The adaptation of chlamydiae to facultative host multicellularity

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The study isolates and characterizes a Dictyostelium giganteum strain naturally infected with a chlamydial symbiont, identifying it as a novel species, Reclusachlamydia socialis. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, quantitative PCR, and transmission electron microscopy, the authors show the symbiont is retained at low copy numbers across the host’s entire social life cycle and lacks an extracellular form, with transmission entirely dependent on host cell-to-cell contact during aggregation. The paper concludes that the symbiont’s genome reflects this adaptation through loss of genes needed for the canonical chlamydial biphasic developmental cycle and extracellular survival, while explicitly noting this represents an unprecedented variation of a highly conserved developmental feature. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis, but it is included in the endometriosis/adenomyosis corpus via an upstream keyword match related to host-associated intracellular biology and persistent infections.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Summary The phylum Chlamydiota consists of obligate intracellular bacteria comprising the human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis and a large variety of species infecting animals and protists. Despite their enormous diversity, a feature shared by all known chlamydiae is their biphasic developmental cycle, consisting of intra- and extracellular stages with substantial differences in morphology and physiology. A similarly remarkable shift occurs in the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum and related dictyostelids in their so-called social life cycle, leading to the formation of spores through aggregation of vegetative trophozoites and the development of multicellular fruiting bodies. Although dictyostelids undergo symbioses with various bacteria, chlamydiae have only recently been found to be associated with this host. Here we report the isolation of a Dictyostelium giganteum strain naturally infected with a chlamydial symbiont, identified as a novel species, Reclusachlamydia socialis . The symbiont is retained in all stages of the host’s social life cycle and notably lacks an extracellular form. Combining fluorescence microscopy and quantitative PCR we showed that transmission is entirely dependent on cell-to-cell contact during the host aggregation stage. The absence of an extracellular stage is further supported by transmission electron microscopy and the lack of genes essential for chlamydial developmental cycle regulation and extracellular survival. This unprecedented variation of a highly conserved developmental feature that evolved more than a billion years ago illustrates the remarkable adaptability of chlamydiae. This study adds to our understanding of endosymbiosis in the face of facultative multicellularity.
Full text 89,211 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 7 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Dictyostelium giganteum, dictyostelids, social amoeba, social life cycle, cell-to-cell transmission, endosymbiont, Chlamydia, Rhabdochlamydia, developmental cycle, eukaryotic-like proteins 40

Introduction

The phylum Chlamydiota is a group of obligate intracellular bacteria best known for major animal and human pathogens such as Chlamydia trachomatis. This species causes the ocular disease trachoma affecting 1.5 million humans globally 1 and infects the human genital tract at an 45 estimated worldwide prevalence of 3% 2. The last three decades have expanded our kno wledge of the Chlamydiota beyond those pathogens to the so-called environmental chlamydiae. These chlamydiae are found in diverse eukaryotic hosts and environments, natural and engineered, with molecular data suggesting the existence of hundreds of chlamydial families 3. The most characteristic feature of known chlamydiae is their biphasic developmental cycle. This lifestyle is 50 best described for C. trachomatis and other members of the family Chlamydiaceae, and highly conserved among environmental chlamydiae 4–6. Briefly, an extracellular stage, the elementary body (EB), enters a host cell. Within a host-derived vacuole, termed inclusion, the EB radically changes its morphology and metabolism, and transforms into a reticulate body (RB). After multiple rounds of replication as RBs, the chlamydial progeny differentiates back to EBs and exits the host 55 cell, via lysis or extrusion, to infect new hosts and start a new developmental cycle. Due to the challenging extracellular environment EBs possess a more rigid cell envelope and densely packed chromatin compared to their RB counterpart s 7–9. The progression through this developmental .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 3 program is well-orchestrated by a set of conserved chlamydiae-specific transcription factors 10–12 and metabolic pathways to meet the phase -specific needs of energy parasitism and energy 60 conservation, respectively 6,13. Reconstruction of the genomic repertoire of the last common ancestor of the chlamydiae revealed that already 1-2 billion years ago, these bacteria were obligate endosymbionts equipped with the hallmark genes of an intracellular lifestyle and the chlamydial bi-phasic developmental cycle 14. The strictly host -associated lifestyle has been hampering the isolation of environmental 65 chlamydiae, and we thus lack isolates for the vast majority of chlamydial lineages 3,15,16. Yet, a source of chlamydial isolates in the past was the paraphyletic group of the free-living amoebae. These unicellular eukaryotes move via pseudopods and are ubiquitous in the environment 17. One of the most intensely studied free -living amoebae is the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum, affiliated to the clade Dictyostelia, i.e., dictyostelids, rooted within the Amoebozoa 70 18,19. Undoubtedly, the characteristic drawing the most attention to this microorganism is its social life cycle first described in the original report about D. discoideum 20 and known to occur in different variations in all dictyostelids studied so far 18. Briefly, the social life cycle involves the aggregation of tens of thousands of amoeba cells (trophozoites) upon nutrient deprivation to form a multicellular structure, the pseudoplasmodium, resembling a slug. This slug migrates towards light 75 sources and other environmental cues and subsequently transforms into a mulitcellular fruiting body visible with the naked eye. The fruiting body is made up by a stalk lifting up spores ready to be dispersed in the environment and to found a new population 21. Despite its complexity, similar forms of facultative multicellularity have evolved at least seven times independently in amoeba 22. D. discoideum shows complex interaction patterns with facultative bacterial symbionts to ensure 80 nutrient availability 23 and serves as a model to study host-microbe interaction with several human pathogens 24,25. Yet, the first molecular evidence of chlamydiae naturally infecting D. discoideum and other dictyostelids was only reported recently 26. Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of Dictyostelium giganteum PALH, a close relative of D. discoideum, harboring a chlamydial symbiont remarkably well-adapted to the social 85 life cycle of its amoeba host. The symbiont remains within the host cell throughout the entire dictyostelid social life cycle and depends on the host’s aggregation stage for the infection of naïve amoeba. This adaptation is also reflected in the symbiont genome by the loss of highly conserved genes involved in the canonical bi-phasic developmental cycle of chlamydiae. 90

Results

and Discussion A chlamydial symbiont stably infecting Dictyostelium giganteum In an effort to isolate novel environmental chlamydiae, the amoeba isolate D. giganteum PALH was recovered from forest soil ( Figure 1A) and identified based on its partial 18S rRNA gene sequence. Either on plates or in liquid cultures D. giganteum PALH entered the social life cycle. 95 However, fruiting bodies and spores only formed on agar plates (Figure 1CD). By performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chlamydiae -specific probes, the presence of chlamydial symbionts in D. giganteum PALH trophozoites and spores was readily visible (Figure 1BE). Despite a chlamydial prevalence of 100% in D. giganteum PALH, the number of chlamydial cells counted per trophozoite and spore hardly exceeded 10 and 5, respectively ( Figure 1BE). 100 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 4 This stands in stark contrast to most other chlamydial species like Parachlamydia acanthamoebae 27, Simkania negevensis 28, Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis 29 or C. trachomatis 13, which are found in large inclusions harboring dozens of bacterial cells. The stable but low level of infection indicates that the chlamydial symbiont is highly infectious, and that its proliferation is tightly controlled either by the symbiont or the host. 105 D. discoideum interact with food bacteria and symbionts in manifold ways throughout their entire life cycle 30. In the vegetative trophozoite stage the amoeba exploit distinct pathways to discriminate between different types of food bacteria 31 and are able to induce endosymbiosis with food bacteria by the secretion of lectins 32. During multicellular stages, specialized sentinel cells are responsible for clearing pathogens via phagocytosis or extracellular traps 33,34. In addition, D. 110 discoideum may show a farming phenotype, in which food and non-food bacteria are maintained throughout the social life cycle 23. This behavior is controlled by facultative intracellular Burkholderia spp. symbionts, which can be present in high numbers in both trophozoites and spores 35–37. Further, obligate intracellular Amoebophilus and Procabacter species have been detected as natural symbionts inside D. discoideum spores with no described fitness costs for the 115 host 38. In contrast, when D. discoideum was artificially infected with environmental chlamydiae in the past, they either prevented spore formation or were lost during spore development (Horn et al., 2000; Michel et al., 2004). The natural chlamydial symbiont of D. giganteum identified here and its retention throughout the social life cycle thus point to a well-established symbiosis and a high degree of reciprocal adaptation of both partners. 