis is a perennial herbaceous plant with a decumbent to slightly erect growth habit, often reclining over neighboring species in its natural habitat. It is profusely branched at the stem base, with branches reaching up to 90 cm (occasionally 1.5 m) in length. Its internodes are long (> 6 cm), and the number of fruits per plant is similar to that of annual species. This prostrate growth appears to be less advantageous for cultivation; therefore, implementing staking or similar systems could enhance its production. Notably, for P. peruviana , a perennial species with erect growth and profuse branching, X- and V-type staking systems have been successfully applied (Fisher et al. 2005). The agronomic potential of P. gracilis is noteworthy for its possible establishment as a new crop, particularly because of its desirable fruit traits. Fruit weight (1.99–2.48 g) and equatorial diameter (15.65–16.92 mm) were higher than those reported by Valdivia-Mares et al. ( 2016 ) for the three wild species studied ( P. acutifolia , P. pubescens , P. chenopodiifolia ), and even higher than cultivated P. angulata , which was used as a control (1.64 g and 12.63 mm) in their study. Likewise, sweetness, expressed as total soluble solids (11.17–11.36 ºBrix), was superior to that of the aforementioned wild species (7.43–10.88 ºBrix), which are typically acidic or only slightly sweet, such as P. chenopodiifolia . The sweetness of P. gracilis fruits is comparable to values reported for P. peruviana (10.86–15.5 ºBrix), as are the pH values (3.88 in P. peruviana ; 4.18 in P. gracilis ) (Castro et al. 2008 ; Madruga et al. 2009 ; Mejía 2015; Novoa et al. 2006 ; Puente et al. 2011 ; Ramadan 2011 ). PERMANOVA revealed significant differences among the three P. gracilis accessions analyzed, and PCO helped visualize the relationship among agronomic variables and each accession. The San Luis Potosí accessions (512 and 513) were found to be the most promising. Accession 512 showed superior traits for selecting plants with larger and heavier fruits, whereas 513 presented the highest number of fruits per plant and the best ºBrix values. Accession 532 produced smaller fruits with high sweetness. Interestingly, accessions 513 and 432 combined high sweetness values with small fruit size, indicating a negative correlation between fruit size and sweetness, a trend also observed in wild accessions of Solanum lycopersicum , which poses challenges for breeding programs (Luengwilai et al. 2010 ). The variation observed among the P. gracilis accessions was consistent with the morphological variability expected in cross-pollinated species (Olsen and Wendel 2013 ). The sweetness fruits (8–13 ºBrix) of melon, orange, papaya, and pineapple (Riaz et al. 2015 ; Santamaría et al. 2009; Soloman et al. 2016 ; Tapia et al. 2010;), have orange/yellow colors, and are categorized by the FAO (2021) as major contributors of carotenoids. The health benefits of these fruits have been widely documented (Leenders et al. 2013 ; Xin 2016 ). In this context, the sweetness of P. gracilis fruits (11.17–11.36 ºBrix) falls within the same range, suggesting that their consumption could provide a valuable source of nutrients. Moreover, their potential versatility, whether consumed fresh, as fruit, juice, jam, or dried, enhances their attractiveness to consumers. Reproductive system: advantages and limitations for cultivation Physalis gracilis is completely self-incompatible; it relies entirely on cross-pollination for reproduction. This condition could initially represent a disadvantage in achieving phenotypic uniformity and establishing the species as a monoculture. However, our results demonstrate that pollinators ensure high fruit and seed production, suggesting that cross-pollination may also confer advantages, particularly in terms of crop resistance to pests, diseases, and herbivory. For instance, Ruiz-Arocho et al. (2023) reported that herbivory was lower in cultivated populations of P. philadelphica than in wild populations, possibly because of the greater genetic diversity generated by cross-pollination during domestication. Although approximately 25% of cultivated species are self-incompatible, only a minority are completely self-incompatible, while most exhibit partial self-incompatibility (Dempewolf et al. 2012 ). Furthermore, some self-incompatible species subjected to artificial selection tend to undergo transitions toward self-compatibility, thereby facilitating the fixation of desirable traits (Rick 1988 ). In this regard, P. gracilis may not be exempt from changes in its reproductive system, especially since breakdowns of self-incompatibility have been documented in P. acutifolia , even within individual plants (Pretzs and Smith 2021). Cross-pollination also offers advantages in terms of crop productivity (Klein et al. 2018 ; Rosas et al. 2010). Approximately 70% of self-incompatible crops exhibit higher yields when animal-mediated pollination occurs (Roubik 1995 ; Wilmer 2011). Additional benefits include increased seed production in alfalfa, improved fiber quality in cotton, and up to a 50% increase in raspberry fruit weight (Rodes 2002; Wilmer 2011). Therefore, quantifying the contribution and estimating the value of cross-pollination in P. gracilis are essential for assessing its potential as a monoculture. Conclusions Physalis gracilis is a completely self-incompatible species that does not exhibit pollen limitation and responds positively to agricultural management. While self-incompatibility entails complete reliance on pollinators, in this species, it does not appear to be a limitation or disadvantage, as efficient pollination ensures consistent fruit production. Moreover, its perennial growth habit favors the extension of fruiting periods. Although the per-hectare productivity of P. gracilis is comparable to that of other Physalis species, it is relatively low compared to that of the most widely cultivated taxa. Nevertheless, productivity could be improved through agronomic practices such as staking or trellising which promote vertical plant growth and higher fruit set. Importantly, its favorable fruit quality traits, particularly sweetness (11.17–11.36 ºBrix), comparable to that of cape gooseberry ( P. peruviana ), a fruit highly valued in South America, highlight its potential as a promising agro-food resource. Declarations Author Contribution Author Contribution: OEA carried out the experimental work in openfield and greenhouse, acquisition and interpretation of data, writing–original draft. M.P.Z-T, conceived and partially designed the study, reviewed the manuscript. LSM made substantial contributions to the conception of the reproductive biology, advised on statistical analysis, reviewed the manuscript. FARZ advised on statistical analysis, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. CVSH revised the manuscript critically and refined the writing style. GAG acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. JASN support the field work and agricultural management. O.V-P conceived and designed the study, funding acquisition, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. M.P.Z-T, FARZ, OV-P prepared figures 1-3. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Acknowledgement This work was supported by Universidad de Guadalajara (P3E and PROSNI 2022-2024 to OVP). The authors are grateful to José Sánchez Martínez for his advice on crop establishment. Thanks go to SECIHTI for the OEA scholarship for graduate studies at Maestría en Biosistemática y Manejo de Recursos Naturales (BIMARENA). GAG acknowledges the postdoctoral fellowship from SECIHTI 2024-2025. GAG's postdoctoral fellowship was led by OVP References Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke RK (2008) PERMANOVA + para PRIMER: Guía para el programa y métodos estadísticos. PRIMER-E, Massey University, Plymouth, U.K, pp. 264. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amrasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85(9):2408–2421. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024 Ashman TL, Schoen DJ (1997) The cost of floral longevity in Clarkia tembloriensis: an experimental investigation. Evol Ecol 11:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018416403530 Azeez SO (2020) Characterization and reproductive biology of four Physalis L. Species from ILE-IFE, Nigeria. NJB 33(2):151–172. Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/njbot/article/view/235802 Bharucha Z, Pretty J (2010) The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1554):2913–2926. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0123 Casas A, Vázquez MDC, Viveros JL, Caballero J (1996) Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec in the Balsas River Basin, Mexico: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol 24(4):455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168862 Castillo PI, Peña-Lomelí A, Cruz G (1992) Densidad de población, sistemas de manejo y arreglos topológicos en tomate de cáscara ( Physalis ixocarpa ). Rev Chapingo 15(73–74):53–56. Castro S, Silveira P, Navarro L (2008) Effect of pollination on floral longevity and costs of delaying fertilization in the out-crossing Polygala vayredae Costa (Polygalaceae). Ann Bot 102(6):1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn184 Cayuela L, Ruiz-Arriaga S, Ozers CP (2011) Honeybees increase fruit set in native plant species important for wildlife conservation. Environ Manage 48:910–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9677-5 Clark MJ, Husband BC (2007) Plasticity and timing of flower closure in response to pollination in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Int J Plant Sci 168(5):619–625. Delmas CE, Escaravage N, Cheptou PO, Charrier O, Ruzafa S, Winterton P, Pornon A (2015) Relative impact of mate versus pollinator availability on pollen limitation and outcrossing rates in a mass-flowering species. Plant Biol 17(1):209–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12200 Dempewolf H, Hodgins KA, Rummell SE, Ellstrand NC, Rieseberg LH (2012) Reproductive isolation during domestication. Plant Cell 24(7):2710–2717. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.100115 Dieringer G (1992) Pollinator limitation in populations of Agalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). Bull Torrey Bot Club 119(2)131–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997024 Figueiredo MCC, Passos AR, Hughes FM, Santos KSD, Silva AL, Soares TL (2020) Reproductive biology of Physalis angulata L. (Solanaceae). Sci Hortic 267:109307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109307 Fischer G, Miranda D, Piedrahíta W, Romero J (2005) Avances en cultivo, poscosecha y exportación de la uchuva ( Physalis peruviana L.) en Colombia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2021). Fruit and vegetables- your dietary essentials. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/43d566ab-d031-435a-b30d-309b70eb5ddc . Accessed 20 May 2024 Franklin-Tong NV, Franklin FCH (2003) Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 8(12):598–605 García E (2004) Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, et al (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339(6127):1608–1611. https://10.1126/science.1230200 Gibbs PE, Talavera S (2001) Breeding system studies with three species of Anagallis (Primulaceae): self-incompatibility and reduced female fertility in A. monelli L. Ann. Bot 88(1):139–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1439 Gómez JM, Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Muñoz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F (2010) Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. J. Ecol. 98(5):1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:1–26. Harrell FE, Dupont C (2019) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.2-0 Herrera AM, Ortiz JD, Fischer G, Chacón MI (2011) Behavior in yield and quality of 54 cape gooseberry ( Physalis peruviana L.) accessions from north-eastern Colombia. Agron Colomb 29(2):189–196. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/29027 Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50(3):346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425 Igic B, Bohs L, Kohn JR (2006) Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(5):1359–1363. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506283103 Kindscher K, Long Q, Corbett S, Bosnak K, Loring H, Cohen M, Timmermann BN (2012) The ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology of wild tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related Physalis species: a review. Econ Bot 66(3):298–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-012-9210-7 Klein AM, Boreux V, Fornoff F, Mupepele AC, Pufal G (2018) Relevance of wild and managed bees for human well-being. Curr Opin Insect Sci 26:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.011 Lagos TC, Vallejo Cabrera FA, Criollo Escobar H, Muñoz Flórez JE (2008) Biología reproductiva de la uchuva. Acta Agron 57(2):81–87 Larson BM, Barrett SC (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69(4):503–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01221.x Leenders M, Sluijs I, Ros MM, Boshuizen HC, Siersema PD, Ferrari P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB (2013) Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality: European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 178(4):590–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt006 López-López R, Arteaga-Ramírez R, Vázquez-Peña MA, López-Cruz IL, Sánchez-Cohen I (2009) Producción de tomate de cáscara ( Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) basado en láminas de riego y acolchado plástico. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 15(1):83–89. Luengwilai K, Fiehn OE, Beckles DM (2010) Comparison of leaf and fruit metabolism in two tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes varying in total soluble solids. J. Agric Food Chem 58(22):11790–11800. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102562n Madruga LS, Severo J, Manica-Berto R, Silva JA, Rufato L, Rufato ADR (2009) Características físico-químicas de physalis em diferentes colorações do cálice e sistemas de condução. Rev Bras Frutic 31:1061–1068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452009000400020 Martén-Rodríguez S, Fenster CB (2008) Pollination ecology and breeding systems of five Gesneria species from Puerto Rico. Ann Bot 102(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn056 Martínez M, Vargas-Ponce O, Rodríguez A, Chiang F, Ocegueda S (2017) Solanaceae family in Mexico. Bot Sci 95(1):131–145. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.658 Martínez M, Vargas-Ponce O, Zamora-Tavares P (2023) Taxonomic revision of Physalis in Mexico. Front Genet 14:1080176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1080176 Mejía M (2010) Evaluación productiva de veinte genotipos de uchuva ( Physalis peruviana L) en dos localidades del oriente Antioqueño. Dissertation, Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Izasa Cadavid. Menzel MY (1951) The cytotaxonomy and genetics of Physalis . Proc Am Philos Soc 95(2):132–183 Morales-Saavedra JDC, Rodríguez-Zaragoza FA, Cabrera-Toledo D, Sánchez-Hernández CV, Vargas-Ponce O (2019) Agromorphological characterization of wild and weedy populations of Physalis angulata in Mexico. Sci Hortic 246:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.055 Mulato-Brito J, Peña-Lomelí A (2007) Germplasm evaluation of tomatillo ( Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) cropped under Ontario, Canada and Chapingo, Mexico environmental conditions. Veg Crop Res Bull 66:117–127. https://10.2478/v10032-007-0014-8 Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1987) The effects of pollen competition. Am. Sci. 75(1):44–50 Nee M (1993) Solanaceae II. Flora de Veracruz. Instituto de Ecología, AC Xalapa-University of California, Riverside. Novoa RH, Bojacá M, Galvis JA, Fischer G (2006) La madurez del fruto y el secado del cáliz influyen en el comportamiento poscosecha de la uchuva, almacenada a 12C ( Physalis peruviana L.). Agron Colomb 24(1):77–86. Ojeda-Flores F (2024) Interacción polen-pistilo en dos especies de Physalis (Solanaceae). Master’s dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. Olsen KM, Wendel JF (2013) A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64(1):47–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048 Ortiz MÁ, Talavera S, Garcia-Castaño JL, Tremetsberger K, Stuessy T, Balao F, Casimiro‐Soriguer R (2006) Self‐incompatibility and floral parameters in Hypochaeris sect. Hypochaeris (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 93(2):234–244. