Tropheryma whipplei detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A retrospective study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 71,729 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Tropheryma whipplei detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A retrospective study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Tropheryma whipplei detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A retrospective study Zhixiong He, Hui Li This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Whipple’s disease(WD) is a rare chronic and systemic disease caused by the rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacterium Tropheryma whipplei (T. whipplei) that primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract, however, the involvement of the lung is rare, and few study have explored the significance of the detection of TW in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). So, we performed a retrospective study in patients with T. whipplei positive in 848 BALF samples which detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) from 21 September 2022 to 1 March 2024 in The First Hospital of Changsha. Forty-three BALF samples from forty-four (44/848, 5.2%) patients were positive for T. whipplei (one patient was excluded due to incomplete data). Twenty-nine patients were male with an average age of 46.9 years. The main symptoms included cough (36/43), expectoration (22/43), dyspnea/shortness of breath (14/43), fever (13/43), hemoptysis/bloody sputum (5/43), vomiting (2/43), abdominal pain (1/43), and only one patient complained about neurological symptoms. Chronic liver disease (including fatty liver, chronic hepatitis C and chronic hepatitis B) were the most common comorbidity (n = 11, 25.6%), followed by chronic lung disease (n = 8, 18.6%). Only 11 patients (25.6%) were immunocompromised. One patient was finally diagnosed with reactivation tuberculosis and two patients were diagnosed with lung tumors (including one primary lung adenocarcinoma and one primary lung squamous carcinoma), and twenty-two patients (53.5%) had pneumonia. T. whipplei was the sole agent in 6 samples, and Epstein-Barr virus was the most common detected pathogens, followed by Haemophilus influenzae. The most common chest CT imaging manifestation is lung nodules (18/43, 41.9%), including fourteen solid nodules and five ground-glass nodules (three cases of calcified nodules caused by pulmonary tuberculosis were excluded). Our study indicates that T. whipplei is a causative pathogen in various lung diseases, and clinicians should be wary of this. The mNGS technology improves the detection and attention of rare pathogens and provide guidance for treatment in clinical practice. In the future, the natural history of T. whipplei infections and the possible pathogenesis still need to be studied. Tropheryma whipplei (T. whipplei) Whipple’s disease (WD) metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing(mNGS) bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Introduction Tropheryma whipplei is the causative bacterium of Whipple's disease, which was first described by George Hoyt Whipple in 1907[ 1 ]. Whipple’s disease is a rare systemic infection disease mainly affects middle-aged Caucasian men, but extremely rare in the native Asian and African populations[ 2 , 3 ], but carriage is common in these latter two continents[ 4 , 5 ]. The gastrointestinal tract is the main target organs for its invasion. T. whipplei can be manifested as local infectious diseases, such as infective endocarditis, encephalitis, skin infection, etc. It has also been associated with acute infections, including gastroenteritis, bacteraemia, and pneumonia [ 6 , 7 ]. The T. whipplei related pneumonia was rarely reported and first detected from a BALF of a child in 2007[ 8 ]. Traditional culture methods are time consuming and have low rates of positive detection. In recent years, diagnosis has become more accessible due to the use of mNGS, this new technology has improved the detection of rare pathogens and provide guidance for treatment in clinical practice. In this study, we analyzed the demographic characteristics, the symptoms, the co-infection pathogens, laboratory data and the CT images in a population of patients according to the presence of T. whipplei detected by mNGS in BALF. Material and methods Patients and Detection procedure A retrospective analysis was conducted on all T. whipplei positive samples from 848 BALF samples collected between 21 September 2022 and 1 March 2024 at The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine, Central South University, China. The BALF collection process adhered strictly to clinical operating standards and maintained sterility principles. 3-5mL BALF samples obtained from the involved sub-segments placed in sterile sputum containers, stored in -20°C, and then sent to KingMed Diagnostics (Changsha KingMed Center For Clinical Laboratory, China) for detection(the mNGS procedure for BALF samples including nucleic acid extraction, library construction, sequencing, and bioinformation analysis, as this operation was performed by KingMed Diagnostics, the specific steps were not be described here). Collecting relevant data on T. whipplei positive patients, including age, gender, laboratory data, clinical symptoms, Comorbidity, imaging examination results, diagnosis, pathological results, and treatment history. Immunocompromised patients were considered to be those with malignancy undergoing treatment, organ transplant, AIDS patients, diabetes mellitus patients or long-term therapy with corticosteroid or immunosuppressive agent[ 9 ]. Pneumonia was diagnosed by the symptoms and chest CT imaging. Statistical analysis Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, otherwise, median and IQR (interquartile range). Comparative analysis was conducted by t’ test. The chi-square test was used to calculate the difference between both groups, or the exact Fisher test as appropriate. Data analysis and mapping were performed with GraphPad Prism10. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results Forty-three BALFs were positive for T. whipplei. Twenty-eight patients were male (65.1%) with an average age of 46.9 years, ranged from 4 to 89 years. Fifteen patients were female (34.9%) with an average age of 58.4 years, the age ranged from 11 to 75 years. All patients were hospitalized, with 31(72%) patients in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, 4(9.3%) in Infection and Immunology Department, 4(9.3%) in Pediatrics Department, 2 (4.7%) in Thoracic surgery and 2 (4.7%) in Intensive-Care Unit at the sampling time of BALF. The main clinical symptoms of patients included cough (36/43), expectoration (22/43), dyspnea/shortness of breath (14/43), fever (13/43), hemoptysis/bloody sputum (5/43), vomiting (2/43), abdominal pain (1/43), and only one patient complained about neurological symptoms (slight headache). (Table 1 ). Table 1 The characteristics of patients with T. whipplei positive in BALF Parameter T. whipplei positive (n = 43) Age Male(mean,SD) Female(mean,SD) Smoking history, n (%) Never Current Immunocompromised, n (%) Symptoms, n (%) Cough Expectoration Dypnea/shortness of breath Fever Hemoptysis/bloody sputum Abdominal pain Vomiting Chest tightness Weight loss Neurological Blood test result White blood cell count (×10 9 /L) (mean, SD) Neutrophils Percentage (%) (mean, SD) Lymphocyte Percentage (%) (mean, SD) Haemoglobin (g/L) (mean, SD) CRP (mg/L) (median, IQR) ESR (mm/h) (median, IQR) LDH(U/L) (median, IQR) PCT(normal<0.05ng/mL)(median, IQR) Main CT images, n (%) Ground glass nodules or solid nodules Patchy infiltration Pleural effusion Interstitial changes Mass Cavity 28(46.9, 22.8) 15 (58.4, 17.6) 29(67.4%) 14(32.6%) 11(25.6%) 36(83.7%) 22 (51.2%) 14(32.6%) 13 (30.2%) 5 (11.6%) 4 (9.4%) 3 (7.0%) 2 (4.7%) 2 (4.7%) 1 (2.3%) 6.74 (2.62) 63.2 (11.7) 24.8 (11.0) 124 (19.2) 5.13 (1.9–24.5) 50 (20–93) 199 (167–273) 0.06(0.02–0.11) 18(41.9%) 16(37.2%) 5(11.6%) 2(4.7%) 2(4.7%) 1(2.35%) ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate LDH, lactic dehydroge PCT, Procalcitonin Comorbidity, immune status, and laboratory data Chronic liver disease(including fatty liver, Chronic hepatitis C and Chronic hepatitis B) were the most common comorbidity (n = 11, 25.6%), followed by chronic lung disease(n = 8, 18.6%),including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Bronchiectasia. Non-immunocompromised patients accounted for the majority. Immunodeficiency in 11 patients (25.6%) was including taken leflunomide (n = 1), corticosteroids (n = 1), AIDS (n = 4), diabetes mellitus(n = 3) and lung cancer (n = 2). (Fig. 1 ). The laboratory tests data of 43 patients was collected before treatment. The mean white blood cell count, neutrophils percentage, and haemoglobin were 6.74×10 9 /L, 63.2% (11.7), and 124g/L, respectively. The median LDH was 199U/L (IQR 167–273), C-reactive protein was 5.13mg/L (IQR 1.9-24.5mg/L), PCT was 0.06ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.11), and ESR was 50mm/h (IQR 20–93). (Table 1 ). Chest CT Images We simply described the chest CT findings (Fig. 2), the most common chest CT imaging manifestation is pulmonary nodules (18/43, 41.9%), including eleven solid nodules and seven ground-glass nodules(one miliary tuberculosis patient and three cases of fibrocalcific nodules caused by pulmonary tuberculosis were excluded), and followed by patchy infiltration (16/43, 37.2%),the remaining CT findings included pleural effusion (n = 5), mass(n = 2), interstitial fibrosis (n = 2 ) and cavity (n = 1), In summary, the chest imaging manifestations were various. Pathogens detected in BALF by mNGS T. whipplei was the sole agent in only 6 BALF samples. The most common detected bacterial pathogen with T. whipplei was Haemophilus influenzae , followed by Staphylococcus aureus , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Moraxella catarrhalis . The most common detected atypical pathogen was Mycoplasma pneumoniae . The most commonly detected fungi were Pneumocystis jirovecii, followed by Candida albicans. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the most commonly detected virus, as illustrated in Table 2 and Fig. 3 . Immunodeficient patients had a higher detection rate of fungi compared to non-immunodeficient patients (9/11, 81% vs 8/32, 28%, p < 0.01), with Talaromyces marneffei only being detected in immunodeficient patients (specifically AIDS patients). There is no correlation between T. whipplei reads and the patient's immune status(p = 0.2245) or the incidence of pneumonia(p = 0.1492), as you can see in Fig. 4 (a, b). Table 2 Pathogens detected by mNGS Pathogen N (n/N, %) T. whipplei as sole agent Co-infection with two or more pathogens Co-infection with three or more pathogens Epstein-Barr virus Haemophilus influenzae Pneumocystis jirovecii Candida albicans Staphylococcus aureus Mycoplasma pneumoniae Klebsiella pneumoniae Human Herpesvirus- 7 Moraxella catarrhalis Cytomegalovirus Fusobacterium nucleatum Rhinovirus COVID-19 Streptococcus pneumonia Aspergillus fumigatus Influenza A virus Talaromyces marneffei Legionella Chlamydia psittaci Coxsackievirus Other 6 (14.0%) 37 (86.0%) 29 (67.4%) 13 (30.2%) 10 (23.3%) 8 (18.6%) 7 (16.3%) 7 (16.3%) 7 (16.3%) 6 (14.0%) 6 (14.0%) 4 (9.3%) 4 (9.3%) 4 (9.3%) 3 (7.0%) 3 (7.0%) 3 (7.0%) 2 (4.7%) 2 (4.7%) 2 (4.7%) 1 (2.3%) 1 (2.3%) 1 (2.3%) 5 (11.6%) Diagnosis Twenty-two patients (51.2%) were diagnosed with pneumonia and all received antimicrobial treatment. Three patients (6.9%) were ultimately diagnosed with reactivation tuberculosis and received anti-tuberculosis treatment. Histopathology results showed that two patients (4.7%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Additionally, one patient was diagnosed with PCP and another patient was diagnosed with ABPA. Discussion Whipple’s disease (WD) is a rare infectious disease with an incidence of one in a million individuals. It can affect multiple organs, leading to highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Although it was first described over a hundred years, but due to the low positive rate of traditional detection methods and a lack of understanding of the disease, a considerable such disease has been overlooked. With the advancement of molecular biological diagnostic technology, it has greatly improved the detection of T. whipplei in various samples and enlarged the spectrum of TW infections[ 10 ]. NGS is a new technology that uses High-Throughput Sequencing to sequence all the DNA in samples. This new technology has improved the detection of rare pathogens, a retrospective study reported that the total positive rate detected by NGS method (91.1%) was significantly higher than that detected by the culture method (62.2%) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients[ 11 ]. In recent years, many pneumonia caused by T. whipplei have been diagnosed by the use of NGS in BALF [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], this also confirms that T. whipplei can cause respiratory infections, but few study have explored the significance of the detection of T. whipplei in BALF. So, we performed a retrospective study in 43 patients with T. whipplei positive in 848 BALF samples. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first in a Hunan region, the second largest sample size in the epidemiological study of T. whipplei detected in BALF in China followed the study performed by Lin et al[ 12 ], and may provide valuable initial data for future epidemiological studies. Our study showed that the disease was more likely to occur in middle-aged males rather than females, consistent with the study performed by Biagi F et al [ 17 ], and some scholars suggested that hormonal or genetic sex chromosome-associated factors influence the course of the infection or susceptibility[ 18 ]. However, a newer study in the United States suggested that the prevalence of Whipple’s disease was similar between males and females[ 19 ]. We found T. whipplei detected in the BALF is not related to smoking history, and the number of T. whipplei sequences was not related to the patient's immune status(Fig. 4 ). Besides, most patients in our study were non-immunodeficient status, we did not detect a higher prevalence of T. whipplei infection in immunocompromised patients which unlike the recent study performed by Lozupone et al[ 20 ], and a large study has also shown that T. whipplei infection had nothing to do with the patient’s immune status[ 9 ]. In our study, there were 22 patients diagnosed with pneumonia, accounting for half of the samples, this also supports that T. whipplei can causes acute lung infections, but the number of T. whipplei sequences was not related to the occurrence of pneumonia, so it indicates that only a limited number of carriers may develop to lung infection, so it supports that the host, bacterial, and environmental factors may all contribute to the pathogenesis[ 21 ], and some study suggested the host immunity appears to play a crucial role in developing the disease. Therefore, the mechanism of T. whipplei leading to pulmonary infection still needs further research. The most common symptoms among these 43 patients were cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, and fever. Digestive and neurological symptoms were rare, this may be related to the fact that the gastrointestinal and nervous systems of these patients are not affected, which suggests that the respiratory tract can be an independent infected system, and if we can conduct pathological examinations on the intestines of these patients, it may better explain this phenomenon. A previous study shown that routine laboratory tests for WD patients has no specific results, including elevated ESR or CRP levels (84%), and anemia in 50 patients (60%) [ 22 ], our study found the white blood cell count(WBC) can be elevated or normal, the PCT often increased slightly, but anemia is uncommon. In a recent study showed T. whipplei infection often led to increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and this might be used to predict the prognosis[ 23 ]. But, as far as we know, LDH can increased in many cases, the role of LDH in WD requires further research. Chest CT image of the those patients exhibited a diverse range of findings, the most common imaging manifestation is lung nodules(18/43, 41.9%), including eleven solid nodules and seven ground-glass nodules, which could be solitary or diffuse, this is consistent with some other research findings[ 24 ], but the relationship between T. whipplei and lung nodules is not yet clear, and further exploration and research are needed in the future. Patchy infiltration (16/43, 37.2%) was the second most common imaging manifestation. Besides, five cases (5/43, 11.6%) had pleural effusion, two had interstitial changes, and only one case had cavity. T. whipplei as the sole pathogen only in 6 BALF samples, and more often it co-exists with other pathogens. Among them, the most common co-exists is Epstein-Barr virus EBV(n = 13), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (n = 10), there is no research report on similar results currently. In addition, it is also common to have fungal co-exists, with a total number of 19 cases(including Pneumocystis jirovecii, Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium marneffei), the most common detected fungi was Pneumocystis jirovecii, consistent with the research findings of Ying Li et al[ 25 ]. As for why there is such a high probability of co-exists between them, larger prospective studies are needed. However, unlike the results reported by Lin et al[ 12 ], none of our patients were found to have Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, although one case was ultimately diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and improved after anti-tuberculosis treatment. Conclusion In conclusion, we summary analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with positive T. whipplei detected by mNGS in BALF, further enhanced the understanding of this pathogen. The use of mNGS technology has enhanced the detection of rare and slow-growing pathogens, providing significant benefits in pinpointing the causative pathogen and facilitating targeted antimicrobial treatment. However, our study has some limitations. Primarily, our sample size is not sufficiently large; perhaps collaborating with other centers to conduct a multi-center study on this disease would yield more representative results; Secondly, most patients seek medical attention due to respiratory symptoms and are hospitalized in the Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine department, no relevant examinations were conducted on their digestive system; Thirdly, we did not set up a control group for comparison. However, we believe the study is informative, and may provide valuable data for future comparative and epidemiological studies. In the future, the design of an animal model of pneumonia induced by T. whipplei are needed to improve our understanding of the natural history of T whipplei infections and of the possible predisposing immune factors that permit development of infection. Declarations Competing Interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Author Contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Zhixiong He and Hui Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhixiong He and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Consent to Publish All authors agree to publish. Data Availability The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to individual privacy could be compromised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Ethics statement This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine (The First Hospital of Changsha 2024 (5) V 1.0). Acknowledgements We thank Changsha KingMed Center For Clinical Laboratory for their technical assistance. Funding This work was funded by the Changsha Science and Technology Program(kq1907013), Youth Fund of the Hunan Natural Science Foundation(2023JJ4006) and Hunan Provincial Health Commission (202103020384). References WhippleGH.1907.A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and mesenteric lymphatic tissues.Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp18:382–393. MoosV,SchneiderTetal.Changing paradigms in Whipple’s disease and infection with Tropheryma whipplei. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis(2011) 30:1151–1158.doi:10.1007/s10096-011-1209-y.Epub 2011 Apr 2. DolmansRA,BoelCH,LacleMM,KustersJG.Clinical manifestations, treatment, and diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infections.Clin Microbiol Rev.2017;30(2):529–555.doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16. KeitaAK,MediannikovO,RatmanovP,DiattaG,BasseneH,RoucherC,TallA,SokhnaC,TrapeJF,RaoultD,FenollarF.2013.Looking for Tropheryma whipplei source and reservoir in rural Senegal.Am J TropMed Hyg88:339–343.DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0614 KeitaAK,Dubot-PeresA,PhommasoneK,SibounheuangB,VongsouvathM,MayxayM,RaoultD,NewtonPN,FenollarF.2015.High prevalence Tropheryma whipplei in Lao kindergarten children.PLoS Negl Trop Dis9:e0003538. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003538. RaoultD,FenollarF,RolainJM,MinodierP,BosdureE,LiW,GarnierJM,RichetH.2010.Tropheryma whipplei in children with gastroenteritis.Emerg Infect Dis16:776–782. doi:10.3201/eid1605.091801. FenollarF,MediannikovO,SocolovschiC,BasseneH,DiattaG,RichetH,TallA,SokhnaC,TrapeJF,RaoultD.2010.Tropherymawhipplei bacteremia during fever in rural West Africa.Clin Infect Dis51:515–521. doi:10.3201/eid2207.150441. HarrisJK,DeGrooteMA,SagelSD,ZemanickET,KapsnerR,PenvariC,etal.Molecular identifification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fifibrosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2007; 104:20529e33. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709804104. J.-C.Lagieretal.Tropheryma whipplei DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage samples: a case control study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection22(2016):875–879. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.010. JIESHAOetal.Next-generation sequencing as an advanced supplementary tool for the diagnosis of pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections: An observational trial in Xi'an, China.BIOMEDICAL REPORTS16:14,2022. doi:10.3892/br.2021.1497. ZhangP,ChenY,LiS,LiC,ZhangS,ZhengW,ChenY,MaJ,ZhangX,HuangY,LiuS.2020.Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical diagnosis and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe pneumonia: a retrospective study.PeerJ8: e9623.DOI10.7717/peerj. 9623. LinM,etal.Tropheryma whipplei detectionby metagenomic next-generationsequencing in bronchoalveolar lavagefluid: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.12:961297. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.961297. Wen MeiZhang,LingXu.Pulmonary parenchymal involvement caused by Tropheryma whipplei.Open Medicine2021;16:843–846. doi:10.1515/med-2021-0297. LiW,ZhangQ,XuY,ZhangX,HuangQ,SuZ.Severe pneumonia in adults caused by Tropheryma whipplei and Candida sp. infection: a 2019 case series.BMC Pulm Med.2021;21(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12890-020-01384-4. SabriBousbia,LaurentPapazian,etal.Tropheryma whipplei in Patients with Pneumonia.Emerging Infectious DiseasesVol.16,No.2,February2010:258–263. doi:10.3201/eid1602.090610. Y.Shenetal.Acute pneumonia due to Tropheryma whipplei diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and pathology: A case report.Heliyon10(2024)e26747.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26747. BiagiF,BalduzziD,DelvinoP,SchiepattiA,KlersyC,CorazzaGR.Prevalence of Whipple’s disease in north-western Italy.Eur J Clin Microbial Infect Dis. (2015)34:1347–8. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2357-2. AsmaBoumaza, etal.Whipple’s disease and Tropheryma whipplei infections: from bench to bedside.Lancet Infect Dis (2022) ;22(10):e280–e291.doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1. ElchertJA,MansoorE,Abou-SalehM,CooperGS.Epidemiology of Whipple’s disease in the USA between 2012 and 2017: a population-based national study.Dig Dis Sci.