COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN STANDARD LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC-ASSISTED APPROACH IN WOMEN WITH RECTOSIGMOID ENDOMETRIOSIS

Benedetta Orsini
2020 · doi:10.17632/hpf6pxxzzm · W6944008114
dataset OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This study compared perioperative outcomes between standard laparoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopy for women undergoing treatment for rectosigmoid endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text ⓘ

This study compared standard laparoscopic surgery (S-LPS) versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) in women with rectosigmoid (colorectal) endometriosis, assessing perioperative surgical and clinical outcomes. The report focuses on how surgical approach related to recorded perioperative data, with the main analysis framed around differences between the two methods. The paper explicitly presents these comparisons within the colorectal endometriosis population, but no further limitations were stated in the provided text. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly compares laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted perioperative outcomes specifically in rectosigmoid endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The present study compares S-LPS and RALS in women with colorectal endometriosis in terms of perioperative surgical and clinical data.
Full text 730 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN STANDARD LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC-ASSISTED APPROACH IN WOMEN WITH RECTOSIGMOID ENDOMETRIOSIS Published: 2 November 2020| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/hpf6pxxzzm.1 Contributors: Diego Raimondo, Carlo Alboni, Benedetta Orsini, Anna Chiara Aru, Antonino Farulla, Manuela Maletta, Alessandro Arena, Simona Del Forno, Veronica Sampogna, Manuela Mastronardi, Mohamed Mabrouk, Renato SeracchioliDescription The present study compares S-LPS and RALS in women with colorectal endometriosis in terms of perioperative surgical and clinical data. Files Institutions - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Categories Laparoscopy, Robotic Surgery, Endometriosis

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:40:17.476207+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK