Mid-level visual features engage V4 to support sparse object recognition under uncertainty

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The study used fMRI in 24 participants performing a sparse object recognition task with visual stimuli fragmented into either phosphene-like dots or mid-level curve segments intended to engage area V4, testing effects on behavioral performance and cortical recruitment. Curve segments supported recognition at lower fragment densities and showed steeper psychometric slopes, while neural data indicated both fragment types engaged V1 but only curve segments recruited V4, with broader occipito-temporo-parietal responses for correct recognition of segments. Multivariate decoding suggested phosphene-based recognition depended on early visual and cingulate activity, and mediation analyses attributed higher-uncertainty phosphene recognition to anterior cingulate cortex, whereas segment recognition depended primarily on visual cortex; the paper’s limitation is that it reports fMRI correlates in human tasks rather than direct prosthesis outcomes in implanted subjects. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,769 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Cortical visual prostheses aim to restore sight by stimulating the visual cortex, yet current approaches remain limited. Implants targeting V1 typically evoke isolated phosphenes that do not support coherent object recognition. We asked whether mid-level visual features, specifically curve segments associated with area V4, could provide a more efficient substrate for artificial vision. Using fMRI, 24 participants performed an object recognition task with stimuli fragmented into either phosphene-like dots or curve segments at varying densities. Behaviorally, curve segments enabled recognition at lower density thresholds and produced steeper psychometric slopes. Neurally, both fragment types engaged V1, but only curve segments recruited V4, and correct recognition of segments relative to phosphenes evoked broader occipito-temporo-parietal responses. Multivariate decoding showed that successful recognition of phosphenes was predicted by early visual and cingulate activity, whereas recognition of segments was predicted only by V4, indicating a shift toward mid-level representational support. Mediation analyses further showed that phosphene-based recognition relied on anterior cingulate cortex under conditions of higher uncertainty, while segment-based recognition depended primarily on visual cortex. Together, these results show that mid-level fragments confer perceptual and neural advantages, reducing reliance on both dense stimulation and downstream uncertainty resolution, and identify V4 as a promising target for next-generation cortical prostheses. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The revised version of the manuscript now includes an additional analysis on the fMRI data (MVPA).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00