Attention and Retention Effects of Culturally Targeted Billboard Messages: An Eye-Tracking Study Using Immersive Virtual Reality

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Targeting, the creation of a match between message content and receiver characteristics, is a key strategy in communication message design. Cultural targeting, or adapting message characteristics to be congruent with a group’s cultural knowledge, appearance, or beliefs of recipients, is used in practice and is a potentially effective strategy to boost the relevance of a message, affecting attention to messages and enhancing effects. However, many open questions remain regarding the mechanisms and consequences of targeting. This is partly due to methodological challenges in experimentally manipulating messages that match cultural recipient characteristics while simultaneously measuring effects and balancing experimental control and realism. Here, we used a novel VR-based paradigm in which participants drove along a virtual highway flanked by billboards with varying message designs. Specifically, we manipulated the message design to either match or mismatch peoples’ cultures of origin. We used unobtrusive eye tracking to assess participants’ attention (i.e., for how long and how often they look at matched vs. unmatched billboards). Results show a tendency of the participants to inspect culturally matched billboards more often and for longer. We further found that matched billboards produce better recall, indicating more efficient encoding and storage of the messages. Our results underscore the effectiveness of cultural targeting and demonstrate how researchers can rigorously manipulate relevant message factors using virtual environments. We discuss the implications of these findings regarding theories of cultural targeting and methodological perspectives for the objective measurement of exposure factors through eye tracking.
Full text 1,839 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Targeting, the creation of a match between message content and receiver characteristics, is a key strategy in communication message design. Cultural targeting, or adapting message characteristics to be congruent with a group’s cultural knowledge, appearance, or beliefs of recipients, is used in practice and is a potentially effective strategy to boost the relevance of a message, affecting attention to messages and enhancing effects. However, many open questions remain regarding the mechanisms and consequences of targeting. This is partly due to methodological challenges in experimentally manipulating messages that match cultural recipient characteristics while simultaneously measuring effects and balancing experimental control and realism. Here, we used a novel VR-based paradigm in which participants drove along a virtual highway flanked by billboards with varying message designs. Specifically, we manipulated the message design to either match or mismatch peoples’ cultures of origin. We used unobtrusive eye tracking to assess participants’ attention (i.e., for how long and how often they look at matched vs. unmatched billboards). Results show a tendency of the participants to inspect culturally matched billboards more often and for longer. We further found that matched billboards produce better recall, indicating more efficient encoding and storage of the messages. Our results underscore the effectiveness of cultural targeting and demonstrate how researchers can rigorously manipulate relevant message factors using virtual environments. We discuss the implications of these findings regarding theories of cultural targeting and methodological perspectives for the objective measurement of exposure factors through eye tracking. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00