Results
and Discussion
A chlamydial symbiont stably infecting Dictyostelium giganteum
In an effort to isolate novel environmental chlamydiae, the amoeba isolate D. giganteum PALH
was recovered from forest soil ( Figure 1A) and identified based on its partial 18S rRNA gene
sequence. Either on plates or in liquid cultures D. giganteum PALH entered the social life cycle. 95
However, fruiting bodies and spores only formed on agar plates (Figure 1CD). By performing
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chlamydiae -specific probes, the presence of
chlamydial symbionts in D. giganteum PALH trophozoites and spores was readily visible (Figure
1BE). Despite a chlamydial prevalence of 100% in D. giganteum PALH, the number of chlamydial
cells counted per trophozoite and spore hardly exceeded 10 and 5, respectively ( Figure 1BE). 100
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
This stands in stark contrast to most other chlamydial species like Parachlamydia acanthamoebae
27, Simkania negevensis 28, Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis 29 or C. trachomatis 13, which are found
in large inclusions harboring dozens of bacterial cells. The stable but low level of infection indicates
that the chlamydial symbiont is highly infectious, and that its proliferation is tightly controlled either
by the symbiont or the host. 105
D. discoideum interact with food bacteria and symbionts in manifold ways throughout their entire
life cycle 30. In the vegetative trophozoite stage the amoeba exploit distinct pathways to
discriminate between different types of food bacteria 31 and are able to induce endosymbiosis with
food bacteria by the secretion of lectins 32. During multicellular stages, specialized sentinel cells
are responsible for clearing pathogens via phagocytosis or extracellular traps 33,34. In addition, D. 110
discoideum may show a farming phenotype, in which food and non-food bacteria are maintained
throughout the social life cycle 23. This behavior is controlled by facultative intracellular
Burkholderia spp. symbionts, which can be present in high numbers in both trophozoites and
spores 35–37. Further, obligate intracellular Amoebophilus and Procabacter species have been
detected as natural symbionts inside D. discoideum spores with no described fitness costs for the 115
host 38. In contrast, when D. discoideum was artificially infected with environmental chlamydiae in
the past, they either prevented spore formation or were lost during spore development (Horn et
al., 2000; Michel et al., 2004). The natural chlamydial symbiont of D. giganteum identified here
and its retention throughout the social life cycle thus point to a well-established symbiosis and a
high degree of reciprocal adaptation of both partners. 120
Figure 1: D. giganteum PALH naturally containing chlamydial symbionts. Light microscopy images
and fluorescence in situ hybridization images of trophozoites (A, B) and spores (D, E); nuclei are shown in
cyan, amoebae in magenta , and chlamydiae in yellow. Bars, 10 µm. A scheme illustrating the presence of
the symbiont during the social life cycle stages of its dictyostelid host is depicted in (C); infected amoeba 125
trophozoites and spores are shown in magenta, chlamydial symbionts in yellow.
Electron microscopy reveals peculiar symbiont morphology
To elucidate the morphological features of the symbiont and its location within the amoeba host
cells, we cryofixed D. giganteum PALH trophozoites and spores and analyzed them at the 130
transmission electron microscope . Bacterial symbionts could be readily identified in both
trophozoites and spores based on their size between 300 and 800 nm, a Gram-negative type cell
wall, and the ribosomes visible in the cytoplasm (Figure 2). Unlike most chlamydiae, the symbionts
were located directly in the host cytosol and not surrounded by an inclusion membrane. In other
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
chlamydiae, this host-derived membrane is formed after host cell entry and serves to protect the 135
bacteria from the host immune response and phagocytosis 13. Although wide-spread among the
Chlamydiota, inclusions are not seen for all environmental chlamydiae or host cells 3,39,40.
The chlamydial symbionts in D. giganteum show a peculiar, strongly wrinkled, almost flower- or
clover-like shape, in many cases containing a nucleoid -like structure of varying electron density
(Figure 2 ). Prominent, electron -dense n ucleoid-like structures are a characteristic feature of 140
chlamydial EBs 9,40–42. In C. trachomatis, chromatin condensation is mediated by at least two
histone-like proteins, Hct1 and Hct2, and is involved in the regulation of replication and
transcription 43–45. However, in contrast to classical chlamydial EBs with their rigid and thickened
cell envelope, the D. giganteum symbionts are of irregular shape, even more pronounced than
observed for RBs of some environmental chlamydiae 9. This polymorphic cell shape suggests a 145
high degree of cell envelope flexibility and a lack of rigid , stabilizing structures. The symbiont
morphology is also different from described aberrant bodies, a persisten t cell form induced by
tryptophan depletion or peptidoglycan-targeting antibiotics in Chlamydia species 46. To our
knowledge, the only chlamydial species with a comparable cell morphology was described for a
chlamydial symbiont of D. discoideum, visualized in spores after chemical fixation 38. 150
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
Symbiont genome features and phylogenetic relationship
To investigate if the observed phenotypic traits are reflected in the symbiont’s genome, we
combined long and short read sequencing and obtained a closed circular genome of 1.74 Mbp 155
with an average G+C content of 38.4%. This is well within the expected range for environmental
Figure 2: The chlamydial symbiont Reclusachlamydia socialis in D. giganteum PALH. Transmission
electron microscopy images of cryofixed and freeze -substituted amoeba trophozoites and spores are
shown. Overview s of a single amoebae trophozoite (A) and spore (C) harboring chlamydia l symbionts
(arrowheads). Rectangles indicate the area shown in detail in (B) and (D). The chlamydial symbionts show
amorphous cell shapes, contain ribosomes, a Gram-negative type cell envelope. Within the bacterial cells,
nucleoid-like structures of varying electron density can be seen . Note that different staining methods were
used for trophozoite and spore samples, respectively. Bars, 500 nm; n, amoeba nucleus; m, mitochondria.
Note the different staining protocols used.
Note
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
chlamydiae 14,16,47. No plasmid was recovered. The genome contains one ribosomal RNA operon,
36 tRNAs and 1236 coding sequences, the latter with an average length of 1251 bp (Table S1).