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.2.234 Panayotov N, Popova A (2014) Vegetative and productive behaviors of Cape gooseberry ( Physalis peruviana L.), grown by direct sowing outside under conditions of Bulgaria. Turk J Agric Nat Sci Special Issue 1:1141–1146 Pretz C, Smith SD (2022) Intraspecific breakdown of self-incompatibility in Physalis acutifolia (Solanaceae). AoB PLANTS 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plab080 Primack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annu Rev Syst Ecol 16:15–37 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097041 Prohens J, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Nuez F (2003) New crops: an alternative for the development of horticulture. Food Agric Environ 1:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2003.319 Prokop P (2024) Urban environment decreases pollinator availability, fertility, and prolongs anthesis in the field bindweed ( Convolvulus arvensis Linnaeus, 1753). Plant Signal Behav 19(1):2325225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2325225 Prokop P, Molnárová D, Fančovičová J, Medina-Jerez W (2021) Seasonal variability in flower lifespan in common chicory ( Cichorium intybus L.). Flora 284:151935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2021.151935 Puente LA, Pinto-Muñoz CA, Castro ES, Cortés M (2011) Physalis peruviana Linnaeus, the multiple properties of a highly functional fruit: A review. Food Res Int 44(7):1733–1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.034 R Core Team. (2023). A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (4.3.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Software available at: https://www.r-project.org/ Ramadan MF (2011) Bioactive phytochemicals, nutritional value, and functional properties of cape gooseberry ( Physalis peruviana ): An overview. Food Res Int 44(7):1830–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.042 Ramírez F, Davenport TL (2021) Pollination. In: Uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) Reproductive Biology. Springer Cham. pp 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66552-4 Rengifo-Salgado E, Vargas-Arana G (2013) Physalis angulata L. (Bolsa Mullaca): a review of its traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology. Bol Latinoam Caribe Plant Med Aromat 12(5):431–445. Rhodes J (2002) Cotton pollination by honey bees. Aust J Exp Agric 42:513–518. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA01063 Riaz M, Zamir T, Rashid N, Jamil N, Rizwan S, Masood Z, et al (2015) Comparative study of nutritional quality of orange ( Citrus sinensis ) at different maturity stages in relation to significance for human health. Am Eur J Toxicol Sci 7:209–213. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejts.2015.7.4.95200 Rick CM (1988) Evolution of mating systems in cultivated plants. In: Plant Evolutionary Biology. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 133–147 Rosa ADS, Blochtein B, Ferreira NR, Witter S (2010) Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a potential Brassica napus pollinator (cv. Hyola 432) (Brassicaceae), in Southern Brazil. Braz J Biol 70:1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842010000500024 Roubik DW (Ed.) (1995) Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. Food & Agriculture Org., Vol. 118. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500 .14283/v5040e Ruiz Zapata T, Arroyo MTK (1978) Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 10(3):221–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2387907 Ruiz-Arocho J, González-Salas R, LeMay G, Steinthal N, Mastretta-Yanes A, Wegier A, et al (2024) How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin. Arthropod-Plant Interact 18(1):89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4 Santamaría Basulto F, Díaz Plaza R, Sauri Duch E, Espadas y Gil F, Santamaría Fernández JM, Larqué Saavedra A (2009) Características de calidad de frutos de papaya Maradol en la madurez de consumo. Agric Téc México 35(3):347–353 Santiaguillo H FJ, Blas YS (2009) Aprovechamiento tradicional de las especies de Physalis en México. Rev Geogr Agrícola (43):81–86. Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75715608006 Santiaguillo Hernández FJ, Peña Lomelí A, Montalvo D (1998) Evaluación de variedades de tomate de cáscara ( Physalis spp.) en Tlajomulco de Zuñiga, Jalisco. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 4(2):83–88 Singh DB, Ahmed N, Lal S, Mirza A, Sharma OC, Pal A (2014) Variation in growth, production and quality attributes of Physalis species under temperate ecosystem. Fruits 69:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2013099 Solís-Montero L, Aceves-Chong L, Vega-Polanco M, Vargas-Ponce O (2021) Changes in reproductive traits in Physalis philadelphica ; an unexpected shift toward self-incompatibility in a domesticated annual fruit crop. Front Plant Sci 12:834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.658406 Solís-Montero L, Vergara CH, Vallejo-Marín M (2015) High incidence of pollen theft in natural populations of a buzz-pollinated plant. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 9:599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9397-5 Soloman GD, Razali Z, Somasundram C (2016) Physiochemical changes during growth and development of pineapple ( Ananas comosus L. Merr. cv. Sarawak). J Agric Sci Technol 18:491–503 Southwick EE, Southwick L Jr (1992) Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. J Econ Entomol 85(3):621–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.3.621 Stead AD, Moore KG (1983) Studies on flower longevity in Digitalis: the role of ethylene in corolla abscission. Planta 157:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394535 Sullivan JR (1985) Systematics of the Physalis viscosa complex (Solanaceae). Syst Bot 10:426–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419136 Sun SG, Huang SQ, Guo YH (2013) Pollinator shift to managed honeybees enhances reproductive output in a bumblebee-pollinated plant. Plant Syst Evol 299:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0711-8 Takayama S, Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56(1):467–489. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249 Tapia-Vargas LM, Rico-Ponce HR, Larios-Guzmán A, Vidales-Fernández I, Pedraza-Santos ME (2010) Manejo nutrimental en relación con la calidad de fruto y estado nutricional del melón cantaloupe. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 16(1):49–55. Valdivia-Mares LE, Rodríguez-Zaragoza FA, Sánchez-González JJ, Vargas-Ponce O (2016) Phenology, agronomic and nutritional potential of three wild husk tomato species (Physalis, Solanaceae) from Mexico. Sci Hortic 200:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.005 Vargas-Ponce O, Pérez-Álvarez LF, Zamora-Tavares P, Rodríguez A (2011) Assessing genetic diversity in Mexican husk tomato species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29(3):733–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0258-1 Vargas-Ponce O, Sánchez-Martínez J, Zamora-Tavares MP, Valdivia-Mares LE (2016) Traditional management and small-scale crop of Physalis angulata in Western Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0326-3 Waterfall UT (1967) Physalis in Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. Rhodora 69(777):82–120. Weber JJ, Goodwillie C (2013) Variation in floral longevity in the genus Leptosiphon: mating system consequences. Plant Biol 15(1):220–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00595.x Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. In: Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press. Wyatt R (1981) The reproductive biology of Asclepias tuberosa: II. Factors determining fruit-set. New Phytol 88(2):375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb01732.x Xin OJ (2016) Food for children: Why fruits and vegetables are important. https://www.healthxchange.sg/children/food-nutrition/food-children-fruits-vegetables-important . Accessed 20 May 2024 Zamora-Tavares P, Vargas-Ponce O, Sánchez-Martínez J, Cabrera-Toledo D (2015) Diversity and genetic structure of the husk tomato ( Physalis philadelphica Lam.) in Western Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62(1):141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0163-9 Zeisler M (1933) Über die Abgrenzung des eigentlichen Narbenfläche mit Hilfe von Reaktionen. Beitr Bot Zentl A 58:308–318. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7687132","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":525608211,"identity":"f93ea994-c72f-421d-bcaf-a441f66d5b3b","order_by":0,"name":"Omar Enríquez Antonio","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Omar","middleName":"Enríquez","lastName":"Antonio","suffix":""},{"id":525608213,"identity":"6f442e5d-b100-4970-b2a5-6cced72615e8","order_by":1,"name":"María del Pilar Zamora-Tavares","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"María","middleName":"del Pilar","lastName":"Zamora-Tavares","suffix":""},{"id":525608215,"identity":"d9210ffd-fdb0-4d34-9e69-85b30cd61e93","order_by":2,"name":"Lislie Solís-Montero","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"El Colegio de la Frontera Sur","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lislie","middleName":"","lastName":"Solís-Montero","suffix":""},{"id":525608216,"identity":"aef6b364-499c-4ef0-a478-4a3f02e2e521","order_by":3,"name":"Fabián A. Rodríguez Zaragoza","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fabián","middleName":"A. Rodríguez","lastName":"Zaragoza","suffix":""},{"id":525608217,"identity":"a62a9f52-6654-4cb5-b05c-1b23bde59828","order_by":4,"name":"Carla Vanessa Sánchez Hernández","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carla","middleName":"Vanessa Sánchez","lastName":"Hernández","suffix":""},{"id":525608218,"identity":"d3efc88f-4489-43fe-be77-980b7c68d9ef","order_by":5,"name":"Gabriela Alcala-Gómez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gabriela","middleName":"","lastName":"Alcala-Gómez","suffix":""},{"id":525608219,"identity":"1d27a68f-1fa1-417e-99ea-5c1a7b6e9c65","order_by":6,"name":"José Alberto Sánchez Nuño","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"José","middleName":"Alberto Sánchez","lastName":"Nuño","suffix":""},{"id":525608220,"identity":"a5eef631-bf69-41d9-8e9b-5f5079196ae9","order_by":7,"name":"Ofelia Vargas-Ponce","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCBA","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ofelia","middleName":"","lastName":"Vargas-Ponce","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-23 01:39:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":93022039,"identity":"c2fe1fa5-e054-4cff-b41d-367bfeb0d00d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"tif","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2627390,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Fig1Pgracilis.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/892f4e6c20303c95e46514cc.tif"},{"id":93022853,"identity":"eb12bb1f-7ff5-4c14-87df-4c854e37ca34","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 09:05:02","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":73736,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"EnriquezetalPgracilisGRACE.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/61dccc390e5126b304646be2.docx"},{"id":93022854,"identity":"f9b1b6bd-33ee-4bac-b025-0e9cb84992fe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 09:05:03","extension":"tif","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15044046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure2.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/145740b326fb16adbfcb7f13.tif"},{"id":93022034,"identity":"8a164639-9a74-4c65-b915-72811c480566","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"json","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":10047,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"7826bff0087f4db8912bae25069b9107.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/b2a56d53c2d8f2dcf2e4c607.json"},{"id":93022041,"identity":"f47c1fd9-1f8d-4877-8968-7bcd5d55e802","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"xml","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":202172,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"7826bff0087f4db8912bae25069b91071enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/82c8003233dfca8d291c6c2a.xml"},{"id":93022042,"identity":"d3a93dae-2680-45a3-b96b-a1cf267e01b1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"tif","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2627390,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Fig1Pgracilis.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/0cbbf5275b8be84d24a8e770.tif"},{"id":93022049,"identity":"7e074fc1-eb39-43f6-943b-1d2fd186b661","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:03","extension":"tif","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15044046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Figure2.tif","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/a476989bf5c48cb5cb475f17.tif"},{"id":93022047,"identity":"7c338531-a544-4e2a-a0f1-fd134b696d28","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:03","extension":"eps","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3259956,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"figura3.eps","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/fd6d33ad54491e283b80e16f.eps"},{"id":93022043,"identity":"704fef1b-6512-4ac1-8536-514788f813f6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:03","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":382569,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFig1Pgracilis.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/e357714ab5fab44998711f8d.png"},{"id":93022040,"identity":"4a0a5d25-95f4-4eb6-83c4-312fbfe498e9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":321618,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/ecaacb52fc1ca2a6ca68b061.png"},{"id":93022046,"identity":"9d82faf4-26a3-4b1f-b355-8d85f9535e6f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:03","extension":"xml","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":199228,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"7826bff0087f4db8912bae25069b91071structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/d5770594819d83bbdeda7462.xml"},{"id":93022044,"identity":"034fa22e-47e8-4ec4-b83c-cbb482af010d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:03","extension":"html","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":213457,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/8e358be4c116bb989c3aafe3.html"},{"id":93022036,"identity":"9c69adca-d191-4503-8a4a-fa3f18605e97","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":5163846,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eCultivated Plant of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e. A) flowers and rooting at the lower nodes,\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eB) prostrate habit, C) mature fruits with husk\u003cem\u003e, \u003c/em\u003eD) fruits.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig1Pgracilis.