Development of Customized Subperiosteal Dental Implants Using 3D Modeling Techniques

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint describes a cost-effective workflow to design and manufacture customized subperiosteal dental implants using freely available software to overcome the high expense of specialized industrial/medical design tools. Patient maxilla CT data were converted into a watertight STL model, design corrections were performed with free Autodesk programs, and the implant was fabricated from Ti64 using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). The authors acknowledge that achieving accuracy between virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions depends on assessment methods, each with inevitable errors requiring careful interpretation. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract In cases of severe jawbone resorption where standard screw-type implants are not viable, custom-made subperiosteal dental implants offer a promising alternative. Advancements in 3D imaging, design, and printing technologies have streamlined the production of these implants, reducing treatment time and providing effective abutments for prostheses. A significant challenge in this process is the high cost of specialized industrial or medical design software, which can be prohibitive for smaller clinics. This study outlines a cost-effective workflow for designing and manufacturing custom subperiosteal implants using freely available software. The process involves selecting appropriate software, processing CT data, creating a 3D virtual model, designing the custom implant, and preparing data files for printing. Patient CT data was successfully converted into a watertight STL model of the maxilla. Design corrections were completed using free programs from Autodesk Inc. The implant was fabricated in Ti64 (a grade 5 titanium alloy) using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). By avoiding expensive software, this approach makes the treatment more accessible to smaller clinics and mid-sized production facilities, thereby benefiting a broader range of patients.The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre-and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation.
Full text 11,222 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Development of Customized Subperiosteal Dental Implants Using 3D Modeling Techniques | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Development of Customized Subperiosteal Dental Implants Using 3D Modeling Techniques Divyani Mankar, David Angira, Subodh Daronde This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract In cases of severe jawbone resorption where standard screw-type implants are not viable, custom-made subperiosteal dental implants offer a promising alternative. Advancements in 3D imaging, design, and printing technologies have streamlined the production of these implants, reducing treatment time and providing effective abutments for prostheses. A significant challenge in this process is the high cost of specialized industrial or medical design software, which can be prohibitive for smaller clinics. This study outlines a cost-effective workflow for designing and manufacturing custom subperiosteal implants using freely available software. The process involves selecting appropriate software, processing CT data, creating a 3D virtual model, designing the custom implant, and preparing data files for printing. Patient CT data was successfully converted into a watertight STL model of the maxilla. Design corrections were completed using free programs from Autodesk Inc. The implant was fabricated in Ti64 (a grade 5 titanium alloy) using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). By avoiding expensive software, this approach makes the treatment more accessible to smaller clinics and mid-sized production facilities, thereby benefiting a broader range of patients.The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre-and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation. 3D virtual computer-aided design titanium implants Cone beam computed topography computed tomography Dental Implants Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6144498","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":423827692,"identity":"81494f80-6ad0-478b-beeb-d984b70aaef7","order_by":0,"name":"Divyani Mankar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education and Research","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Divyani","middleName":"","lastName":"Mankar","suffix":""},{"id":423827696,"identity":"2be4461d-1236-4eb5-9bed-521aecff91d6","order_by":1,"name":"David Angira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education and Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"","lastName":"Angira","suffix":""},{"id":423827697,"identity":"894f64cd-61ba-4c0e-986f-893b0888fb13","order_by":2,"name":"Subodh Daronde","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education and Research","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Subodh","middleName":"","lastName":"Daronde","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-03-03 09:08:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":78065789,"identity":"23d26d40-8c36-46e5-a2dd-dd04acef975b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-09 02:46:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":290737,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"MankarDivya.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6144498/v1_covered_20c7c1b4-b93f-43a8-9a0b-1e37d1d06b8b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Development of Customized Subperiosteal Dental Implants Using 3D Modeling Techniques","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"3D virtual, computer-aided design, titanium implants, Cone beam computed topography, computed tomography, Dental Implants","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIn cases of severe jawbone resorption where standard screw-type implants are not viable, custom-made subperiosteal dental implants offer a promising alternative. Advancements in 3D imaging, design, and printing technologies have streamlined the production of these implants, reducing treatment time and providing effective abutments for prostheses. A significant challenge in this process is the high cost of specialized industrial or medical design software, which can be prohibitive for smaller clinics. This study outlines a cost-effective workflow for designing and manufacturing custom subperiosteal implants using freely available software. The process involves selecting appropriate software, processing CT data, creating a 3D virtual model, designing the custom implant, and preparing data files for printing. Patient CT data was successfully converted into a watertight STL model of the maxilla. Design corrections were completed using free programs from Autodesk Inc. The implant was fabricated in Ti64 (a grade 5 titanium alloy) using direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). By avoiding expensive software, this approach makes the treatment more accessible to smaller clinics and mid-sized production facilities, thereby benefiting a broader range of patients.The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre-and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Development of Customized Subperiosteal Dental Implants Using 3D Modeling Techniques","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-03-06 14:29:29","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6144498/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"0663285e-7077-440b-abcf-771fa10e9ebb","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-09T02:38:15+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-03-06 14:29:29","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6144498","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6144498","identity":"rs-6144498","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00