We next constructed a phylogenetic tree using conserved marker proteins and a data set of high-
quality Chlamydiota genomes. The maximum likelihood tree placed the chlamydial symbiont in 160
the family Rhabdochlamydiaceae, proposed previously to represent the most species-rich family
within the Chlamydiota (Figure 3A , Figure S1)48. Members of this family were detected in
arthropods such as ticks 49, spiders 50,51, and terrestrial isopods 29, all affiliated to the genus
Rhabdochlamydia. Additionally, the genera Sacchlamyda and Renichlamydia’ were proposed
based on molecular data associated with brown algae and fish, respectively 52,53. Average amino 165
acid identity (AAI) values of less than 60% with other members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae
support the classification of the symbiont as a new genus within this family (Figure S1)54,55. We
thus propose the novel name Reclusachlamydia socialis for the chlamydial symbiont of D.
giganteum PALH (see Text S1 for a formal species description ). In our phylogenomic analysis,
members of the genus Rhabdochlamydia are the closest described and cultured relatives of R. 170
socialis. The symbiont forms a monophyletic clade with a metagenome assembled genome (MAG)
originating from wastewater, which is however only moderately related (60% AAI, Figure 3A).
Large eukaryote-like proteins of Reclusachlamydia socialis
Upon initial inspection of the R. socialis genome, we noticed that 102 of the total 1236 genes 175
(8.3%) encode unusually large proteins (> 1000 amino acids), which is unusual for small genomes
and more than three times the amount reported for other members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae
(Figure 3 BC). Of these, 91 were annotated as hypothetical proteins but we identified
tetratricopeptide repeats, ankyrin repeats and L domain-like stretches in 4 8%, 14% and 11% of
the proteins, respectively. These domains are often part of so-called eukaryote-like proteins, which 180
are found primarily encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes and host-associated bacteria but rarely
in free-living microbes. They are assumed to be secreted to the host cytosol and may interfere
with host cellular processes such as cell cycle control, ubiquitination and phagocytosis 56–58. The
importance of eukaryote-like proteins for bacteria replicating in amoebae is underlined by their
high prevalence across several bacterial phyla 57,59. 185
Additionally, we identified protein prenyl transferase domains in 8 of the 102 large proteins and 15
in total . Prenyl transferases are involved in the post translational modification of proteins in
eukaryotes, by specifically binding to CAAX motifs at the N-terminal end of proteins and attaching
isoprenoids to the cysteine residue, which leads to the localization of the modified proteins to lipids
and membranes 60. This CAAX motif is often found in members of the Ras superfamily of small 190
GTPases. Small host GTPases are recruited and used for manipulation of cellular pathways by
chlamydial pathogens (reviewed in 61). In D. discoideum this superfamily includes Rac proteins,
such as RacG, RacJ, and RacH 62. RacH has been shown to influence bacterial infections in D.
discoideum in at least two, contradicting ways. Firstly, it is a driver of the acidification of
phagosomes, thus deletion of racH enhances intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila and 195
Mycobacterium marinum in D. discoideum 63,64. Conversely , RacH mediates the non -lytic
transmission of M. marinum via ejectosomes during cell-to-cell contact 65,66. Eight out of the 15
putative prenyl transferases encoded in the R. socialis genome are predicted to be secreted by
the type III secretion system (T3SS) and therefore likely function within the amoeba host cell. The
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
manipulation of host Ras GTPases by symbiont-encoded prenyl transferases could be an efficient 200
way of host-symbiont interaction.
Figure 3: Genome features of the D. giganteum symbiont R. socialis. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of 205
R. socialis with other members of the family Rhabdochlamydiaceae based on maximum likelihood
phylogenetic analysis of 43 conserved marker genes. R. socialis is the first member of the novel genus
Reclusachlamydia and represents a sister branch of a metagenome assembled genome (MAG) from a
wastewater sample. M embers of the genus Rhabdochlamydia are the closest described and cultured
relatives of R. socialis. The full tree is available as Data S1. (B) Genomic map of R. socialis. Coordinates in 210
black, GC skew in green and blue ; the orange bars denote the position of genes encoding large proteins
(>1000 aa). (C) Length distribution of proteins longer than 1000 aa encoded in the genome s of selected
members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae. (D) Presence or absence of hallmark chlamydial genes in R.
socialis and representative Chlamydiota species. Presence and the number of orthologs is indicated by a
tile and the depicted number, respectively. 215
R. socialis lacks vital genes for extracellular survival
Similar to other obligate endosymbionts, chlamydiae experienced substantial gene loss during the
millions of years of evolution as strictly host -associated bacteria. Yet, their core genome is
remarkably conserved 14,16. Many of th e core genes reflect the obligate intracellular lifestyle and 220
are involved in the interaction with the eukaryotic host cell . The most prominent feature is the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
chlamydial T3SS and its affiliated effectors 67. The presence of all relevant structural genes and
additional effectors, such as the serine/threonine protein kinase CopN and the pseudokinase Pkn5
in the genome of R. socialis suggest a functional type III secretion system . Similarly, the two
nucleotide transporters NTT1 and NTT2, as well as the glucose -6-phosphate transporter UhpC, 225
involved in energy parasitism, nucleotide, and glucose acquisition from the host cell 6,13,68 are
encoded in the genome of R. socialis (Figure 3D, Table S1).
Of note, R. socialis lacks all of the known pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. The deoxyxylulose
5-phosphate (DXP) pathway is virtually absent although it is well conserved across the domain
Bacteria including the Chlamydiota (Figure 3D). Additionally, none of the genes of the alternative 230
mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway used by the chlamydia l species Waddlia chondrophila and
generally found in mammals and yeast 69,70 could be detected in R. socialis. Isoprenoids are
essential cellular components involved in critical functions such as electron transport and
peptidoglycan synthesis 71. A dependency o n host-derived isoprenoid precursors has been
reported for the obligate intracellular pathogen Rickettisa parkerii 72 but represents a novel type of 235
parasitism among chlamydiae.
