Safety and Efficacy of Procarbazine and Lomustine Chemotherapy as a Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Adult Glioma

Abstract PurposeWhile procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy is considered a salvage option for adult glioma, whether vincristine included in this regimen is beneficial is uncertain due to its potential toxicity and uncertain efficacy. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of PC chemotherapy in contrast with those of PCV chemotherapy. MethodsUsing electronic medical records, all patient with adult recurrent glioma who received PC or PCV chemotherapy between 2009 and 2020 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital or St. Vincent’s Hospital were examined retrospectively. A total of 59 patients met our eligibility criteria. Among them, 15 patients received PC chemotherapy (PC group) and 44 patients received PCV chemotherapy (PCV group). ResultsThe PC group presented a significantly lower hematology toxicity (anemia: 6.7% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.02 and thrombocytopenia: 20.0% vs. 70.4%; p < 0.001). Also, the clinical impacts of PC chemotherapy, including delay of a cycle, dose reduction, discontinuation of drug(s), or total cessation of chemotherapy, were significantly less frequent (26.7% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.012). The overall survival of PC group was significantly longer than that of PCV group (396 vs. 232 days; p = 0.042), while there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between two groups (284.5 vs. 131 days; p = 0.077). ConclusionThis is the first comparative study to suggest that PC chemotherapy leads to less toxicity than PCV chemotherapy without loss of clinical efficacy in patients with recurrent adult glioma. Further prospective and larger studies are needed to validate our findings.