A phase Ib trial evaluating the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel or flat-dose capecitabine in 1st/2nd line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background Chemoimmunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 and cytotoxic chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic modality for women with triple-negative breast cancer, but questions remain regarding optimal chemotherapy backbone and biomarkers for patient selection. Methods We report final outcomes from a phase Ib trial evaluating pembrolizumab (200mg IV every 3 weeks) with either weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2 weekly) or flat-dose capecitabine (2000mg orally twice daily for 7 days of every 14-day cycle) in the 1st /2nd line setting. The primary endpoint was safety (receipt of 2 cycles without grade III/IV toxicities requiring discontinuation or ≥ 21-day delays). The secondary endpoint was efficacy (week 12 objective response rate). Exploratory aims were to characterize immunologic effects of treatment over time, and to evaluate novel biomarkers. Results Both regimens met the pre-specified safety endpoint (paclitaxel: 87%; capecitabine: 100%). Objective response rate was 29% for pembrolizumab/paclitaxel and 43% for pembrolizumab/capecitabine. Partial responses were observed in two subjects with chemo-refractory metaplastic carcinoma (both in capecitabine arm). Both regimens were associated with significant peripheral leukocyte contraction over time. Response was associated with clinical PD-L1 score, non-receipt of prior chemotherapy, and the H&E stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocyte score, but also by a novel 27 gene IO score and spatial biomarkers (lymphocyte spatial skewness). Conclusions Pembrolizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine is safe and clinically active. Both regimens were lymphodepleting, highlighting the competing immunostimulatory versus lymphotoxic effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further exploration of the IO score and spatial TIL biomarkers is warranted. Trial registration: NCT02734290

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00