Progression through the bi-phasic developmental cycle is a tightly regulated process in all known
members of the Chlamydiota. The best-known major regulator, early upstream ORF (EUO), is
expressed during the initial infection stage, and its downregulation coincides with transformation
to EBs 73. This process further relies on the cell cycle regulators GrgA and HrcA 74, all of which are 240
encoded in the genome of R. socialis (Figure 3D, Table S1). Conversely, the genome of R. socialis
lacks the genes for AtoC/AtoS, which form a two-component signal transduction system activating
the σ54 transcription factor that regulates genes involved in the RB -to-EB transition 75,76. This
coincides with the loss of ChxR, a transcriptional regulator of mid- and late cycle genes functioning
in e.g., glycogen and nucleotide metabolism, modification of the inclusion membrane, and the 245
T3SS 10,77.
The extracellular EB stage of chlamydiae demands protection and condensation of the DNA,
which is facilitated by two histone-like proteins HctA and HctB in C. trachomatis 43–45. In contrast
to hctB, hctA is conserved across most environmental chlamydiae 16. Yet, the genome of R.
socialis lacks both genes (Figure 3D, Table S1). It is thus either unable to pack its chromatin or 250
employs a yet undescribed mechanism, as suggested by transmission electron microscopy
(Figure 2 ). To release chromatin from both HctA and HctB, C. trachomatis depends on the
expression of IspE, a central enzyme of the DXP pathway missing in the R. socialis genome 45,78.
The extracellular chlamydial EB stage relies on efficient energy storage mediated by glycogen .
Glycogen synthesis is thus considered a hallmark of chlamydiae, and al l known chlamydiae 255
encode one of two glycogen synthesis pathways 79,80. Yet, none of the enzymes of these pathways
is encoded in the R. socialis genome (Figure 3D). This suggests the lack of the capability to
produce and utilize this storage compound, which should severely impact the symbiont’s ability to
survive outside the host cell.
We noted that the MAG Bodden seems to exhibit a very similar pattern of gene loss, suggesting 260
that this is a common feature of th is clade. Genome reduction is a process common in
endosymbiosis, however, the genes lost in R. socialis compared to other chlamydiae indicate a
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
reduced role or complete loss of the extracellular phase of the canonical chlamydial developmental
cycle.
265
Transmission of R. socialis is independent of extracellular chlamydiae
The absence of several hallmark genes involved in the biphasic chlamydial developmental cycle,
particularly in the formation of the extracellular EB stage , led us to investigate how R. socialis
spreads and establishes new infections . To this end , we used rifampicin to generate an
aposymbiotic D. giganteum host culture. We subsequently tested whether it was possible to 270
reinfect symbiont-free amoeba using supernatant from infected amoeba cultures or lysed
symbiont-containing amoeba cells. Despite following well-established protocols, reinfection of
aposymbiotic amoeba failed repeatedly (data not shown) . We thus resorted to survey and
compare infection dynamics of R. socialis in aposymbiotic, symbiotic, and mixed (1:5;
symbiotic:aposymbiotic) D. giganteum populations. We monitored amoeba and symbiont total 275
abundance in both culture supernatant and cellular fraction, as well as R. socialis prevalence.
D. giganteum cell numbers increased by a factor of ~230 in all populations during the course of
the experiment and were not significantly different between aposymbiotic, symbiotic, and mixed
populations at any of the time points analysed ( Figure 4A, Table S2). Nearly identical growth in
the presence and absence of R. socialis indicate that the symbiont does not impose considerable 280
fitness costs on its amoeba host under the monoxenic culture conditions used . This was also
reflected in the maximum growth rate of all populations, which was not significantly affected by
the presence of the symbiont ( Figure S2). Consistent with host cell growth, the number of
chlamydial genome copies measured by digital PCR increased continuously in the cellular fraction
of symbiotic and mixed populations over the course of the experiment and reached similar levels 285
in both after 72 h incubation (Figure 4B). Of note , the number of chlamydial genome copies
detected at this time point in the supernatant of symbiotic and mixed populations did not differ
from the aposymbiotic population (non-parametric ANOVA, p= 0.871; Figure 4B). This indicates
the absence of extracellular chlamydiae in the culture medium. In parallel, we used FISH to
monitor the prevalence of chlamydiae in the mixed amoeba populations. We observed a significant 290
increase from 29.9% (SD=4.8%) infected amoeba cells at 48 h to 39.5% (SD=4.5%) at 72 h (t-
test; t(15.9)=-4.35, p = 0.000498; Figure 4CD).
Taken together, the increase of R. socialis cell numbers and prevalence in the mixed populations
in the absence of detectable extracellular chlamydiae suggests that the infection of new host cells
is independent of an extracellular stage of R. socialis. This would leave c ell-to-cell transmission 295
as the only option for R. socialis to infect naive amoeba host cells. This infection route would
demand intimate contact of individual amoeba cells, a behavior frequently observed in
dictyostelids, especially during the initiation of the multicellular stages 18.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
Figure 4: Transmission of R. socialis is independent o f extracellular chlamydiae. Symbiotic (red), 300
aposymbiotic (blue) or mixed (yellow ; 1:5, symbiotic:aposymbiotic) D. giganteum PALH populations were
allowed to grow in the presence of an excess of K. aerogenes as a food source for 72 hours. Amoeba cell
numbers were monitored using a cell counter (A). Chlamydial genome copy numbers were determined by
dPCR in cellular fractions (circles) and supernatant (triangles) , respectively (B). Mean values or replicates
are shown in black or color, respectively. Amoeba growth rate was not significantly affected by the presence 305
of R. socialis (P > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test; Figure S2). Chlamydial prevalence in mixed populations was
quantified 48 and 72 hours after inoculation by FISH (C) and increased significantly during this period (***,
P < 0.001, t-test) (D). Each dot represents a replicate. Boxes and error bars depict the interquartile range
and the 95% confidence interval , respectively. In the fluorescence images, amoebae are depicted in
magenta, chlamydiae in yellow , nuclei and food bacteria K. aerogenes in cyan. I nfected a moebae are 310
marked with white arrowheads. Bar, 10 µm.