120 Figure 1: D. giganteum PALH naturally containing chlamydial symbionts. Light microscopy images and fluorescence in situ hybridization images of trophozoites (A, B) and spores (D, E); nuclei are shown in cyan, amoebae in magenta , and chlamydiae in yellow. Bars, 10 µm. A scheme illustrating the presence of the symbiont during the social life cycle stages of its dictyostelid host is depicted in (C); infected amoeba 125 trophozoites and spores are shown in magenta, chlamydial symbionts in yellow. Electron microscopy reveals peculiar symbiont morphology To elucidate the morphological features of the symbiont and its location within the amoeba host cells, we cryofixed D. giganteum PALH trophozoites and spores and analyzed them at the 130 transmission electron microscope . Bacterial symbionts could be readily identified in both trophozoites and spores based on their size between 300 and 800 nm, a Gram-negative type cell wall, and the ribosomes visible in the cytoplasm (Figure 2). Unlike most chlamydiae, the symbionts were located directly in the host cytosol and not surrounded by an inclusion membrane. In other .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 5 chlamydiae, this host-derived membrane is formed after host cell entry and serves to protect the 135 bacteria from the host immune response and phagocytosis 13. Although wide-spread among the Chlamydiota, inclusions are not seen for all environmental chlamydiae or host cells 3,39,40. The chlamydial symbionts in D. giganteum show a peculiar, strongly wrinkled, almost flower- or clover-like shape, in many cases containing a nucleoid -like structure of varying electron density (Figure 2 ). Prominent, electron -dense n ucleoid-like structures are a characteristic feature of 140 chlamydial EBs 9,40–42. In C. trachomatis, chromatin condensation is mediated by at least two histone-like proteins, Hct1 and Hct2, and is involved in the regulation of replication and transcription 43–45. However, in contrast to classical chlamydial EBs with their rigid and thickened cell envelope, the D. giganteum symbionts are of irregular shape, even more pronounced than observed for RBs of some environmental chlamydiae 9. This polymorphic cell shape suggests a 145 high degree of cell envelope flexibility and a lack of rigid , stabilizing structures. The symbiont morphology is also different from described aberrant bodies, a persisten t cell form induced by tryptophan depletion or peptidoglycan-targeting antibiotics in Chlamydia species 46. To our knowledge, the only chlamydial species with a comparable cell morphology was described for a chlamydial symbiont of D. discoideum, visualized in spores after chemical fixation 38. 150 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 6 Symbiont genome features and phylogenetic relationship To investigate if the observed phenotypic traits are reflected in the symbiont’s genome, we combined long and short read sequencing and obtained a closed circular genome of 1.74 Mbp 155 with an average G+C content of 38.4%. This is well within the expected range for environmental Figure 2: The chlamydial symbiont Reclusachlamydia socialis in D. giganteum PALH. Transmission electron microscopy images of cryofixed and freeze -substituted amoeba trophozoites and spores are shown. Overview s of a single amoebae trophozoite (A) and spore (C) harboring chlamydia l symbionts (arrowheads). Rectangles indicate the area shown in detail in (B) and (D). The chlamydial symbionts show amorphous cell shapes, contain ribosomes, a Gram-negative type cell envelope. Within the bacterial cells, nucleoid-like structures of varying electron density can be seen . Note that different staining methods were used for trophozoite and spore samples, respectively. Bars, 500 nm; n, amoeba nucleus; m, mitochondria. Note the different staining protocols used. Note .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 7 chlamydiae 14,16,47. No plasmid was recovered. The genome contains one ribosomal RNA operon, 36 tRNAs and 1236 coding sequences, the latter with an average length of 1251 bp (Table S1). We next constructed a phylogenetic tree using conserved marker proteins and a data set of high- quality Chlamydiota genomes. The maximum likelihood tree placed the chlamydial symbiont in 160 the family Rhabdochlamydiaceae, proposed previously to represent the most species-rich family within the Chlamydiota (Figure 3A , Figure S1)48. Members of this family were detected in arthropods such as ticks 49, spiders 50,51, and terrestrial isopods 29, all affiliated to the genus Rhabdochlamydia. Additionally, the genera Sacchlamyda and Renichlamydia’ were proposed based on molecular data associated with brown algae and fish, respectively 52,53. Average amino 165 acid identity (AAI) values of less than 60% with other members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae support the classification of the symbiont as a new genus within this family (Figure S1)54,55. We thus propose the novel name Reclusachlamydia socialis for the chlamydial symbiont of D. giganteum PALH (see Text S1 for a formal species description ). In our phylogenomic analysis, members of the genus Rhabdochlamydia are the closest described and cultured relatives of R. 170 socialis. The symbiont forms a monophyletic clade with a metagenome assembled genome (MAG) originating from wastewater, which is however only moderately related (60% AAI, Figure 3A). Large eukaryote-like proteins of Reclusachlamydia socialis Upon initial inspection of the R. socialis genome, we noticed that 102 of the total 1236 genes 175 (8.3%) encode unusually large proteins (> 1000 amino acids), which is unusual for small genomes and more than three times the amount reported for other members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae (Figure 3 BC). Of these, 91 were annotated as hypothetical proteins but we identified tetratricopeptide repeats, ankyrin repeats and L domain-like stretches in 4 8%, 14% and 11% of the proteins, respectively. These domains are often part of so-called eukaryote-like proteins, which 180 are found primarily encoded in the genomes of eukaryotes and host-associated bacteria but rarely in free-living microbes. They are assumed to be secreted to the host cytosol and may interfere with host cellular processes such as cell cycle control, ubiquitination and phagocytosis 56–58. The importance of eukaryote-like proteins for bacteria replicating in amoebae is underlined by their high prevalence across several bacterial phyla 57,59. 185 Additionally, we identified protein prenyl transferase domains in 8 of the 102 large proteins and 15 in total . Prenyl transferases are involved in the post translational modification of proteins in eukaryotes, by specifically binding to CAAX motifs at the N-terminal end of proteins and attaching isoprenoids to the cysteine residue, which leads to the localization of the modified proteins to lipids and membranes 60. This CAAX motif is often found in members of the Ras superfamily of small 190 GTPases. Small host GTPases are recruited and used for manipulation of cellular pathways by chlamydial pathogens (reviewed in 61). In D. discoideum this superfamily includes Rac proteins, such as RacG, RacJ, and RacH 62. RacH has been shown to influence bacterial infections in D. discoideum in at least two, contradicting ways. Firstly, it is a driver of the acidification of phagosomes, thus deletion of racH enhances intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila and 195 Mycobacterium marinum in D. discoideum 63,64. Conversely , RacH mediates the non -lytic transmission of M. marinum via ejectosomes during cell-to-cell contact 65,66. Eight out of the 15 putative prenyl transferases encoded in the R. socialis genome are predicted to be secreted by the type III secretion system (T3SS) and therefore likely function within the amoeba host cell. The .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 8 manipulation of host Ras GTPases by symbiont-encoded prenyl transferases could be an efficient 200 way of host-symbiont interaction. Figure 3: Genome features of the D. giganteum symbiont R. socialis. (A) Phylogenetic relationship of 205 R. socialis with other members of the family Rhabdochlamydiaceae based on maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of 43 conserved marker genes. R. socialis is the first member of the novel genus Reclusachlamydia and represents a sister branch of a metagenome assembled genome (MAG) from a wastewater sample. M embers of the genus Rhabdochlamydia are the closest described and cultured relatives of R. socialis. The full tree is available as Data S1. (B) Genomic map of R. socialis. Coordinates in 210 black, GC skew in green and blue ; the orange bars denote the position of genes encoding large proteins (>1000 aa). (C) Length distribution of proteins longer than 1000 aa encoded in the genome s of selected members of the Rhabdochlamydiaceae. (D) Presence or absence of hallmark chlamydial genes in R. socialis and representative Chlamydiota species. Presence and the number of orthologs is indicated by a tile and the depicted number, respectively. 215 R. socialis lacks vital genes for extracellular survival Similar to other obligate endosymbionts, chlamydiae experienced substantial gene loss during the millions of years of evolution as strictly host -associated bacteria. Yet, their core genome is remarkably conserved 14,16. Many of th e core genes reflect the obligate intracellular lifestyle and 220 are involved in the interaction with the eukaryotic host cell . The most prominent feature is the .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 9 chlamydial T3SS and its affiliated effectors 67. The presence of all relevant structural genes and additional effectors, such as the serine/threonine protein kinase CopN and the pseudokinase Pkn5 in the genome of R. socialis suggest a functional type III secretion system . Similarly, the two nucleotide transporters NTT1 and NTT2, as well as the glucose -6-phosphate transporter UhpC, 225 involved in energy parasitism, nucleotide, and glucose acquisition from the host cell 6,13,68 are encoded in the genome of R. socialis (Figure 3D, Table S1). Of note, R. socialis lacks all of the known pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. The deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate (DXP) pathway is virtually absent although it is well conserved across the domain Bacteria including the Chlamydiota (Figure 3D). Additionally, none of the genes of the alternative 230 mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway used by the chlamydia l species Waddlia chondrophila and generally found in mammals and yeast 69,70 could be detected in R. socialis. Isoprenoids are essential cellular components involved in critical functions such as electron transport and peptidoglycan synthesis 71. A dependency o n host-derived isoprenoid precursors has been reported for the obligate intracellular pathogen Rickettisa parkerii 72 but represents a novel type of 235 parasitism among chlamydiae. Progression through the bi-phasic developmental cycle is a tightly regulated process in all known members of the Chlamydiota. The best-known major regulator, early upstream ORF (EUO), is expressed during the initial infection stage, and its downregulation coincides with transformation to EBs 73. This process further relies on the cell cycle regulators GrgA and HrcA 74, all of which are 240 encoded in the genome of R. socialis (Figure 3D, Table S1). Conversely, the genome of R. socialis lacks the genes for AtoC/AtoS, which form a two-component signal transduction system activating the σ54 transcription factor that regulates genes involved in the RB -to-EB transition 75,76. This coincides with the loss of ChxR, a transcriptional regulator of mid- and late cycle genes functioning in e.g., glycogen and nucleotide metabolism, modification of the inclusion membrane, and the 245 T3SS 10,77. The extracellular EB stage of chlamydiae demands protection and condensation of the DNA, which is facilitated by two histone-like proteins HctA and HctB in C. trachomatis 43–45. In contrast to hctB, hctA is conserved across most environmental chlamydiae 16. Yet, the genome of R. socialis lacks both genes (Figure 3D, Table S1). It is thus either unable to pack its chromatin or 250 employs a yet undescribed mechanism, as suggested by transmission electron microscopy (Figure 2 ). To release chromatin from both HctA and HctB, C. trachomatis depends on the expression of IspE, a central enzyme of the DXP pathway missing in the R. socialis genome 45,78. The extracellular chlamydial EB stage relies on efficient energy storage mediated by glycogen . Glycogen synthesis is thus considered a hallmark of chlamydiae, and al l known chlamydiae 255 encode one of two glycogen synthesis pathways 79,80. Yet, none of the enzymes of these pathways is encoded in the R. socialis genome (Figure 3D). This suggests the lack of the capability to produce and utilize this storage compound, which should severely impact the symbiont’s ability to survive outside the host cell. We noted that the MAG Bodden seems to exhibit a very similar pattern of gene loss, suggesting 260 that this is a common feature of th is clade. Genome reduction is a process common in endosymbiosis, however, the genes lost in R. socialis compared to other chlamydiae indicate a .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 10 reduced role or complete loss of the extracellular phase of the canonical chlamydial developmental cycle. 265 Transmission of R. socialis is independent of extracellular chlamydiae The absence of several hallmark genes involved in the biphasic chlamydial developmental cycle, particularly in the formation of the extracellular EB stage , led us to investigate how R. socialis spreads and establishes new infections . To this end , we used rifampicin to generate an aposymbiotic D. giganteum host culture. We subsequently tested whether it was possible to 270 reinfect symbiont-free amoeba using supernatant from infected amoeba cultures or lysed symbiont-containing amoeba cells. Despite following well-established protocols, reinfection of aposymbiotic amoeba failed repeatedly (data not shown) . We thus resorted to survey and compare infection dynamics of R. socialis in aposymbiotic, symbiotic, and mixed (1:5; symbiotic:aposymbiotic) D. giganteum populations. We monitored amoeba and symbiont total 275 abundance in both culture supernatant and cellular fraction, as well as R. socialis prevalence. D. giganteum cell numbers increased by a factor of ~230 in all populations during the course of the experiment and were not significantly different between aposymbiotic, symbiotic, and mixed populations at any of the time points analysed ( Figure 4A, Table S2). Nearly identical growth in the presence and absence of R. socialis indicate that the symbiont does not impose considerable 280 fitness costs on its amoeba host under the monoxenic culture conditions used . This was also reflected in the maximum growth rate of all populations, which was not significantly affected by the presence of the symbiont ( Figure S2). Consistent with host cell growth, the number of chlamydial genome copies measured by digital PCR increased continuously in the cellular fraction of symbiotic and mixed populations over the course of the experiment and reached similar levels 285 in both after 72 h incubation (Figure 4B). Of note , the number of chlamydial genome copies detected at this time point in the supernatant of symbiotic and mixed populations did not differ from the aposymbiotic population (non-parametric ANOVA, p= 0.871; Figure 4B). This indicates the absence of extracellular chlamydiae in the culture medium. In parallel, we used FISH to monitor the prevalence of chlamydiae in the mixed amoeba populations. We observed a significant 290 increase from 29.9% (SD=4.8%) infected amoeba cells at 48 h to 39.5% (SD=4.5%) at 72 h (t- test; t(15.9)=-4.35, p = 0.000498; Figure 4CD). Taken together, the increase of R. socialis cell numbers and prevalence in the mixed populations in the absence of detectable extracellular chlamydiae suggests that the infection of new host cells is independent of an extracellular stage of R. socialis. This would leave c ell-to-cell transmission 295 as the only option for R. socialis to infect naive amoeba host cells. This infection route would demand intimate contact of individual amoeba cells, a behavior frequently observed in dictyostelids, especially during the initiation of the multicellular stages 18. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 11 Figure 4: Transmission of R. socialis is independent o f extracellular chlamydiae. Symbiotic (red), 300 aposymbiotic (blue) or mixed (yellow ; 1:5, symbiotic:aposymbiotic) D. giganteum PALH populations were allowed to grow in the presence of an excess of K. aerogenes as a food source for 72 hours. Amoeba cell numbers were monitored using a cell counter (A). Chlamydial genome copy numbers were determined by dPCR in cellular fractions (circles) and supernatant (triangles) , respectively (B). Mean values or replicates are shown in black or color, respectively. Amoeba growth rate was not significantly affected by the presence 305 of R. socialis (P > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test; Figure S2). Chlamydial prevalence in mixed populations was quantified 48 and 72 hours after inoculation by FISH (C) and increased significantly during this period (***, P < 0.001, t-test) (D). Each dot represents a replicate. Boxes and error bars depict the interquartile range and the 95% confidence interval , respectively. In the fluorescence images, amoebae are depicted in magenta, chlamydiae in yellow , nuclei and food bacteria K. aerogenes in cyan. I nfected a moebae are 310 marked with white arrowheads. Bar, 10 µm. Infection depends on cell-to-cell contact between host cells Exploiting the direct contact between host cells for transmission is a behavior known from human 315 and amoeba pathogens , such as Listeria and Mycobacteria species 66,81. To investigate the importance of cell-to-cell contact for the transmission of R. socialis we co-incubated symbiotic and aposymbiotic D. giganteum populations under conditions leading to rapid amoeba aggregation and determined chlamydial prevalence after a short incubation period (Figure 5AC). To distinguish between originally symbiotic and aposymbiotic populations, amoeba were stained differentially 320 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 12 using fluorescent live stains prior to co-incubation. A second set of cultures was set up identically, except that the populations were separated by a cell culture insert including a filter membrane. This filter is permeable for chlamydia e but efficiently inhibits migration of amoebae and thus hampers cell-to-cell contact between symbiotic and aposymbiotic amoeba (Figure 5BD). The size- selective retention of amoeba by cell culture inserts has been used for the isolation of chlamydiae 325 in the past 27. Hence, the cell culture inserts were no barrier for EBs of the chlamydial symbiont P . acanthamoebae infecting Acanthamoeba terricola (formerly A. castellanii Neff) used as positive control for the extracellular transmission route in our experiment (Figure S3). At the end of the incubation period, we removed the cell culture insert containing the symbiotic amoeba. We then sampled the originally aposymbiotic population and examined the prevalence of R. socialis using 330 FISH (Figure 5CD). Originally aposymbiotic D. giganteum cells that were allowed to freely interact with their symbiotic counterparts showed a chlamydial prevalence of 35.4% (SD=5.6%), which can be explained by the transmission of R. socialis between th ese populations. Conversely, chlamydial prevalence in originally aposymbiotic amoeba physically separated from the symbiotic population was with 3.5% extremely low (SD=1.8%; t-test; t(9.7)= 16.2, p < 0.0000001; Figure 335 5E). In the absence of detectable extracellular EBs, this low percentage of newly infected amoeba most likely resulted from direct interactions with the low number of symbiotic amoeba, which still passed the filter (1.7% of all cells). We thus concluded that transmission of R. socialis is dependent on physical contact between its host cells. For k nown chlamydiae , the infection of new host cells primarily depends on the uptake of 340 extracellular EBs. Yet, if uptake is blocked experimentally, direct cell-to-cell transmission has been reported for C. trachomatis through tunneling nanotubes in human cell lines 82. Similar to tunneling nanotubes, D. discoideum exhibits temporary cell fusion, particularly during aggregation, called anastomosis 83. These structures facilitate the exchange of cytoplasm and even mitochondria between neighboring cells, albeit at a low rate (Bloomfield et al., 2019). R. socialis hijacking 345 Dictyostelium anastomosis during the social life cycle could thus represent a route for cell-to-cell transmission. However, the mechanism behind this process remains to be elucidated. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 13 350 Figure 5: Transmission of R. socialis requires cell-to-cell contact between amoeba host cells : D. giganteum PALH populations were differentially stained with CellTracker dyes and incubated for 48h , followed by FISH to visualize R. socialis. Originally aposymbiotic amoeba (green) and symbiotic amoeba (magenta, chlamydiae in yellow) could either interact freely (A, C) or were separated physically by a filter membrane permeable for bacteria (B, D). At the end of the incubation period, the number of amoeba newly 355 infected with R. socialis was determined by fluorescence microscopy (C, D). Non-separated populations of D. giganteum showed a significantly higher prevalence of chlamydiae in originally aposymbiotic cells than the physically separated populations (E) (****, P < 0.001, t-test). Each dot represents a replicate. Boxes and error bars depict the interquartile range and the 95% confidence interval, respectively. In the fluorescence images, newly infected amoeba are marked with white arrowheads. Bars, 10 µm. 360

Conclusion

The chlamydiae re present one of the evolutionary oldest groups of strictly host -associated bacteria. Their ability to infect eukaryotic cells and their intracellular lifestyle can be traced back to a last common ancestor that lived around 1 billion years ago (Dharamshi et al., 2023). Here we 365 show that one of the most conserved features of all known chlamydiae, t heir biphasic developmental cycle including an infective extracellular stage , shows remarkable variations in a novel chlamydial species, R. socialis, that infects the social amoeba D. giganteum. We present evidence that the chlamydial symbiont R. socialis does not have an extracellular EB stage: The symbiont lacks (i) morphologically clearly distinct developmental forms, (ii) genes for 370 extracellular survival and developmental cycle regulation, and (iii) detectable extracellular cells. The symbiont is retained through the dictyostelid social life cycle in an infected amoeba population and is dependent on cell-to-cell contact between host cells for the infection of naïve amoeba. This represents a remarkable adaptation of a chlamydial symbiont to its host and ra ises the question of evolutionary causes and consequences. It is tempting to speculate that the long-term 375 co-existence of R. socialis with a unicellular host frequently undergoing multicellular stages might have relaxed the dependency on an extracellular chlamydial form. This would in turn have favored .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 14 an alternative transmission route in which the symbionts eventually rely on aggregation of their host cell s. While the mechanism facilitating direct cell -to-cell transmission is still unclear , R. socialis notably encodes putative effector proteins with the potential to manipulate host cellular 380 processes involved in the cell-to-cell transmission of M. marinum in D. discoideum (Gerstenmaier et al., 2015; Hagedorn et al., 2009). The social life cycle of dictyostelids poses a barrier for maladapted intracellular bacteria 33,34,84. R. socialis, however, is well able to persist during the social life cycle and the spore stage. This type of vertical transmission over extended evolutionary time periods is known to lead to reduced 385 virulence of chlamydiae (Herrera et al., 20 20). More generally, vertical transmission increases cooperation between symbiotic partners (Bull et al., 1991), often resulting in obligate symbioses in which one or both partners strongly depend on the other (Husnik & Keeling, 2019). Here, we did not observe an effect of R. socialis on amoeba fitness with respect to host growth rate, yet host fitness is strongly context dependent (Noh et al., 2018). Bacterial symbionts of microbial 390 eukaryotes can function in nutritional or protective symbiosis 85–88. In dictyo stelids, this is exemplified by the s ymbioses between D. discoideum and Paraburkholderia species, which decrease host growth in vegetative cells but increase the probability of spore survival after germination 23,89–92. The micobiome of dictyostelids in the wild is diverse and includes among other bacteria various 395 chlamydial lineages 26,38. Studying these symbionts will help to further understand microbe-host interactions during and evolutionary consequences of facultative host multicellularity.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jeffrey Blanchard for providing the soil sample for amoeba isolation, Siegfried Reipert 400 for assistance with electron microscopy, Lisa Dobinger for help with the preparation of samples for fluorescence microscopy, Alejandro Manzano -Marin for help with genome assembly, Flo Panhölzl for help with R, and Tamara Haselkorn, Susanne DiSalvo, and Thierry Soldati for their helpful advice. Genome sequencing was performed at t he Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities and the Joint Microbiome Facility of the University of Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna. The 405 Life Science Compute Cluster LiSC at the University of Vienna provided the high-performance computing infrastructure for this study . M.H. acknowledges support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [DOI 10.55776/DOC69] and the FWF Cluster of Excellence COE7 [DOI 10.55776/COE7]. A.C. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF (DOI 10.55776/P32112). 410 Author contributions Conceptualization, Methodology: L.H., P.A., M.H.; Investigation, L.H., P.A., N.C.; Resources, Data Curation, A.C.; Writing – Original Draft, L.H.; Writing – Review & Editing, all authors. Funding Acquisition, M.H., A.C. 415 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 15 Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests. Supplemental information 420 Document S1. Text S1, Figures S1–S3, Table S2 Data S1. Phylogenetic tree in Newick tree format calculated with genomes listed in Table S3. Table S1. Excel file containing comprehensive information on the annotation of R. socialis. Table S3. Excel file containing information on the genomes used for calculating the phylogenetic tree. 425 Table S4. Excel file containing information on the genomes used for calculating orthogroups.

Material

& Methods Isolation and maintenance of amoeba and bacteria D. giganteum PALH was isolated from soil samples from Harvard Forest, Massachusetts, USA. 430 An aliquot was placed on non-nutrient agar (NNA) plates (1 g/L sodium citrate, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 4 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM KH 2PO4, 15 g/L agar) and overlayed with a suspension of live E. coli. After incubation at 20°C and the onset of amoeba e growth, trophozoites were picked from the NNA plate and transferred to a fresh E. coli-covered NNA plate. Eukaryotic primers TAReuk454FWD (5′-CCAGCASCYGCGGTAATTCC-3′) and TAReukREV3 (5′-ACTTTCGTTCTTGATYRA-3′) were 435 used to amplify and sequence an approximately 520 bp region of the eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene 93. D. giganteum PALH was kept in monoxenic liquid cultures in Page’s amoeba saline buffer (PAS; 1 g/L sodium citrate, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 4 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM KH2PO4, in MiliQ water), supplemented with E. coli or K. aerogenes as food bacteria in 25 cm² cell culture flasks at 22°C. Bacteria were 440 inoculated in 100 mL LB-Medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast-extract, 10 g/L NaCl) and incubated overnight at 37°C and 180 rpm. Subsequently, the bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 5 min, resuspended in PAS buffer to a final concentration of 2.5x1010 cells per mL and stored at 4°C. Generation of aposymbiotic amoeba 445 NNA plates were overlayed with 200 µL rifampicin (c=2.5 mg/mL) and 200 µL E. coli (2.5x1010 cells/mL). A single D. giganteum PALH fruiting body was picked with a sterile pipette tip and placed in the middle of a freshly prepared plate, which was allowed to dry and then incubated at 20°C until new fruiting bodies were formed. Fruiting bodies picked from this plate were used to repeat the procedure twice. The loss of the symbiont was confirmed by chlamydiae-specific FISH and 450 PCR. Aposymbiotic D. giganteum PALH were subsequently propagated using the conditions described above. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 16 Transmission electron microscopy D. giganteum PALH trophozoites infected with R. socialis were grown in 25 cm² flasks in PAS buffer supplemented with E. coli. At the phase of nascent aggregation, the trophozoites were 455 harvested by centrifugation at 1500 x g for 3 min. Spores infected with R. socialis were grown on SM/5 plates, collected with PAS buffer in the plate lids and centrifuged at 1500 x g for 3 min. Trophozoite and spore pellets were transferred into high-pressure freezing type A carriers (3 mm in diameter, 200 μm in depth) and covered with 20% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and type B carriers (Leica Microsystems, Austria). Before use, the inner surfaces of the carriers were coated 460 with 1-hexadecene. The mounted sample carrier sandwiches were then frozen at approximately 2000 bar using the HPM100 high -pressure freezer (Leica Microsystems, Austria). Freeze substitution was performed in an automated freeze substitution system AFS2 (Leica Microsystems, Austria). Carriers containing high-pressure frozen samples were placed on 1 m L liquid nitrogen frozen 1% OsO4 in acetone in 2 mL cryotubes. The following temperature program 465 was used for freeze substitution under agitation: 2 h from -105 to -95 °C, 40 h at -95°C, 2 h from -95 °C to -90 °C, 5 h at -90 °C, 2 h from -90 °C to -60 °C, 2 h at -60 °C, 4 h from -60 °C to 20 °C. Samples were infiltrated with mixtures of 100% acetone and epoxy resin Agar 100 (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted, UK) according to the following schedule: 3:1 for 1 h, 1:1 for 1.5 h, 1:3 overnight. The samples were then transferred into silicon embedding molds and infiltrated with low-viscosity 470 resin for 4 h. The resin was polymerized in an oven at 63 °C for 28 h. Ultrathin sections of 70−90 nm thickness were prepared with a Leica ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica Microsystems, Austria) using a diamond knife (Diatome, Nidau, Switzerland) and mounted on 200 mesh copper grids. The grids holding the ultrathin sections of trophozoite or spore pellets were mounted on a grid holder and single drop stained with gadolinium (III) acetate for 25 min (trophozoites) or 4% 475 neodymium (III) acetate hydrate for 50 min (spores). Subsequently, the samples were rinsed and immersed in water, single drop post-stained with 3% lead citrate for 8 min (in a covered petri dish with NAOH pellets to scavenge lead carbonate) and then washed again with water. The stained ultrathin sections were examined with a Zeiss Libra 120 transmission electron microscope. Fluorescence in situ hybridization 480 Aliquots of D. giganteum cell suspensions were placed on teflon-coated microscope slides and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature to allow attachment of the trophozoites. The PAS buffer droplet was then replaced with 20 µL of 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PAS buffer and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Fixation was terminated by removing PFA/PAS and briefly washing each well with 50 µL water. The fixed cells were covered with 10 µL of 485 hybridization buffer (900 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% SDS, 25 % formamide) mixed with 1 µL of the respective probes and hybridized at 46°C for 2 h in an atmosphere saturated with hybridization buffer. The slides were then incubated in washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.25 mM EDTA and 0.149 M NaCl) at 48°C for 15 min and washed in ice-cold water for 10 s. The probes used in this study were Chla -232 (5' - TAG CTG ATA TCA CAT AGA -3'), Chls -523 (5' - 490 CCTCCGTATTACCGCAGC -3') 94 each 5’-labelled with the fluorescent dye Cy3 for the detection of the chlamydial symbiont, and Euk-516 (5'- GGA GGG CAA GTC TGG T -3') 5’-labelled with Cy5 for the detection of amoeba 95. To stain DNA, all wells were covered with 10 µL 4′,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI) in deionized water (c = 1 µg / mL) for 3 min and subsequently washed for 7 min in 99% ethanol. Citifluor AF1 (Electron Microscopy Scienc es, USA) was used to mount a 495 coverslip. Slides were analyzed using a Leica TCS SP8 X confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with a 93x glycerol objective and the Leica application suite X software (v3.7.6). .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 17 Growth and infection experiments To assess the maximum growth rates of symbiotic, aposymbiotic, and mixed (1:5, symbiotic:aposymbiotic) D. giganteum PALH populations, trophozoites in log phase were 500 incubated at a starting cell concentration of 104 cells per mL in PAS buffer supplemented with K. aerogenes in 25 cm 2 cell culture flasks ( Fisher Scientific Austria GmbH, Austria ) at 22°C. At defined timepoints, amoeba cells were detached from the bottom of the cell culture flasks using cell scraper s. Aliquots were taken and frozen for subsequent DNA extraction (250 µ L) and measurement of amoeba concentrations (10 µL) using the LUNA-FX7™ Automated Cell Counter 505 (Logos Biosystems, South Korea). For microscopy, 40 µL aliquots were applied to microscope slides and allowed to attach prior to chemical fixation and FISH with chlamydiae- and eukaryote- specific probes. To analyse the supernatant for extracellular chlamydiae, 1 mL aliquots of the supernatant were taken, homogenized using 25G syringes to break possible bacterial cell aggregates, and filtered through 1.2 µm filters to remove amoebae. Samples were frozen for 510 subsequent DNA extraction and digital PCR. To study the effect of physical contact between amoeba host cells on symbiont transmission, log phase symbiotic and aposymbiotic trophozoites were washed to remove food bacteria and stained with CellTracker deep red and green, respectively, according to the manufacturer ’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). Trophozoites were then inoculated at a concentration of 515 5x105 cells/mL and a ratio of 1:5 of symbiotic to aposymbiotic amoeba either mixed in 12-well plates or separated using Nunc™ Cell Culture Inserts in Carrier Plate Systems with a pore size of 3 µm (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). After 48 h of incubation at 22 °C, amoeba were harvested from the wells and transferred to a microscope slide. Chlamydial prevalence was assessed by FISH followed by DAPI staining. Positive controls consisting of Acanthamoeba 520 terricola (formerly A. castellanii Neff) infected with P. acanthamoebae were also assessed but the amoeba were derived from cultures grown in TSY medium (30 g/L trypticase soy broth, 30 g/L yeast extract). Infection with P. acanthamoebae was performed 48 hours before the start of the co-incubation, at an MOI of 200. Chlamydiae and amoebae were mixed, centrifuged at 150 x g for 15 min, and the supernatant was exchanged after 3 h to remove excess chlamydiae. 525 Symbiont quantification by digital PCR Aliquots of frozen amoeba cells were thawed , centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min and resuspended in 200 µL PAS buffer. DNA was then extracted using the QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube HT Kit (QIAGEN, NL) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The efficiency of the extraction was tested using the Qubit system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). Digital PCR was 530 performed using the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System (Biorad, USA). The final PCR reaction mixture contained 1x QX200 ™ ddPCR™ EvaGreen Supermix, SigF2 (5’- CRGCGTGGATGAGGCAT-3’) and SigR2 (5’-TCAGTCCCARTGTTGGC-3’) primers (0.18 pM) 96, 2 µL of the respective DNA sample and ddH2O in a total volume of 22 µL. Droplet generation was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was performed with the following steps: 535 enzyme activation at 95°C for 5 min, 40 steps of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s and annealing at 59°C for 1 min, signal stabilization at 4°C for 5 min, and a final step at 90°C for 5 min. The droplet suspension was subsequently analyzed using the QX200 droplet reader combined with the QX Manager standard edition software (v 1.2) . To distinguish positive from negative droplets, a fluorescence amplitude threshold of 6000 was set uniformly for all samples. 540 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 18 Genome sequencing and assembly Symbiotic D. giganteum PALH cultures were incubated in PAS buffer supplemented with E. coli, until the bottom of twelve 175 cm² cell culture flasks was confluent. The supernatant was replaced with fresh PAS buffer without food bacteria, and the amoebae were detached using a cell scraper. The detached amoebae were transferred to 50 mL tubes and centrifuged at 5000 x g for 10 545 minutes. The resulting pellet was resuspended in PAS buffer, transferred to 2 mL Eppendorf tubes prefilled with 0.5 mL glass beads (d=0.25-0.5mm) and vortexed horizontally at 2700 x g for 2 min. The disrupted amoeba cells were further homogenized using a 25G needle and passed sequentially through 5 µm and 1.2 µm pore size filters to remove host cell debris and nuclei. The Wizard® HMW DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, USA) was then used to extract DNA for long read 550 sequencing according to the manufacturer ’s protocol. Library preparation was performed at the Vienna Bio Center Core Facilities using the Multiplex Ligation Sequencing Kit and the Native Barcoding Kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Long -read sequencing was performed on an ONT Flongle system. Libraries for short read sequencing were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina, pooled equimolarly, and sequenced 555 using an Illumina MiSeq instrument (2 x 300bp, 600 cycles). Short reads were trimmed using cutadapt 3.5 97 to avoid adapter contamination and low quality sequences. Long reads were trimmed using Porechop 0.2.4 98 and corrected using Canu 2.0 (Koren et al., 2017). To assemble the R. socialis genome, all reads were used in a hybrid approach using Unicycler 0.4.8 99. The resulting single chlamydial contig was then rotated and the origin of 560 replication determined using Ori-finder 2022 100 and originx 101. Annotation, comparative genomics, and phylogenetic analysis Gene calling and annotation was performed using bakta 1.9.1 102. The coding sequences called by bakta were the basis for the subsequent comparative genome analysis. InterProScan 5 103 was used for protein domain identification 104. The prediction of effector proteins was performed using 565 EffectiveT3 105. AAI was calcuated using the enve-omics tool box with minimum alignment length 0 aa, minimum identity 20 % and minimum score 0 bits (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai/) 106. To understand patterns of gene loss and gain, orthofinder 2.5.5 was used 107 to construct orthogroups with a comprehensive dataset of 174 chlamydial genomes and high -quality MAGs (Table S4). Synteny regions, regions coding for long proteins , and the GC skew were visualized 570 using circos 108. For phylogenomics, CheckM 109 was used to produce a concatenated alignment of 43 marker proteins including the homologs of 171 chlamydial and 89 Planctomycetota -Verrucomicrobiota outgroup representatives (Table S3). This alignment was passed to IQ-TREE 2.2.6 to compute a maximum likelihood tree 110. Modelfinder plus 111 selected LG+C20+R4 as optimal model, and the 575 final tree was calculated with u ltrafast bootstraps 112, and the (Shimodaira -Hasegawa) SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test 113 with 1000 repeats each. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 19 Statistical Analysis All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio Statistical Software (v2024.04.2+764; 580 Posit team, 2024) Data availability The R. socialis genome sequence and annotation is available under Bioproject no. PRJEB79376, accession no. ERZ24898538. 585

