Virus-Like Particles: The Next Frontier in Livestock Gene Editing

Lab / animal preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Pigs and chickens are not only the most important livestock species for global food production but also serve as key model organisms in various research disciplines. The pig is widely used in translational research due to its anatomical and physiological similarity to humans, providing valuable insights into immunology, metabolism, and disease mechanisms. In contrast, the chicken has become an essential model for studies related to poultry health, animal welfare, and developmental biology. Its externally developing embryo offers exceptional accessibility for experimental manipulation. Recent advances in genome editing technologies, particularly CRISPR/Cas9, have further expanded the potential of these species for functional genomic studies, although the efficient delivery of such tools remains a major challenge. By using virus-like particles (VLPs), we have been able to overcome this limitation. Here, we evaluated VLPs as delivery vehicles for genome engineering tools in pigs and chickens, two key livestock species at the human–animal interface. VLP-mediated delivery enabled efficient Cre recombination and high CRISPR/Cas9 editing rates in porcine cells, organoids, and oocytes, particularly when multiplexed. In chickens, VLPs supported robust Cre recombination and Cas9-mediated editing in cell culture, tracheal organ cultures, and in ovo . Reporter VLPs and dCas9 VLPs further demonstrated the versatility of this platform across porcine and avian systems. Together, these findings establish VLPs as an efficient and time-saving strategy for gene editing in livestock, with relevance for animal health, agricultural productivity, and translational One Health research.
Full text 1,989 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Pigs and chickens are not only the most important livestock species for global food production but also serve as key model organisms in various research disciplines. The pig is widely used in translational research due to its anatomical and physiological similarity to humans, providing valuable insights into immunology, metabolism, and disease mechanisms. In contrast, the chicken has become an essential model for studies related to poultry health, animal welfare, and developmental biology. Its externally developing embryo offers exceptional accessibility for experimental manipulation. Recent advances in genome editing technologies, particularly CRISPR/Cas9, have further expanded the potential of these species for functional genomic studies, although the efficient delivery of such tools remains a major challenge. By using virus-like particles (VLPs), we have been able to overcome this limitation. Here, we evaluated VLPs as delivery vehicles for genome engineering tools in pigs and chickens, two key livestock species at the human–animal interface. VLP-mediated delivery enabled efficient Cre recombination and high CRISPR/Cas9 editing rates in porcine cells, organoids, and oocytes, particularly when multiplexed. In chickens, VLPs supported robust Cre recombination and Cas9-mediated editing in cell culture, tracheal organ cultures, and in ovo. Reporter VLPs and dCas9 VLPs further demonstrated the versatility of this platform across porcine and avian systems. Together, these findings establish VLPs as an efficient and time-saving strategy for gene editing in livestock, with relevance for animal health, agricultural productivity, and translational One Health research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Competing Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00