Infection depends on cell-to-cell contact between host cells
Exploiting the direct contact between host cells for transmission is a behavior known from human 315
and amoeba pathogens , such as Listeria and Mycobacteria species 66,81. To investigate the
importance of cell-to-cell contact for the transmission of R. socialis we co-incubated symbiotic and
aposymbiotic D. giganteum populations under conditions leading to rapid amoeba aggregation
and determined chlamydial prevalence after a short incubation period (Figure 5AC). To distinguish
between originally symbiotic and aposymbiotic populations, amoeba were stained differentially 320
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
using fluorescent live stains prior to co-incubation. A second set of cultures was set up identically,
except that the populations were separated by a cell culture insert including a filter membrane.
This filter is permeable for chlamydia e but efficiently inhibits migration of amoebae and thus
hampers cell-to-cell contact between symbiotic and aposymbiotic amoeba (Figure 5BD). The size-
selective retention of amoeba by cell culture inserts has been used for the isolation of chlamydiae 325
in the past 27. Hence, the cell culture inserts were no barrier for EBs of the chlamydial symbiont P .
acanthamoebae infecting Acanthamoeba terricola (formerly A. castellanii Neff) used as positive
control for the extracellular transmission route in our experiment (Figure S3). At the end of the
incubation period, we removed the cell culture insert containing the symbiotic amoeba. We then
sampled the originally aposymbiotic population and examined the prevalence of R. socialis using 330
FISH (Figure 5CD). Originally aposymbiotic D. giganteum cells that were allowed to freely interact
with their symbiotic counterparts showed a chlamydial prevalence of 35.4% (SD=5.6%), which
can be explained by the transmission of R. socialis between th ese populations. Conversely,
chlamydial prevalence in originally aposymbiotic amoeba physically separated from the symbiotic
population was with 3.5% extremely low (SD=1.8%; t-test; t(9.7)= 16.2, p < 0.0000001; Figure 335
5E). In the absence of detectable extracellular EBs, this low percentage of newly infected amoeba
most likely resulted from direct interactions with the low number of symbiotic amoeba, which still
passed the filter (1.7% of all cells). We thus concluded that transmission of R. socialis is dependent
on physical contact between its host cells.
For k nown chlamydiae , the infection of new host cells primarily depends on the uptake of 340
extracellular EBs. Yet, if uptake is blocked experimentally, direct cell-to-cell transmission has been
reported for C. trachomatis through tunneling nanotubes in human cell lines 82. Similar to tunneling
nanotubes, D. discoideum exhibits temporary cell fusion, particularly during aggregation, called
anastomosis 83. These structures facilitate the exchange of cytoplasm and even mitochondria
between neighboring cells, albeit at a low rate (Bloomfield et al., 2019). R. socialis hijacking 345
Dictyostelium anastomosis during the social life cycle could thus represent a route for cell-to-cell
transmission. However, the mechanism behind this process remains to be elucidated.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
350
Figure 5: Transmission of R. socialis requires cell-to-cell contact between amoeba host cells : D.
giganteum PALH populations were differentially stained with CellTracker dyes and incubated for 48h ,
followed by FISH to visualize R. socialis. Originally aposymbiotic amoeba (green) and symbiotic amoeba
(magenta, chlamydiae in yellow) could either interact freely (A, C) or were separated physically by a filter
membrane permeable for bacteria (B, D). At the end of the incubation period, the number of amoeba newly 355
infected with R. socialis was determined by fluorescence microscopy (C, D). Non-separated populations of
D. giganteum showed a significantly higher prevalence of chlamydiae in originally aposymbiotic cells than
the physically separated populations (E) (****, P < 0.001, t-test). Each dot represents a replicate. Boxes and
error bars depict the interquartile range and the 95% confidence interval, respectively. In the fluorescence
images, newly infected amoeba are marked with white arrowheads. Bars, 10 µm. 360
References
1. World Health Organization (2023). WHO Alliance for the global elimination of trachoma:
progress report on elimination of trachoma, 2022–alliance de l’OMS pour l’élimination
mondiale du trachome: rapport de situation sur l’élimination du trachome, 2022. Wkly. 590
Epidemiol. Rec. Relevé Épidémiologique Hebd. 98, 297–131.
2. Huai, P ., Li, F., Chu, T., Liu, D., Liu, J., and Zhang, F. (2020). Prevalence of genital
Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect.
Dis. 20, 589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05307-w.
3. Collingro, A., Köstlbacher, S., and Horn, M. (2020). Chlamydiae in the environment. Trends 595
Microbiol. 28, 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.020.
4. Elwell, C., Mirrashidi, K., and Engel, J. (2016). Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30.
5. Horn, M. (2008). Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 113–
131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162818. 600
6. Omsland, A., Sixt, B.S., Horn, M., and Hackstadt, T. (2014). Chlamydial metabolism
revisited: interspecies metabolic variability and developmental stage-specific physiologic
activities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 779–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12059.
7. Lewis, M.E., Belland, R.J., AbdelRahman, Y .M., Beatty, W.L., Aiyar, A.A., Zea, A.H.,
Greene, S.J., Marrero, L., Buckner, L.R., Tate, D.J., et al. (2014). Morphologic and 605
molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct
growth patterns. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00071.
8. Nans, A., Saibil, H.R., and Hayward, R.D. (2014). Pathogen–host reorganization during
Chlamydia invasion revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Cell. Microbiol. 16, 1457–1472.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12310. 610
9. Pilhofer, M., Aistleitner, K., Ladinsky, M.S., König, L., Horn, M., and Jensen, G.J. (2014).
Architecture and host interface of environmental chlamydiae revealed by electron
cryotomography. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12299.
10. Domman, D., and Horn, M. (2015). Following the footsteps of chlamydial gene regulation.
Mol. Biol. Evol., msv193. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv193. 615
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
11. Hakiem, O.R., Rizvi, S.M.A., Ramirez, C., and Tan, M. (2023). Euo is a developmental
regulator that represses late genes and activates midcycle genes in Chlamydia
trachomatis. mBio 14, e00465-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00465-23.