(2019)64:1305–1311.doi:10.1007/s10620-018-5393-9. Lozupone,C.,Cota-Gomez,A.,Palmer,B. E.,Linderman,D. J.,Charlson,E. S.,Sodergren,E.,etal.(2013).Widespread colonization of the lung by tropheryma whipplei in HIV infection.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.187(10),1110–1117.doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2145OC. FenollarF,LagierJC,RaoultD.2014.Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple’s disease.J Infect69:103–112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008. Lagier,etal.Systemic Tropheryma whipplei Clinical Presentation of 142 Patients With Infections Diagnosed or Confirmed in a Reference Center.Medicine2010;89:337–345. Z.Fangetal.Experience in the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia caused by infection with Tropheryma whipplei: A case series.Heliyon9(2023)e17132.doi:10.1016/j. Zhang,W. M.,andXu,L.(2021).Pulmonary parenchymal involvement caused by tropheryma whipplei.Open Med. (Wars)16(1),843–846. doi:10.1515/med-2021-0297. YingLietal.Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases(2020)39:369–374. doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03734-5. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4705443","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":334899950,"identity":"e24c0e04-2675-4f0b-ae9e-faf453f632eb","order_by":0,"name":"Zhixiong He","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine,Central South University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhixiong","middleName":"","lastName":"He","suffix":""},{"id":334899951,"identity":"7148e65b-736d-41ae-a427-a3538a6546f4","order_by":1,"name":"Hui Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine,Central South University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hui","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-08 12:12:27","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":62183231,"identity":"42e28863-0a06-4284-837d-c3bd5dfaecec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 11:34:11","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":49034,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDistribution of main comorbidities\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4705443/v1/ed9d1b42654a0abfcf036f10.png"},{"id":62183230,"identity":"64da3ef1-17ad-4e7e-bd79-f06240a7be06","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 11:34:11","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":46486,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMain Chest CT findings\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4705443/v1/22052292536f3fa381180d31.png"},{"id":62183232,"identity":"3d0c9ce5-85ba-46aa-bcdc-22f67bb17398","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 11:34:11","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":72711,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePathogens detected by mNGS in BALF\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4705443/v1/85e30fa65178e064df1a0581.png"},{"id":62183234,"identity":"45ea1169-3728-4cd8-9497-e87cd8a50ed2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 11:34:11","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":156875,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a, b) There is no correlation between T. whipplei reads and the patient's immune status or the incidence of pneumonia\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineFigure4a1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4705443/v1/01bff0e4cc8c5eb4888018bd.png"},{"id":62184412,"identity":"d3615537-d071-486e-bd16-3f357415dbc5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-10 11:42:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":365493,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4705443/v1/94e1d22b-d7d5-400d-90be-2b5f22432ce8.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Tropheryma whipplei detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A retrospective study","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eTropheryma whipplei\u003c/em\u003e is the causative bacterium of Whipple's disease, which was first described by George Hoyt Whipple in 1907[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease is a rare systemic infection disease mainly affects middle-aged Caucasian men, but extremely rare in the native Asian and African populations[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e], but carriage is common in these latter two continents[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. The gastrointestinal tract is the main target organs for its invasion. \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e can be manifested as local infectious diseases, such as infective endocarditis, encephalitis, skin infection, etc. It has also been associated with acute infections, including gastroenteritis, bacteraemia, and pneumonia [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. The T. whipplei related pneumonia was rarely reported and first detected from a BALF of a child in 2007[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditional culture methods are time consuming and have low rates of positive detection. In recent years, diagnosis has become more accessible due to the use of mNGS, this new technology has improved the detection of rare pathogens and provide guidance for treatment in clinical practice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, we analyzed the demographic characteristics, the symptoms, the co-infection pathogens, laboratory data and the CT images in a population of patients according to the presence of T. whipplei detected by mNGS in BALF.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Material and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePatients and Detection procedure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA retrospective analysis was conducted on all T. whipplei positive samples from 848 BALF samples collected between 21 September 2022 and 1 March 2024 at The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine, Central South University, China. The BALF collection process adhered strictly to clinical operating standards and maintained sterility principles. 3-5mL BALF samples obtained from the involved sub-segments placed in sterile sputum containers, stored in -20\u0026deg;C, and then sent to KingMed Diagnostics (Changsha KingMed Center For Clinical Laboratory, China) for detection(the mNGS procedure for BALF samples including nucleic acid extraction, library construction, sequencing, and bioinformation analysis, as this operation was performed by KingMed Diagnostics, the specific steps were not be described here).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollecting relevant data on T. whipplei positive patients, including age, gender, laboratory data, clinical symptoms, Comorbidity, imaging examination results, diagnosis, pathological results, and treatment history.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImmunocompromised patients were considered to be those with malignancy undergoing treatment, organ transplant, AIDS patients, diabetes mellitus patients or long-term therapy with corticosteroid or immunosuppressive agent[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Pneumonia was diagnosed by the symptoms and chest CT imaging.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eContinuous variables are presented as the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation, otherwise, median and IQR (interquartile range). Comparative analysis was conducted by t\u0026rsquo; test. The chi-square test was used to calculate the difference between both groups, or the exact Fisher test as appropriate. Data analysis and mapping were performed with GraphPad Prism10. A p-value\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered to be significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eForty-three BALFs were positive for T. whipplei. Twenty-eight patients were male (65.1%) with an average age of 46.9 years, ranged from 4 to 89 years. Fifteen patients were female (34.9%) with an average age of 58.4 years, the age ranged from 11 to 75 years. All patients were hospitalized, with 31(72%) patients in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, 4(9.3%) in Infection and Immunology Department, 4(9.3%) in Pediatrics Department, 2 (4.7%) in Thoracic surgery and 2 (4.7%) in Intensive-Care Unit at the sampling time of BALF. The main clinical symptoms of patients included cough (36/43), expectoration (22/43), dyspnea/shortness of breath (14/43), fever (13/43), hemoptysis/bloody sputum (5/43), vomiting (2/43), abdominal pain (1/43), and only one patient complained about neurological symptoms (slight headache). (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe characteristics of patients with T. whipplei positive in BALF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT. whipplei positive (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;43)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale(mean,SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale(mean,SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSmoking history, n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNever\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCurrent\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eImmunocompromised, n\u003c/b\u003e (%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSymptoms, n\u003c/b\u003e (%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCough\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExpectoration\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDypnea/shortness of breath\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFever\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHemoptysis/bloody sputum\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAbdominal pain\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVomiting\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eChest tightness\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWeight loss\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNeurological\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBlood test result\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhite blood cell count (\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e(mean, SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNeutrophils Percentage (%) (mean, SD)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLymphocyte Percentage (%) (mean, SD)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHaemoglobin (g/L) (mean, SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCRP (mg/L) (median, IQR)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eESR (mm/h) (median, IQR)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLDH(U/L) (median, IQR)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCT(normal\u0026lt;0.05ng/mL)(median, IQR)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMain CT images, n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGround glass nodules or solid nodules\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePatchy infiltration\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePleural effusion\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eInterstitial changes\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMass\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCavity\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28(46.9, 22.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 (58.4, 17.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e29(67.4%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e14(32.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11(25.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e36(83.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e22 (51.2%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e14(32.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e13 (30.2%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (11.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (9.4%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.74 (2.62)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e63.2 (11.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.8 (11.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e124 (19.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.13 (1.9\u0026ndash;24.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 (20\u0026ndash;93)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e199 (167\u0026ndash;273)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.06(0.02\u0026ndash;0.11)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e18(41.9%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e16(37.2%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(11.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(2.35%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate LDH, lactic dehydroge PCT, Procalcitonin\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eComorbidity, immune status, and laboratory data\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eChronic liver disease(including fatty liver, Chronic hepatitis C and Chronic hepatitis B) were the most common comorbidity (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11, 25.6%), followed by chronic lung disease(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, 18.6%),including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Bronchiectasia. Non-immunocompromised patients accounted for the majority. Immunodeficiency in 11 patients (25.6%) was including taken leflunomide (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1), corticosteroids (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1), AIDS (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4), diabetes mellitus(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3) and lung cancer (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2). (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe laboratory tests data of 43 patients was collected before treatment. The mean white blood cell count, neutrophils percentage, and haemoglobin were 6.74\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L, 63.2% (11.7), and 124g/L, respectively. The median LDH was 199U/L (IQR 167\u0026ndash;273), C-reactive protein was 5.13mg/L (IQR 1.9-24.5mg/L), PCT was 0.06ng/mL (IQR 0.02\u0026ndash;0.11), and ESR was 50mm/h (IQR 20\u0026ndash;93). (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eChest CT Images\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe simply described the chest CT findings (Fig.\u0026nbsp;2), the most common chest CT imaging manifestation is pulmonary nodules (18/43, 41.9%), including eleven solid nodules and seven ground-glass nodules(one miliary tuberculosis patient and three cases of fibrocalcific nodules caused by pulmonary tuberculosis were excluded), and followed by patchy infiltration (16/43, 37.2%),the remaining CT findings included pleural effusion (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5), mass(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2), interstitial fibrosis (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2 ) and cavity (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1), In summary, the chest imaging manifestations were various.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePathogens detected in BALF by mNGS\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eT. whipplei was the sole agent in only 6 BALF samples. The most common detected bacterial pathogen with T. whipplei was \u003cem\u003eHaemophilus influenzae\u003c/em\u003e, followed by \u003cem\u003eStaphylococcus aureus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eKlebsiella pneumoniae\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eMoraxella catarrhalis\u003c/em\u003e. The most common detected atypical pathogen was \u003cem\u003eMycoplasma pneumoniae\u003c/em\u003e. The most commonly detected fungi were Pneumocystis jirovecii, followed by Candida albicans. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was the most commonly detected virus, as illustrated in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. Immunodeficient patients had a higher detection rate of fungi compared to non-immunodeficient patients (9/11, 81% vs 8/32, 28%, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01), with Talaromyces marneffei only being detected in immunodeficient patients (specifically AIDS patients). There is no correlation between T. whipplei reads and the patient's immune status(p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.2245) or the incidence of pneumonia(p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.1492), as you can see in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e (a, b).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePathogens detected by mNGS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePathogen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN (n/N, %)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT. whipplei as sole agent\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-infection with two or more pathogens\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-infection with three or more pathogens\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEpstein-Barr virus\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaemophilus influenzae\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePneumocystis jirovecii\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCandida albicans\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStaphylococcus aureus\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMycoplasma pneumoniae\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eKlebsiella pneumoniae\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHuman Herpesvirus- 7\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoraxella catarrhalis\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCytomegalovirus\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFusobacterium nucleatum\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRhinovirus\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCOVID-19\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eStreptococcus pneumonia\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAspergillus fumigatus\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eInfluenza A virus\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTalaromyces marneffei\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLegionella\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eChlamydia psittaci\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCoxsackievirus\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOther\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (14.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e37 (86.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e29 (67.4%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e13 (30.2%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 (23.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8 (18.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (16.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (16.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (16.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (14.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (14.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (9.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (9.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (9.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.0%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (4.7%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.3%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (11.6%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDiagnosis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwenty-two patients (51.2%) were diagnosed with pneumonia and all received antimicrobial treatment. Three patients (6.9%) were ultimately diagnosed with reactivation tuberculosis and received anti-tuberculosis treatment. Histopathology results showed that two patients (4.7%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Additionally, one patient was diagnosed with PCP and another patient was diagnosed with ABPA.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eWhipple\u0026rsquo;s disease (WD) is a rare infectious disease with an incidence of one in a million individuals. It can affect multiple organs, leading to highly heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Although it was first described over a hundred years, but due to the low positive rate of traditional detection methods and a lack of understanding of the disease, a considerable such disease has been overlooked. With the advancement of molecular biological diagnostic technology, it has greatly improved the detection of T. whipplei in various samples and enlarged the spectrum of TW infections[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. NGS is a new technology that uses High-Throughput Sequencing to sequence all the DNA in samples. This new technology has improved the detection of rare pathogens, a retrospective study reported that the total positive rate detected by NGS method (91.1%) was significantly higher than that detected by the culture method (62.2%) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. In recent years, many pneumonia caused by T. whipplei have been diagnosed by the use of NGS in BALF [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e], this also confirms that T. whipplei can cause respiratory infections, but few study have explored the significance of the detection of T. whipplei in BALF. So, we performed a retrospective study in 43 patients with T. whipplei positive in 848 BALF samples. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first in a Hunan region, the second largest sample size in the epidemiological study of T. whipplei detected in BALF in China followed the study performed by Lin et al[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], and may provide valuable initial data for future epidemiological studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur study showed that the disease was more likely to occur in middle-aged males rather than females, consistent with the study performed by Biagi F et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e], and some scholars suggested that hormonal or genetic sex chromosome-associated factors influence the course of the infection or susceptibility[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. However, a newer study in the United States suggested that the prevalence of Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease was similar between males and females[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. We found T. whipplei detected in the BALF is not related to smoking history, and the number of T. whipplei sequences was not related to the patient's immune status(Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Besides, most patients in our study were non-immunodeficient status, we did not detect a higher prevalence of T. whipplei infection in immunocompromised patients which unlike the recent study performed by Lozupone et al[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e], and a large study has also shown that T. whipplei infection had nothing to do with the patient\u0026rsquo;s immune status[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. In our study, there were 22 patients diagnosed with pneumonia, accounting for half of the samples, this also supports that T. whipplei can causes acute lung infections, but the number of T. whipplei sequences was not related to the occurrence of pneumonia, so it indicates that only a limited number of carriers may develop to lung infection, so it supports that the host, bacterial, and environmental factors may all contribute to the pathogenesis[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e], and some study suggested the host immunity appears to play a crucial role in developing the disease. Therefore, the mechanism of T. whipplei leading to pulmonary infection still needs further research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe most common symptoms among these 43 patients were cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, and fever. Digestive and neurological symptoms were rare, this may be related to the fact that the gastrointestinal and nervous systems of these patients are not affected, which suggests that the respiratory tract can be an independent infected system, and if we can conduct pathological examinations on the intestines of these patients, it may better explain this phenomenon.