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/87059300772b1083fe998d64.png"},{"id":93022852,"identity":"e8238392-d60d-46de-b049-c9e638a90e26","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 09:05:02","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":6261512,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFloral development states of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e. Codes: 0 = immature floral bud; 1= mature floral bud (trichomes on the floral calyx); 2 = separation of the calyx lobes; 3 = beginning of corolla opening; 4 = full corolla opening; 5 = onset of dehiscence (in two anthers); 6 = full anther dehiscence; 7= floral senescence. Scale = 5 mm\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/60be6b67a6cfc33c433e65be.png"},{"id":93022037,"identity":"2401d8d6-0907-474f-97a1-06150c1f2141","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-08 08:57:02","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":17220,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePrincipal Coordinates Analysis (PCO) ordination based on the mean values of six agronomic descriptors from three accessions of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"figura3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/3f60d6047de59ff5428beeed.png"},{"id":103932929,"identity":"694f2ae9-ea03-46aa-8283-27740bc295d1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-04 16:56:05","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":11639401,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7687132/v1/f36b1b6e-c002-48e2-a034-98b4c1c8b323.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Reproductive system and agronomic potential of wild husk tomato Physalis gracilis (Solanaceae)","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eGlobally, wild plants play a crucial role in human nutrition (Bharucha and Pretty \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). In Mexico, approximately 5,000 non-domesticated plant species are used either in their wild state or as tolerated species within agroecosystems and traditional gardens (Casas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e). There is increasing interest in characterizing wild species with food potential to identify their nutritional attributes and develop novel crops (Prohens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). The Solanaceae family includes species of major horticultural relevance, such as potato (\u003cem\u003eSolanum tuberosum\u003c/em\u003e L.), tomato (\u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e L.), chili pepper (\u003cem\u003eCapsicum\u003c/em\u003e spp.), and husk tomato (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis spp\u003c/em\u003e.; Mart\u0026iacute;nez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), along with several wild relatives that could enhance food agrobiodiversity.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe genus \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e (Solanaceae) contains several species that are economically and nutritionally important. The edible fruits, which are berries with an acidic or sweet taste, possess nutraceutical properties (Herrera et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). In the American continent, two species are pre-Hispanic crops of national significance: \u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L. (uchuva, cape gooseberry, aguaymanto) in South America (Puente et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) and \u003cem\u003ePhysalis philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e Lam. (husk tomato) in North America, mainly in Mexico (Zamora-Tavares et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Alcal\u0026aacute;-G\u0026oacute;mez et al. 2022). Over the last 50 years, \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e L. (tomatillo milpero), a native species, has been cultivated in the central region of Jalisco, Mexico (Vargas-Ponce et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Historically, the fruits of \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e have been used as food and medicine in Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico (Rengifo and Vargas 2013; Vargas-Ponce et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Likewise, the backyard cultivation of \u003cem\u003eP. grisea\u003c/em\u003e (Waterf.) M. Mart\u0026iacute;nez (goldenberry) and \u003cem\u003eP. longifolia\u003c/em\u003e Nutt. to consumption of their sweet fruits is common in the United States of America (USA) (Kindscher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, the agronomic potential of several wild and weedy populations of \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e has been confirmed (Morales-Saavedra et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Also, the agronomic productivity of \u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e (Miers) Sandw., \u003cem\u003eP. chenopodifolia\u003c/em\u003e Lam., and \u003cem\u003eP. pubescens\u003c/em\u003e L. have been demonstrated. These species hold cultural significance for certain ethnic groups in Northwest and Central Mexico (Kindscher et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Valdivia-Mares et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, some \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species have been evaluated as new crops outside their native range, including \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e (Panayotov and Popova \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Sing et al. 2014), \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e (Mulato-Brito and Pe\u0026ntilde;a Lomeli 2007; Sing et al. 2014), \u003cem\u003eP. pruinosa\u003c/em\u003e L., and \u003cem\u003eP. nicandroides\u003c/em\u003e Schltdl. (Sing et al. 2014).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e Miers is a perennial herb, slightly erect to prostrate, reaching up to 90 cm in length and rooting at the lower nodes. Flowering occurs year-round. The flowers are solitary, with yellow corollas that bear five distinct dark spots. The fruit is a berry, orange in color, 8\u0026ndash;15 mm in diameter, and characterized by its sweet taste, which makes it highly valued for family consumption and, on a very small scale, for sale in local markets in Mexico (Santiaguillo and Blas \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Vargas-Ponce et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). The species is distributed from Nayarit and San Luis Potos\u0026iacute;, Mexico, through Central America to Panama, at elevations between 1,400 and 2,250 m asl. It inhabits open areas within pine\u0026ndash;oak and cloud forests and occurs as a weed in agricultural fields associated with these ecosystems (Mart\u0026iacute;nez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Nee \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). Given its perennial habit and fruit sweetness, assessing its performance under cultivation and its yield potential is relevant for future domestication efforts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, understanding the reproductive system of species with agronomic potential is essential, since fruit production is directly determined by the reproductive strategy employed. According to Menzel (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1951\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species are predominantly allogamous. However, recent studies on the reproductive biology of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e, conducted mainly on wild species or those under incipient utilization, have revealed variation in their reproductive system. For example, in \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e, artificial selection through cultivation has favored self-incompatibility in domesticated populations, whereas in wild populations, self-pollination seems advantageous by producing seeds that germinate faster than those of cultivated plants (Sol\u0026iacute;s-Montero et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). In \u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e, self-incompatibility is predominant, although intraspecific variation has been observed, with some populations exhibiting self-pollination (Pretzs and Smith, 2021). Meanwhile, \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP. pubescens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP. micrantha\u003c/em\u003e Link, and \u003cem\u003eP. nicandroides\u003c/em\u003e reproduce mainly through self-pollination (Azeez \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Figueiredo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Ojeda-Flores \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), with \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e exhibiting a mixed system (Ram\u0026iacute;rez et al. 2021). Whereas, \u003cem\u003eP. viscosa\u003c/em\u003e L. and \u003cem\u003eP. cinerascens\u003c/em\u003e (Dunal) Hitchc. are allogamous (Ojeda-Flores \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Sullivan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe reproductive system of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e remains unknown; however, determining it is crucial for establishing its cultivation as a new crop. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the reproductive system of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e and evaluate its agronomic potential. Given that most \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species reproduce by cross-pollination, we hypothesized that \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is self-incompatible and that it will perform favorably under open-field cultivation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStudy Area\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study was conducted in the experimental fields, both open-air and greenhouse, of the University Center for Biological and Agricultural Sciences (CUCBA), University of Guadalajara, located in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico (20\u0026deg;44'41''N, 103\u0026deg;30'58''W, 1640 m asl). The site has Eutric Regosol soils with an average pH of 5.38 and a semi-warm temperate climate with warm and rainy summers (Garc\u0026iacute;a \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). The mean annual temperature is 19.6\u0026deg;C, mean annual precipitation is 979.6 mm, and average relative humidity of 60% (Garc\u0026iacute;a \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePlant material\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAccessions of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e were obtained from collections carried out in the states of San Luis Potos\u0026iacute; and Quer\u0026eacute;taro, Mexico (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). To obtain seedlings, seeds from the three accessions were germinated in trays in a greenhouse using a substrate mixture of moss, regolith, humus (3:2:1).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGeographical data of the studied populations of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCode\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAcession\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eState\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMunicipality\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLocality\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eElevation\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003em asl\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e432\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eOVP 432\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eQuer\u0026eacute;taro\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePinal de Amoles\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePinal de Amoles\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2340\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e512\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLEV sn\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSan Luis Potos\u0026iacute;\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eXilitla\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eXilitla\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e638\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e513\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLEV sn\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSan Luis Potos\u0026iacute;\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHuehuetl\u0026aacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eRancho la Pimienta\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e161\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCharacterization of the reproductive system\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEstablishment of seedlings\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhen the seedlings reached 10 cm in height, they were transplanted into 10 cm diameter pots. One month later, they were transferred to 15 cm diameter pots containing a substrate composed of volcanic rock (pumice) and organic matter (soil) (1:1). To characterize the reproductive system, 15 plants were established under greenhouse conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFloral development and longevity\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFloral longevity and developmental stages were assessed by monitoring flower buds from emergence to senescence in plants grown in a greenhouse and open-field during the spring-summer cycle of 2023. Thirty buds were randomly selected (15 in the greenhouse and 15 in the open-field, one bud per plant), and observations were made hourly from 9:00 to 17:00 h over seven days. Anthesis was determined by recording the timing of stigma receptivity and anther dehiscence. Each day after anthesis, the pistils were immersed in hydrogen peroxide to assess the stigma receptivity. A stigma was considered receptive when a strong bubbling reaction was observed (Zeisler \u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1933\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eArtificial crossing experiments\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe reproductive system of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e was determined using seven artificial crossing treatments, following the approach proposed by Sol\u0026iacute;s-Montero et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Five treatments were conducted under greenhouse conditions and two under open-field conditions. Artificial crosses were performed once the stigma receptivity was established. Experiments were conducted on 15 plants, with two replicates per treatment (30 flowers in total).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe five greenhouse artificial crossing treatments were as follows: 1) Agamospermy (A): This treatment evaluated the capacity of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e to produce fruit through endogenous mechanisms in the absence of pollen. Anthers were removed (emasculated with metal forceps) on the first day of anthesis, prior to anther dehiscence, to prevent self-pollen deposition. 2) Autonomous self-pollination (AS): Flowers were left intact and unmanipulated until senescence to determine whether \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is capable of autonomous self-pollination in the absence of pollinators. 3) Hand-mediated self-pollination (MS): This treatment was used to test for the presence of a self-incompatibility system by transferring pollen from a flower\u0026rsquo;s own anthers onto its stigma using metal forceps. 4) Hand-mediated cross-pollination with a single pollen donor (CP1): This treatment assessed whether fruit set could occur using pollen from another plant. Pollen from one flower was deposited onto the stigma of a different, previously emasculated flower. 5) Hand-mediated cross-pollination with three pollen donors (CP3): To evaluate fruit set under an excess of pollen availability, anthers from three flowers (each from a different individual) were collected, placed in a 0.2 mL tube, mixed, and deposited onto the stigma of a previously emasculated flower using metal forceps. The two open-field treatments were as follows: 6) Pollen supplementation (PS): This treatment determined whether plants were pollen-limited. Pollen from three different plants was mixed (one anther per flower in a 0.2 mL tube) and applied to the stigma of the selected flower. Following manual cross-pollination, the plants were left exposed to open (natural) pollination. 7) Natural pollination (NP): Flowers were marked at the pedicel and left exposed to natural pollination. This treatment tested the capacity of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e to set fruit under natural conditions. For all treatments, the number of immature fruits (one week later) and mature fruits (approximately three weeks later) was recorded.