12. Rosario, C.J., Soules, K., Hefty, P.S., and Tan, M. (2020). Chlamydia gene regulation. In
Chlamydia Biology: From Genome to Disease (Caister Academic Press). 620
https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530281.10.
13. Stelzner, K., Vollmuth, N., and Rudel, T. (2023). Intracellular lifestyle of Chlamydia
trachomatis and host–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 448–462.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00860-y.
14. Dharamshi, J.E., Köstlbacher, S., Schön, M.E., Collingro, A., Ettema, T.J.G., and Horn, M. 625
(2023). Gene gain facilitated endosymbiotic evolution of chlamydiae. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 40–
54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01284-9.
15. Dharamshi, J.E., Tamarit, D., Eme, L., Stairs, C.W., Martijn, J., Homa, F., Jørgensen, S.L.,
Spang, A., and Ettema, T.J.G. (2020). Marine sediments illuminate chlamydiae diversity
and evolution. Curr. Biol. 30, 1032-1048.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.016. 630
16. Köstlbacher, S., Collingro, A., Halter, T., Schulz, F., Jungbluth, S.P ., and Horn, M. (2021).
Pangenomics reveals alternative environmental lifestyles among chlamydiae. Nat.
Commun. 12, 4021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24294-3.
17. Samba-Louaka, A., Delafont, V., Rodier, M.-H., Cateau, E., and Héchard, Y . (2019). Free-
living amoebae and squatters in the wild: ecological and molecular features. FEMS 635
Microbiol. Rev. 43, 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuz011.
18. Romeralo, M., Escalante, R., and Baldauf, S.L. (2012). Evolution and diversity of
dictyostelid social amoebae. Protist 163, 327–343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2011.09.004.
19. Tekle, Y .I., Wang, F., Wood, F.C., Anderson, O.R., and Smirnov, A. (2022). New insights on 640
the evolutionary relationships between the major lineages of Amoebozoa. Sci. Rep. 12,
11173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15372-7.
20. Raper, K.B. (1935). Dictyostelium discoideum, a new species of slime mold from decaying
forest leaves. J. Agric. Res. 50, 135.
21. Kessin, R.H. ed. (2001). A brief introduction to Dictyostelium discoideum and its relatives. 645
In Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity
Developmental and Cell Biology Series. (Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525315.002.
22. Brown, M.W., and Silberman, J.D. (2013). The non-dictyostelid sorocarpic amoebae. In
Dictyostelids: Evolution, Genomics and Cell Biology, M. Romeralo, S. Baldauf, and R. 650
Escalante, eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg), pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
642-38487-5_12.
23. Brock, D.A., Douglas, T.E., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2011). Primitive agriculture
in a social amoeba. Nature 469, 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09668.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
24. Bozzaro, S., and Eichinger, L. (2011). The professional phagocyte Dictyostelium 655
discoideum as a model host for bacterial pathogens. Curr. Drug Targets 12, 942–954.
https://doi.org/10.2174/138945011795677782.
25. Dunn, J.D., Bosmani, C., Barisch, C., Raykov, L., Lefrançois, L.H., Cardenal-Muñoz, E.,
López-Jiménez, A.T., and Soldati, T. (2018). Eat prey, live: Dictyostelium discoideum as a
model for cell-autonomous defenses. Front. Immunol. 8, 1906. 660
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01906.
26. Sallinger, E., Robeson, M.S., and Haselkorn, T.S. (2021). Characterization of the bacterial
microbiomes of social amoebae and exploration of the roles of host and environment on
microbiome composition. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-
2920.15279. 665
27. Collingro, A., Poppert, S., Heinz, E., Schmitz-Esser, S., Essig, A., Schweikert, M., Wagner,
M., and Horn, M. (2005). Recovery of an environmental chlamydia strain from activated
sludge by co-cultivation with Acanthamoeba sp. Microbiology 151, 301–309.
https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27406-0.
28. Kahane, S., Kimmel, N., and Friedman, M.G. (2002). The growth cycle of Simkania 670
negevensis. Microbiology 148, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-3-735.
29. Kostanjšek, R., Štrus, J., Drobne, D., and Avguštin, G. (2004). ‘Candidatus
Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis’, an intracellular bacterium from the hepatopancreas of the
terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54,
543–549. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02802-0. 675
30. Farinholt, T., Dinh, C., and Kuspa, A. (2019). Microbiome management in the social
amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum compared to humans. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 63, 447–450.
https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.190240ak.
31. Nasser, W., Santhanam, B., Miranda, E.R., Parikh, A., Juneja, K., Rot, G., Dinh, C., Chen,
R., Zupan, B., Shaulsky, G., et al. (2013). Bacterial discrimination by dictyostelid amoebae 680
reveals the complexity of ancient interspecies interactions. Curr. Biol. 23, 862–872.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.034.
32. Dinh, C., Farinholt, T., Hirose, S., Zhuchenko, O., and Kuspa, A. (2018). Lectins modulate
the microbiota of social amoebae. Science 361, 402–406.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2058. 685
33. Chen, G., Zhuchenko, O., and Kuspa, A. (2007). Immune-like phagocyte activity in the
social amoeba. Science 317, 678–681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143991.
34. Zhang, X., Zhuchenko, O., Kuspa, A., and Soldati, T. (2016). Social amoebae trap and kill
bacteria by casting DNA nets. Nat. Commun. 7, 10938.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10938. 690
35. Shu, L., Brock, D.A., Geist, K.S., Miller, J.W., Queller, D.C., Strassmann, J.E., and DiSalvo,
S. (2018). Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis
between social amoebae and bacteria. eLife 7, e42660.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42660.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
36. Brock, D.A., Callison, W.É., Strassmann, J.E., and Queller, D.C. (2016). Sentinel cells, 695
symbiotic bacteria and toxin resistance in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.
Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20152727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2727.
37. DiSalvo, S., Haselkorn, T.S., Bashir, U., Jimenez, D., Brock, D.A., Queller, D.C., and
Strassmann, J.E. (2015). Burkholderia bacteria infectiously induce the proto-farming
symbiosis of Dictyostelium amoebae and food bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112. 700
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511878112.