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA previous study shown that routine laboratory tests for WD patients has no specific results, including elevated ESR or CRP levels (84%), and anemia in 50 patients (60%) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e], our study found the white blood cell count(WBC) can be elevated or normal, the PCT often increased slightly, but anemia is uncommon. In a recent study showed T. whipplei infection often led to increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and this might be used to predict the prognosis[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. But, as far as we know, LDH can increased in many cases, the role of LDH in WD requires further research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eChest CT image of the those patients exhibited a diverse range of findings, the most common imaging manifestation is lung nodules(18/43, 41.9%), including eleven solid nodules and seven ground-glass nodules, which could be solitary or diffuse, this is consistent with some other research findings[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e], but the relationship between T. whipplei and lung nodules is not yet clear, and further exploration and research are needed in the future. Patchy infiltration (16/43, 37.2%) was the second most common imaging manifestation. Besides, five cases (5/43, 11.6%) had pleural effusion, two had interstitial changes, and only one case had cavity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eT. whipplei as the sole pathogen only in 6 BALF samples, and more often it co-exists with other pathogens. Among them, the most common co-exists is Epstein-Barr virus EBV(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;13), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;10), there is no research report on similar results currently. In addition, it is also common to have fungal co-exists, with a total number of 19 cases(including Pneumocystis jirovecii, Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium marneffei), the most common detected fungi was Pneumocystis jirovecii, consistent with the research findings of Ying Li et al[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. As for why there is such a high probability of co-exists between them, larger prospective studies are needed. However, unlike the results reported by Lin et al[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e], none of our patients were found to have Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, although one case was ultimately diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and improved after anti-tuberculosis treatment.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, we summary analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with positive T. whipplei detected by mNGS in BALF, further enhanced the understanding of this pathogen. The use of mNGS technology has enhanced the detection of rare and slow-growing pathogens, providing significant benefits in pinpointing the causative pathogen and facilitating targeted antimicrobial treatment. However, our study has some limitations. Primarily, our sample size is not sufficiently large; perhaps collaborating with other centers to conduct a multi-center study on this disease would yield more representative results; Secondly, most patients seek medical attention due to respiratory symptoms and are hospitalized in the Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine department, no relevant examinations were conducted on their digestive system; Thirdly, we did not set up a control group for comparison. However, we believe the study is informative, and may provide valuable data for future comparative and epidemiological studies. In the future, the design of an animal model of pneumonia induced by T. whipplei are needed to improve our understanding of the natural history of T whipplei infections and of the possible predisposing immune factors that permit development of infection.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Zhixiong He and Hui Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhixiong He and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Publish\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors agree to publish.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to individual privacy could be compromised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of XiangyaSchool of Medicine (The First Hospital of Changsha 2024 (5) V 1.0).\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank Changsha KingMed Center For Clinical Laboratory for their technical assistance.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was funded by the Changsha Science and Technology Program(kq1907013), Youth Fund of the Hunan Natural Science Foundation(2023JJ4006) and Hunan Provincial Health Commission (202103020384).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhippleGH.1907.A hitherto undescribed disease characterized anatomically by deposits of fat and fatty acids in the intestinal and mesenteric lymphatic tissues.Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp18:382\u0026ndash;393.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoosV,SchneiderTetal.Changing paradigms in Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease and infection with Tropheryma whipplei. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis(2011) 30:1151\u0026ndash;1158.doi:10.1007/s10096-011-1209-y.Epub 2011 Apr 2.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDolmansRA,BoelCH,LacleMM,KustersJG.Clinical manifestations, treatment, and diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infections.Clin Microbiol Rev.2017;30(2):529\u0026ndash;555.doi:10.1128/CMR.00033-16.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKeitaAK,MediannikovO,RatmanovP,DiattaG,BasseneH,RoucherC,TallA,SokhnaC,TrapeJF,RaoultD,FenollarF.2013.Looking for Tropheryma whipplei source and reservoir in rural Senegal.Am J TropMed Hyg88:339\u0026ndash;343.DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0614\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKeitaAK,Dubot-PeresA,PhommasoneK,SibounheuangB,VongsouvathM,MayxayM,RaoultD,NewtonPN,FenollarF.2015.High prevalence Tropheryma whipplei in Lao kindergarten children.PLoS Negl Trop Dis9:e0003538. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003538.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRaoultD,FenollarF,RolainJM,MinodierP,BosdureE,LiW,GarnierJM,RichetH.2010.Tropheryma whipplei in children with gastroenteritis.Emerg Infect Dis16:776\u0026ndash;782. doi:10.3201/eid1605.091801.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFenollarF,MediannikovO,SocolovschiC,BasseneH,DiattaG,RichetH,TallA,SokhnaC,TrapeJF,RaoultD.2010.Tropherymawhipplei bacteremia during fever in rural West Africa.Clin Infect Dis51:515\u0026ndash;521. doi:10.3201/eid2207.150441.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarrisJK,DeGrooteMA,SagelSD,ZemanickET,KapsnerR,PenvariC,etal.Molecular identifification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fifibrosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2007; 104:20529e33. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709804104.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJ.-C.Lagieretal.Tropheryma whipplei DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage samples: a case control study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection22(2016):875\u0026ndash;879. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.010.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJIESHAOetal.Next-generation sequencing as an advanced supplementary tool for the diagnosis of pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections: An observational trial in Xi'an, China.BIOMEDICAL REPORTS16:14,2022. doi:10.3892/br.2021.1497.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhangP,ChenY,LiS,LiC,ZhangS,ZhengW,ChenY,MaJ,ZhangX,HuangY,LiuS.2020.Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical diagnosis and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe pneumonia: a retrospective study.PeerJ8: e9623.DOI10.7717/peerj. 9623.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLinM,etal.Tropheryma whipplei detectionby metagenomic next-generationsequencing in bronchoalveolar lavagefluid: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.12:961297. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.961297.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWen MeiZhang,LingXu.Pulmonary parenchymal involvement caused by Tropheryma whipplei.Open Medicine2021;16:843\u0026ndash;846. doi:10.1515/med-2021-0297.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiW,ZhangQ,XuY,ZhangX,HuangQ,SuZ.Severe pneumonia in adults caused by Tropheryma whipplei and Candida sp. infection: a 2019 case series.BMC Pulm Med.2021;21(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12890-020-01384-4.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSabriBousbia,LaurentPapazian,etal.Tropheryma whipplei in Patients with Pneumonia.Emerging Infectious DiseasesVol.16,No.2,February2010:258\u0026ndash;263. doi:10.3201/eid1602.090610.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eY.Shenetal.Acute pneumonia due to Tropheryma whipplei diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and pathology: A case report.Heliyon10(2024)e26747.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26747.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBiagiF,BalduzziD,DelvinoP,SchiepattiA,KlersyC,CorazzaGR.Prevalence of Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease in north-western Italy.Eur J Clin Microbial Infect Dis. (2015)34:1347\u0026ndash;8. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2357-2.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAsmaBoumaza, etal.Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease and Tropheryma whipplei infections: from bench to bedside.Lancet Infect Dis (2022) ;22(10):e280\u0026ndash;e291.doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElchertJA,MansoorE,Abou-SalehM,CooperGS.Epidemiology of Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease in the USA between 2012 and 2017: a population-based national study.Dig Dis Sci.(2019)64:1305\u0026ndash;1311.doi:10.1007/s10620-018-5393-9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLozupone,C.,Cota-Gomez,A.,Palmer,B. E.,Linderman,D. J.,Charlson,E. S.,Sodergren,E.,etal.(2013).Widespread colonization of the lung by tropheryma whipplei in HIV infection.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.187(10),1110\u0026ndash;1117.doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-2145OC.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFenollarF,LagierJC,RaoultD.2014.Tropheryma whipplei and Whipple\u0026rsquo;s disease.J Infect69:103\u0026ndash;112. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.008.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLagier,etal.Systemic Tropheryma whipplei Clinical Presentation of 142 Patients With Infections Diagnosed or Confirmed in a Reference Center.Medicine2010;89:337\u0026ndash;345.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZ.Fangetal.Experience in the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia caused by infection with Tropheryma whipplei: A case series.Heliyon9(2023)e17132.doi:10.1016/j.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang,W. M.,andXu,L.(2021).Pulmonary parenchymal involvement caused by tropheryma whipplei.Open Med. (Wars)16(1),843\u0026ndash;846. doi:10.1515/med-2021-0297.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYingLietal.Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology \u0026amp; Infectious Diseases(2020)39:369\u0026ndash;374. doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03734-5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Tropheryma whipplei (T. whipplei), Whipple’s disease (WD), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing(mNGS), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eWhipple\u0026rsquo;s disease(WD) is a rare chronic and systemic disease caused by the rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacterium \u003cem\u003eTropheryma whipplei\u003c/em\u003e (T. whipplei) that primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract, however, the involvement of the lung is rare, and few study have explored the significance of the detection of TW in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). So, we performed a retrospective study in patients with \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e positive in 848 BALF samples which detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) from 21 September 2022 to 1 March 2024 in The First Hospital of Changsha. Forty-three BALF samples from forty-four (44/848, 5.2%) patients were positive for \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e (one patient was excluded due to incomplete data). Twenty-nine patients were male with an average age of 46.9 years. The main symptoms included cough (36/43), expectoration (22/43), dyspnea/shortness of breath (14/43), fever (13/43), hemoptysis/bloody sputum (5/43), vomiting (2/43), abdominal pain (1/43), and only one patient complained about neurological symptoms. Chronic liver disease (including fatty liver, chronic hepatitis C and chronic hepatitis B) were the most common comorbidity (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11, 25.6%), followed by chronic lung disease (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8, 18.6%). Only 11 patients (25.6%) were immunocompromised. One patient was finally diagnosed with reactivation tuberculosis and two patients were diagnosed with lung tumors (including one primary lung adenocarcinoma and one primary lung squamous carcinoma), and twenty-two patients (53.5%) had pneumonia. \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e was the sole agent in 6 samples, and Epstein-Barr virus was the most common detected pathogens, followed by Haemophilus influenzae. The most common chest CT imaging manifestation is lung nodules (18/43, 41.9%), including fourteen solid nodules and five ground-glass nodules (three cases of calcified nodules caused by pulmonary tuberculosis were excluded). Our study indicates that \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e is a causative pathogen in various lung diseases, and clinicians should be wary of this. The mNGS technology improves the detection and attention of rare pathogens and provide guidance for treatment in clinical practice. In the future, the natural history of \u003cem\u003eT. whipplei\u003c/em\u003e infections and the possible pathogenesis still need to be studied.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Tropheryma whipplei detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A retrospective study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-10 11:34:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4705443/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"3275e6e0-a323-423f-a94f-cdc8badc07ad","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 10th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-08-10T11:34:09+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-10 11:34:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4705443","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4705443","identity":"rs-4705443","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00