Correlates of protection against African swine fever virus identified by a systems immunology approach

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes a fatal hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs and wild boars, which poses severe threats to the global pork industry. Despite the promise of live attenuated vaccines (LAVs), their narrow margin between efficacy and residual virulence presents major safety challenges. This study bridges a critical knowledge gap in ASF vaccinology by identifying innate and adaptive correlates of protection. This was achieved by using an established model with two groups of pigs differing in baseline immunological status (farm and specific pathogen-free [SPF]). The animals were immunized with an attenuated ASFV strain and subsequently challenged with a related, highly virulent genotype II strain. By applying a systems immunology approach, we correlated kinetic data, including serum cytokines, blood transcription modules (BTMs), T-cell responses, and antibody levels, with clinical outcomes to track protective and detrimental immune responses to the virus over time. Key innate correlates of protection included early and sustained IFN-α response, activation of antigen presentation BTMs, and controlled IL-8 levels during immunization. Lower baseline immune activation observed in SPF pigs in steady state was linked to increased protection. Adaptive correlates encompassed cell cycle, plasma cell, and T-cell BTM responses lasting until day 15 post-immunization. Consequently, an effective response from ASFV-specific T h cells prior to challenge indicated protection. After the challenge, an early IFN-α response, along with low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a strong induction of memory T h and T c cells, correlated with improved clinical outcomes. The model highlights the critical role of host-specific factors in vaccine efficacy and provides a valuable framework for optimizing ASFV vaccine design while distinguishing between protective and detrimental immune responses.
Full text 2,131 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes a fatal hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs and wild boars, which poses severe threats to the global pork industry. Despite the promise of live attenuated vaccines (LAVs), their narrow margin between efficacy and residual virulence presents major safety challenges. This study bridges a critical knowledge gap in ASF vaccinology by identifying innate and adaptive correlates of protection. This was achieved by using an established model with two groups of pigs differing in baseline immunological status (farm and specific pathogen-free [SPF]). The animals were immunized with an attenuated ASFV strain and subsequently challenged with a related, highly virulent genotype II strain. By applying a systems immunology approach, we correlated kinetic data, including serum cytokines, blood transcription modules (BTMs), T-cell responses, and antibody levels, with clinical outcomes to track protective and detrimental immune responses to the virus over time. Key innate correlates of protection included early and sustained IFN-α response, activation of antigen presentation BTMs, and controlled IL-8 levels during immunization. Lower baseline immune activation observed in SPF pigs in steady state was linked to increased protection. Adaptive correlates encompassed cell cycle, plasma cell, and T-cell BTM responses lasting until day 15 post-immunization. Consequently, an effective response from ASFV-specific Th cells prior to challenge indicated protection. After the challenge, an early IFN-α response, along with low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a strong induction of memory Th and Tc cells, correlated with improved clinical outcomes. The model highlights the critical role of host-specific factors in vaccine efficacy and provides a valuable framework for optimizing ASFV vaccine design while distinguishing between protective and detrimental immune responses. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The text and figures have been revised to improve readability and to present the ideas more clearly to the reader.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00