38. Haselkorn, T.S., Jimenez, D., Bashir, U., Sallinger, E., Queller, D.C., Strassmann, J.E., and
DiSalvo, S. (2021). Novel chlamydiae and Amoebophilus endosymbionts are prevalent in
wild isolates of the model social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Environ. Microbiol.
Rep. 13, 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12985. 705
39. Ishida, K., Sekizuka, T., Hayashida, K., Matsuo, J., Takeuchi, F., Kuroda, M., Nakamura, S.,
Yamazaki, T., Yoshida, M., Takahashi, K., et al. (2014). Amoebal endosymbiont
Neochlamydia genome sequence illuminates the bacterial role in the defense of the host
amoebae against Legionella pneumophila. PLoS ONE 9, e95166.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095166. 710
40. Michel, R., Steinert, M., Zoeller, L., Hauroeder, B., and Henning, K. (2004). Free-living
amoebae may serve as hosts for the Chlamydia-like bacterium Waddlia chondrophila
isolated from an aborted bovine foetus. Acta Protozool. 43, 37–42.
41. Higashi, N. (1965). Electron microscopic studies on the mode of reproduction of trachoma
virus and psittacosis virus in cell cultures. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 4, 24–39. 715
https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4800(65)90021-3.
42. Kostanjšek, R., and Pirc Marolt, T. (2015). Pathogenesis, tissue distribution and host
response to Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis infection in rough woodlouse Porcellio scaber.
J. Invertebr. Pathol. 125, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.01.001.
43. Barry, C.E., Hayes, S.F., and Hackstadt, T. (1992). Nucleoid condensation in Escherichia 720
coli that express a chlamydial histone homolog. Science 256, 377–379.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.256.5055.377.
44. Brickman, T.J., Barry, C.E., and Hackstadt, T. (1993). Molecular cloning and expression of
hctB encoding a strain-variant chlamydial histone-like protein with DNA-binding activity. J.
Bacteriol. 175, 4274–4281. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.14.4274-4281.1993. 725
45. Grieshaber, N.A., Sager, J.B., Dooley, C.A., Hayes, S.F., and Hackstadt, T. (2006).
Regulation of the Chlamydia trachomatis histone H1-Like protein Hc2 Is IspE dependent
and IhtA independent. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5289–5292. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00526-06.
46. Brockett, M.R., and Liechti, G.W. (2021). Persistence alters the interaction between
Chlamydia trachomatis and its host cell. Infect. Immun. 89, e00685-20. 730
https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00685-20.
47. Collingro, A., Tischler, P., Weinmaier, T., Penz, T., Heinz, E., Brunham, R.C., Read, T.D.,
Bavoil, P .M., Sachse, K., Kahane, S., et al. (2011). Unity in variety -the pan-genome of the
chlamydiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 3253–3270. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr161.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
48. Lagkouvardos, I., Weinmaier, T., Lauro, F.M., Cavicchioli, R., Rattei, T., and Horn, M. 735
(2014). Integrating metagenomic and amplicon databases to resolve the phylogenetic and
ecological diversity of the Chlamydiae. ISME J. 8, 115–125.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.142.
49. Pillonel, T., Bertelli, C., Aeby, S., De Barsy, M., Jacquier, N., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Mueller,
L., Vouga, M., and Greub, G. (2019). Sequencing the obligate intracellular 740
Rhabdochlamydia helvetica within Its tick host Ixodes ricinus to investigate their symbiotic
relationship. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz072.
50. Halter, T., Köstlbacher, S., Collingro, A., Sixt, B.S., Tönshoff, E.R., Hendrickx, F.,
Kostanjšek, R., and Horn, M. (2022). Ecology and evolution of chlamydial symbionts of
arthropods. ISME Commun. 2, 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00124-5. 745
51. Vanthournout, B., and Hendrickx, F. (2015). Endosymbiont dominated bacterial
communities in a dwarf spider. PLOS ONE 10, e0117297.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117297.
52. Corsaro, D., and Work, T. (2012). Candidatus Renichlamydia lutjani, a gram-negative
bacterium in internal organs of blue-striped snapper Lutjanus kasmira from Hawaii. Dis. 750
Aquat. Organ. 98, 249–254. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02441.
53. Davison, H.R., and Hurst, G.D.D. (2023). Hidden from plain sight: novel Simkaniaceae and
Rhabdochlamydiaceae diversity emerging from screening genomic and metagenomic data.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126468.
54. Barco, R.A., Garrity, G.M., Scott, J.J., Amend, J.P ., Nealson, K.H., and Emerson, D. (2020). 755
A genus definition for Bacteria and Archaea based on a standard genome relatedness
index. mBio 11, e02475-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02475-19.
55. Konstantinidis, K.T., Rosselló-Móra, R., and Amann, R. (2017). Uncultivated microbes in
need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 11, 2399–2406.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.113. 760
56. Frank, A.C. (2019). Molecular host mimicry and manipulation in bacterial symbionts. FEMS
Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz038. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz038.
57. Martyn, J.E., Gomez-Valero, L., and Buchrieser, C. (2022). The evolution and role of
eukaryotic-like domains in environmental intracellular bacteria: the battle with a eukaryotic
cell. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46, fuac012. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuac012. 765
58. Reynolds, D., and Thomas, T. (2016). Evolution and function of eukaryotic-like proteins
from sponge symbionts. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5242–5253.
59. Schmitz-Esser, S., Tischler, P ., Arnold, R., Montanaro, J., Wagner, M., Rattei, T., and Horn,
M. (2010). The genome of the amoeba symbiont “Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus”
reveals common mechanisms for host cell interaction among amoeba-associated bacteria. 770
J. Bacteriol. 192, 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01379-09.
60. Wang, M., and Casey, P .J. (2016). Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on
biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.11.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
61. Gitsels, A., Sanders, N., and Vanrompay, D. (2019). Chlamydial infection from outside to
inside. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02329. 775
62. Okuwa, T., Morio, T., Saito, T., Masamune, Y ., and Yasukawa, H. (2001). Complete
sequences and expression kinetics of racG, racH, racI and racJ genes in Dictyostelium
discoideum. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 24, 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.24.84.