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe self-incompatibility index (SII) was calculated as the ratio of mature fruits produced per flower in self-pollination treatments to that in cross-pollination treatments with a single pollen donor (Ru\u0026iacute;z-Zapata and Arroyo 1978). SII values were classified as follows: 1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;fully compatible; 0.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;SII\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;partially compatible; SII\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.2\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;highly incompatible; and SII\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;completely incompatible. To evaluate pollen limitation, the pollen limitation index (PL) was calculated as PL\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1 - (NP/PS), where NP corresponds to immature fruit production under natural pollination and PS to that under pollen supplementation (Larson and Barrett \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Immature fruits were used because some mature fruits were lost to pests. Negative or zero values indicated no pollen limitation, whereas positive values indicated pollen limitation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, the pre-dispersal fitness index was calculated as Wpre\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1-(WpreNP/WprePS), where WpreNP was obtained by multiplying fruit production by the mean number of seeds per plant under natural pollination, and WprePS was calculated similarly for the pollen-supplementation treatment (G\u0026oacute;mez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Sol\u0026iacute;s-Montero et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Confidence intervals (95%) were estimated using bootstrapping with 1000 permutations (G\u0026oacute;mez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Finally, differences in fruit set and seed number were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLM). A binomial distribution was used for the fruit set, and a Poisson distribution was used for the seed number. For fruit set, confidence intervals were estimated using the Hmisc library (Harrel and Dupont 2019). For seed number, post-hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey's test with the glht function and multcomp library (Hothorn et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). Treatments involving agamospermy, autonomous self-pollination, and hand-mediated self-pollination were excluded from the analysis as they produced no fruit. All analyses, except for the SII self-incompatibility index, were performed using RStudio ver. 4.3.2 (R Core Team \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCharacterization of Agronomic Potential\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAgricultural management\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhen the Seedling reached 10 cm in height, they were transplanted to an open field at a spacing of 60 cm between plants and 150 cm between rows in a continuous layout without replication, resulting in a planting density of 13,778 plants\u0026middot;ha⁻\u0026sup1;. The crop was established in rows with mulch and drip irrigation (500 l\u0026middot;h⁻\u0026sup1;) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). To improve soil quality, 500 kg of worm humus was incorporated into the experimental area. Agricultural management included weed control and the application weekly of a complete fertilizer (1:1:1) throughout the experimental period. Organic insecticides were applied every 15 days, as needed. Data were collected from the fruits harvested from 48 plants per accession.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of Agronomic Potential\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAgronomic potential was evaluated using descriptors commonly applied to Mexican species of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e (Morales et al. 2018; Valdivia et al. 2016): total number of fruits per plant (NFP), average fruit weight (AFW), equatorial diameter of the fruit (EDF), firmness (F), total soluble solids (TSS) expressed as Brix grades, and pH (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, the yield per hectare (Yha) was calculated by multiplying the average number of fruits per plant by the mean fruit weight and planting density. This descriptor was used to estimate the agronomic potential of the accession and compare its yield with that of other cultivated species.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDescriptors used in the agronomic characterization of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDescriptor\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCode\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eType\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eUnits\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal number of fruits per plant\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNFP\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eamount\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAverage fruit weight\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAFW\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003egr\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eEquatorial diameter of the fruit\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDE\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003emm\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFirmness\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eKg/cm\u0026sup2;\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal soluble solids\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTSS\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePCh\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBrix grades\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHydrogen potential\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePCh\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eLog\u003csub\u003en\u003c/sub\u003e potential of hydrogen\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eYield per hectare\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eYha\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003et\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"5\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e A\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;agronomic, PCh\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;physicochemical\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFruit weight was measured using an analytical balance (Nimbus\u0026reg;). The equatorial diameter was determined using a digital caliper (precision\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.01 mm), and fruit firmness was determined with an analog penetrometer (GY-3, resolution 0.02). TSS (\u0026deg;Brix) and fruit acidity (pH) were measured using a refractometer (Atago Ind) and a digital potentiometer (Science Med, precision\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05), respectively. Except for pH, the descriptors were measured in five randomly selected fruits per plant. For pH, the number of fruits varied for each plant, depending on juice availability.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the variation in descriptors among accessions, a one-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed. A Euclidean distance matrix was constructed, and data were standardized to z-scores to ensure comparability among variables. Accessions were considered fixed effects, and statistical significance was assessed using 10,000 permutations based on the unrestricted permutation of raw data method and the type III sums of squares. Finally, a test for homogeneity of dispersion (PERMDISP) and principal coordinate analysis (PCO) were performed as complementary analyses to the PERMANOVA results, using the same data preprocessing and similarity coefficients as PERMANOVA. PERMDISP was applied to assess differences in the variability of descriptors among accessions, with statistical significance, using 10,000 permutations. PCO was based on six descriptors (NFP, AWF, ED, F, TSS, and pH) to visualize differences in agronomic attributes among accessions. All analyses were performed with Primer 6.1.11\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;PERMANOVA 1.0.1 (Anderson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCharacterization of reproductive biology\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFloral development and longevity\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOf the 30 selected buds, 28 completed their development through to floral senescence (13 in the greenhouse and 15 in the open-field). Monitoring from bud to senescence allowed us to define eight developmental stages and longevity in \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e): 0) immature floral bud; 1) mature floral bud (with trichomes on the floral calyx); 2) separation of calyx lobes; 3) onset of corolla opening; 4) full corolla opening; 5) onset of anther dehiscence (two anthers); 6) full anther dehiscence; and 7) floral senescence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e flowers exhibited daily opening and closing cycles until senescence. The opening began between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. and closing occurred around 5:00 p.m. Stigma receptivity was observed at stage 5, coinciding with the onset of anther dehiscence. Flower longevity differed between environments: in the greenhouse stages 3\u0026ndash;7 lasted an average of four days, whereas in open-field lasted an average of 2.5 days.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eArtificial crosses\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e did not produce fruits through agamospermy or apomixis and was confirmed as a self-incompatible species; neither agamospermy nor autonomous nor hand-mediated self-pollination resulted in fruit set. The self-incompatibility index indicated a completely self-incompatible reproductive system (SII\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0). In contrast, treatments favoring cross-pollination (cross-pollination, pollen supplementation, and natural pollination) produced 84% of the fruits set to maturity. The statistical analysis (GLM) comparing the four treatments (CP1, CP3, PS, and NP) indicated significant differences; however, pairwise tests (Tukey) were not sufficiently robust to confirm them, likely due to the nature of the data (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Pollen supplementation (PS) appeared to generate lower fruit production compared to other treatments, with only nine of the 30 expected fruits reaching maturity. Several fruits were lost in the open-field due to causes unrelated to the experiment. The pollen limitation (PL) and pre-dispersal fitness (Wpre) indices indicated no evidence of pollen limitation, as both values were negative, with PL = -0.17 and upper and lower confidence intervals of -0.3927 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.0127, and Wpre\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.43 and confidence intervals of -0.7184 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.0910 (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Seed production varied among the treatments. Crosses with a single donor (CP1) produced significantly fewer seeds than those with three donors (CP3), with the highest seed numbers observed under natural pollination (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Pollen supplementation with at least three donors yielded results comparable to those of CP3.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eImmature fruit production (number of flowers per treatment), seed number of mature fruits\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard error (number of mature fruits) of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e, pollen limitation (PL), and predispersal fitness (L_Wpre) indices.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGLM\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c6\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePL\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTreatment\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eImmature\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003efruit\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eproduction\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMean number\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eof seeds\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNumber fruits\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMean number of seeds\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAgamospermy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAutonomous self-pollination\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHand-mediated self-pollination\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCross-pollination single pollen donor\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e100 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e188.43\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.19 \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ec\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCross-pollination three pollen donor\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e100 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e206.61\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.18 \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003eb\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (28)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNatural pollination\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e96.6 (30)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e282.72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.39 \u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e (29)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePL/L_Wpre\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;O.12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e-0.4333\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePollen supplementation\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e77.77(18)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e205.11\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;41.55 \u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e (9)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIC 95%\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e(-0.3927, -0.0127)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e(-0.7184,-0.0910)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDevianza\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.654\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e533.94\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGL\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c5\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSelf-incompatibility index\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSII\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ep\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003ctfoot\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eDifferent letters indicate statistical differences between the treatments.