References

1. World Health Organization (2023). WHO Alliance for the global elimination of trachoma: progress report on elimination of trachoma, 2022–alliance de l’OMS pour l’élimination mondiale du trachome: rapport de situation sur l’élimination du trachome, 2022. Wkly. 590 Epidemiol. Rec. Relevé Épidémiologique Hebd. 98, 297–131. 2. Huai, P ., Li, F., Chu, T., Liu, D., Liu, J., and Zhang, F. (2020). Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 20, 589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05307-w. 3. Collingro, A., Köstlbacher, S., and Horn, M. (2020). Chlamydiae in the environment. Trends 595 Microbiol. 28, 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.020. 4. Elwell, C., Mirrashidi, K., and Engel, J. (2016). Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30. 5. Horn, M. (2008). Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 113– 131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162818. 600 6. Omsland, A., Sixt, B.S., Horn, M., and Hackstadt, T. (2014). Chlamydial metabolism revisited: interspecies metabolic variability and developmental stage-specific physiologic activities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 779–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12059. 7. Lewis, M.E., Belland, R.J., AbdelRahman, Y .M., Beatty, W.L., Aiyar, A.A., Zea, A.H., Greene, S.J., Marrero, L., Buckner, L.R., Tate, D.J., et al. (2014). Morphologic and 605 molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct growth patterns. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00071. 8. Nans, A., Saibil, H.R., and Hayward, R.D. (2014). Pathogen–host reorganization during Chlamydia invasion revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Cell. Microbiol. 16, 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12310. 610 9. Pilhofer, M., Aistleitner, K., Ladinsky, M.S., König, L., Horn, M., and Jensen, G.J. (2014). Architecture and host interface of environmental chlamydiae revealed by electron cryotomography. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12299. 10. Domman, D., and Horn, M. (2015). Following the footsteps of chlamydial gene regulation. Mol. Biol. Evol., msv193. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv193. 615 .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 20 11. Hakiem, O.R., Rizvi, S.M.A., Ramirez, C., and Tan, M. (2023). Euo is a developmental regulator that represses late genes and activates midcycle genes in Chlamydia trachomatis. mBio 14, e00465-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00465-23. 12. Rosario, C.J., Soules, K., Hefty, P.S., and Tan, M. (2020). Chlamydia gene regulation. In Chlamydia Biology: From Genome to Disease (Caister Academic Press). 620 https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530281.10. 13. Stelzner, K., Vollmuth, N., and Rudel, T. (2023). Intracellular lifestyle of Chlamydia trachomatis and host–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00860-y. 14. Dharamshi, J.E., Köstlbacher, S., Schön, M.E., Collingro, A., Ettema, T.J.G., and Horn, M. 625 (2023). Gene gain facilitated endosymbiotic evolution of chlamydiae. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 40– 54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01284-9. 15. Dharamshi, J.E., Tamarit, D., Eme, L., Stairs, C.W., Martijn, J., Homa, F., Jørgensen, S.L., Spang, A., and Ettema, T.J.G. (2020). Marine sediments illuminate chlamydiae diversity and evolution. Curr. Biol. 30, 1032-1048.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.016. 630 16. Köstlbacher, S., Collingro, A., Halter, T., Schulz, F., Jungbluth, S.P ., and Horn, M. (2021). Pangenomics reveals alternative environmental lifestyles among chlamydiae. Nat. Commun. 12, 4021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24294-3. 17. Samba-Louaka, A., Delafont, V., Rodier, M.-H., Cateau, E., and Héchard, Y . (2019). Free- living amoebae and squatters in the wild: ecological and molecular features. FEMS 635 Microbiol. Rev. 43, 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuz011. 18. Romeralo, M., Escalante, R., and Baldauf, S.L. (2012). Evolution and diversity of dictyostelid social amoebae. Protist 163, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2011.09.004. 19. Tekle, Y .I., Wang, F., Wood, F.C., Anderson, O.R., and Smirnov, A. (2022). New insights on 640 the evolutionary relationships between the major lineages of Amoebozoa. Sci. Rep. 12, 11173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15372-7. 20. Raper, K.B. (1935). Dictyostelium discoideum, a new species of slime mold from decaying forest leaves. J. Agric. Res. 50, 135. 21. Kessin, R.H. ed. (2001). A brief introduction to Dictyostelium discoideum and its relatives. 645 In Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity Developmental and Cell Biology Series. (Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525315.002. 22. Brown, M.W., and Silberman, J.D. (2013). The non-dictyostelid sorocarpic amoebae. In Dictyostelids: Evolution, Genomics and Cell Biology, M. Romeralo, S. Baldauf, and R. 650 Escalante, eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg), pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 642-38487-5_12. 23. Brock, D.A., Douglas, T.E., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2011). Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba. Nature 469, 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09668. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 21 24. Bozzaro, S., and Eichinger, L. (2011). The professional phagocyte Dictyostelium 655 discoideum as a model host for bacterial pathogens. Curr. Drug Targets 12, 942–954. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945011795677782. 25. Dunn, J.D., Bosmani, C., Barisch, C., Raykov, L., Lefrançois, L.H., Cardenal-Muñoz, E., López-Jiménez, A.T., and Soldati, T. (2018). Eat prey, live: Dictyostelium discoideum as a model for cell-autonomous defenses. Front. Immunol. 8, 1906. 660 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01906. 26. Sallinger, E., Robeson, M.S., and Haselkorn, T.S. (2021). Characterization of the bacterial microbiomes of social amoebae and exploration of the roles of host and environment on microbiome composition. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462- 2920.15279. 665 27. Collingro, A., Poppert, S., Heinz, E., Schmitz-Esser, S., Essig, A., Schweikert, M., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2005). Recovery of an environmental chlamydia strain from activated sludge by co-cultivation with Acanthamoeba sp. Microbiology 151, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27406-0. 28. Kahane, S., Kimmel, N., and Friedman, M.G. (2002). The growth cycle of Simkania 670 negevensis. Microbiology 148, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-3-735. 29. Kostanjšek, R., Štrus, J., Drobne, D., and Avguštin, G. (2004). ‘Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis’, an intracellular bacterium from the hepatopancreas of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02802-0. 675 30. Farinholt, T., Dinh, C., and Kuspa, A. (2019). Microbiome management in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum compared to humans. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 63, 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.190240ak. 31. Nasser, W., Santhanam, B., Miranda, E.R., Parikh, A., Juneja, K., Rot, G., Dinh, C., Chen, R., Zupan, B., Shaulsky, G., et al. (2013). Bacterial discrimination by dictyostelid amoebae 680 reveals the complexity of ancient interspecies interactions. Curr. Biol. 23, 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.034. 32. Dinh, C., Farinholt, T., Hirose, S., Zhuchenko, O., and Kuspa, A. (2018). Lectins modulate the microbiota of social amoebae. Science 361, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2058. 685 33. Chen, G., Zhuchenko, O., and Kuspa, A. (2007). Immune-like phagocyte activity in the social amoeba. Science 317, 678–681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143991. 34. Zhang, X., Zhuchenko, O., Kuspa, A., and Soldati, T. (2016). Social amoebae trap and kill bacteria by casting DNA nets. Nat. Commun. 7, 10938. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10938. 690 35. Shu, L., Brock, D.A., Geist, K.S., Miller, J.W., Queller, D.C., Strassmann, J.E., and DiSalvo, S. (2018). Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis between social amoebae and bacteria. eLife 7, e42660. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42660. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 22 36. Brock, D.A., Callison, W.É., Strassmann, J.E., and Queller, D.C. (2016). Sentinel cells, 695 symbiotic bacteria and toxin resistance in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20152727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2727. 37. DiSalvo, S., Haselkorn, T.S., Bashir, U., Jimenez, D., Brock, D.A., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2015). Burkholderia bacteria infectiously induce the proto-farming symbiosis of Dictyostelium amoebae and food bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112. 700 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511878112. 