63. Balest, A., Peracino, B., and Bozzaro, S. (2011). Legionella pneumophila infection is
enhanced in a RacH-null mutant of Dictyostelium. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 194–197. 780
https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.2.14381.
64. Hagedorn, M., and Soldati, T. (2007). Flotillin and RacH modulate the intracellular immunity
of Dictyostelium to Mycobacterium marinum infection. Cell. Microbiol. 9, 2716–2733.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00993.x.
65. Gerstenmaier, L., Pilla, R., Herrmann, L., Herrmann, H., Prado, M., Villafano, G.J., Kolonko, 785
M., Reimer, R., Soldati, T., King, J.S., et al. (2015). The autophagic machinery ensures
nonlytic transmission of mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423318112.
66. Hagedorn, M., Rohde, K.H., Russell, D.G., and Soldati, T. (2009). Infection by tubercular
Mycobacteria Is spread by nonlytic ejection from their amoeba hosts. Science 323, 1729–790
1733. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169381.
67. Rucks, E.A. (2023). Type III secretion in chlamydia. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 87, e00034-
23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00034-23.
68. Fisher, D.J., Fernández, R.E., and Maurelli, A.T. (2013). Chlamydia trachomatis transports
NAD via the Npt1 ATP/ADP translocase. J. Bacteriol. 195, 3381–3386. 795
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00433-13.
69. Bertelli, C., Collyn, F., Croxatto, A., Rückert, C., Polkinghorne, A., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C.,
Goesmann, A., Vaughan, L., and Greub, G. (2010). The Waddlia genome: A window into
chlamydial biology. PLoS ONE 5, e10890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010890.
70. Lange, B.M., Rujan, T., Martin, W., and Croteau, R. (2000). Isoprenoid biosynthesis: The 800
evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97,
13172–13177. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240454797.
71. Heuston, S., Begley, M., Gahan, C.G.M., and Hill, C. (2012). Isoprenoid biosynthesis in
bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 158, 1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.051599-0.
72. Ahyong, V., Berdan, C.A., Burke, T.P., Nomura, D.K., and Welch, M.D. (2019). A metabolic 805
dependency for host isoprenoids in the obligate intracellular pathogen Rickettsia parkeri
underlies a sensitivity to the statin class of host-targeted therapeutics. mSphere 4, e00536-
19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00536-19.
73. Appa, C.R., Grieshaber, N.A., Yang, H., Omsland, A., McCormick, S., Chiarelli, T.J., and
Grieshaber, S.S. (2024). The chlamydial transcriptional regulator Euo is a key switch in cell 810
form developmental progression but is not involved in the committed step to the formation
of the infectious form. mSphere, e00437-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00437-24.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
74. Wurihan, W., Zou, Y., Weber, A.M., Weldon, K., Huang, Y ., Bao, X., Zhu, C., Wu, X., Wang,
Y., Lai, Z., et al. (2021). Identification of a GrgA-Euo-HrcA transcriptional regulatory network
in chlamydia. mSystems 6, e00738-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00738-21. 815
75. Lu, B., Wang, Y., Wurihan, W., Cheng, A., Yeung, S., Fondell, J.D., Lai, Z., Wan, D., Wu, X.,
Li, W.V., et al. (2024). Requirement of GrgA for Chlamydia infectious progeny production,
optimal growth, and efficient plasmid maintenance. mBio 15, e02036-23.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02036-23.
76. Soules, K.R., LaBrie, S.D., May, B.H., and Hefty, P .S. (2020). Sigma 54-regulated 820
transcription is associated with membrane reorganization and type III secretion effectors
during conversion to infectious forms of Chlamydia trachomatis. mBio 11, e01725-20.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01725-20.
77. Yang, C., Kari, L., Sturdevant, G.L., Song, L., Patton, M.J., Couch, C.E., Ilgenfritz, J.M.,
Southern, T.R., Whitmire, W.M., Briones, M., et al. (2017). Chlamydia trachomatis ChxR is 825
a transcriptional regulator of virulence factors that function in in vivo host–pathogen
interactions. Pathog. Dis. 75. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx035.
78. Grieshaber, N.A., Fischer, E.R., Mead, D.J., Dooley, C.A., and Hackstadt, T. (2004).
Chlamydial histone-DNA interactions are disrupted by a metabolite in the methylerythritol
phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 7451–7456. 830
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400754101.
79. Colpaert, M., Kadouche, D., Ducatez, M., Pillonel, T., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Cenci, U.,
Huang, B., Chabi, M., Maes, E., Coddeville, B., et al. (2021). Conservation of the glycogen
metabolism pathway underlines a pivotal function of storage polysaccharides in
Chlamydiae. Commun. Biol. 4, 296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01794-y. 835
80. N’Gadjaga, M.D., Perrinet, S., Connor, M.G., Bertolin, G., Millot, G.A., and Subtil, A. (2022).
Chlamydia trachomatis development requires both host glycolysis and oxidative
phosphorylation but has only minor effects on these pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102338.
81. Kühn, S., and Enninga, J. (2020). The actin comet guides the way: How LISTERIA actin 840
subversion has impacted cell biology, infection biology and structural biology. Cell.
Microbiol. 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13190.
82. Jahnke, R., Matthiesen, S., Zaeck, L.M., Finke, S., and Knittler, M.R. (2022). Chlamydia
trachomatis cell-to-cell spread through tunneling nanotubes. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e02817-
22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02817-22. 845
83. Huffman, D.M., and Olive, L.S. (1964). Engulfment and anastomosis in the cellular slime
molds (Acrasiales). Am. J. Bot. 51, 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-
2197.1964.tb06657.x.