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e*** P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eCI\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;confidence intervals\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eA\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Agamospermy; AS\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Autonomous self-pollination; MS\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Hand-mediated self-pollination; CP1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Cross-pollination single pollen donor; CP3\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Cross-pollination three pollen donor; NP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Natural pollination; PS\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Pollen supplementation\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tfoot\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAgronomic Potential Characterization\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResponse to Agricultural Management\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA total of 162 plants from three \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e accessions were established under agricultural management. Their establishment and adaptation were favorable, achieving a survival rate of 93.8% and an average productivity of 8.178 t \u0026middot; ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Accession 513 showed the highest Yha of 9.079 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, but also had the highest proportion of non-established plants (9.2%), whereas accession 432 recorded the lowest yield (7.001 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e). The number of fruits per plant varied widely among accessions, from 41 in accession 512 to 744 in accession 513, the latter also having the highest average number of fruits per plant (278). Fruit weight ranged from 0.66 g to 5.12 g, with accession 512 presenting the highest average (2.48 g) and accession 432 presenting the lowest. The equatorial diameter ranged from 11 to 22 mm, with accession 512 displaying the largest mean value (16.92 mm). Fruit firmness was similar between accessions 432 and 512, both exceeding that in 513. The \u0026ordm;Brix ranged from 11.17 to 11.36, while the pH ranged from 3.91 to 4.43.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMeans and standard deviations per accession of descriptors used in \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"9\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAccession\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNPF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eP\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDE\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026deg;Brix\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eYha\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e432\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e255\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.99\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15.65\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.49\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.34\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.43\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e7.001\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;103\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.58\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.82\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.48\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.28\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eminimum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e59\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.66\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.83\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003emaximum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e504\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5.12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5.31\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e512\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e247\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.48\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e16.92\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.46\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.17\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.22\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.462\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;142\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.70\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.67\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.62\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.32\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eminimum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e41\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.22\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.56\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003emaximum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e626\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.65\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.5\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e5.23\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e513\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e278\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.37\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e16.72\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.31\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e11.36\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.91\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.079\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSD\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;159\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.53\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.33\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.27\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eminimum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.54\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003emaximum\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e744\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.86\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e17.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4.87\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eM\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e260.36\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.28\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e16.43\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1.42\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11.29\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4.18\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8.178\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003ctfoot\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003eNPF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;total number of fruits per plant, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;fruit weight, DE\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;equatorial diameter of the fruit, F\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;firmness, Yha\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;yield per hectare (t-ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e), SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;standard deviation, M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;mean of the three accessions\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tfoot\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAgronomic Potential\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe one-way PERMANOVA model explained 29.6% of the variation in agronomic descriptors among the \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e accessions, revealing statistically significant differences (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). Pairwise comparisons confirmed that all three accessions were distinct. PERMDISP further indicated significant differences in the variation of descriptors among accessions (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e), suggesting that both dispersion and location effects contributed to this variation. The principal coordinate analysis (PCO) ordination conducted at the accession level based on the mean values of descriptors showed that the first axis explained 59.4% of the total variation, primarily associated with equatorial diameter, fruit weight, pH, and firmness (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Along this axis, accession 512 was strongly associated with fruit weight and equatorial diameter, whereas 432 was aligned with pH and firmness. The second axis accounted for 40.6% of the variation, mainly related to \u0026ordm;Brix, number of fruits per plant, diameter, and fruit weight. Accession 513 was closely associated with the number of fruits per plant and \u0026ordm;Brix compared to the other accessions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne-way PERMANOVA and PERMDISP results of variation among the three analyzed accessions of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFactor\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePERMANOVA\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePERMDISP\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePseudo-F\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eP\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eC.V %\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eP\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eAccesssions\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9.457\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.0001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e29.6\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.4518\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.0406\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eResiduals\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e70.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003ctfoot\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"7\"\u003eP\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;statistical significance (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05); C.V. % = coefficient of variation expressed as a percentage\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tfoot\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOutcrossing plants are generally expected to experience stronger pollen limitations because of their reliance on pollinators for reproduction (Larson and Barret 2000). Contrary to this expectation, \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e did not exhibit pollen limitation, despite being a completely self-incompatible species. Moreover, the high efficiency of its pollination is reflected in the evaluated agronomic traits, underscoring its potential as a monoculture crop.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCharacterization of the Reproductive Biology\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFloral Development and Longevity\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe floral anthesis of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e differed between individuals grown under open-field and greenhouse conditions differed. In the greenhouse, anthesis lasted almost twice as long, averaging four days and up to seven days in some plants. This extended duration is likely due to the absence of natural pollination, in contrast to open fields, where pollinators were present. For \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e, a self-compatible species, Figueiredo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) reported a shorter anthesis period of two days, consistent with what we observed for \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e under open-field conditions. Similarly, Lagos et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) found that in \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e, a species with a mixed mating system (Ram\u0026iacute;rez et al. 2021), anthesis lasts only for two days. Recently, Ojeda-Flores (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) reported that \u003cem\u003eP. cinerascens\u003c/em\u003e (self-incompatible) and \u003cem\u003eP. nicandroides\u003c/em\u003e (self-compatible) differ in their floral longevity, with longer anthesis in \u003cem\u003eP. cinerascens\u003c/em\u003e than in \u003cem\u003eP. nicandroides\u003c/em\u003e. These findings align with our observations in \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e under greenhouse conditions and are consistent with the general expectation that self-incompatibility reproductive systems prolong anthesis to increase pollination opportunities (Gibbs and Talavera \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Mart\u0026eacute;n-Rodr\u0026iacute;guez and Fenster \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Ortiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Weber and Goodwillie 2003; Wyatt \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1981\u003c/span\u003e). The short duration observed in open-field \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e plants is ecologically meaningful because floral anthesis influences the probability and frequency of pollinator visits (Primack \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e). Ashman (2004) suggests that floral longevity is \"a trait shaped by natural selection to suit a plant's ecological context.\" Studies on diverse plant groups support this view (Ashman and Schoen \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e; Castro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Clark and Husband \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Prokop \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Prokop et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Stead and Moore \u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, Prokop (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) found that in \u003cem\u003eConvolvulus arvensis\u003c/em\u003e, a completely self-incompatible species, floral longevity varies with pollinator abundance, and that reductions in anthesis duration depend on the pollinator species present.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn our study, natural pollination resulted in a very high fruit set (96.6%), suggesting that both pollinator abundance in the open field and prolonged floral longevity in their absence under greenhouse conditions are important. Although \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species differ in life cycles and reproductive systems (e.g., \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is perennial and self-incompatible; \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e is an annual self-compatible; \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e is perennial with a mixed system), anthesis duration among them are surprisingly similar. This pattern contrasts with the expectation that reproductive systems should drive substantial differences in floral longevity (Ashman 2004).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eArtificial Crosses\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe absence of fruit development both autonomous and hand-mediated self-pollination confirms that \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e lacks mechanisms for self-pollen deposition and possess genetic mechanisms that recognize and reject its self-pollen (Takamaya and Isogai 2005). In Solanaceae, approximately 39% of species have a gametophytic self-incompatibility system mediated by RNases, which recognize and reject self-pollen grains to prevent self-fertilization (Franklin-Tong and Franklin \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Igic et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). Our results strongly suggest that \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e has such a system, which enforces self-incompatibility and promotes outcrossing. Moreover, the agamospermy treatment indicated the absence of endogenous mechanisms enabling fruit development without pollination does not occur.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePollen Limitation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur results confirmed that \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is completely self-incompatible. Self-incompatibility has been reported in \u003cem\u003eP. viscosa\u003c/em\u003e (Sullivan 1984), populations of \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e (Ram\u0026iacute;rez et al. 2021), and cultivated populations of \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e (Sol\u0026iacute;s-Montero et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Although \u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e is considered self-incompatible within populations breakdowns of this system have been observed (Pretzs and Smith 2021), as has recently been reported in \u003cem\u003eP. cinerascens\u003c/em\u003e (Ojeda-Flores \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Self-incompatibility is thought to represent the ancestral state of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e (Igic et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e), yet only \u003cem\u003eP. viscosa\u003c/em\u003e had previously been described as completely self-incompatible (Figuereido 2020; Sullivan 1984), to which \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e can now be added.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAccording to the pollen limitation hypothesis, cross-pollinated species are expected to experience stronger limitations due to pollen availability or pollinators (Larson and Barret 2000). Contrary to this expectation, \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e exhibited no pollen limitation, and both fruit and seed production were higher under natural pollination than under pollen supplementation, suggesting that pollinators alone ensured sufficient pollen transfer. This indicates highly efficient plant-pollinator interactions. The reduction in seed production observed under pollen supplementation may be explained by competition among the growing pollen tubes. Specifically, the deposition of excessive pollen grains on the stigma may cause saturation, where only a fraction of pollen tubes successfully fertilize ovules (Mulcahy and Mulcahy \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAlthough floral visitors were not systematically quantified, field observations indicated frequent visits by \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera.\u003c/em\u003e Related to this, Delmas et al. (2014) found that in \u003cem\u003eRhododendron ferrugineum\u003c/em\u003e, pollen limitation increases with population density due to visitation rates per flower, whereas smaller populations may experience less pollen limitation but can also be less attractive to pollinators (Ashman et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e). In this study, the experimental pot was small but was surrounded by diverse crops, which may have enhanced pollinator attraction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSeed production also varied among the cross-pollination treatments. Pollination with a single donor or with three individuals (including supplementation treatment) produced fewer seeds than natural pollination, which yielded the highest values. The frequent presence of \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e in crop fields may account for this enhanced seed production under natural conditions. Previous studies have shown that introduced honeybees can increase fruit and seed production in some native plants (Cayuela et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Dieringer \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Garibaldi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Rosas et al. 2010; Sun et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). However, they can also displace native pollinators (Gouldson 2003). In some systems, \u003cem\u003eA. mellifera\u003c/em\u003e complements native bee species, whereas in others, its contribution is dominant, and its absence leads to production losses of up to 90% (Rosas et al. 2010; Southwick and Southwick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Sun et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, the high seed production observed in the natural pollination treatment of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e under natural pollination is likely related to \u003cem\u003eA. mellifera\u003c/em\u003e, although detailed pollinator studies are still needed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCharacterization of Agronomic Potential\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResponse to Agricultural Management and Agronomic Potential\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e showed a positive response to agricultural management, similar to that observed in other wild and cultivated \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species (L\u0026oacute;pez et al. 2009; Morales-Saavedra et al. 2018; Valdivia-Mares et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), achieving a successful establishment rate of 93.8% under cultivation. The yield obtained (7\u0026ndash;9 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) fell within the range recorded for \u003cem\u003eP. pubescens\u003c/em\u003e (7.5\u0026ndash;12.5 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e (4.9\u0026ndash;20.8 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e), but was lower than that of \u003cem\u003eP. chenopodiifolia\u003c/em\u003e (16\u0026ndash;20 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e), the wild species evaluated by Valdivia-Mares et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Likewise, the yield per hectare of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is modest when compared to the most widely cultivated species, \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e (0.63\u0026ndash;30.97 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, Santiaguillo et al. 1998) and \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e (8\u0026ndash;28 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, Morales-Saavedra et al. 2018). It has also been reported that ground-level cultivation systems generally yield less than staking systems (Castillo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Mexico, \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species are typically grown as monocultures on the ground. However, in \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e, staking has been shown to increase yields by up to 40 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e (Castillo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003ePhysalis philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e are annual species that exhibit erect growth, dichotomous branching, relatively short internodes, and high fruit production, traits that contribute to their higher yield. In contrast, \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is a perennial herbaceous plant with a decumbent to slightly erect growth habit, often reclining over neighboring species in its natural habitat. It is profusely branched at the stem base, with branches reaching up to 90 cm (occasionally 1.5 m) in length. Its internodes are long (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;6 cm), and the number of fruits per plant is similar to that of annual species. This prostrate growth appears to be less advantageous for cultivation; therefore, implementing staking or similar systems could enhance its production. Notably, for \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e, a perennial species with erect growth and profuse branching, X- and V-type staking systems have been successfully applied (Fisher et al. 2005).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe agronomic potential of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is noteworthy for its possible establishment as a new crop, particularly because of its desirable fruit traits. Fruit weight (1.99\u0026ndash;2.48 g) and equatorial diameter (15.65\u0026ndash;16.92 mm) were higher than those reported by Valdivia-Mares et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e) for the three wild species studied (\u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP. pubescens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP. chenopodiifolia\u003c/em\u003e), and even higher than cultivated \u003cem\u003eP. angulata\u003c/em\u003e, which was used as a control (1.64 g and 12.63 mm) in their study. Likewise, sweetness, expressed as total soluble solids (11.17\u0026ndash;11.36 \u0026ordm;Brix), was superior to that of the aforementioned wild species (7.43\u0026ndash;10.88 \u0026ordm;Brix), which are typically acidic or only slightly sweet, such as \u003cem\u003eP. chenopodiifolia\u003c/em\u003e. The sweetness of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e fruits is comparable to values reported for \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e (10.86\u0026ndash;15.5 \u0026ordm;Brix), as are the pH values (3.88 in\u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e; 4.18 in \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e) (Castro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Madruga et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Mej\u0026iacute;a 2015; Novoa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Puente et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Ramadan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePERMANOVA revealed significant differences among the three \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e accessions analyzed, and PCO helped visualize the relationship among agronomic variables and each accession. The San Luis Potos\u0026iacute; accessions (512 and 513) were found to be the most promising. Accession 512 showed superior traits for selecting plants with larger and heavier fruits, whereas 513 presented the highest number of fruits per plant and the best \u0026ordm;Brix values. Accession 532 produced smaller fruits with high sweetness. Interestingly, accessions 513 and 432 combined high sweetness values with small fruit size, indicating a negative correlation between fruit size and sweetness, a trend also observed in wild accessions of \u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e, which poses challenges for breeding programs (Luengwilai et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). The variation observed among the \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e accessions was consistent with the morphological variability expected in cross-pollinated species (Olsen and Wendel \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe sweetness fruits (8\u0026ndash;13 \u0026ordm;Brix) of melon, orange, papaya, and pineapple (Riaz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Santamar\u0026iacute;a et al. 2009; Soloman et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Tapia et al. 2010;), have orange/yellow colors, and are categorized by the FAO (2021) as major contributors of carotenoids. The health benefits of these fruits have been widely documented (Leenders et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Xin \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). In this context, the sweetness of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e fruits (11.17\u0026ndash;11.36 \u0026ordm;Brix) falls within the same range, suggesting that their consumption could provide a valuable source of nutrients. Moreover, their potential versatility, whether consumed fresh, as fruit, juice, jam, or dried, enhances their attractiveness to consumers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eReproductive system: advantages and limitations for cultivation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is completely self-incompatible; it relies entirely on cross-pollination for reproduction. This condition could initially represent a disadvantage in achieving phenotypic uniformity and establishing the species as a monoculture. However, our results demonstrate that pollinators ensure high fruit and seed production, suggesting that cross-pollination may also confer advantages, particularly in terms of crop resistance to pests, diseases, and herbivory. For instance, Ruiz-Arocho et al. (2023) reported that herbivory was lower in cultivated populations of \u003cem\u003eP. philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e than in wild populations, possibly because of the greater genetic diversity generated by cross-pollination during domestication.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAlthough approximately 25% of cultivated species are self-incompatible, only a minority are completely self-incompatible, while most exhibit partial self-incompatibility (Dempewolf et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Furthermore, some self-incompatible species subjected to artificial selection tend to undergo transitions toward self-compatibility, thereby facilitating the fixation of desirable traits (Rick \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e). In this regard, \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e may not be exempt from changes in its reproductive system, especially since breakdowns of self-incompatibility have been documented in \u003cem\u003eP. acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e, even within individual plants (Pretzs and Smith 2021).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCross-pollination also offers advantages in terms of crop productivity (Klein et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Rosas et al. 2010). Approximately 70% of self-incompatible crops exhibit higher yields when animal-mediated pollination occurs (Roubik \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Wilmer 2011). Additional benefits include increased seed production in alfalfa, improved fiber quality in cotton, and up to a 50% increase in raspberry fruit weight (Rodes 2002; Wilmer 2011). Therefore, quantifying the contribution and estimating the value of cross-pollination in \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e are essential for assessing its potential as a monoculture.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is a completely self-incompatible species that does not exhibit pollen limitation and responds positively to agricultural management. While self-incompatibility entails complete reliance on pollinators, in this species, it does not appear to be a limitation or disadvantage, as efficient pollination ensures consistent fruit production. Moreover, its perennial growth habit favors the extension of fruiting periods. Although the per-hectare productivity of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is comparable to that of other \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species, it is relatively low compared to that of the most widely cultivated taxa. Nevertheless, productivity could be improved through agronomic practices such as staking or trellising which promote vertical plant growth and higher fruit set. Importantly, its favorable fruit quality traits, particularly sweetness (11.17\u0026ndash;11.36 \u0026ordm;Brix), comparable to that of cape gooseberry (\u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e), a fruit highly valued in South America, highlight its potential as a promising agro-food resource.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAuthor Contribution: OEA carried out the experimental work in openfield and greenhouse, acquisition and interpretation of data, writing\u0026ndash;original draft. M.P.Z-T, conceived and partially designed the study, reviewed the manuscript. LSM made substantial contributions to the conception of the reproductive biology, advised on statistical analysis, reviewed the manuscript. FARZ advised on statistical analysis, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. CVSH revised the manuscript critically and refined the writing style. GAG acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. JASN support the field work and agricultural management. O.V-P conceived and designed the study, funding acquisition, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. M.P.Z-T, FARZ, OV-P prepared figures 1-3. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by Universidad de Guadalajara (P3E and PROSNI 2022-2024 to OVP). The authors are grateful to Jos\u0026eacute; S\u0026aacute;nchez Mart\u0026iacute;nez for his advice on crop establishment. Thanks go to SECIHTI for the OEA scholarship for graduate studies at Maestr\u0026iacute;a en Biosistem\u0026aacute;tica y Manejo de Recursos Naturales (BIMARENA). GAG acknowledges the postdoctoral fellowship from SECIHTI 2024-2025. GAG's postdoctoral fellowship was led by OVP\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke RK (2008) PERMANOVA\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;para PRIMER: Gu\u0026iacute;a para el programa y m\u0026eacute;todos estad\u0026iacute;sticos. PRIMER-E, Massey University, Plymouth, U.K, pp. 264.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAshman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amrasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85(9):2408\u0026ndash;2421. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1890/03-8024\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAshman TL, Schoen DJ (1997) The cost of floral longevity in Clarkia tembloriensis: an experimental investigation. Evol Ecol 11:289\u0026ndash;300. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018416403530\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1023/A:1018416403530\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAzeez SO (2020) Characterization and reproductive biology of four \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e L. Species from ILE-IFE, Nigeria. NJB 33(2):151\u0026ndash;172. Available: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/njbot/article/view/235802\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.ajol.info/index.php/njbot/article/view/235802\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBharucha Z, Pretty J (2010) The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1554):2913\u0026ndash;2926. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0123\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1098/rstb.2010.0123\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCasas A, V\u0026aacute;zquez MDC, Viveros JL, Caballero J (1996) Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec in the Balsas River Basin, Mexico: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol 24(4):455\u0026ndash;478. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168862\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF02168862\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCastillo PI, Pe\u0026ntilde;a-Lomel\u0026iacute; A, Cruz G (1992) Densidad de poblaci\u0026oacute;n, sistemas de manejo y arreglos topol\u0026oacute;gicos en tomate de c\u0026aacute;scara (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis ixocarpa\u003c/em\u003e). Rev Chapingo 15(73\u0026ndash;74):53\u0026ndash;56.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCastro S, Silveira P, Navarro L (2008) Effect of pollination on floral longevity and costs of delaying fertilization in the out-crossing \u003cem\u003ePolygala vayredae\u003c/em\u003e Costa (Polygalaceae). Ann Bot 102(6):1043\u0026ndash;1048. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn184\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/aob/mcn184\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCayuela L, Ruiz-Arriaga S, Ozers CP (2011) Honeybees increase fruit set in native plant species important for wildlife conservation. Environ Manage 48:910\u0026ndash;919. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9677-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00267-011-9677-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClark MJ, Husband BC (2007) Plasticity and timing of flower closure in response to pollination in \u003cem\u003eChamerion angustifolium\u003c/em\u003e (Onagraceae). Int J Plant Sci 168(5):619\u0026ndash;625.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDelmas CE, Escaravage N, Cheptou PO, Charrier O, Ruzafa S, Winterton P, Pornon A (2015) Relative impact of mate versus pollinator availability on pollen limitation and outcrossing rates in a mass-flowering species. Plant Biol 17(1):209\u0026ndash;218. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12200\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/plb.12200\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDempewolf H, Hodgins KA, Rummell SE, Ellstrand NC, Rieseberg LH (2012) Reproductive isolation during domestication. Plant Cell 24(7):2710\u0026ndash;2717. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.100115\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1105/tpc.112.100115\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDieringer G (1992) Pollinator limitation in populations of Agalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). Bull Torrey Bot Club 119(2)131\u0026ndash;136. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/2997024\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2307/2997024\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFigueiredo MCC, Passos AR, Hughes FM, Santos KSD, Silva AL, Soares TL (2020) Reproductive biology of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis angulata\u003c/em\u003e L. (Solanaceae). Sci Hortic 267:109307. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109307\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109307\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFischer G, Miranda D, Piedrah\u0026iacute;ta W, Romero J (2005) Avances en cultivo, poscosecha y exportaci\u0026oacute;n de la uchuva (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L.) en Colombia.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2021). Fruit and vegetables- your dietary essentials. FAO. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://openknowledge.fao.org/items/43d566ab-d031-435a-b30d-309b70eb5ddc\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/43d566ab-d031-435a-b30d-309b70eb5ddc\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Accessed 20 May 2024\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFranklin-Tong NV, Franklin FCH (2003) Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 8(12):598\u0026ndash;605\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarc\u0026iacute;a E (2004) Modificaciones al sistema de clasificaci\u0026oacute;n clim\u0026aacute;tica de K\u0026ouml;ppen. Universidad Nacional Aut\u0026oacute;noma de M\u0026eacute;xico.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGaribaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, et al (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339(6127):1608\u0026ndash;1611. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://10.1126/science.1230200\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://10.1126/science.1230200\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGibbs PE, Talavera S (2001) Breeding system studies with three species of \u003cem\u003eAnagallis\u003c/em\u003e (Primulaceae): self-incompatibility and reduced female fertility in \u003cem\u003eA. monelli\u003c/em\u003e L. Ann. Bot 88(1):139\u0026ndash;144. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1439\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1006/anbo.2001.1439\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eG\u0026oacute;mez JM, Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F (2010) Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. J. Ecol. 98(5):1243\u0026ndash;1252. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:1\u0026ndash;26.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarrell FE, Dupont C (2019) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.2-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHerrera AM, Ortiz JD, Fischer G, Chac\u0026oacute;n MI (2011) Behavior in yield and quality of 54 cape gooseberry (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L.) accessions from north-eastern Colombia. Agron Colomb 29(2):189\u0026ndash;196. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/29027\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/29027\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50(3):346\u0026ndash;363. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/bimj.200810425\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIgic B, Bohs L, Kohn JR (2006) Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(5):1359\u0026ndash;1363. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506283103\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1073/pnas.0506283103\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKindscher K, Long Q, Corbett S, Bosnak K, Loring H, Cohen M, Timmermann BN (2012) The ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology of wild tomatillos, \u003cem\u003ePhysalis longifolia\u003c/em\u003e Nutt., and related Physalis species: a review. Econ Bot 66(3):298\u0026ndash;310. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-012-9210-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12231-012-9210-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKlein AM, Boreux V, Fornoff F, Mupepele AC, Pufal G (2018) Relevance of wild and managed bees for human well-being. Curr Opin Insect Sci 26:82\u0026ndash;88. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.011\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.011\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLagos TC, Vallejo Cabrera FA, Criollo Escobar H, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz Fl\u0026oacute;rez JE (2008) Biolog\u0026iacute;a reproductiva de la uchuva. Acta Agron 57(2):81\u0026ndash;87\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLarson BM, Barrett SC (2000) A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69(4):503\u0026ndash;520. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01221.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01221.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeenders M, Sluijs I, Ros MM, Boshuizen HC, Siersema PD, Ferrari P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB (2013) Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality: European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 178(4):590\u0026ndash;602. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/aje/kwt006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eL\u0026oacute;pez-L\u0026oacute;pez R, Arteaga-Ram\u0026iacute;rez R, V\u0026aacute;zquez-Pe\u0026ntilde;a MA, L\u0026oacute;pez-Cruz IL, S\u0026aacute;nchez-Cohen I (2009) Producci\u0026oacute;n de tomate de c\u0026aacute;scara (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis ixocarpa\u003c/em\u003e Brot.) basado en l\u0026aacute;minas de riego y acolchado pl\u0026aacute;stico. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 15(1):83\u0026ndash;89.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuengwilai K, Fiehn OE, Beckles DM (2010) Comparison of leaf and fruit metabolism in two tomato (\u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e L.) genotypes varying in total soluble solids. J. Agric Food Chem 58(22):11790\u0026ndash;11800. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/jf102562n\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/jf102562n\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMadruga LS, Severo J, Manica-Berto R, Silva JA, Rufato L, Rufato ADR (2009) Caracter\u0026iacute;sticas f\u0026iacute;sico-qu\u0026iacute;micas de physalis em diferentes colora\u0026ccedil;\u0026otilde;es do c\u0026aacute;lice e sistemas de condu\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o. Rev Bras Frutic 31:1061\u0026ndash;1068. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452009000400020\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1590/S0100-29452009000400020\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026eacute;n-Rodr\u0026iacute;guez S, Fenster CB (2008) Pollination ecology and breeding systems of five Gesneria species from Puerto Rico. Ann Bot 102(1):23\u0026ndash;30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn056\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/aob/mcn056\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez M, Vargas-Ponce O, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez A, Chiang F, Ocegueda S (2017) Solanaceae family in Mexico. Bot Sci 95(1):131\u0026ndash;145. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.658\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.17129/botsci.658\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez M, Vargas-Ponce O, Zamora-Tavares P (2023) Taxonomic revision of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e in Mexico. Front Genet 14:1080176. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1080176\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fgene.2023.1080176\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMej\u0026iacute;a M (2010) Evaluaci\u0026oacute;n productiva de veinte genotipos de uchuva (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L) en dos localidades del oriente Antioque\u0026ntilde;o. Dissertation, Polit\u0026eacute;cnico Colombiano Jaime Izasa Cadavid.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMenzel MY (1951) The cytotaxonomy and genetics of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e. Proc Am Philos Soc 95(2):132\u0026ndash;183\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMorales-Saavedra JDC, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Zaragoza FA, Cabrera-Toledo D, S\u0026aacute;nchez-Hern\u0026aacute;ndez CV, Vargas-Ponce O (2019) Agromorphological characterization of wild and weedy populations of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis angulata\u003c/em\u003e in Mexico. Sci Hortic 246:86\u0026ndash;94. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.055\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.055\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMulato-Brito J, Pe\u0026ntilde;a-Lomel\u0026iacute; A (2007) Germplasm evaluation of tomatillo (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis ixocarpa\u003c/em\u003e Brot.) cropped under Ontario, Canada and Chapingo, Mexico environmental conditions. Veg Crop Res Bull 66:117\u0026ndash;127. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://10.2478/v10032-007-0014-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://10.2478/v10032-007-0014-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1987) The effects of pollen competition. Am. Sci. 75(1):44\u0026ndash;50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNee M (1993) Solanaceae II. Flora de Veracruz. Instituto de Ecolog\u0026iacute;a, AC Xalapa-University of California, Riverside.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNovoa RH, Bojac\u0026aacute; M, Galvis JA, Fischer G (2006) La madurez del fruto y el secado del c\u0026aacute;liz influyen en el comportamiento poscosecha de la uchuva, almacenada a 12C (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L.). Agron Colomb 24(1):77\u0026ndash;86.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOjeda-Flores F (2024) Interacci\u0026oacute;n polen-pistilo en dos especies de \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e (Solanaceae). Master\u0026rsquo;s dissertation, Universidad Aut\u0026oacute;noma de Quer\u0026eacute;taro.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOlsen KM, Wendel JF (2013) A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64(1):47\u0026ndash;70. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrtiz M\u0026Aacute;, Talavera S, Garcia-Casta\u0026ntilde;o JL, Tremetsberger K, Stuessy T, Balao F, Casimiro‐Soriguer R (2006) Self‐incompatibility and floral parameters in \u003cem\u003eHypochaeris\u003c/em\u003e sect. \u003cem\u003eHypochaeris\u003c/em\u003e (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 93(2):234\u0026ndash;244. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.2.234\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3732/ajb.93.2.234\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePanayotov N, Popova A (2014) Vegetative and productive behaviors of Cape gooseberry (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e L.), grown by direct sowing outside under conditions of Bulgaria. Turk J Agric Nat Sci Special Issue 1:1141\u0026ndash;1146\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePretz C, Smith SD (2022) Intraspecific breakdown of self-incompatibility in \u003cem\u003ePhysalis acutifolia\u003c/em\u003e (Solanaceae). AoB PLANTS 14(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plab080\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/aobpla/plab080\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePrimack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annu Rev Syst Ecol 16:15\u0026ndash;37 \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2097041\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097041\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eProhens J, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Burruezo A, Nuez F (2003) New crops: an alternative for the development of horticulture. Food Agric Environ 1:75\u0026ndash;79. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1234/4.2003.319\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1234/4.2003.319\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eProkop P (2024) Urban environment decreases pollinator availability, fertility, and prolongs anthesis in the field bindweed (\u003cem\u003eConvolvulus arvensis\u003c/em\u003e Linnaeus, 1753). Plant Signal Behav 19(1):2325225. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2325225\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/15592324.2024.2325225\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eProkop P, Moln\u0026aacute;rov\u0026aacute; D, Fančovičov\u0026aacute; J, Medina-Jerez W (2021) Seasonal variability in flower lifespan in common chicory (\u003cem\u003eCichorium intybus\u003c/em\u003e L.). Flora 284:151935. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2021.151935\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.flora.2021.151935\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePuente LA, Pinto-Mu\u0026ntilde;oz CA, Castro ES, Cort\u0026eacute;s M (2011) \u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e Linnaeus, the multiple properties of a highly functional fruit: A review. Food Res Int 44(7):1733\u0026ndash;1740. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.034\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.foodres.2010.09.034\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eR Core Team. (2023). A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (4.3.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Software available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.r-project.org/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.r-project.org/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRamadan MF (2011) Bioactive phytochemicals, nutritional value, and functional properties of cape gooseberry (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis peruviana\u003c/em\u003e): An overview. Food Res Int 44(7):1830\u0026ndash;1836. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.042\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.042\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRam\u0026iacute;rez F, Davenport TL (2021) Pollination. In: Uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) Reproductive Biology. Springer Cham. pp 71\u0026ndash;93. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66552-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-030-66552-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRengifo-Salgado E, Vargas-Arana G (2013) \u003cem\u003ePhysalis angulata\u003c/em\u003e L. (Bolsa Mullaca): a review of its traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology. Bol Latinoam Caribe Plant Med Aromat 12(5):431\u0026ndash;445.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRhodes J (2002) Cotton pollination by honey bees. Aust J Exp Agric 42:513\u0026ndash;518. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1071/EA01063\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1071/EA01063\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRiaz M, Zamir T, Rashid N, Jamil N, Rizwan S, Masood Z, et al (2015) Comparative study of nutritional quality of orange (\u003cem\u003eCitrus sinensis\u003c/em\u003e) at different maturity stages in relation to significance for human health. Am Eur J Toxicol Sci 7:209\u0026ndash;213. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejts.2015.7.4.95200\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5829/idosi.aejts.2015.7.4.95200\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRick CM (1988) Evolution of mating systems in cultivated plants. In: Plant Evolutionary Biology. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 133\u0026ndash;147\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRosa ADS, Blochtein B, Ferreira NR, Witter S (2010) \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a potential \u003cem\u003eBrassica napus\u003c/em\u003e pollinator (cv. Hyola 432) (Brassicaceae), in Southern Brazil. Braz J Biol 70:1075\u0026ndash;1081. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842010000500024\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1590/S1519-69842010000500024\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoubik DW (Ed.) (1995) Pollination of cultivated plants in the tropics. Food \u0026amp; Agriculture Org., Vol. 118. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.14283/v5040e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuiz Zapata T, Arroyo MTK (1978) Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 10(3):221\u0026ndash;230. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/2387907\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2307/2387907\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuiz-Arocho J, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Salas R, LeMay G, Steinthal N, Mastretta-Yanes A, Wegier A, et al (2024) How is leaf herbivory related to agriculture? Insights from the Mexican center of crop origin. Arthropod-Plant Interact 18(1):89\u0026ndash;104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11829-023-10019-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantamar\u0026iacute;a Basulto F, D\u0026iacute;az Plaza R, Sauri Duch E, Espadas y Gil F, Santamar\u0026iacute;a Fern\u0026aacute;ndez JM, Larqu\u0026eacute; Saavedra A (2009) Caracter\u0026iacute;sticas de calidad de frutos de papaya Maradol en la madurez de consumo. Agric T\u0026eacute;c M\u0026eacute;xico 35(3):347\u0026ndash;353\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantiaguillo H FJ, Blas YS (2009) Aprovechamiento tradicional de las especies de \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e en M\u0026eacute;xico. Rev Geogr Agr\u0026iacute;cola (43):81\u0026ndash;86. Available in: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75715608006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75715608006\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSantiaguillo Hern\u0026aacute;ndez FJ, Pe\u0026ntilde;a Lomel\u0026iacute; A, Montalvo D (1998) Evaluaci\u0026oacute;n de variedades de tomate de c\u0026aacute;scara (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e spp.) en Tlajomulco de Zu\u0026ntilde;iga, Jalisco. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 4(2):83\u0026ndash;88\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSingh DB, Ahmed N, Lal S, Mirza A, Sharma OC, Pal A (2014) Variation in growth, production and quality attributes of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species under temperate ecosystem. Fruits 69:31\u0026ndash;40. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2013099\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1051/fruits/2013099\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSol\u0026iacute;s-Montero L, Aceves-Chong L, Vega-Polanco M, Vargas-Ponce O (2021) Changes in reproductive traits in \u003cem\u003ePhysalis philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e; an unexpected shift toward self-incompatibility in a domesticated annual fruit crop. Front Plant Sci 12:834. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.658406\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2021.658406\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSol\u0026iacute;s-Montero L, Vergara CH, Vallejo-Mar\u0026iacute;n M (2015) High incidence of pollen theft in natural populations of a buzz-pollinated plant. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 9:599\u0026ndash;611. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-015-9397-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11829-015-9397-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoloman GD, Razali Z, Somasundram C (2016) Physiochemical changes during growth and development of pineapple (\u003cem\u003eAnanas comosus\u003c/em\u003e L. Merr. cv. Sarawak). J Agric Sci Technol 18:491\u0026ndash;503\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSouthwick EE, Southwick L Jr (1992) Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. J Econ Entomol 85(3):621\u0026ndash;633. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.3.621\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jee/85.3.621\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStead AD, Moore KG (1983) Studies on flower longevity in Digitalis: the role of ethylene in corolla abscission. Planta 157:15\u0026ndash;21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394535\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF00394535\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSullivan JR (1985) Systematics of the \u003cem\u003ePhysalis viscosa\u003c/em\u003e complex (Solanaceae). Syst Bot 10:426\u0026ndash;444. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2307/2419136\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2307/2419136\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun SG, Huang SQ, Guo YH (2013) Pollinator shift to managed honeybees enhances reproductive output in a bumblebee-pollinated plant. Plant Syst Evol 299:139\u0026ndash;150. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0711-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00606-012-0711-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTakayama S, Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56(1):467\u0026ndash;489. DOI: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTapia-Vargas LM, Rico-Ponce HR, Larios-Guzm\u0026aacute;n A, Vidales-Fern\u0026aacute;ndez I, Pedraza-Santos ME (2010) Manejo nutrimental en relaci\u0026oacute;n con la calidad de fruto y estado nutricional del mel\u0026oacute;n cantaloupe. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 16(1):49\u0026ndash;55.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eValdivia-Mares LE, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Zaragoza FA, S\u0026aacute;nchez-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez JJ, Vargas-Ponce O (2016) Phenology, agronomic and nutritional potential of three wild husk tomato species (Physalis, Solanaceae) from Mexico. Sci Hortic 200:83\u0026ndash;94. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVargas-Ponce O, P\u0026eacute;rez-\u0026Aacute;lvarez LF, Zamora-Tavares P, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez A (2011) Assessing genetic diversity in Mexican husk tomato species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29(3):733\u0026ndash;738. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0258-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11105-010-0258-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVargas-Ponce O, S\u0026aacute;nchez-Mart\u0026iacute;nez J, Zamora-Tavares MP, Valdivia-Mares LE (2016) Traditional management and small-scale crop of \u003cem\u003ePhysalis angulata\u003c/em\u003e in Western Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:1383\u0026ndash;1395. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0326-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10722-015-0326-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWaterfall UT (1967) Physalis in Mexico, Central America and the West Indies. Rhodora 69(777):82\u0026ndash;120.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeber JJ, Goodwillie C (2013) Variation in floral longevity in the genus Leptosiphon: mating system consequences. Plant Biol 15(1):220\u0026ndash;225. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00595.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00595.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWillmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. In: Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWyatt R (1981) The reproductive biology of Asclepias tuberosa: II. Factors determining fruit-set. New Phytol 88(2):375\u0026ndash;385. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb01732.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb01732.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXin OJ (2016) Food for children: Why fruits and vegetables are important. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.healthxchange.sg/children/food-nutrition/food-children-fruits-vegetables-important\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.healthxchange.sg/children/food-nutrition/food-children-fruits-vegetables-important\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Accessed 20 May 2024\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZamora-Tavares P, Vargas-Ponce O, S\u0026aacute;nchez-Mart\u0026iacute;nez J, Cabrera-Toledo D (2015) Diversity and genetic structure of the husk tomato (\u003cem\u003ePhysalis philadelphica\u003c/em\u003e Lam.) in Western Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62(1):141\u0026ndash;153. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0163-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10722-014-0163-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZeisler M (1933) \u0026Uuml;ber die Abgrenzung des eigentlichen Narbenfl\u0026auml;che mit Hilfe von Reaktionen. Beitr Bot Zentl A 58:308\u0026ndash;318.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"fruits horticulture, new crops, plant reproduction, self-incompatible plant, wild genetic resources","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWild plants are fundamental to human nutrition. Characterizing species with food value is essential to promote agro-food diversity. The genus \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e produces acidic and sweet edible fruits that are traditionally consumed in local diets. \u003cem\u003ePhysalis gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is a perennial herb, with sweet, orange-colored fruits harvested for householdconsumption, distributed throughout Mexico and Central America. This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive system of \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e and its agronomic potential. Floral longevity and development stages were determined in 30 flower buds until floral senescence, using individuals grown under greenhouse and open-field conditions. Stigma receptivity was assessed using hydrogen peroxide. Six artificial cross treatments were conducted to characterize the reproductive system, and indices of self-incompatibility and pollen limitation were calculated. To assess agronomic potential, an open-field crop was established with 144 plants (three accessions \u0026times; 48 individuals), and six descriptors were evaluated from five fruits per plant. Results showed that \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is a completely self-incompatible species, however, it does not exhibit pollen limitation. \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e responded positively to agricultural management (93.8% plant survival) and showed an average yield of 8.178 t\u0026middot;ha\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. Fruit size ranged from 11\u0026ndash;22 mm. The average sweetness was 11.29\u0026deg; Brix and pH was 4.18. This study demonstrates that \u003cem\u003eP. gracilis\u003c/em\u003e is a strong candidate for domestication as a new open-field crop, with desirable fruit traits, such as weight, size, and sweetness, that are superior to those of other wild \u003cem\u003ePhysalis\u003c/em\u003e species and comparable to the cultivated \u003cem\u003eP. peruviana\u003c/em\u003e, a species highly valued for its fruit flavor.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Reproductive system and agronomic potential of wild husk tomato Physalis gracilis (Solanaceae)","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-08 08:56:58","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7687132/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"218271a6-4019-4349-bd48-6413248c6d89","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 8th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-04T16:54:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-08 08:56:58","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7687132","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7687132","identity":"rs-7687132","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}