38. Haselkorn, T.S., Jimenez, D., Bashir, U., Sallinger, E., Queller, D.C., Strassmann, J.E., and DiSalvo, S. (2021). Novel chlamydiae and Amoebophilus endosymbionts are prevalent in wild isolates of the model social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 13, 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12985. 705 39. Ishida, K., Sekizuka, T., Hayashida, K., Matsuo, J., Takeuchi, F., Kuroda, M., Nakamura, S., Yamazaki, T., Yoshida, M., Takahashi, K., et al. (2014). Amoebal endosymbiont Neochlamydia genome sequence illuminates the bacterial role in the defense of the host amoebae against Legionella pneumophila. PLoS ONE 9, e95166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095166. 710 40. Michel, R., Steinert, M., Zoeller, L., Hauroeder, B., and Henning, K. (2004). Free-living amoebae may serve as hosts for the Chlamydia-like bacterium Waddlia chondrophila isolated from an aborted bovine foetus. Acta Protozool. 43, 37–42. 41. Higashi, N. (1965). Electron microscopic studies on the mode of reproduction of trachoma virus and psittacosis virus in cell cultures. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 4, 24–39. 715 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4800(65)90021-3. 42. Kostanjšek, R., and Pirc Marolt, T. (2015). Pathogenesis, tissue distribution and host response to Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis infection in rough woodlouse Porcellio scaber. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 125, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.01.001. 43. Barry, C.E., Hayes, S.F., and Hackstadt, T. (1992). Nucleoid condensation in Escherichia 720 coli that express a chlamydial histone homolog. Science 256, 377–379. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.256.5055.377. 44. Brickman, T.J., Barry, C.E., and Hackstadt, T. (1993). Molecular cloning and expression of hctB encoding a strain-variant chlamydial histone-like protein with DNA-binding activity. J. Bacteriol. 175, 4274–4281. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.14.4274-4281.1993. 725 45. Grieshaber, N.A., Sager, J.B., Dooley, C.A., Hayes, S.F., and Hackstadt, T. (2006). Regulation of the Chlamydia trachomatis histone H1-Like protein Hc2 Is IspE dependent and IhtA independent. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5289–5292. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00526-06. 46. Brockett, M.R., and Liechti, G.W. (2021). Persistence alters the interaction between Chlamydia trachomatis and its host cell. Infect. Immun. 89, e00685-20. 730 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00685-20. 47. Collingro, A., Tischler, P., Weinmaier, T., Penz, T., Heinz, E., Brunham, R.C., Read, T.D., Bavoil, P .M., Sachse, K., Kahane, S., et al. (2011). Unity in variety -the pan-genome of the chlamydiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 3253–3270. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr161. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 23 48. Lagkouvardos, I., Weinmaier, T., Lauro, F.M., Cavicchioli, R., Rattei, T., and Horn, M. 735 (2014). Integrating metagenomic and amplicon databases to resolve the phylogenetic and ecological diversity of the Chlamydiae. ISME J. 8, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.142. 49. Pillonel, T., Bertelli, C., Aeby, S., De Barsy, M., Jacquier, N., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Mueller, L., Vouga, M., and Greub, G. (2019). Sequencing the obligate intracellular 740 Rhabdochlamydia helvetica within Its tick host Ixodes ricinus to investigate their symbiotic relationship. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz072. 50. Halter, T., Köstlbacher, S., Collingro, A., Sixt, B.S., Tönshoff, E.R., Hendrickx, F., Kostanjšek, R., and Horn, M. (2022). Ecology and evolution of chlamydial symbionts of arthropods. ISME Commun. 2, 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00124-5. 745 51. Vanthournout, B., and Hendrickx, F. (2015). Endosymbiont dominated bacterial communities in a dwarf spider. PLOS ONE 10, e0117297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117297. 52. Corsaro, D., and Work, T. (2012). Candidatus Renichlamydia lutjani, a gram-negative bacterium in internal organs of blue-striped snapper Lutjanus kasmira from Hawaii. Dis. 750 Aquat. Organ. 98, 249–254. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02441. 53. Davison, H.R., and Hurst, G.D.D. (2023). Hidden from plain sight: novel Simkaniaceae and Rhabdochlamydiaceae diversity emerging from screening genomic and metagenomic data. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126468. 54. Barco, R.A., Garrity, G.M., Scott, J.J., Amend, J.P ., Nealson, K.H., and Emerson, D. (2020). 755 A genus definition for Bacteria and Archaea based on a standard genome relatedness index. mBio 11, e02475-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02475-19. 55. Konstantinidis, K.T., Rosselló-Móra, R., and Amann, R. (2017). Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J. 11, 2399–2406. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.113. 760 56. Frank, A.C. (2019). Molecular host mimicry and manipulation in bacterial symbionts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz038. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz038. 57. Martyn, J.E., Gomez-Valero, L., and Buchrieser, C. (2022). The evolution and role of eukaryotic-like domains in environmental intracellular bacteria: the battle with a eukaryotic cell. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46, fuac012. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuac012. 765 58. Reynolds, D., and Thomas, T. (2016). Evolution and function of eukaryotic-like proteins from sponge symbionts. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5242–5253. 59. Schmitz-Esser, S., Tischler, P ., Arnold, R., Montanaro, J., Wagner, M., Rattei, T., and Horn, M. (2010). The genome of the amoeba symbiont “Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus” reveals common mechanisms for host cell interaction among amoeba-associated bacteria. 770 J. Bacteriol. 192, 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01379-09. 60. Wang, M., and Casey, P .J. (2016). Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.11. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 24 61. Gitsels, A., Sanders, N., and Vanrompay, D. (2019). Chlamydial infection from outside to inside. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02329. 775 62. Okuwa, T., Morio, T., Saito, T., Masamune, Y ., and Yasukawa, H. (2001). Complete sequences and expression kinetics of racG, racH, racI and racJ genes in Dictyostelium discoideum. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 24, 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.24.84. 63. Balest, A., Peracino, B., and Bozzaro, S. (2011). Legionella pneumophila infection is enhanced in a RacH-null mutant of Dictyostelium. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 194–197. 780 https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.2.14381. 64. Hagedorn, M., and Soldati, T. (2007). Flotillin and RacH modulate the intracellular immunity of Dictyostelium to Mycobacterium marinum infection. Cell. Microbiol. 9, 2716–2733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00993.x. 65. Gerstenmaier, L., Pilla, R., Herrmann, L., Herrmann, H., Prado, M., Villafano, G.J., Kolonko, 785 M., Reimer, R., Soldati, T., King, J.S., et al. (2015). The autophagic machinery ensures nonlytic transmission of mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423318112. 66. Hagedorn, M., Rohde, K.H., Russell, D.G., and Soldati, T. (2009). Infection by tubercular Mycobacteria Is spread by nonlytic ejection from their amoeba hosts. Science 323, 1729–790 1733. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169381. 67. Rucks, E.A. (2023). Type III secretion in chlamydia. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 87, e00034- 23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00034-23. 68. Fisher, D.J., Fernández, R.E., and Maurelli, A.T. (2013). Chlamydia trachomatis transports NAD via the Npt1 ATP/ADP translocase. J. Bacteriol. 195, 3381–3386. 795 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00433-13. 69. Bertelli, C., Collyn, F., Croxatto, A., Rückert, C., Polkinghorne, A., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Goesmann, A., Vaughan, L., and Greub, G. (2010). The Waddlia genome: A window into chlamydial biology. PLoS ONE 5, e10890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010890. 70. Lange, B.M., Rujan, T., Martin, W., and Croteau, R. (2000). Isoprenoid biosynthesis: The 800 evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 13172–13177. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240454797. 71. Heuston, S., Begley, M., Gahan, C.G.M., and Hill, C. (2012). Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 158, 1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.051599-0. 72. Ahyong, V., Berdan, C.A., Burke, T.P., Nomura, D.K., and Welch, M.D. (2019). A metabolic 805 dependency for host isoprenoids in the obligate intracellular pathogen Rickettsia parkeri underlies a sensitivity to the statin class of host-targeted therapeutics. mSphere 4, e00536- 19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00536-19. 73. Appa, C.R., Grieshaber, N.A., Yang, H., Omsland, A., McCormick, S., Chiarelli, T.J., and Grieshaber, S.S. (2024). The chlamydial transcriptional regulator Euo is a key switch in cell 810 form developmental progression but is not involved in the committed step to the formation of the infectious form. mSphere, e00437-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00437-24. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 25 74. Wurihan, W., Zou, Y., Weber, A.M., Weldon, K., Huang, Y ., Bao, X., Zhu, C., Wu, X., Wang, Y., Lai, Z., et al. (2021). Identification of a GrgA-Euo-HrcA transcriptional regulatory network in chlamydia. mSystems 6, e00738-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00738-21. 815 75. Lu, B., Wang, Y., Wurihan, W., Cheng, A., Yeung, S., Fondell, J.D., Lai, Z., Wan, D., Wu, X., Li, W.V., et al. (2024). Requirement of GrgA for Chlamydia infectious progeny production, optimal growth, and efficient plasmid maintenance. mBio 15, e02036-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02036-23. 76. Soules, K.R., LaBrie, S.D., May, B.H., and Hefty, P .S. (2020). Sigma 54-regulated 820 transcription is associated with membrane reorganization and type III secretion effectors during conversion to infectious forms of Chlamydia trachomatis. mBio 11, e01725-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01725-20. 77. Yang, C., Kari, L., Sturdevant, G.L., Song, L., Patton, M.J., Couch, C.E., Ilgenfritz, J.M., Southern, T.R., Whitmire, W.M., Briones, M., et al. (2017). Chlamydia trachomatis ChxR is 825 a transcriptional regulator of virulence factors that function in in vivo host–pathogen interactions. Pathog. Dis. 75. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx035. 78. Grieshaber, N.A., Fischer, E.R., Mead, D.J., Dooley, C.A., and Hackstadt, T. (2004). Chlamydial histone-DNA interactions are disrupted by a metabolite in the methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 7451–7456. 830 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400754101. 79. Colpaert, M., Kadouche, D., Ducatez, M., Pillonel, T., Kebbi-Beghdadi, C., Cenci, U., Huang, B., Chabi, M., Maes, E., Coddeville, B., et al. (2021). Conservation of the glycogen metabolism pathway underlines a pivotal function of storage polysaccharides in Chlamydiae. Commun. Biol. 4, 296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01794-y. 835 80. N’Gadjaga, M.D., Perrinet, S., Connor, M.G., Bertolin, G., Millot, G.A., and Subtil, A. (2022). Chlamydia trachomatis development requires both host glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation but has only minor effects on these pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102338. 81. Kühn, S., and Enninga, J. (2020). The actin comet guides the way: How LISTERIA actin 840 subversion has impacted cell biology, infection biology and structural biology. Cell. Microbiol. 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13190. 82. Jahnke, R., Matthiesen, S., Zaeck, L.M., Finke, S., and Knittler, M.R. (2022). Chlamydia trachomatis cell-to-cell spread through tunneling nanotubes. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e02817- 22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02817-22. 845 83. Huffman, D.M., and Olive, L.S. (1964). Engulfment and anastomosis in the cellular slime molds (Acrasiales). Am. J. Bot. 51, 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537- 2197.1964.tb06657.x. 84. Horn, M., Wagner, M., Müller, K.-D., Schmid, E.N., Fritsche, T.R., Schleifer, K.-H., and Michel, R. (2000). Neochlamydia hartmannellae gen. nov., sp. nov. (Parachlamydiaceae), 850 an endoparasite of the amoeba Hartmannella vermiformis. Microbiology 146, 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-5-1231. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 26 85. Arthofer, P., Delafont, V., Willemsen, A., Panhölzl, F., and Horn, M. (2022). Defensive symbiosis against giant viruses in amoebae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2205856119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205856119. 855 86. Brock, D.A., Read, S., Bozhchenko, A., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2013). Social amoeba farmers carry defensive symbionts to protect and privatize their crops. Nat. Commun. 4, 2385. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3385. 87. Flórez, L.V., Biedermann, P.H.W., Engl, T., and Kaltenpoth, M. (2015). Defensive symbioses of animals with prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 860 904–936. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NP00010F. 88. König, L., Wentrup, C., Schulz, F., Wascher, F., Escola, S., Swanson, M.S., Buchrieser, C., and Horn, M. (2019). Symbiont-mediated defense against Legionella pneumophila in amoebae. mBio 10, e00333-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00333-19. 89. Brock, D.A., Noh, S., Hubert, A.N.M., Haselkorn, T.S., DiSalvo, S., Suess, M.K., Bradley, 865 A.S., Tavakoli-Nezhad, M., Geist, K.S., Queller, D.C., et al. (2020). Endosymbiotic adaptations in three new bacterial species associated with Dictyostelium discoideum : Paraburkholderia agricolaris sp. nov., Paraburkholderia hayleyella sp. nov., and Paraburkholderia bonniea sp. nov. PeerJ 8, e9151. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9151. 90. Garcia, J.R., Larsen, T.J., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2019). Fitness costs and 870 benefits vary for two facultative Burkholderia symbionts of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. Ecol. Evol. 9, 9878–9890. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5529. 91. Noh, S., Peck, R.F., Larson, E.R., Covitz, R.M., Chen, A., Roy, P ., Hamilton, M.C., and Dettmann, R.A. (2024). Facultative symbiont virulence determines horizontal transmission rate without host specificity in Dictyostelium discoideum social amoebas. Evol. Lett. 8, 437–875 447. https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae001. 92. Scott, T.J., Larsen, T.J., Brock, D.A., Uhm, S.Y .S., Queller, D.C., and Strassmann, J.E. (2023). Symbiotic bacteria, immune-like sentinel cells, and the response to pathogens in a social amoeba. R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 230727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230727. 93. Zorz, J.K., Sharp, C., Kleiner, M., Gordon, P .M.K., Pon, R.T., Dong, X., and Strous, M. 880 (2019). A shared core microbiome in soda lakes separated by large distances. Nat. Commun. 10, 4230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12195-5. 94. Poppert, S., Essig, A., Marre, R., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2002). Detection and differentiation of chlamydiae by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 4081–4089. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.4081-4089.2002. 885 95. Amann, R.I., Binder, B.J., Olson, R.J., Chisholm, S.W., Devereux, R., and Stahl, D.A. (1990). Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1919 LP – 1925. 96. Haider, S., Collingro, A., Walochnik, J., Wagner, M., and Horn, M. (2008). Chlamydia-like bacteria in respiratory samples of community-acquired pneumonia patients: Chlamydia-like 890 bacteria in CAP patients. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 281, 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01099.x. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 27 97. Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetjournal Vol 17 No 1 Gener. Seq. Data Anal. - 1014806ej171200. 98. Wick, R.R., Judd, L.M., Gorrie, C.L., and Holt, K.E. (2017). Completing bacterial genome 895 assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb. Genomics 3. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000132. 99. Wick, R.R., Judd, L.M., Gorrie, C.L., and Holt, K.E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. 900 100. Dong, M.-J., Luo, H., and Gao, F. (2022). Ori-Finder 2022: A comprehensive web server for prediction and analysis of bacterial replication origins. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20, 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.10.002. 101. Worning, P ., Jensen, L.J., Hallin, P.F., Stærfeldt, H., and Ussery, D.W. (2006). Origin of replication in circular prokaryotic chromosomes. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 353–361. 905 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00917.x. 102. Schwengers, O., Jelonek, L., Dieckmann, M.A., Beyvers, S., Blom, J., and Goesmann, A. (2021). Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification: Find out more about Bakta, the motivation, challenges and applications, here. Microb. Genomics 7. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000685. 910 103. Jones, P ., Binns, D., Chang, H.-Y., Fraser, M., Li, W., McAnulla, C., McWilliam, H., Maslen, J., Mitchell, A., Nuka, G., et al. (2014). InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. 104. De Lima Morais, D.A., Fang, H., Rackham, O.J.L., Wilson, D., Pethica, R., Chothia, C., and Gough, J. (2011). SUPERFAMILY 1.75 including a domain-centric gene ontology method. 915 Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D427–D434. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1130. 105. Eichinger, V., Nussbaumer, T., Platzer, A., Jehl, M.-A., Arnold, R., and Rattei, T. (2016). EffectiveDB—updates and novel features for a better annotation of bacterial secreted proteins and Type III, IV, VI secretion systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D669–D674. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1269. 920 106. Rodriguez-R, L.M., and Konstantinidis, K.T. (2016). The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 4, e1900v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1. 107. Emms, D.M., and Kelly, S. (2019). OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y. 925 108. Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S.J., and Marra, M.A. (2009). Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109. 109. Parks, D.H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C.T., Hugenholtz, P ., and Tyson, G.W. (2015). CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, 930 and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114. .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint 28 110. Minh, B.Q., Schmidt, H.A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M.D., Von Haeseler, A., and Lanfear, R. (2020). IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015. 935 111. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K.F., Von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L.S. (2017). ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285. 112. Hoang, D.T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B.Q., and Vinh, L.S. (2018). UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522. 940 https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281. 113. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010. 114. Posit team (2024). RStudio: integrated development environment for R (Posit Software, 945 PBC). .CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted November 28, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.28.625222doi: bioRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0