84. Horn, M., Wagner, M., Müller, K.-D., Schmid, E.N., Fritsche, T.R., Schleifer, K.-H., and
Michel, R. (2000). Neochlamydia hartmannellae gen. nov., sp. nov. (Parachlamydiaceae), 850
an endoparasite of the amoeba Hartmannella vermiformis. Microbiology 146, 1231–1239.
https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-5-1231.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
26
85. Arthofer, P., Delafont, V., Willemsen, A., Panhölzl, F., and Horn, M. (2022). Defensive
symbiosis against giant viruses in amoebae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2205856119.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205856119. 855
86. Brock, D.A., Read, S., Bozhchenko, A., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2013). Social
amoeba farmers carry defensive symbionts to protect and privatize their crops. Nat.
Commun. 4, 2385. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3385.
87. Flórez, L.V., Biedermann, P.H.W., Engl, T., and Kaltenpoth, M. (2015). Defensive
symbioses of animals with prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 860
904–936. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NP00010F.
88. König, L., Wentrup, C., Schulz, F., Wascher, F., Escola, S., Swanson, M.S., Buchrieser, C.,
and Horn, M. (2019). Symbiont-mediated defense against Legionella pneumophila in
amoebae. mBio 10, e00333-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00333-19.
89. Brock, D.A., Noh, S., Hubert, A.N.M., Haselkorn, T.S., DiSalvo, S., Suess, M.K., Bradley, 865
A.S., Tavakoli-Nezhad, M., Geist, K.S., Queller, D.C., et al. (2020). Endosymbiotic
adaptations in three new bacterial species associated with Dictyostelium discoideum :
Paraburkholderia agricolaris sp. nov., Paraburkholderia hayleyella sp. nov., and
Paraburkholderia bonniea sp. nov. PeerJ 8, e9151. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9151.
90. Garcia, J.R., Larsen, T.J., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2019). Fitness costs and 870
benefits vary for two facultative Burkholderia symbionts of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium
discoideum. Ecol. Evol. 9, 9878–9890. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5529.
91. Noh, S., Peck, R.F., Larson, E.R., Covitz, R.M., Chen, A., Roy, P ., Hamilton, M.C., and
Dettmann, R.A. (2024). Facultative symbiont virulence determines horizontal transmission
rate without host specificity in Dictyostelium discoideum social amoebas. Evol. Lett. 8, 437–875
447. https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae001.
92. Scott, T.J., Larsen, T.J., Brock, D.A., Uhm, S.Y .S., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E.
(2023). Symbiotic bacteria, immune-like sentinel cells, and the response to pathogens in a
social amoeba. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230727.
93. Zorz, J.K., Sharp, C., Kleiner, M., Gordon, P .M.K., Pon, R.T., Dong, X., and Strous, M. 880
(2019). A shared core microbiome in soda lakes separated by large distances. Nat.
Commun. 10, 4230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12195-5.
94. Poppert, S., Essig, A., Marre, R., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2002). Detection and
differentiation of chlamydiae by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68, 4081–4089. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.4081-4089.2002. 885
95. Amann, R.I., Binder, B.J., Olson, R.J., Chisholm, S.W., Devereux, R., and Stahl, D.A.
(1990). Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for
analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1919 LP – 1925.
96. Haider, S., Collingro, A., Walochnik, J., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2008). Chlamydia-like
bacteria in respiratory samples of community-acquired pneumonia patients: Chlamydia-like 890
bacteria in CAP patients. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 281, 198–202.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01099.x.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
27
97. Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing
reads. EMBnetjournal Vol 17 No 1 Gener. Seq. Data Anal. - 1014806ej171200.
98. Wick, R.R., Judd, L.M., Gorrie, C.L., and Holt, K.E. (2017). Completing bacterial genome 895
assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb. Genomics 3.
https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000132.
99. Wick, R.R., Judd, L.M., Gorrie, C.L., and Holt, K.E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial
genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput. Biol. 13,
e1005595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. 900
100. Dong, M.-J., Luo, H., and Gao, F. (2022). Ori-Finder 2022: A comprehensive web server for
prediction and analysis of bacterial replication origins. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics
20, 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.10.002.
101. Worning, P ., Jensen, L.J., Hallin, P.F., Stærfeldt, H., and Ussery, D.W. (2006). Origin of
replication in circular prokaryotic chromosomes. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 353–361. 905
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00917.x.
102. Schwengers, O., Jelonek, L., Dieckmann, M.A., Beyvers, S., Blom, J., and Goesmann, A.
(2021). Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free
sequence identification: Find out more about Bakta, the motivation, challenges and
applications, here. Microb. Genomics 7. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000685. 910
103. Jones, P ., Binns, D., Chang, H.-Y., Fraser, M., Li, W., McAnulla, C., McWilliam, H., Maslen,
J., Mitchell, A., Nuka, G., et al. (2014). InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function
classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031.
104. De Lima Morais, D.A., Fang, H., Rackham, O.J.L., Wilson, D., Pethica, R., Chothia, C., and
Gough, J. (2011). SUPERFAMILY 1.75 including a domain-centric gene ontology method. 915
Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D427–D434. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1130.
105. Eichinger, V., Nussbaumer, T., Platzer, A., Jehl, M.-A., Arnold, R., and Rattei, T. (2016).
EffectiveDB—updates and novel features for a better annotation of bacterial secreted
proteins and Type III, IV, VI secretion systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D669–D674.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1269. 920
106. Rodriguez-R, L.M., and Konstantinidis, K.T. (2016). The enveomics collection: a toolbox for
specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 4, e1900v1.
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1.
107. Emms, D.M., and Kelly, S. (2019). OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for
comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y. 925
108. Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S.J.,
and Marra, M.A. (2009). Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics.
Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109.
109. Parks, D.H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C.T., Hugenholtz, P ., and Tyson, G.W. (2015).
CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, 930
and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint
28
110. Minh, B.Q., Schmidt, H.A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M.D., Von Haeseler,
A., and Lanfear, R. (2020). IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic
inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015. 935
111. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K.F., Von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L.S. (2017).
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14,
587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285.
112. Hoang, D.T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B.Q., and Vinh, L.S. (2018). UFBoot2:
Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522. 940
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281.
113. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O. (2010).
New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the
performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010.
114. Posit team (2024). RStudio: integrated development environment for R (Posit Software, 945
PBC).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint